ABN Amro analysts see ESG bond issuance dropping ‘considerably'
ESG issuance is 'expected to considerably lag in 2025', amid 'a noticeable surge in negative news related to ESG in the first half of the year', analysts Marta Ferro Teixeira and Filipa de Carvalho Tomas wrote in a note on Friday (Jul 18).
They now see issuance of 247 billion euros (S$369 billion), down from an earlier forecast of 266 billion euros. In 2024, issuance reached 272 billion euros, they said.
Interest in financial products claiming to target environmental, social and governance goals is flagging amid politically motivated attacks on so-called 'woke' capitalism, combined with evidence of greenwashing. The global market for ESG funds saw its worst quarter on record in the three months through March, as the broad-based backlash against the investment strategy gains ground.
The ABN Amro analysts pointed to US President Donald Trump's decision to declare a national energy emergency as a key reason for the decline, with policies in the world's largest economy now 'prioritising fossil fuels over clean energy initiatives', they wrote.
The shift in sentiment has led oil producers such as BP to cut back on their renewable energy programmes, while major banks have been turning their backs on the world's biggest climate alliance for the industry. Such developments raise 'concerns about waning climate commitments', Teixeira and Tomas wrote.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights
An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues.
Sign Up
Sign Up
At the same time, efforts in Europe to simplify ESG rules 'suggest that both regulators and companies worldwide might be scaling back their climate ambitions', the analysts said.
ABN Amro's analysis shows that ESG issuance from utilities has fallen short, while sovereign issuance has taken a small hit in part as bond sales under Europe's NextGenerationEU programme lag behind earlier expectations, they wrote.
The overall effect is one that the analysts said they 'consider not as negative, given the significant policy shifts in some other Western countries'.
Finally, the ABN Amro analysts noted that 'there is a lengthy process for ESG bond issuances, and timing for issuance becomes a key factor during volatile markets, which might have been an additional contributing factor for why issuers have given preference to non-ESG labelled debt'. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
Ikea bets on online growth in China with JD.com launch
[LONDON] Swedish budget furniture retailer Ikea opened a digital store on Chinese ecommerce platform on Friday (Aug 8), as it expands its presence on third-party online shopping sites in China to draw in new customers with cut-price products. Western retailers are experimenting with new formats and channels to take a bigger slice of China's highly competitive ecommerce market, as the government expands policies meant to revive consumer spending. Ikea, known for wooden bookshelves and beds, launched a 2,999 yuan (S$536.70) gaming chair and 3,999 yuan gaming desk specially for – much more expensive offerings than its top-selling BILLY bookcase priced at 249 yuan. But Ikea also plans to offer special discounts to mark the opening of the store which will sell 6,500 products, and use logistics network to deliver to homes. is the second Chinese ecommerce platform Ikea has joined, after opening a store on Alibaba's Tmall in March 2020. 'We will continue the great work we are doing (on Tmall), but now we are also adding as another channel to reach and acquire customers,' said Tolga Oncu, retail operations manager at Ingka Group, the biggest Ikea franchiser, which runs Ikea stores in China. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up One in five new Ikea customers in China came from Tmall in the last financial year and that trend is going up, according to the company. Ikea has also expanded its store network in China, with three new openings since September one last year, bringing the total number to 40. The launch is part of a 6.3 billion yuan investment Ingka plans in China by 2027. Ikea entered China in 1998 and the country was for several years in its top five markets by revenue, but has shrunk. China's share of Ingka Group's overall sales has been flatlining, at 3.5 per cent of global sales in the 2023-2024 financial year and 3.6 per cent in 12 months before that. Ingka will report results for its 2024-2025 financial year, which ends on Aug 31, in October. REUTERS
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
Issue 158: Who says what's material for Singapore firms; catastrophe payouts pile up for insurers
This week in ESG: Study finds lack of external input in materiality identification; US$80 billion of insured losses from natural catastrophes in H1 2025, says Swiss Re Institute Sustainability reporting Reporting in a material world Singapore-listed companies should seek more external perspectives to determine the non-financial issues that could most affect their businesses, a new analysis suggests. Large companies listed on the Singapore Exchange (SGX) tend to rely on internal feedback, peer benchmarks and international standards significantly more than external stakeholder feedback in identifying material sustainability-related factors, shows a report co-authored by Professor Mak Yuen Teen of the National University of Singapore and Tina Thomas, Baker Tilly's head of environmental, social and governance (ESG) and sustainability. The report is published by Governance for Stakeholders – an advocacy platform run by Prof Mak – and Sustainable Finance Institute Asia. The study assesses disclosures about materiality identification by 300 listed companies – 100 each from the Australia, Malaysia and Singapore stock exchanges. The companies come from 10 industry sectors that are either high emitters of greenhouse gases or major sectors with many large companies. Materiality identification is a critical aspect of ESG and managing sustainability-related risks and opportunities (SROs). In essence, companies need to prioritise SROs. The more important ones should be addressed and disclosed, while the less important ones do not need to be reported. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 12.30 pm ESG Insights An exclusive weekly report on the latest environmental, social and governance issues. Sign Up Sign Up One of the questions the study asks is how companies identify material SROs. The analysis grouped the identification methods into five key channels: Internal stakeholder feedback External stakeholder feedback External sustainability consultancy Peer benchmarking International standards alignment There are two additional methods for unspecified channels: Unspecified stakeholder feedback Unspecified standards alignment The study finds that of the 100 Singapore-listed companies, only 20 report using external stakeholder feedback, which is fewer than half of the 42 that report using internal stakeholder feedback. It's also fewer than half of the 46 that use international standards alignment and the 49 that use peer benchmarking. There is also a drop-off – albeit not as steep – for external stakeholder feedback in Malaysia. On Bursa, 16 companies report using external stakeholder feedback, which is about 65 per cent of the 25 companies that report using internal stakeholder feedback. Australia-listed companies are more balanced, with 68 using internal stakeholder feedback and 63 using external stakeholder feedback. However, Australian firms are less likely to seek the independent industry-wide perspective. Only 47 companies report using international standards alignment, which is 70 per cent of those that use internal stakeholder feedback. A significant number of companies from the Singapore and Malaysia samples disclose unspecified stakeholder feedback, but that's unlikely to change the fact that external stakeholders' views are sought less often than internal ones in these markets. That's because it's much easier to obtain feedback from internal stakeholders than external stakeholders, and it's highly probable that most of the unspecified cases will include internal feedback. Unknown unknowns It's important that companies in Singapore and Malaysia take greater effort to obtain external stakeholders' views, to guard against blind spots. The five key channels used in the study reflect three different kinds of perspectives on SROs. From internal stakeholder feedback, companies obtain the internal company-specific perspective on key risks and opportunities. From external stakeholders and external consultancies, companies acquire an external perspective that's specific to them. From peer benchmarking and international standards alignment, companies get an independent, industry-wide perspective of SROs. However, while benchmarks and standards are independent, they do not reflect idiosyncratic circumstances that a company faces. Meanwhile, interpreting and applying those benchmarks and standards to account for circumstances is an internal process. Therefore, the external stakeholders' perspective is valuable because it helps a company to obtain independent views that account for the company's circumstances. Without that perspective, companies risk blind spots – the unknown unknowns. For example, a producer of plant-based health foods might not be aware of customer and civil society concerns about human rights and labour issues at the farms that supply the producer's chickpeas. Companies must also seek out a diversity of external views. The study finds that Singapore and Malaysia companies in the sample engage with non-government organisations less than their Australia-listed counterparts. Defining impact The study notes that there is currently uncertainty about how materiality assessment will evolve as implementation begins for the accounting profession's IFRS sustainability and climate reporting standards. SGX has mandated phased alignment with the IFRS standards starting this year. The phased implementation calls for a climate-first approach, which could lead to climate issues rising in importance in companies' materiality assessments, the study says. But closer alignment to the IFRS standards could eventually narrow the scope of material factors. Most Singapore-listed companies are using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards, which approach materiality from a broad understanding of impact. By contrast, the IFRS focuses on financial materiality. When SGX eventually moves towards the full adoption of the IFRS standards, 'the scope of disclosure would narrow', the study states. 'Only topics that present a financial material impact to the company would be required to be reported, potentially reducing the visibility of broader environmental and social issues currently captured under the GRI framework if companies do not voluntarily report'. The IFRS approach doesn't mean that non-financial factors won't be deemed material, but the onus is placed on companies to determine the potential financial impact of ESG factors, which can be challenging when gazing at medium-to-long-term horizons. This raises the importance of engaging with external stakeholders, who can help companies to better understand impact over longer periods. Investors will also have to raise their game when it comes to imposing market discipline. Professional and institutional investors, especially, can play a bigger role in calling companies to task if they're not properly capturing material issues. For Singapore-listed companies, the materiality landscape could change in the coming years. It's good to have some outside insights. Climate risk When protection hurts If there's one sector where climate change directly impacts profit, it might be in insurance. Swiss Re Institute estimates that global insured losses from natural catastrophes stood at US$80 billion in the first half of 2025. That's almost double the 10-year average. The main source of losses came from the Palisades wildfires that hit Los Angeles in the first quarter of the year. Without that fire, total insured losses would have been below trend. The Palisades fires hit especially hard because of the value of assets affected by the blaze. 'With changing climates, unexpected and unseasonal weather conditions may occur more frequently, making loss outcomes more volatile and difficult to predict,' the institute says. The institute worked out that global insured losses from natural catastrophes have been growing at a long-term trend of 5 per cent to 7 per cent. If that trend holds in 2025, full-year losses could approach US$150 billion. Insurers have begun to walk away from parts of the world where catastrophe risk has risen too much. For example, home insurance is too costly to be practical in parts of hurricane-prone Florida. But even in places where catastrophe risk is still manageable, the physical risk of climate change is an unavoidable problem. Asset owners in coastal or low-lying areas must plan for potentially damaging flooding. Assets close to vegetation must confront the higher possibility of wildfires. Either invest in climate adaptation and resilience, or pay higher insurance premiums. These problems exist for a significant portion of the global population. That's why climate change is a global problem, and why businesses should consider climate change to be a material sustainability-related risk or opportunity. That's true even for businesses that don't belong to emissions-intensive sectors. Other ESG reads
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Russia's struggle to build commercial jets reflects deeper industrial malaise
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Russian aircraft makers have delivered only one of 15 planned commercial jets this year, data from Swiss aviation intelligence provider ch-aviation shows, as sanctions on foreign components stall production and high interest rates crimp investment. Since Russia's February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Western sanctions have cut off access to foreign-made aircraft and spare parts. With a fleet of more than 700 planes dominated by Airbus and Boeing jets, Russian airlines now rely on complex, indirect import routes to source critical components. "There is no component base, no technology, no production facilities, no engineers," said one Russian aviation industry source, who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter. "To create all this from scratch takes years, if not decades." Given Russia's geographical challenges as the world's largest country, it depends on commercial aircraft for domestic freight and passenger transport across its 11 time zones. Recent major incidents highlight an urgent need to prevent the fleet degrading. In late July, a Soviet-era Antonov An-24, built in 1976, crashed in the country's far east, killing all 48 people on board. Days later, flag carrier Aeroflot grounded dozens of flights following a crippling cyberattack. The aviation sector's struggles to become self-sufficient are part of a broader industrial slowdown. Russia's factory output contracted at its fastest pace since March 2022 in July, according to Purchasing Managers' Index data, and industrial growth continues to decelerate. High interest rates have played a part in dwindling car production, coal sector bankruptcies, slowing export volumes of commodities like metals and oil products, as well as the missed plane-building targets, officials and businesses have said, contributing to slowing economic growth. "Industry is being hit faster and harder by tight monetary policy," said Dmitry Polevoy, head of investment at Astra Asset Management, warning that the industrial sector was on the brink of recession. PRODUCTION DELAYS AND NEW TARGETS In 2021, Russia added 52 new commercial aircraft to its fleet — including 27 from Airbus, three from Boeing, and 22 Sukhoi Superjets built with imported parts - for airlines including Aeroflot, S7, Red Wings, Rossiya, and Ural Airlines, data from ch-aviation shows. Since then, only 13 new planes have been added: 12 Superjets used by several Russian airlines and one Tupolev Tu-214, a twin-engine, narrow-bodied jet designed for medium-haul flights, the data showed. The Tu-214 is being used by First Deputy Prime Minister Denis Manturov, according to a person familiar with the matter, FlightRadar24 data, and Russian media reports. The government has repeatedly revised its production goals. In mid-2024, it cut the 2024–2025 delivery target to 21 from 171 aircraft. Last month, officials said targets would be revised again, citing high interest rates, which have made financing more expensive and slowed production. State conglomerate Rostec, which oversees production of the Superjet-100s, Tupolev Tu-214s, Ilyushin passenger planes and the new Yakovlev MC-21 jet, has struggled to meet deadlines. Rostec CEO Sergei Chemezov told Reuters last year that Russia would produce its own passenger planes, but delivery dates have repeatedly slipped. The MC-21 aircraft, built entirely with Russian-made parts, was much heavier than the version built with imported parts, reducing range and fuel efficiency - so airlines have been reluctant to adopt it, according to the Russian aviation source. On Tuesday, Chemezov told Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin that serial production of the MC-21, SJ-100, and IL-114 jets would begin in 2026, two years later than originally planned. United Aircraft Corporation, the Rostec subsidiary that manages all the conglomerate's aircraft production, did not respond to a request for comment. SANCTIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN Despite efforts to localise production, Russia continues to rely on foreign suppliers. Customs data seen by Reuters shows that parts worth at least $300,000 were imported in 2024 via intermediaries in Turkey, China, Kyrgyzstan, and the UAE. These included components from France's Safran, U.S. Honeywell, and Britain's Rolls-Royce. There is no evidence of these companies having violated sanctions. Russia has developed a system of parallel imports, allowing goods to enter the country through third parties without the manufacturer's knowledge or consent. Safran and Rolls-Royce did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Honeywell said it is not providing any equipment, parts, or products to any company in Russia and is "actively working to identify and interrupt any possible diversion of our products into Russia via third parties." Russia is trying to solve a unique and "hypercomplex" problem, Industry and Trade Minister Anton Alikhanov said last month. "No other country in the world produces fully import-substituted planes," Alikhanov said. Reduced aircraft supply while demand remains high is pushing up prices for consumers, with ticket prices rising steadily throughout 2023 and 2024, Rosstat data shows. Meanwhile, Moscow has been forced to get creative, asking airlines from Central Asian countries like Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan to run domestic Russian routes. REUTERS
