
The city doth protest too much? Hamlet gets LA curfew exemption
Theater-goers with a valid ticket for the performance in Downtown LA were exempted from the overnight lockdown that has left much of the city center looking as ghostly as the banquet in Shakespeare's play about the prince of Denmark.
"The Los Angeles Mayor's Office has updated guidance on the Downtown LA area curfew and has granted an exception to allow individuals with tickets to an indoor venue to attend that event as scheduled," said an announcement on the Center Theatre Group's website.
"Center Theatre Group, The Music Center, and the surrounding streets have not been directly impacted by protest or law enforcement activity."
Protests sprang up in Los Angeles last week over President Donald Trump's increased immigration raids as anger grew in the sprawling multicultural city.
Violence flared, notably on Sunday when autonomous cars were set on fire and rocks were burled at police, but the demonstrations have been mostly peaceful.
Trump, who has repeatedly exaggerated the scale of the protests, deployed 4,700 soldiers, including active duty Marines, in what he says is a necessary step to bring order.
Opponents accuse him of a power grab and say troops have no place in policing civilian protest.
A "No Kings" movement promises protests in more than 2,000 places across the country, including a large demonstration in Los Angeles, on Saturday.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Minnesota Democratic lawmaker shot dead, another wounded in 'politically motivated' attacks
A gunman shot two Democratic state lawmakers in Minnesota early Saturday, killing one and her husband and wounding the other, in what the northern US state's governor said were "politically motivated" attacks. The shootings came at a moment of deep political divisions in the United States, as thousands prepared to take to the streets in protest at the policies of Republican President Donald Trump. The suspected assailant was still at large, officials said, with a massive manhunt underway. US President Donald Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi decried what they called "horrific violence" and said the perpetrators would be prosecuted to "the fullest extent of the law." State representative Melissa Hortman – the former speaker – and her husband Mark were killed at their home near Minneapolis, Governor Tim Walz told a press conference. State senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were shot and wounded, the governor said, his voice breaking with emotion. He said officials remained "cautiously optimistic" they would recover. "This was an act of targeted political violence," Walz told reporters. "Peaceful discourse is the foundation of our democracy. We don't settle our differences with violence or at gunpoint." Drew Evans, superintendent of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, said Hoffman and his wife were shot first, and as police investigated, Hortman and her husband were shot about 90 minutes later. The suspected gunman was able to escape during an exchange of gunfire with officers near Hortman's residence, Evans told reporters. "We're actively searching for that individual right now," he said. In both cases, authorities believe the assailant was impersonating a law enforcement officer, ABC News reported, quoting a source familiar with the investigation. Police are looking for a white man with brown hair, wearing black body armor over a blue shirt and blue pants, local TV station KSTP said. The United States has been deeply divided since Trump returned to the White House in January. The Republican president has drawn criticism from Democrats over his harsh deportation policy, his assault on universities and the media and a perceived flouting of limits on executive power as he pushes his agenda. "At this precipice moment we're on, this tragic act here in Minnesota should serve as a reminder to all of us," Walz said. "The democracy and the debates in the halls of Congress, in state houses, in school boards, is a way to settle our differences peacefully and move society to a better place."

LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Europe's paradoxical support for Israel's attack against Iran
Calling for restraint and diplomacy, without condemning Israel or disavowing its strikes: France, the United Kingdom and Germany reacted on Friday, June 13, in a somewhat unexpected, even acrobatic manner, to the vast offensive launched by Israel against Iran. One after another, the three European states – which, in 2015, were signatories with Iran, the European Union, the United States, Russia and China, of the agreement intended to limit the expansion of Iran's nuclear program, buried by Donald Trump three years later – supported Israel's "right to defend itself" in the face of what they see as an existential threat: The prospect of the Teheran regime possessing nuclear weapons. Until now, Paris, London and Berlin had tried, unsuccessfully, to talk Benjamin Netanyahu out of carrying out his threats in order to favor the diplomatic option. No hard feelings. On Friday, the French, British and German leaders each called the Israeli prime minister to express their solidarity, despite the clear deterioration, at least for the first two, of their relations with Netanyahu because of the war in Gaza. "Israel has the right to defend its existence and the safety and security of its citizens. The aim must be to ensure that Iran does not develop nuclear weapons," said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, speaking promptly. The British leader Keir Starmer emphasized in the afternoon Israel's "right to self-defense" and the "UK's grave concerns" regarding Iran's nuclear program.

LeMonde
7 hours ago
- LeMonde
Israel's war in Iran: The choice of war and its risks
As it has come under a massive campaign of Israeli bombardments since Friday, June 13, the Tehran regime can fully grasp the extent of its isolation. This regime, which has made itself widely detestable, is above all paying the price for its choice to enrich uranium to levels that are only compatible with a military program, despite its denials. It is Israel's determination to put a definitive end to this program that has earned it the explicit or tacit support of many Western countries. For Tehran, the Israeli offensive has come at the worst possible time. Previous strikes and reprisals in 2024 exposed the limitations of its arsenal. The " axis of resistance," which had formed its main defensive shield, was significantly weakened after the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah was decimated in the autumn. This, in turn, triggered the fall of Bashar al-Assad, who, during the devastating Syrian civil war, had become dependent on the Iranian regime. After years of repression of its people, strangled by international sanctions linked to its nuclear program, the regime in Iran can hardly count on a patriotic reflex of unity. Another path, a diplomatic one, was pursued in the past, with the conclusion, in 2015, of a deal supported by a broad international coalition patiently put together by Washington. Iran had agreed to limit its nuclear ambitions in exchange for regional reintegration and the lifting of sanctions. That deal, criticized by warmongers, could have changed the course of events, had it not been buried by Donald Trump during his first term. The US president hastily tried to reach a new compromise with Tehran upon returning to the White House, hoping to avoid being drawn into another regional conflict. Because the Israeli gamble brings with it many uncertainties beyond the current escalation. The first is over the war's objectives: In calling on the Iranian people to rise up, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu appears to be tying the destruction of the nuclear program to regime change, in a region where similar interventions have ended in disaster. The effectiveness of Israeli bombings also remains to be proven, not least because they could push the Iranian regime, should it withstand this humiliation, to resume its program clandestinely, cutting ties with the International Atomic Energy Agency, which has so far been able to measure its progress. The path of force and disregard for law raises another question: What does Israel intend to do with its new status as the region's military superpower? The desire to reshape the Middle East according to its own interests only is already sparking the deepest concerns. First of all in Gaza, where ongoing bombings without any political horizon feed chaos. Then in Lebanon and Syria, where Israel's relentless strikes have undermined the fragile process of reviving institutions in Beirut and the perilous transition underway in Damascus. It is essential to resist the intoxication of power and to recognize the responsibilities it entails. Otherwise, Israel will lose a unique opportunity to break the cycle of wars that has held the Middle East captive until now.