Talk of coup in South Africa unrealistic, say experts
'One reason is that intelligence in general has been politicised. People talk about it being 'weaponised'. It's used in internal ANC politics to compromise people and gather information, not necessarily for national security reasons.'
Kotze said the report Ntshavheni based the risk of a coup on does not identify a coup as an immediate or short-term risk. 'I think it's a bit of an overstatement to say a coup is imminent based on what's in the actual document. From what I see in the assessment, it's not stated in that way,' he said.
Advocate Sipho Mantula, a law expert, said South Africa would be able to respond to any threats. He said a coup is normally led by the military.
'What I read there was more about the idea that if the president takes action against Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi [KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner] or proceeds with the case against him, it might cause unrest similar to what we saw in the July 2021 unrest.'
He said Ntshavheni should have detailed what sort of coup she was talking about. 'So you can't just come out and say those things. I think the issue of the special task force wearing uniforms that resemble military attire was perhaps a misunderstanding.'
SowetanLIVE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
4 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
ANC, DA square off over budget
(Graphic: John McCann/M&G) The Democratic Alliance won't back the budgets for the departments of higher education, human settlements and police This content is restricted to subscribers only . Join the M&G Community Our commitment at the Mail & Guardian is to ensure every reader enjoys the finest experience. Join the M&G community and support us in delivering in-depth news to you consistently. Subscription enables: - M&G community membership - independent journalism - access to all premium articles & features - a digital version of the weekly newspaper - invites to subscriber-only events - the opportunity to test new online features first Already a subscriber?
Mail & Guardian
4 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Ramaphosa's gambit on KwaZulu-Natal tightrope
President Cyril Ramaphosa. Photo: FIle Senzo Mchunu has been placed on special leave pending a judicial commission of inquiry into allegations with national security implications. Despite the veneer of procedural propriety the announcement was anything but benign. 'Special leave' is neither a definitive sanction nor exoneration, but an unease to placate critics while preserving political capital. Ramaphosa, often accused of dithering, was again simply kicking for touch down the treacherous road of South African politics. The week-long delay in any meaningful statement about the KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner, Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's damning allegations of corruption against Mchunu lays bare the fault lines of a presidency perpetually teetering on the edge of survival, particularly in the treacherous context of KwaZulu-Natal. The president was in a serious predicament. Mchunu is no ordinary minister. He backed Ramaphosa in the heavy contestation for president of the ANC in 2017. Mchunu, as a former premier and MEC is a lynchpin in the ANC's precarious hold on KwaZulu-Natal, a province where political loyalties are a brisk trade. Mchunu's influence, particularly north of the Tugela River, where the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) holds sway, is a rare asset for the ANC. His political clout in this region, coupled with his role as police minister, has made him a figure Ramaphosa cannot easily discard. Yet, Mchunu's alleged indiscretions — details of which remain shrouded in the opaque language of 'national security' — have forced Ramaphosa's hand. The president's hesitation to act decisively speaks volumes about the delicate balance he must strike, not least because Mchunu holds a sword over Ramaphosa's own head — the Phala Phala scandal. Had the police minister pursued those allegations with zeal, Ramaphosa might have faced the real prospect of criminal prosecution. The president's decision to place Mchunu on special leave, rather than sack him outright, hints at a quid pro quo, a tacit acknowledgment of mutual vulnerabilities. This is not the politics of principle but of survival, a grim reminder that in South Africa's corridors of power, loyalty is often a currency more valuable than integrity. Ramaphosa's reluctance to wield the axe betrays his fear that alienating Mchunu could unravel the ANC's fragile grip on KwaZulu-Natal. KwaZulu-Natal is a microcosm of South Africa's fractured polity, where opportunism and patronage reign supreme. The province defies the neat analyses of political scientists. Former president Jacob Zuma looms large over its rural hinterlands and urban centres. His uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party, a belligerent force, threatens to erode the ANC's dominance in the provincial legislature and key municipalities, including the metropolitan prize of eThekwini. With municipal elections in 2026, Ramaphosa cannot afford to destabilise the ANC's already shaky foundations. A slip below 30% in the polls — a threshold the ANC has not crossed since 1994 — would signal not just an electoral defeat but the likely end of the party as a political force of any consequence. Ramaphosa knows that any misstep in KwaZulu-Natal could hasten its demise. The province's politics is a marketplace of competing interests, where loyalty is transactional and power is a prize to be bartered. Ramaphosa's lieutenants in the province are few and far between, their reliability questionable. Mchunu's value lies not just in his political acumen but in his ability to navigate this treacherous terrain, particularly in the IFP-dominated north. By placing him on special leave, Ramaphosa has opted for a half-measure, a gesture that avoids burning bridges while signalling a tepid commitment to anti-corruption. This decision is prevarication dressed up as pragmatism. The judicial commission of inquiry, like so many before it, risks becoming a theatre of delay, a mechanism to deflect public outrage while allowing the status quo to persist. What does this mean for South Africa? Ramaphosa's gambit is a microcosm of the broader malaise afflicting the nation's politics. The ANC, once a stellar liberation movement, is now a machine of patronage, its ideals eroded by the exigencies of power. In KwaZulu-Natal, where the stakes are highest, Ramaphosa's indecision risks ceding ground to forces that thrive on chaos. The 2026 municipal elections will be a litmus test, not just for the ANC but for Ramaphosa's fragile legacy. Dr Imraan Buccus is research associate at ASRI and at the University of the Free State.
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
A coup? Here's what makes SA most vulnerable to attacks
The NSS stated that a disregard for the state's authority was growing, fuelled by the malicious use of communication platforms. A National Security Strategy (NSS) document published this week gives an overview of the greatest dangers posed to South Africa's stability. Threats of a possible coup d'état were raised by Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni as the country still reels from allegations made by a senior police official. Neither Ntshavheni nor the NSS document elaborate on any specific groups which could carry out a coup, amplifying calls for the minister to furnish the nation with proof of her claims. SA 'remains stable' The redacted NSS document released on 15 July stated that domestically, the primary risks were those that undermined the state's functionality and the physical vulnerability of citizens. The report listed organised crime, gangsterism and illegal migration as breeding grounds of instability — all tied together with the consistent use of illegal firearms. 'Illegal migrants create 'no-go' areas in South Africa that violate the sovereignty of the country and undermine the authority of the state. 'The threat to socio-economic stability is caused by, among others, violent community protests as well as instability in the labour, transport and education sectors,' read the NSS. The NSS stated that a disregard for the state's authority was growing, fuelled by the malicious use of communication platforms. 'In order to destabilise the social and political situation in South Africa, inaccurate information is distributed, including deliberately false reports about the threat of terrorist acts,' read the document. However, it concluded that 'South Africa remains a stable country', despite the number of internal social ills. African and global threats Outside South Africa's borders, threats to the Southern African Development Community primarily stemmed from poverty. 'Poverty and underdevelopment are the overriding human security challenge. Violence and crime feature strongly in the region as both a cause and symptom of underdevelopment,' the NSS states. 'The level and extent of terrorism as an asymmetric threat is contingent on the extent to which major demographic, socio-economic, developmental and governance issues are addressed,' it explained. This leads to a continental spread that sees the 'expansion of ungoverned and ungovernable spaces, transnational militancy, organised crime and trafficking'. Globally, the digital age has removed the geographical limits of crimes, leaving nations open to international crime, terrorism, sabotage and trafficking networks. However, Deputy Minister of Defence Bantu Holomisa said on Thursday that coups were not discussed on social media. Holomisa was one of the last leaders to successfully stage a coup south of the Limpopo when he took control of the Transkei civilian government in December 1987 as chief of the Transkei Defence Force. 'We are not expecting conventional warfare in South Africa. The major threat I foresee is civil disobedience, where we are asked by the police to assist and protect them,' said Holomisa while conducting an oversight visit at 1 Military Hospital. Digital insurgency Digital communications have also been highlighted by a European body as a platform for plotting social unrest and insurgency. A study by the German Council for Foreign Relations (GCFR) states that insurgent groups were most likely to use multiple online platforms to mobilise. 'There is a playbook available to plan a coup based on digitally maximising on- and offline capabilities to amplify a cause and push for mobilisation,' states the GCFR. However, no group or sector of society has been identified as having the resources or organisational capacity to pose a threat to the South African government. This has led Ntshavheni's opponents to insist that the minister or the security cluster reveal the source of her coup claims. 'She must tell us who, what and where,' said uMkhonto weSizwe (MP) party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela. 'She has already told the public, now she must give us details and stop politicking,' he concluded. NOW READ: 'A coup is not discussed on social media': Holomisa says no need to press panic buttons
