Building Bridges: The Power of Public Relations in Modern Marketing
Public relations marketing is the mix of public relations (PR) and marketing strategies to promote a brand, product, or service. PR focuses on building a good image and trust with the public, while marketing aims to sell or promote services and products. When used together, they create a powerful message that reaches more people and builds stronger relationships.
For example, a dentist can use PR to show how they help low-income families through Medicaid. Then, they can use marketing tools like social media and flyers to spread that message even more. This creates a full circle where trust and promotion work together.
People today are smarter buyers. They search for information, read reviews, and ask others before choosing a service. That's where public relations marketing becomes important. It helps build a brand's image by showing honesty, care, and value. In the case of dental services, showing how a clinic helps children through Medicaid dental benefits builds trust with families.
Good PR helps answer questions like:
Is this service reliable?Do they care about my needs?Are they helping the community?
When people believe in the answers, they are more likely to choose that service.
Medicaid is a government health program that helps low-income families, especially children. When it comes to dental care, Medicaid covers dental services for all child enrollees as part of a complete set of benefits. These benefits are called Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT).
Here's what EPSDT means:
Early: Finding health problems early.Periodic: Regular checkups.Screening: Checking for issues before they become serious.Diagnostic: Understanding what's wrong.
Treatment: Getting the right care.
This means children under Medicaid can get dental checkups, cleanings, fillings, and even emergency treatments when needed. It's a full package to make sure children have healthy teeth and gums.
Many families don't know they qualify for free dental care under Medicaid. This is where public relations marketing becomes powerful. Dental clinics and government programs can work together to spread this message. They can use local newspapers, school events, or community centers to educate parents.
Here are a few ways to promote this using PR marketing:
Success Stories: Share real stories of children whose health improved with Medicaid dental care.Community Events: Offer free dental checkups and talk to families about their benefits.Press Releases: Send news updates to local media about new Medicaid programs or partnerships.Social Media Campaigns: Use platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube to reach more people.
By doing this, more families will understand their options and trust the clinics that care about their health.
One of the biggest challenges in healthcare is the communication gap. Patients may not understand what services are available, or they may not trust providers. Public relations marketing helps fix this by building clear and caring communication.
For dentists and clinics working with Medicaid, the goal should be to explain:What services are free or covered.How to apply for Medicaid.Where to go for help.
This can be done through printed materials, radio ads, school newsletters, or even dental health workshops in local communities. When providers speak clearly and kindly, patients feel more connected and confident.
Healthcare is a sensitive field. It's about trust, care, and human connection. That's why public relations marketing is more than just promotion—it's about showing that you care.
When dental clinics use PR strategies, they can:
Improve their image in the community.Show support for families in need.Encourage preventive dental care.Reduce dental emergencies by promoting regular checkups.
It's a win-win situation for everyone. Families get the care they need, and clinics build a reputation for being helpful and caring.
Today, technology helps public relations grow faster. Clinics can use websites, blogs, and videos to explain Medicaid dental benefits. Online reviews also play a big role in building trust.
Tips for using technology in PR marketing:
Create Simple Videos: A short video explaining Medicaid dental benefits can reach thousands of people online.Write Blog Articles: Share tips for children's dental health and how to use Medicaid.Ask for Reviews: Encourage happy patients to leave reviews on Google or Facebook.Email Newsletters: Send regular updates to families about checkup reminders or new services.
These digital tools help reach more people in less time and cost less than traditional marketing.
Public relations marketing isn't just for big companies. It's a powerful tool for small clinics, especially in healthcare and dentistry. By spreading the word about helpful services like Medicaid's dental benefits for children, providers can create stronger relationships with families in their communities.
It's all about building bridges—bridges of trust, care, and understanding. When marketing is done with kindness and clarity, everyone wins.
In the world of modern marketing, public relations marketing stands out as a way to build strong and meaningful relationships. By using honest communication, real stories, and smart promotion, clinics and healthcare providers can reach more families and help them get the care they deserve.
Medicaid's dental services for children are a perfect example. Many families don't know the benefits that are available to them. Through strong PR marketing, dental providers can spread the word, build trust, and make a real difference in their communities.
In the end, public relations is not just about selling—it's about serving. And when service meets strategy, bridges are built that can last a lifetime.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump slashed Medicaid — now he's got another health care crisis looming
President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans are trying to sell the American public on their ' One Big, Beautiful Bill ' despite the fact many Americans, and even members in their own conference, worry about the cuts to Medicaid. Most voters do not trust Trump on health care and fear the significant cuts to Medicaid. Republicans already face hostile voters in their town halls when it comes to health care. But as if that were not a big enough problem, Trump and the Republicans face another looming crisis that could cause health care prices to spike. And it comes from an old political enemy: The Affordable Care Act, Barack Obama's signature health care law. 'I think there's going to be a lot of sticker shock of people who aren't following this debate in Congress and are going to be stunned by just how much their rates go up, because the premiums will increase substantially,' Jonathan Oberlander, a professor of social medicine at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, told The Independent. In 2022, then-Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer brokered a deal with now former senator Joe Manchin for the Inflation Reduction Act. As part of the agreement, the bill extended an expansion of subsidies to the Affordable Care Act that initially passed under the American Rescue Plan Act, Joe Biden's signature piece of legislation to provide relief during the Covid-19 pandemic. Under the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, people who might not have health insurance under their employer but are not eligible for Medicaid can purchase health care on state exchanges. If they earn an income below a certain threshold, they could be eligible for tax credits. 'They might not get employer-sponsored health care, but they're like realtors or entrepreneurs or small business owners or Uber drivers,' one former Capitol Hill aide who now works in health care told The Independent. 'These folks – going to the exchanges trying to purchase their health insurance, they're on the precipice of seeing a big cost of living increase.' The subsidies initially passed under the ARPA, and then later under the IRA, increased eligibility for people making up to 400 percent of the Federal Poverty Line. But they expire at the end of the calendar year. Oberlander said it could create a cost crisis. 'It's going to affect people in the sense that the pool will become smaller, and therefore, depending on who leaves, because it depends – the people are leaving healthier or sicker than the average, it can destabilize the pools to some extent.' he said. 'And people are going to read about it and see it, and they're going to feel it and they're going to pay it, and I think there would be a lot of anger.' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who will not seek re-election in 2026, said Republicans could extend the package, specifically in a year-end spending package. 'I've got to believe that that may become a discussion and the year end appropriations, at least some sort of a short term extension, so they can sort it out,' he told The Independent last week before recess. The government runs out of funding for the fiscal year at the end of September. Open enrollment for the health insurance marketplaces typically begins in November. But Democrats are not as confident. 'Here we are trying to fix all the things that they broke,' Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) told The Independent. 'You've got Republican senators introducing bills to undo the things that they just passed.' There's evidence this could have massive consequences for patients. In December 2024, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office warned that 2.2 million Americans could lose their health insurance by 2026 if the extended subsidies expired. It also warned that 3.7 million people could lose coverage by 2027. Still, some Republicans said that they do not want to make a fix. 'Obamacare is doing so much damage to our healthcare system, to our federal budget, I don't want to renew any part of it. quite honestly,' Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) told The Independent. 'We need to repair the damage done by Obamacare.' But Trump might not have a choice. Polling shows that health care is one of the few policies where voters still trust Democrats more than Republicans. 'This is not the same ACA that he ran against in 2016, it covers many more people, both through Medicaid and in the marketplace,' Oberlander said. 'It's much more popular than it was, and if his administration and congressional Republicans are seen as gutting the health insurance marketplaces and raising people's millions of people's premiums, that's bad politics, and it's bad politics at a time when he already has a fairly low approval rating.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Pharma prepared to work with Trump on DTC drug sales: Pfizer CEO
This story was originally published on BioPharma Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily BioPharma Dive newsletter. Pfizer and other large pharmaceutical companies are taking seriously President Donald Trump's demand that drugmakers make more of their medicines available direct to consumers in the U.S. at lower cost, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said Tuesday. 'We have serious discussions in the industry,' Bourla told investors on a conference call Pfizer held to discuss its earnings for the second quarter. 'I'm connected very often individually with all the major companies and they are all ready to roll up their sleeves and execute something like that.' Pfizer and partner Bristol Myers Squibb recently announced plans to offer their widely-used blood thinner Eliquis at a discounted cash price through an online service. The company previously launched a direct-to-consumer service that allows patients to book telehealth appointments, schedule vaccinations and fill prescriptions for certain medicines, such as those Pfizer sells for migraine and COVID-19. 'We think it is a fantastic way to go ahead, so we will work collaboratively to do it,' Bourla said. Obesity drugmakers Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk have also recently opened up more ways for cash-paying patients to access their weight loss medicines directly. Other companies are signaling interest, too, in exploring ways to sidestep pharmacy benefit managers. These drug-purchasing middlemen extract from drugmakers rebates that insurers say they use to lower overall costs, but not necessarily in ways that are obvious to a prescription-filling patient. Expanding direct-to-consumer options was one of four demands Trump made of the pharmaceutical industry last week in letters issued to 17 drugmakers, including Pfizer. In those letters, the president threatened to use 'every tool' the U.S. government has available if the companies don't take steps to lower the cost of their products to the prices paid in other industrialized countries. Such a 'most favored nation' policy could be a major blow to the industry, although analysts are divided on how sweeping its impact would be if limited only to Medicaid, as Trump indicated. On Tuesday's call, Bourla said he is in 'active discussions' at the 'highest levels of the U.S. government,' including conversations with Trump, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz. In addition to leading Pfizer, Bourla is the current board chair of industry lobbying group PhRMA. 'The letter asks a lot from us,' Bourla added. 'But we are engaged in productive discussion with them and in general I'm happy with the way that they listen to us.' Pricing threats aren't the only challenge drugmakers face in the U.S. The Commerce Department is nearing the end of an investigation into pharmaceutical imports expected to result in sector-specific tariffs. On Tuesday, Trump told CNBC that his administration will initially impose a small levy on pharmaceuticals that could later rise as high as 250% over time. Such duties would be costly for drugmakers, but analysts believe a phase-in period would allow many companies to adjust their supply chains in such a way that the worst financial hit could be mitigated. Already, most of the largest drugmakers have announced major manufacturing investments in the U.S. Pfizer anticipates that it can absorb the impact of tariffs this year, as well as any changes it makes to its products' prices, while still meeting its financial forecast of $61 billion to $64 billion in revenue. On Tuesday, the company raised its guidance for adjusted diluted earnings per share by 10 cents. Shares in Pfizer rose by nearly 4% by midday Tuesday. Recommended Reading Trump redoubles threats in attempt to strongarm drugmakers on prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
A Republican Congressman faced hometown voters. It wasn't pretty
'If we didn't pass the big, beautiful bill,' Flood said, 'there would have been a US$1600 tax increase to every Nebraska family.' In response, the packed auditorium erupted in a chant of 'Tax the rich', and Flood finally had to pause his slides. 'The only way we're going to get through tonight,' he said, 'is if I get a chance to tell you how I voted.' Representative Mike Flood speaks from the stage during a town hall meeting with constituents in Lincoln. Photo / Terry A. Ratlzlaff, The New York Times This was exactly the kind of reception many Republicans dreaded as they headed home to their districts for their six-week summer break. Faced with selling a major piece of legislation that polls show is broadly unpopular and confronted with ruptures in Trump's base over his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, they risk being met with angry questions for which they have no easy answers. And town halls have proven to be a perfect outlet for a wave of energy from Democrats who see an opportunity to knock Republicans off balance more than a year ahead of the midterm elections. The result has been a gradual disappearance of the open town hall as an exercise in democracy, with fewer elected officials willing to face the wrath of opponents in an era of supercharged polarisation. For months, Republican lawmakers have stumbled in particular while trying to answer pointed questions from voters about unpopular cuts to Medicaid, the health insurance system increasingly relied on by working families as well as the poor. 'Well, we all are going to die,' Senator Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, told a crowd at a town hall in Butler, Iowa, in May, when someone in the audience yelled that the potential cuts meant that 'people are going to die'. Flood admitted to voters earlier this northern summer at a town hall that he had not read the entire bill before voting to pass it. The August recess marks the first extended period of time that lawmakers have returned home since Trump signed the bill into law on July 4. The line to get into Flood's event on Monday afternoon local time, which was held in a more progressive city in his red district, snaked all the way around the block and looked from the outside like the size of one for a presidential campaign event. The crowd, encompassing some supporters but by and large made up of critics, arrived heated, ready to express their fear and anger. Every answer from Flood seemed to turn it up a notch. 'How can you stand behind this bill that erodes the very services that people like me, my family and our families, younger vets coming home today, rely on?' John Keller, 76, a veteran, asked. 'Our veterans affairs are going to be better than they've been in a long time,' Flood responded. 'We do not have unlimited money in the US,' he said when asked why he voted for cuts to Snap, the food stamp programme, and healthcare research. When pressed on Trump's decision to fire the commissioner of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, Flood said he gave the President the benefit of the doubt. 'There's always two sides to every story,' he said. 'If all the person did was get the data out there, I would not have fired them. But I don't know; things are complicated.' When another attendee pointed out that tariffs were driving up the price of cars to the point at which they wiped out 'any tax savings I will see from the bill which recently passed,' Flood simply repeated a Trump talking point. 'We need to be a country that makes things,' he said. Flood bristled when one attendee called him a fascist. 'Fascists don't hold town halls with open question-and-answer sessions,' he said. And when he was pressed on why he was 'covering up the Epstein files', he assured them he was for full transparency. It did not seem that many in the crowd awarded him much credit for showing up. 'He's coming here to be able to say that he's listening, but he's not,' said Jackson Hatcher, a student at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 'Everyone here who asked a question, he gave a canned response.' Joyce Kubicek, a retired social worker, said she left unconvinced by his answers. 'I don't understand how he can say some of the things he's saying; it seems false,' she said. Earlier this year, Representative Richard Hudson of North Carolina, the chair of the House Republican campaign arm, discouraged members from holding in-person town halls such as this. He said the sessions were being filled with Democratic activists, generated negative headlines and that a better way to communicate with voters was to hold telephone town halls where questions could be filtered by a moderator. Many House Republicans have taken his advice. Of the 35 House Republicans who hold seats that Democrats are targeting in 2026, only one, Representative Bryan Steil of Wisconsin, has held an in-person town hall. (He, too, was booed and jeered.) But the concerns over the bill and the economy appear to be so widespread that they cannot be screened out — even in the controlled environment of tele-town halls. An audience member stands up to shout during a town hall meeting with Representative Mike Flood in Lincoln, Nebraska. Photo / Terry A. Ratlzlaff, The New York Times An attendee at a recent tele-town hall told Representative Ryan Mackenzie, a vulnerable Republican from Pennsylvania: 'You and other Maga talk about monitoring and cutting welfare for poor people, but you don't talk about the high tax breaks that overwhelmingly help the rich people'. And Representative Eli Crane, a hard-right Republican from Arizona, was confronted by a constituent on a tele-town hall who said he was 'concerned' that the bill added 'significantly to the national debt' while cutting healthcare benefits. In an interview on Tuesday, Representative Lisa McClain of Michigan, the No. 4 House Republican who oversees messaging for the conference, said she was weary of the topic of town halls. 'I don't understand why everyone is fixated on the town hall piece,' she said, when there were other ways to connect with voters. 'Maybe it's site visits; maybe it's field hearings. Why aren't people doing more op-eds?' she said. 'I don't understand this fixation with town halls. You should do what's best for your district. There's 100 different ways to market.' Trump, for his part, is not doing any marketing of his own bill. 'It's been received so well, I don't think I have to,' he said on Meet the Press when asked why he was not doing events to promote his own agenda. McClain, who plans to visit three manufacturing sites this month with vulnerable members in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, said she had not heard any concerns from lawmakers about how to take on tough questions from voters back home. 'What I really heard more than anything from members was, 'Give me the data and the specifics as it pertains to my district,'' she said. 'You really have to break it down into bite-size pieces that's applicable for their districts.' As they seek to turn around public opinion on the bill, Republicans are trying to focus on new data from the US Chamber of Commerce that found that voters favoured the tax provisions in the bill, even if they had a negative view of the agenda overall. A memo from the National Republican Campaign Committee released last week encouraged members to focus on how the bill made the 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent and cut taxes on tips. In offering advice to members on how to get their message out to voters, it notably did not recommend holding in-person town halls. Speaking to reporters after his event, Flood said he still believed that showing up was part of the job, even though the session ended with a chant of 'Vote him out!' 'This doesn't get better unless we show up in the town square,' he said. 'If you feel strongly about what you're doing in Congress, then stand in the town square, tell them why you voted that way.' Flood said he had anticipated a rocky reception and admitted he was not satisfied with his answer on veteran benefits. 'I need to put my notes out,' he said. 'I need to be very clear on why I think our veterans are being taken care of.' Further engagement this year with his constituents, he suggested, may be online, in smaller groups or even on a tele-town hall. 'This is my third and final one for the year,' he said of in-person town halls. 'We're going to give you all a break.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Annie Karni Photographs by: Terry A. Ratlzlaff ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
