
A Republican Congressman faced hometown voters. It wasn't pretty
In response, the packed auditorium erupted in a chant of 'Tax the rich', and Flood finally had to pause his slides.
'The only way we're going to get through tonight,' he said, 'is if I get a chance to tell you how I voted.'
Representative Mike Flood speaks from the stage during a town hall meeting with constituents in Lincoln. Photo / Terry A. Ratlzlaff, The New York Times
This was exactly the kind of reception many Republicans dreaded as they headed home to their districts for their six-week summer break.
Faced with selling a major piece of legislation that polls show is broadly unpopular and confronted with ruptures in Trump's base over his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, they risk being met with angry questions for which they have no easy answers.
And town halls have proven to be a perfect outlet for a wave of energy from Democrats who see an opportunity to knock Republicans off balance more than a year ahead of the midterm elections.
The result has been a gradual disappearance of the open town hall as an exercise in democracy, with fewer elected officials willing to face the wrath of opponents in an era of supercharged polarisation.
For months, Republican lawmakers have stumbled in particular while trying to answer pointed questions from voters about unpopular cuts to Medicaid, the health insurance system increasingly relied on by working families as well as the poor.
'Well, we all are going to die,' Senator Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, told a crowd at a town hall in Butler, Iowa, in May, when someone in the audience yelled that the potential cuts meant that 'people are going to die'.
Flood admitted to voters earlier this northern summer at a town hall that he had not read the entire bill before voting to pass it.
The August recess marks the first extended period of time that lawmakers have returned home since Trump signed the bill into law on July 4.
The line to get into Flood's event on Monday afternoon local time, which was held in a more progressive city in his red district, snaked all the way around the block and looked from the outside like the size of one for a presidential campaign event.
The crowd, encompassing some supporters but by and large made up of critics, arrived heated, ready to express their fear and anger. Every answer from Flood seemed to turn it up a notch.
'How can you stand behind this bill that erodes the very services that people like me, my family and our families, younger vets coming home today, rely on?' John Keller, 76, a veteran, asked.
'Our veterans affairs are going to be better than they've been in a long time,' Flood responded.
'We do not have unlimited money in the US,' he said when asked why he voted for cuts to Snap, the food stamp programme, and healthcare research.
When pressed on Trump's decision to fire the commissioner of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, Flood said he gave the President the benefit of the doubt.
'There's always two sides to every story,' he said. 'If all the person did was get the data out there, I would not have fired them. But I don't know; things are complicated.'
When another attendee pointed out that tariffs were driving up the price of cars to the point at which they wiped out 'any tax savings I will see from the bill which recently passed,' Flood simply repeated a Trump talking point.
'We need to be a country that makes things,' he said.
Flood bristled when one attendee called him a fascist. 'Fascists don't hold town halls with open question-and-answer sessions,' he said.
And when he was pressed on why he was 'covering up the Epstein files', he assured them he was for full transparency.
It did not seem that many in the crowd awarded him much credit for showing up.
'He's coming here to be able to say that he's listening, but he's not,' said Jackson Hatcher, a student at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
'Everyone here who asked a question, he gave a canned response.'
Joyce Kubicek, a retired social worker, said she left unconvinced by his answers. 'I don't understand how he can say some of the things he's saying; it seems false,' she said.
Earlier this year, Representative Richard Hudson of North Carolina, the chair of the House Republican campaign arm, discouraged members from holding in-person town halls such as this.
He said the sessions were being filled with Democratic activists, generated negative headlines and that a better way to communicate with voters was to hold telephone town halls where questions could be filtered by a moderator.
Many House Republicans have taken his advice. Of the 35 House Republicans who hold seats that Democrats are targeting in 2026, only one, Representative Bryan Steil of Wisconsin, has held an in-person town hall. (He, too, was booed and jeered.)
But the concerns over the bill and the economy appear to be so widespread that they cannot be screened out — even in the controlled environment of tele-town halls.
An audience member stands up to shout during a town hall meeting with Representative Mike Flood in Lincoln, Nebraska. Photo / Terry A. Ratlzlaff, The New York Times
An attendee at a recent tele-town hall told Representative Ryan Mackenzie, a vulnerable Republican from Pennsylvania: 'You and other Maga talk about monitoring and cutting welfare for poor people, but you don't talk about the high tax breaks that overwhelmingly help the rich people'.
And Representative Eli Crane, a hard-right Republican from Arizona, was confronted by a constituent on a tele-town hall who said he was 'concerned' that the bill added 'significantly to the national debt' while cutting healthcare benefits.
In an interview on Tuesday, Representative Lisa McClain of Michigan, the No. 4 House Republican who oversees messaging for the conference, said she was weary of the topic of town halls.
'I don't understand why everyone is fixated on the town hall piece,' she said, when there were other ways to connect with voters.
'Maybe it's site visits; maybe it's field hearings. Why aren't people doing more op-eds?' she said.
'I don't understand this fixation with town halls. You should do what's best for your district. There's 100 different ways to market.'
Trump, for his part, is not doing any marketing of his own bill. 'It's been received so well, I don't think I have to,' he said on Meet the Press when asked why he was not doing events to promote his own agenda.
McClain, who plans to visit three manufacturing sites this month with vulnerable members in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, said she had not heard any concerns from lawmakers about how to take on tough questions from voters back home.
'What I really heard more than anything from members was, 'Give me the data and the specifics as it pertains to my district,'' she said. 'You really have to break it down into bite-size pieces that's applicable for their districts.'
As they seek to turn around public opinion on the bill, Republicans are trying to focus on new data from the US Chamber of Commerce that found that voters favoured the tax provisions in the bill, even if they had a negative view of the agenda overall.
A memo from the National Republican Campaign Committee released last week encouraged members to focus on how the bill made the 2017 Trump tax cuts permanent and cut taxes on tips.
In offering advice to members on how to get their message out to voters, it notably did not recommend holding in-person town halls.
Speaking to reporters after his event, Flood said he still believed that showing up was part of the job, even though the session ended with a chant of 'Vote him out!'
'This doesn't get better unless we show up in the town square,' he said. 'If you feel strongly about what you're doing in Congress, then stand in the town square, tell them why you voted that way.'
Flood said he had anticipated a rocky reception and admitted he was not satisfied with his answer on veteran benefits.
'I need to put my notes out,' he said. 'I need to be very clear on why I think our veterans are being taken care of.'
Further engagement this year with his constituents, he suggested, may be online, in smaller groups or even on a tele-town hall.
'This is my third and final one for the year,' he said of in-person town halls. 'We're going to give you all a break.'
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Annie Karni
Photographs by: Terry A. Ratlzlaff
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
3 hours ago
- 1News
Trump's tariffs go into effect — just as economic pain is surfacing
President Donald Trump has officially begun levying higher import taxes on dozens of countries — just as the economic fallout of his months-long tariff threats has begun to create visible damage for the US economy. The White House said that starting just after midnight (4pm NZ Time) that goods from more than 60 countries and the European Union now faced tariff rates of 10% or higher. Products from the European Union, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand are taxed at 15%, while imports from Taiwan, Vietnam and Bangladesh are taxed at 20%. For places such as the EU, Japan and South Korea, Trump also expects them to invest hundreds of billions of dollars in the US. 'I think the growth is going to be unprecedented,' Trump said Wednesday afternoon (local time). He added that the US was 'taking in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs,' but he couldn't provide a specific figure for revenues because 'we don't even know what the final number is' regarding tariff rates. Despite the uncertainty, the Trump White House is confident that the onset of his broad tariffs will provide clarity about the path of the world's largest economy. Now that companies understand the direction the US is headed, the administration believes they can ramp up new investments and jump-start hiring in ways that can rebalance the US economy as a manufacturing power. But so far, there are signs of self-inflicted wounds to America as companies and consumers alike brace for the impact of new taxes. What the data has shown is a US economy that changed in April with Trump's initial rollout of tariffs, an event that led to market drama, a negotiating period and Trump's ultimate decision to start his universal tariffs on Thursday. ADVERTISEMENT A truck carries a cargo container away from a ship unloading at the Port of Oakland, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2025, in Oakland, Calif. (Source: Associated Press) After April, economic reports show that hiring began to stall, inflationary pressures crept upward and home values in key markets started to decline, said John Silvia, CEO of Dynamic Economic Strategy. 'A less productive economy requires fewer workers,' Silvia said in an analysis note. 'But there is more, the higher tariff prices lower workers' real wages. The economy has become less productive, and firms cannot pay the same real wages as before. Actions have consequences.' Even then, the ultimate transformations of the tariffs are unknown and could play out over months, if not years. Many economists say the risk is that the American economy is steadily eroded rather than collapsing instantly. 'We all want it to be made for television where it's this explosion — it's not like that,' said Brad Jensen, a professor at Georgetown University. 'It's going to be fine sand in the gears and slow things down.' Trump has promoted the tariffs as a way to reduce the persistent trade deficit. But importers sought to avoid the taxes by importing more goods before the taxes went into effect. As a result, the $582.7 billion trade imbalance for the first half of the year was 38% higher than in 2024. Total construction spending has dropped 2.9% over the past year, and the factory jobs promised by Trump have so far resulted in job losses. The lead-up to Thursday fit the slapdash nature of Trump's tariffs, which have been variously rolled out, walked back, delayed, increased, imposed by letter and frantically renegotiated. ADVERTISEMENT The process has been so muddled that officials for key trade partners were unclear at the start of the week whether the tariffs would begin Thursday or Friday (local time). The language of the July 31 order to delay the start of tariffs from August 1 said the higher tax rates would start in seven days. On Wednesday morning (local time), Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, was asked if the new tariffs began at midnight Thursday, and he said reporters should check with the US Trade Representative's Office. A student of Gurukul school of Art completes artwork of US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi, in Mumbai, India, Friday, August 1, 2025. (Source: Associated Press) Trump today announced additional 25% tariffs to be imposed on India for its buying of Russian oil, bringing their total import taxes to 50%. He has said that import taxes are still coming on pharmaceutical drugs and announced 100% tariffs on computer chips, meaning the US economy could remain in a place of suspended animation as it awaits the impact. The president's use of a 1977 law to declare an economic emergency to impose the tariffs is also under challenge. The impending ruling from last week's hearing before a US appeals court could cause Trump to find other legal justifications if judges say he exceeded his authority. Even people who worked with Trump during his first term are skeptical that things will go smoothly for the economy, such as Paul Ryan, the former Republican House speaker, who has emerged as a Trump critic. 'There's no sort of rationale for this other than the president wanting to raise tariffs based upon his whims, his opinions,' Ryan told CNBC today. 'I think choppy waters are ahead because I think they're going to have some legal challenges.' ADVERTISEMENT Still, the stock market has been solid during the recent tariff drama, with the S&P 500 index climbing more than 25% from its April low. The market's rebound and the income tax cuts in Trump's tax and spending measures signed into law on July 4 have given the White House confidence that economic growth is bound to accelerate in the coming months. As of now, Trump still foresees an economic boom while the rest of the world and American voters wait nervously. 'There's one person who can afford to be cavalier about the uncertainty that he's creating, and that's Donald Trump,' said Rachel West, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation who worked in the Biden White House on labor policy. 'The rest of Americans are already paying the price for that uncertainty.'


NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
America's punishing new tariffs now operational on more than 90 countries
Trump's tariffs have indeed helped generate money — roughly US$152 billion ($255b) in customs collections through July, recent data show — but his policies have not been without consequence. A growing number of businesses have warned recently that they may no longer be able to stomach the rising costs of key foreign components. As a result, prices have started to climb. The latest monthly measure of inflation showed that appliances, clothing and furnishings became more expensive in June. The economy has grown but at an anaemic pace, and some analysts predict little improvement through the remainder of the year. The labour market has experienced its own strains, with hiring sharply slowing in July. Olu Sonola, the head of US economic research at Fitch Ratings, said the economy was just 'starting to see' the effects of the tariffs that Trump announced in the northern spring, adding that with Trump's newest duties now in place, Americans would 'see that magnified' in coming months. The tariffs start at 15%, targeting imports from countries including Bolivia, Ecuador, Iceland, and Nigeria. Others, like Taiwan, have a 20% tax applied to items sold to US buyers. Trump also imposed a much higher 50% tariff on some goods from Brazil. He has cast it as punishment for Brazil's decision to prosecute his political ally Jair Bolsonaro, the country's former president, for seeking to stay in power after losing an election. And today, Trump said he would raise tariffs on India to 50% by late August for buying Russian oil. The President has signalled he could impose similar penalties on other countries, as he looks for ways to use trade policy to pressure Russia into halting its war against Ukraine. In general, the duties do not apply to foreign goods that have been loaded onto ships just before the deadline. Those products in transit won't be subject to new taxes so long as they enter the US before early October, perhaps opening the door for importers to amass more inventory before the steepest rates cut into their bottom lines. Many smaller countries' exports have faced 10% tariffs since the President first announced, then suspended, his initial tranche of policies in April. Others have staved off eye-watering rates after brokering deals with the US that set their tariffs generally between 15% and 20%. That includes the 27-member EU, as well as Japan, South Korea and Vietnam. Each of those governments promised to open its market to US goods, and in some cases they pledged to invest billions of dollars in American industries. But the exact terms of those deals remain murky. Separately, Trump imposed a 35% tariff on goods from Canada not covered by the existing US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. The Canadian levies took effect on Friday. Similarly high rates have been suspended for Mexico while the two sides keep talking. And duties on Chinese goods remain at 30% under an agreement brokered between the superpowers this year, though the truce is set to expire on Tuesday. The rates that took effect today are unlikely to be the final chapter in Trump's expanding trade war, which faces a series of legal challenges in federal courts. He still plans to impose additional tariffs on foreign-made medicines, computer chips, and other products. Trump said the forthcoming tariffs on semiconductors, which have not been formally announced, would be set at 100%. The President shared his thinking at a White House event alongside Tim Cook, the chief executive of Apple, which had pledged to invest an additional US$100b in the US. Trump signalled that the taxes may be relaxed on companies seeking to produce more of the critical high-tech chips domestically. Tim Cook, chief executive officer of Apple Inc., in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, today. Photo / Getty Images The President also dismissed evidence that his policies may be upsetting the US economy, claiming instead that 'costs are way down' and that the country would experience 'unprecedented' growth. He previously insisted that foreigners were bearing the brunt of his tariffs, and he moved last week to fire the top official who oversees the government's jobs report, claiming without evidence that its data had been rigged to harm him politically. The President's new tariffs send the average US effective tariff rate to above 18%, the highest level since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. For American households, those duties may add up to price increases, resulting in an average annual loss of US$2400, the Yale research centre found. And for the broader economy, it could translate to a drop in output, shaving off half a percentage point in growth starting in 2025. Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Analytics, said the tariffs threatened to create an environment that was 'very stagflation-esque', referring to the risk of a stagnant economy with inflationary prices. That, he said, would add to the challenge facing the Federal Reserve at a time when Trump is demanding lower interest rates. 'Growth is slowing,' Zandi said. 'It's happening, and it's going to become much more obvious.' So far, the US economy has sidestepped the most dire predictions of a recession. But many experts say it was always going to be a matter of time before tariffs unleashed real, noticeable effects, especially because many businesses stockpiled imports before the steepest rates took effect. Matthew Martin, a senior economist at Oxford Economics, said businesses had worked their way through those inventories since the President announced, but quickly suspended, his original slate of steep tariffs in April. With tariffs climbing again, Marin continued, so will prices: 'That is something that's going to accelerate over the next couple months'. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Tony Romm ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES


Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Trump's tariffs come into effect
President Donald Trump's higher tariff rates of 10% to 50% on dozens of trading partners kicked in today, testing his strategy for shrinking US trade deficits without massive disruptions to global supply chains, higher inflation and stiff retaliation from trading partners. US Customs and Border Protection agency began collecting the higher tariffs at 4pm (NZ time) after weeks of suspense over Trump's final tariff rates and frantic negotiations with major trading partners that sought to lower them. Goods loaded on to US-bound vessels and in transit before the midnight deadline can enter at lower prior tariff rates before October 5, according to a CBP notice to shippers issued this week. Imports from many countries had previously been subject to a baseline 10% import duty after Trump paused higher rates announced in early April. But since then, Trump has frequently modified his tariff plan, slapping some countries with much higher rates, including 50% for goods from Brazil, 39% from Switzerland, 35% from Canada and 25% from India. He announced a separate 25% tariff on Indian goods on Wednesday to be imposed in 21 days over the South Asian country's purchases of Russian oil. Ahead of the deadline, Trump heralded the "billions of dollars" that will flow into the US, largely from countries that he said had taken advantage of the United States. "THE ONLY THING THAT CAN STOP AMERICA'S GREATNESS WOULD BE A RADICAL LEFT COURT THAT WANTS TO SEE OUR COUNTRY FAIL!" Trump said on Truth Social. Eight major trading partners accounting for about 40% of US trade flows have reached framework deals for trade and investment concessions with Trump, including the European Union, Japan and South Korea, reducing their base tariff rates to 15%. Britain won a 10% rate, while Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines secured rate reductions to 19% or 20%. "For those countries, it's less bad news," said William Reinsch, a senior fellow and trade expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "There'll be some supply chain rearrangement. There'll be a new equilibrium. Prices here will go up, but it'll take a while for that to show up in a major way," Reinsch said. Countries with punishingly high duties, such as India and Canada, "will continue to scramble around trying to fix this," he added. Trump's order has specified that any goods determined to have been trans-shipped from a third country to evade higher US tariffs will be subject to an additional 40% import duty, but his administration has released few details on how these goods would be identified or the provision enforced. Trump's July 31 tariff order imposed duties above 10% on 67 trading partners, while the rate was kept at 10% for those not listed. These import taxes are one part of a multilayered tariff strategy that includes national security-based sectoral tariffs on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, autos, steel, aluminum, copper, lumber and other goods. Trump said yesterday the microchip duties could reach 100%. China is on a separate tariff track and will face a potential tariff increase on August 12 unless Trump approves an extension of a prior truce after talks last week in Sweden. He has said he may impose additional tariffs over China's purchases of Russian oil as he seeks to pressure Moscow into ending its war in Ukraine. Financial markets largely shrugged off the new tariffs, with stock markets in Asia at or near record highs while the dollar dipped slightly. REVENUES, PRICE HIKES Trump has touted the vast increase in federal revenues from his import tax collections, which are ultimately paid by companies importing the goods and consumers of end products. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said that US tariff revenues could top $300 billion a year. The move will drive average US tariff rates to around 20%, the highest in a century and up from 2.5% when Trump took office in January, the Atlantic Institute estimates. Commerce Department data released last week showed more evidence that tariffs began driving up US prices in June, including for home furnishings and durable household equipment, recreational goods and motor vehicles. Costs from Trump's tariff war are mounting for a wide swath of companies, including bellwethers Caterpillar, Marriott, Molson Coors and Yum Brands. All told, global companies that have reported earnings so far this quarter are looking at a hit of around $US15 billion ($NZ25.17 billion) to profits in 2025, Reuters' global tariff tracker shows.