Ingram Micro (INGM): Buy, Sell, or Hold Post Q1 Earnings?
Is there a buying opportunity in Ingram Micro, or does it present a risk to your portfolio? Get the full breakdown from our expert analysts, it's free.
Even with the cheaper entry price, we're swiping left on Ingram Micro for now. Here are three reasons why INGM doesn't excite us and a stock we'd rather own.
Examining a company's long-term performance can provide clues about its quality. Even a bad business can shine for one or two quarters, but a top-tier one grows for years. Regrettably, Ingram Micro's sales grew at a sluggish 1.3% compounded annual growth rate over the last five years. This was below our standards.
Analyzing the change in earnings per share (EPS) shows whether a company's incremental sales were profitable – for example, revenue could be inflated through excessive spending on advertising and promotions.
Ingram Micro's full-year EPS dropped 20.5%, or 9.8% annually, over the last two years. We tend to steer our readers away from companies with falling revenue and EPS, where diminishing earnings could imply changing secular trends and preferences. If the tide turns unexpectedly, Ingram Micro's low margin of safety could leave its stock price susceptible to large downswings.
If you've followed StockStory for a while, you know we emphasize free cash flow. Why, you ask? We believe that in the end, cash is king, and you can't use accounting profits to pay the bills.
Ingram Micro broke even from a free cash flow perspective over the last five years, giving the company limited opportunities to return capital to shareholders.
Ingram Micro falls short of our quality standards. Following the recent decline, the stock trades at 6.3× forward P/E (or $19.13 per share). While this valuation is optically cheap, the potential downside is huge given its shaky fundamentals. There are better investments elsewhere. We'd recommend looking at one of Charlie Munger's all-time favorite businesses.
Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth.
While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025).
Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Kadant (+351% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
More Americans are driving to Canada than Canadians to the U.S., report finds
More American travellers drove to Canada in July than Canadians did to the United States, according to a new report by Statistics Canada. This is the first time such a reversal has taken place since before the COVID-19 pandemic. The dramatic decline of Canadians travelling to the U.S. was sparked last year, with U.S. President Donald Trump's heated rhetoric about Canada becoming the 51st state that led to an ongoing trade war and lingering tension between the two countries. The data for last month shows that 1.8 million American residents drove to Canada, compared to the 1.7 million Canadian residents who made a return trip from the U.S. by car. Canadian road trips to U.S. plunge for seventh month as boycott continues Both countries saw a decline at land border crossings last month. For Americans driving to Canada, there was a slight dip of 7.4 per cent compared to the same month last year. It was also the sixth consecutive month of year-over-year declines. However, the decline was much steeper for Canadians returning from the U.S. this July compared to the previous year, at nearly 37 per cent. Last month marked the seventh consecutive month of year-over-year declines, StatCan said. 'In 2024, Canadian-resident trips to the United States totalled 39 million, representing 75 per cent of all Canadian-resident travel abroad,' according to another StatCan report published earlier this summer about travel to the U.S. 'However, recent data on foreign travel suggest that Canadians' travel sentiment toward their southern neighbour has been shifting in early 2025.' Although the data reflects a 'notable change in travel patterns,' StatCan said it is 'unclear whether the change is temporary or part of a more permanent shift.' As for air travel, the number of non-resident visitors who flew to Canada increased in July. There were 1.4 million of them — up by just over 3 per cent since the same time last year. While the bump was largely due to residents who came from overseas (up 5.6 per cent this year), American travellers were also up by just under 1 per cent. The highest number of U.S.-resident arrivals by air was 31,600 Americans on July 3, before the Independence Day long weekend in the U.S. Meanwhile, the number of Canadians returning home from abroad by air last month was down by 5.3 per cent compared to the previous year. In particular, Canadians flying back from the U.S. also decreased by nearly 26 per cent since the same time last year. Canadian permanent residents will now have to pay 'visa integrity fee' to enter U.S. Here's what it is An American sent to Canada was shocked by how furious Canadians are at the U.S. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
Gizmodo
19 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Private Spaceflight Enters the Wild West as Trump Slashes Regulations
President Donald Trump is calling for an ease of regulations for commercial spaceflight and streamlining licensing for rocket launches and reentries. The move highly favors companies like SpaceX but could have negative repercussions on environmental habitats surrounding launchpads. On Wednesday, August 13, Trump signed an executive order intended to bolster the spaceflight industry and increase the overall commercial launch cadence. In it, Trump calls on Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, who is also currently serving as the acting administrator for NASA, to 'eliminate or expedite…environmental reviews for, and other obstacles to the granting of, launch and reentry licenses and permits.' The order also directs Duffy to 'reevaluate, amend, or rescind' safety requirements and conditions for launch and reentry licenses that were written during Trump's first term as president in 2020. 'By slashing red tape tying up spaceport construction, streamlining launch licenses so they can occur at scale, and creating high-level space positions in government, we can unleash the next wave of innovation,' Duffy said in a statement. 'I look forward to leveraging my dual role at DOT and NASA to make this dream a reality.' The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is responsible for granting licenses for space launches and reentries while ensuring public safety and protection of property. For years, SpaceX CEO and founder Elon Musk has expressed dismay over regulatory bodies such as the FAA, complaining that bureaucratic red tape is holding his rocket company back. 'Starships need to fly. The more we fly safely, the faster we learn; the faster we learn, the sooner we realize full and rapid rocket reuse,' SpaceX wrote in a blog last year while awaiting a launch license for Starship's fifth test flight. 'Unfortunately, we continue to be stuck in a reality where it takes longer to do the government paperwork to license a rocket launch than it does to design and build the actual hardware.' On the other hand, local environmental groups in Boca Chica, Texas, the site of SpaceX's Starbase launch facility, have criticized the FAA for regulatory oversight. Starship's inaugural liftoff in April 2023 sent chunks of concrete and metal thousands of feet away from the launchpad, prompting a review of environmental impacts and potential threats to endangered species in the Boca Chica region. Shortly after, conservation groups filed a lawsuit against the FAA for its approval of SpaceX's expanded launch operations in Boca Chica, Texas, without adequate environmental review. The lawsuit claims that the FAA didn't require an in-depth environmental impact statement before approving SpaceX's Starship plans. FAA officials claim that the new order will serve the space economy. 'The FAA strongly supports President Trump's Executive Order to make sure the U.S. leads the growing space economy and continues to lead the world in space transportation and innovation,' FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford said in a statement. 'This order safely removes regulatory barriers so that U.S. companies can dominate commercial space activities.' Environmental experts, on the other hand, disagree. 'This reckless order puts people and wildlife at risk from private companies launching giant rockets that often explode and wreak devastation on surrounding areas,' Jared Margolis, senior attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, wrote in a statement. 'Bending the knee to powerful corporations by allowing federal agencies to ignore bedrock environmental laws is incredibly dangerous and puts all of us in harm's way.'
Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Asked About Offering Putin Access To Alaska Rare Minerals
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On Thursday, President Donald Trump was asked about a report that the U.S. is preparing to offer Russian President Vladimir Putin economic incentives to encourage him to end the war in Ukraine—including opening up access to natural resources off Alaska's coast. The president responded, in part, "We're going to see what happens with our meeting. We have a big meeting. It's going to be very important for Russia and very important for us. And important to us since we're trying to save a lot of lives." He continued, "As far as rare earth, that's very unimportant I'm trying to save lives." REPORTER: Are you prepared to offer Putin access to rare minerals to incentive him to end the war? TRUMP: We're gonna see what happens in that meeting. It's gonna be very important for Russia and very important for us. — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 14, 2025 This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
