It's Not Your Imagination: Popular Everyday Products Are Giving You Less And Costing More; Here Are 19 Real Life Examples
It's a phenomenon known as "shrinkflation." When companies face higher costs and don't want to scare off customers by raising prices, items get smaller while the price tag stays the same. Historically, we tend to see more shrinkflation when inflation is high and other costs are rising.
To help you spot shrinkflation in the wild, here are 19 real-life examples people shared online:
1.Changing up packaging is one common way that companies camouflage shrinking products. Of these two bottles of orange juice, which one looks bigger to you?
It's the one on the left. In late 2024, Tropicana was accused of shrinkflation when it switched from the carafe-style bottle on the left that held 52 ounces of juice to the taller, skinnier bottle on the right that holds 46 ounces.
The company denied that the packaging changes were motivated by shrinkflation. On its website, it said, "At Tropicana, the consumer is always at the center of our decision making. Because of that, we redesigned our bottles to directly address their concerns around ease of opening, ease of handling, storage and desire for less plastic, as well as offering more affordable juice options."
2.Sometimes products stay the same size but the ingredients or formulations change, like this drink that went from 70% juice to 60% juice.
—kjacmuse
3.Or this mint chip ice cream that's lost a lot of chips over the years. The picture on the top is from a few months ago, and the picture on the bottom is from a couple of years ago, according to the original poster.
4.Another sign of shrinkage: you might notice a callout on the packaging that looks like it's announcing an increase in value or quantity when the box now actually holds less.
—ageric
Related: It's Kinda Weird, But I TOTALLY Know Which State You're From Based On Your American Taste Buds
5.Like these Dino Nuggets that rebranded as Megadino Nuggets but went from a 64-ounce bag to a 45-ounce bag.
6.Sometimes the packaging looks almost exactly the same, but the product has shrunk.
7.And some packages have been redesigned to hide empty spaces in ways that you wouldn't expect, like this packet of crackers, where the empty spot in the middle would be covered by a label on store shelves.
8.If you didn't have the older string cheese to compare it to, would you have noticed that this snack got both shorter and skinnier?
9.And if you didn't look really closely at this lotion, you'd probably think that nothing had changed.
Related: 21 US Products With Names So Hilariously Different Abroad That I'm Questioning Everything I Know
10.So, which one of these cereal boxes do you think holds the most product?
It's the one on the left. The one on the right is taller, but it's also thinner.
11.Once again, the "taller" container here actually holds less.
12.One of these packages was purchased a year ago, and the other a few months ago. Can you tell which is which?
It's the one on the right, duh!
13.Even items like toilet paper and paper towels can fall victim to shrinkflation, like this roll on the right that clearly has fewer sheets than the one on the left.
14.Or this toilet paper that now has smaller squares.
15.Here's another interesting example. The Reddit user who posted it wrote, "I always buy the $20 Tide detergent. I had my last three still in the laundry room and noticed each time I bought one, the quantity went down."
From left to right, the bottles went from 154 ounces to 146 ounces to 132 ounces.
16.If you use any store apps while you shop that save your past receipts, it can really help you spot shrinkflation.
17.Your recipe book might also tip you off to product size changes. For example, one of my mom's old recipes calls for a 16-ounce can of tomatoes, but I can only ever find 14.5-ounce cans nowadays.
18.If you buy products on a subscription basis, you'll also get tipped off to any changes in product size.
19.And finally, sometimes you just see it, like when this person's can was too small to fit just right inside their coozie:
Have you noticed any recent examples of shrinkflation? Tell us all about it in the comments or via the anonymous form below:
Also in Food: I'm Sorry, But I HIGHLY Doubt Any Adult Can Name All Of These Food Logos, Despite Them All Being Iconic
Also in Food: "We Are VEGETARIAN! We Eat CHICKEN!": Chefs And Servers Are Revealing The Unhinged Orders That Will Haunt Them Forever
Also in Food: People Are Sharing Their Go-To Food Hacks They're Shocked More Home Cooks Don't Already Know
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
The Reason Economists Are Worried About Trump's Labor Statistics Choices
How many commissioners of the Bureau of Labor Statistics can you name? For the vast majority of people (and even most economists) the answer would be zero. And for good reason. While several highly accomplished and effective people have served in that role over the years, it is fundamentally about making sure the plumbing of our data infrastructure is working. Most of us just accept that the data is the best possible estimate of the economy — just as we do not think much about where our water comes from, we simply drink it — and instead argue about much harder and less objective questions, like whether inflation is transitory or job growth is trending toward recession. Unfortunately, that could change if the Senate confirms President Trump's pick, E.J. Antoni, to be the next B.L.S. commissioner. When Mr. Trump abruptly fired the B.L.S. commissioner after negative jobs number revisions earlier this month, he wrote on social media that he would find someone 'much more competent and qualified' for the post. He is proposing replacing Erika McEntarfer, a highly respected economist with decades of experience working at the U.S. Census Bureau and elsewhere, with a partisan favored for the job by Steve Bannon. Mr. Antoni's posts that have shown apparent misunderstandings of import prices and the baby boom retirement have gotten the most attention and criticism, along with his statement before the nomination that the monthly jobs report should be suspended. But even more egregious, as Alan Cole, an economist the right-leaning Tax Foundation, has pointed out, is that in October 2024 Mr. Antoni took the time to publish a report that purported to find that 'the American economy has actually been in recession since 2022.' This claim was based on a concept of 'adjusted real' disposable income, which was down about 2 percent from 2019 to 2024 — in contrast to the official data, which showed real disposable income up 12 percent over this period. The problem was his measure effectively double-counted housing inflation, making the inflation rate artificially higher and growth artificially lower. Mr. Antoni's selection has done something I have rarely seen, which is to unite a number of economists and policy wonks from across the political spectrum. The American Enterprise Institute's Stan Veuger told The Washington Post that 'he is utterly unqualified and as partisan as it gets.' Similar sentiments were echoed by people affiliated with conservative and libertarian think tanks, in a Wall Street Journal editorial and a National Review article. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Buzz Feed
30 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
This Senator Made A Very, Very Good Point About Trump's Weird Comment About Gold
A bunch of Donald Trump's new tariffs went into effect on August 7. But there's one thing that won't be hit with a tariff, and that's gold. Yep, gold is off the table! Some people pointed how that this could be because of all of the gold in the Oval Office. Other people compared him to an Austin Powers villain. And this person said, "I miss when the federal government wasn't a meme." But one reply to Trump's post is going more viral than the rest, and it's from Senator Chris Coons of Delaware. Here's what he said: "Trump could have cancelled tariffs on groceries, clothing, back-to-school supplies – any one of a number of things that would have reduced costs for American families. Instead, he chose gold." NextGen America responded to that comment, "Trumponomics, simplified: More golden ballrooms for him, more tariffs for the rest of us." Thoughts?
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump administration invalidates California's emissions reduction agreement with truck manufacturers
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has declared that an emissions agreement between California and four major truck makers is 'unenforceable' — paving the way for noncompliance with the Golden State's pollution rules, which are stricter than federal standards. The FTC made this determination as the agency closed an investigation into whether several truck and engine manufacturers violated antitrust laws by engaging in a voluntary ' Clean Truck Partnership ' with the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Truck manufacturers, in the July 2023 partnership, agreed to abide by California's emissions standards in exchange for certain concessions. Among those standards is the Advanced Clean Trucks rule, which requires 7.5 percent of heavy-duty vehicles to be emissions-free by 2035. The Omnibus Regulation, meanwhile, has sought to slash nitrogen oxide emissions by 90 percent and update engine testing protocols. The FTC said on Monday that it was closing the antitrust investigation after receiving commitments from four truck manufacturers — Daimler Truck, International Motors, PACCAR and Volvo Group — that they would abandon the Clean Truck Partnership. Specifically, the commitments agreed that 'the Clean Truck Partnership is unenforceable and that none of the manufacturers has ever or will ever attempt to enforce the Clean Truck Partnership's terms against another manufacturer,' according to the FTC. 'CARB's regulatory overreach posed a major threat to American trucking and, in our view, presented serious antitrust concerns,' Taylor Hoogendoorn, deputy director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition, said in a statement. 'The Bureau is pleased that the leading heavy-duty truck manufacturers agreed to a course correction,' Hoogendoorn continued, adding that the reversal would put the partnership 'squarely in the rearview mirror and prevent repeats of CARB's troubling regulatory gambit.' The FTC's announcement came a day after the same four truck makers filed a lawsuit against California regulators, arguing that the Golden State lacks the authority to enforce its heavy-duty vehicle emissions rules. The complaint alleges that the federal government had rendered the standards 'unlawful' in June. At the time, President Trump signed off on three congressional resolutions that upended the rules, which previously received the approval of the Biden administration. In closing the antitrust investigation, an FTC statement referred to past concerns causing the agency to launch the case. Criticizing the structure of the Clean Truck Partnership, the FTC expressed concern that the agreement 'forced manufacturers to produce 'zero emissions' engines' even if CARB rules were later overturned. The agency also expressed concern that 'the agreement did not foreclose one truck manufacturer from enforcing its restrictions against a competing truck manufacturer.'
