G20 leaders can't tackle the climate crisis without addressing information integrity
Last year was
These doubts do not spread organically based on citizens' concerns, but are pushed by well-financed and coordinated disinformation campaigns. Global research on climate change disinformation confirms that this is a lucrative business. Challenges to information integrity are affecting climate change policies, as argued in the Forum on Information & Democracy's policy brief, '
These issues are three-fold: coordinated, financed and targeted climate disinformation, orchestrated by vested interests, for example, the fossil fuel industry, that directly benefits from delaying climate action, spreads doubt about the existence of climate change or the effectiveness of certain measures. The campaigns exploit a polarised issue and target policy makers with the objective of hindering action. The attention-focused business model of online platforms facilitates their work and brings profits to platforms.
Second, attacks against journalists and the crisis of news media are further hampering access to reliable environmental information and investigative reporting on climate scandals. In the past 15 years, 44 environmental journalists around the world were killed and many more were victims of attacks and intimidation, according to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation's (Unesco's)
Natural resource extraction occurs to a great extent in countries with little press freedom, making investigations even more difficult. A worldwide economic crisis of the media exacerbates these problems. According to
Finally, the media and science suffer from a lack of trust. Only 40% state that they trust the news media, according to the
The climate crisis cannot be solved unless we solve the information integrity crisis. As long as the global information space is polluted with false information and doubts, and provides only challenging avenues for reliable climate reporting, it will be difficult to take the needed actions: both citizens and policy-makers will be impacted.
The G20 has started recognising the importance of the issue, notably during Brazil's G20 presidency in 2024. The Global Initiative on Information Integrity on Climate Change launched by the government of Brazil, the UN and Unesco aims to contribute to research, communication campaigns and coordinated actions. The South African presidency should follow in these footsteps and encourage all related negotiation groups to recognise the issue and commit to taking action. Their priorities — solidarity, equality, sustainability
—
cannot be achieved without addressing the global information space and its harmful effect on public debate.
In particular, the Sherpa Tracks Environment and Climate Sustainability Working Group and Just Energy Transitions Workstream are well-positioned to discuss the issues and make information integrity an integral part of policy debates on climate and the environment.
G20 actions must investigate and develop solutions to assess the risk of climate and environmental disinformation on policy-making and the policy debate. Particularly in Global South countries, research is insufficient.
The G20 should also look into solutions to co-regulate and regulate the digital space, ensuring that platforms' business models do not continue to exacerbate the crisis but contribute to a healthy public debate based on access to reliable information.
Moreover, the G20 must address the attacks against environmental journalists and the sustainability crisis of the news media, providing solutions to protect journalists and journalism in the long run.
Finally, debates need to consider how to strengthen access to and trust in reliable information on environmental and climate issues.
We therefore recommend that the G20 Heads of States' Declaration includes the following statement in their final declaration:
'We recognise the importance of access to reliable, independent and pluralistic information sources on climate change and environmental issues and will bolster our efforts to ensure the safety of environmental journalists, access to scientific and fact-based information online and to address the root causes of climate disinformation and climate change denialism.'
The G20 Summit in South Africa could be an important moment to further the protection of information integrity on climate issues. But efforts need to go beyond the G20. Information integrity needs to become an integral part of all climate negotiations, starting with the forthcoming COP30. Only by addressing the information integrity crisis can we establish a global information ecosystem that contributes to a fact-based and healthy debate on climate policy.
Katharina Zuegel is the policy director at the
, and lead author of the
. The
is an independent parallel media initiative to ensure issues relating to media integrity and healthy ecosystems are reflected in the policy agenda of the G20.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
2 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
G20 leaders can't tackle the climate crisis without addressing information integrity
Well-financed and coordinated disinformation campaigns by, for example, the fossil fuel industry, spread doubt about the existence of climate change. Photo: File Last year was These doubts do not spread organically based on citizens' concerns, but are pushed by well-financed and coordinated disinformation campaigns. Global research on climate change disinformation confirms that this is a lucrative business. Challenges to information integrity are affecting climate change policies, as argued in the Forum on Information & Democracy's policy brief, ' These issues are three-fold: coordinated, financed and targeted climate disinformation, orchestrated by vested interests, for example, the fossil fuel industry, that directly benefits from delaying climate action, spreads doubt about the existence of climate change or the effectiveness of certain measures. The campaigns exploit a polarised issue and target policy makers with the objective of hindering action. The attention-focused business model of online platforms facilitates their work and brings profits to platforms. Second, attacks against journalists and the crisis of news media are further hampering access to reliable environmental information and investigative reporting on climate scandals. In the past 15 years, 44 environmental journalists around the world were killed and many more were victims of attacks and intimidation, according to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation's (Unesco's) Natural resource extraction occurs to a great extent in countries with little press freedom, making investigations even more difficult. A worldwide economic crisis of the media exacerbates these problems. According to Finally, the media and science suffer from a lack of trust. Only 40% state that they trust the news media, according to the The climate crisis cannot be solved unless we solve the information integrity crisis. As long as the global information space is polluted with false information and doubts, and provides only challenging avenues for reliable climate reporting, it will be difficult to take the needed actions: both citizens and policy-makers will be impacted. The G20 has started recognising the importance of the issue, notably during Brazil's G20 presidency in 2024. The Global Initiative on Information Integrity on Climate Change launched by the government of Brazil, the UN and Unesco aims to contribute to research, communication campaigns and coordinated actions. The South African presidency should follow in these footsteps and encourage all related negotiation groups to recognise the issue and commit to taking action. Their priorities — solidarity, equality, sustainability — cannot be achieved without addressing the global information space and its harmful effect on public debate. In particular, the Sherpa Tracks Environment and Climate Sustainability Working Group and Just Energy Transitions Workstream are well-positioned to discuss the issues and make information integrity an integral part of policy debates on climate and the environment. G20 actions must investigate and develop solutions to assess the risk of climate and environmental disinformation on policy-making and the policy debate. Particularly in Global South countries, research is insufficient. The G20 should also look into solutions to co-regulate and regulate the digital space, ensuring that platforms' business models do not continue to exacerbate the crisis but contribute to a healthy public debate based on access to reliable information. Moreover, the G20 must address the attacks against environmental journalists and the sustainability crisis of the news media, providing solutions to protect journalists and journalism in the long run. Finally, debates need to consider how to strengthen access to and trust in reliable information on environmental and climate issues. We therefore recommend that the G20 Heads of States' Declaration includes the following statement in their final declaration: 'We recognise the importance of access to reliable, independent and pluralistic information sources on climate change and environmental issues and will bolster our efforts to ensure the safety of environmental journalists, access to scientific and fact-based information online and to address the root causes of climate disinformation and climate change denialism.' The G20 Summit in South Africa could be an important moment to further the protection of information integrity on climate issues. But efforts need to go beyond the G20. Information integrity needs to become an integral part of all climate negotiations, starting with the forthcoming COP30. Only by addressing the information integrity crisis can we establish a global information ecosystem that contributes to a fact-based and healthy debate on climate policy. Katharina Zuegel is the policy director at the , and lead author of the . The is an independent parallel media initiative to ensure issues relating to media integrity and healthy ecosystems are reflected in the policy agenda of the G20.
Mail & Guardian
4 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
Made in China 2.0: Innovation, influence and geopolitics
Made in China' no longer means cheap plastic knockoffs. By 2014 Xiaomi, with its sleek smartphones, was seen as the 'Apple of China'. Photo: File Not long ago, the words 'Made in China' conjured up images of flimsy plastic toys, dodgy electronics and counterfeit designer handbags. For much of the world, it was shorthand for cheap, low-quality goods that generally labelled China as the factory floor of the world, not its innovation lab. Today however, that label appears on drones filming Hollywood blockbusters, smartphones that are increasingly competing with the iPhone and electric vehicles rolling on roads globally. Even the apps we scroll, from Shein to Temu to TikTok, are Chinese creations that have woven themselves into the fabric of everyday life around the world. Somehow, between counterfeit products and next-generation gadgets, China stopped copying the future and started building it. The result? As China's products advanced and improved, so did perception. Not only of Chinese goods but of China itself. China's rise from mass producer to global tech giant did not happen overnight. In the 1990s and 2000s, the country was viewed as a producer of inferior knockoff products, which were mass produced in unregulated sweatshops. The perspective was largely driven by ' Although this market thrived in China and globally, foreign firms were frustrated by intellectual property theft. Chinese authorities, too, were concerned about the effect of the Shanzhai phenomenon, fearing that the country's global reputation would be permanently tarnished. But, by the 2010s, a subtle revolution was starting. Chinese firms began investing heavily in research and development of innovative industries, shifting from the typical low-end manufacturing to high-value tech industries. In 2013, Time magazine ran an article titled reflecting global scepticism. The author, Michael Schuman, argued that 'The country can no longer rely on just making lots of stuff; China has to invent things, design them, brand them and market them. Instead of following the leaders of global industry, China has to produce leaders of its own.' Schuman goes on to add, 'Few emerging nations in modern times have made the leap from assembler to inventor, copycat to innovator.' China did exactly that. By 2014, Xiaomi was commanding headlines as the 'Apple of China', delivering sleek smartphones at a fraction of the cost of its Western counterparts. In 2015, Beijing launched the 'Made in China 2025' initiative aimed at securing the country's position as a global powerhouse in high-value technology, as well as heavily investing in domestic companies, allowing them to compete both locally and globally. Consumer drone company DJI, which makes drones used in Hollywood blockbusters like Shogun and Dune: Part Two , emerged as a global leader in cutting-edge hardware. Today, Huawei smartphones can compete toe-to-toe with Apple on camera benchmark and network performance tests. BYD and Geely are And, perhaps most significantly, ByteDance's TikTok has revolutionised social media engagement with a powerful recommendation algorithm that Western platforms are struggling to recreate. Dominance in other fields, such as high-speed rail, 5G and solar technology infrastructure, shows that China is no longer catching up. It is setting the pace. The evolution, however, has not come without geopolitical tensions. As Chinese products become increasingly used and trusted by consumers globally, they generate soft power for their nation that very few governments can match. One does not need to subscribe to Beijing's ideology to rely on its ever innovative and reliable technology and that directly translates to influence. The rise of China in these industries means different things to different people. In the In the West, however, a strange contradiction unfolds. Citizens continue to embrace platforms like Shein and TikTok, while policymakers are increasingly hostile because of dependency and national security concerns. In some cases, fearing the ideological influence of China through these platforms, Western governments have responded accordingly. Concerns over possible espionage in Huawei's 5G hardware led several states, including the US, to This tension highlights a crucial reality that is happening in front of us — China's technological ascent is no longer just a commercial success story; it is a geopolitical one. As perceptions of China evolve, so will the strategies of nations. The next frontier of geopolitics will not be decided in summits or trade sanctions. It is happening in cyber ecosystems, in the global showrooms of app stores and online platforms. The more the world relies on Chinese tech, the more China's sphere of influence expands. The West may fear ideological influence and data breaches. The Global South may welcome the chance for connectivity and participation. But what is undeniable either way is a perception shift has taken root. Global consumers today, knowingly or not, are casting votes of confidence in China's technological future, and in doing so, are helping shape the map of global influence as we know it. Orefile Babeile is a second-year master's student of international relations at North-West University.
Mail & Guardian
6 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
Africa's youth driving a transformative future
Young people who are pessimistic about their economic futures are unlikely to sit idly by waiting for change. They will demand it. Photo: Nichole Sobecki/AFP Africa's challenges and opportunities are interrelated, as are its past and its future. Meeting them requires holistic and interconnected solutions. Africa must assert its leadership and exercise full agency over its destiny. Africa is the world's youngest continent, home to more than a billion young people, constituting 60% of its population, with this number projected to double over the next quarter of a century. By 2050, one in every four people on the planet will be African. As birth rates decline elsewhere, Africa's youth represents a demographic opportunity and the potential for a powerful force with a multi-layered transformative agenda. They want change, and are driving it from the ground up, pushing the world to re-imagine democracy, development, governance, leadership and institutions at all levels. Open Society has always invested in young people in Africa. Our roots go back 45 years to the height of apartheid in South Africa, when our founder, George Soros, undertook his first major act of philanthropy by funding scholarships at the University of Cape Town. Those students become part of the generation that saw the fall of apartheid and, as the preamble to the 1996 Constitution states, laid 'the foundations for a democratic and open society'. As Open Society's first president from Africa, I'm proud to continue this tradition with the launch of three, multi-year initiatives that invest in the holistic aspirations of an emerging generation for a more inclusive, just and peaceful continent. This work is African-led and born of African realities. It is guided by ubuntu principles — dignity, shared humanity and justice — and rooted in the conviction that communities on the ground are best placed to make decisions about their lives. At a time when many funders are retreating from Africa, we are reaffirming our commitment. The three initiatives — Democratic Futures, Resource Futures and Transformative Peace — address issues that are interlinked. Civic engagement by citizens cannot flourish where communities are trapped in conflicts and subject to exclusion. Peace cannot be sustained without a more inclusive system of governance that also delivers economic justice. And resource wealth, if not managed for the benefit of the people and communities from which it is extracted, can fuel violence, injustice and feed corruption. There are both structural and super-structural factors that underlie Africa's pathway to prosperity and our work centres the democratic developmental role of African states in achieving transformation working in partnership with their citizens. The solutions to Africa's governance, development and security problems offered by the three initiatives are mutually reinforcing, creating a cohesive strategy that shifts power to the people. More responsive and accountable governance enables more inclusive economies — a more equitable distribution of resource wealth weakens the drivers of conflict. And lasting peace allows for more inclusive forms of democratic practice. The three initiatives centre African agency, without ignoring the global inequities and double standards that constrain development such as debt, inequitable risk profiling, unfair trade and punitive tariffs. The global has local impact and the local can reshape the global. The Gen-Z protests in Kenya that began last year have grown into a movement for economic and political justice — one that has sustained its strength in the face of violent state repression and abductions, rather than dialogue and de-escalation. In Senegal, young people were at the heart of a popular movement that resisted repression for two years before sweeping away a president who was determined to extend his rule for a third term. What is striking about these and other movements is that they represent a break from traditional forms of political organising with leadership hierarchies. They come together in digital spaces and manifest themselves in the streets; the repression they face is streamed live and documented. They shun the divide-and-rule carve-ups of their communities, transcending lines that were drawn by ethnicity, religion and region. They are locally rooted in action but have resonance nationally and regionally. While these mobilisations have disrupted the status quo, the path to meaningful political change remains uncertain. There are complexities to youth engagement: some young people embrace activism while others navigate survival in economies that exclude them and many are sceptical of democratic institutions altogether. It is important to harness this passion and energy into the skillsets needed to step into the political leadership of the future. Activism alone does not create change and where institutions are unresponsive to its demands, we have seen frustration, disengagement and even support for military regimes, as in Mali and Burkina Faso. The efforts of young people who aspire to futures centred on the principles of dignity, inclusion and accountability require sustained support to help them move from protests to a trajectory of transformation. West Africa, Ghana and Senegal have recently demonstrated the durability of their democracies — that while transitions of power may be challenging, they can be peaceful. Both democracies can serve as models for regional governance and civic engagement. But they also need support to address the economic challenges that undermine these democracies, particularly the crushing burden of unsustainable debt payments to international financial institutions. These are the consequences of a broken system where indebted African countries are forced to pay high interest rates on their borrowing and inflict austerity that hits the poorest people the hardest. For centuries, Africans were subjected to slavery, racism and colonialism, the impacts of which are still with us today. We are proud to support calls for justice, reparations and cultural restitution to reclaim narratives of identity and memory for people of African descent. As part of these efforts, we have worked with the global reparations movement led by groups across Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean and the US, as well as supporting the work on this front by the governments of Barbados and Ghana. Our second initiative, on Resources Futures, focuses on Africa's potential to leapfrog in its development — and avoid the resource curse. There is a scramble for the critical minerals under its soil, whether it's cobalt in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, lithium in Zimbabwe or platinum in South Africa. These are the coveted raw materials of green energy's future, the batteries that will power electric vehicles, wind turbines and electric grids. For centuries, Africa's resources have been extracted to enrich others and to impoverish its people. That risk is severe at this moment. The countries that hold these deposits are vulnerable to economic coercion, forced into deals made on unjust terms. Many of these countries are weighed down by debt and are desperate for urgent cash. Alone, they do not have the bargaining power to negotiate fair deals for their minerals with big buyers like the US or China. Open Society wants to provide support that enables the supplier countries to build their capacity and competence to be able to negotiate better deals as well as build strong local content policies and capacities to undertake value addition, including through regional value chains. The negotiations around critical minerals will require a wider bargaining bloc, within Africa and beyond it, in other developing countries that face the same challenge. There are imperatives that must anchor such negotiations and the rights and interests of mining-adjacent communities, as well as preventing extraction from becoming exploitation, so that their human rights are respected, the local economy benefits, jobs are created and the environment is protected. The role of communities is also central to our third initiative, on Transformative Peace. The people who suffer in conflict, and are affected by its consequences, have for too long been viewed as objects, not as the agents of peacebuilding. Elite-driven, externally imposed frameworks have failed to rehumanise the victims and survivors of conflict — and they have failed Africa. Lasting peace needs to have a social dimension focused on healing, a political dimension through transitional justice and an economic dimension that creates reparative economies. These three elements, each necessary for the success of the other, are not possible without communities being at the heart of peacebuilding efforts, especially women and young people. Examples of where women have been critical to peacebuilding include Rwanda, Liberia and Sudan. Transformative peacebuilding needs to be bottom-up, not top-down. The infrastructure created by communities who possess the requisite local knowledge and social capital can be scaled up. It can support experts and governments in creating infrastructure across Africa's regions and beyond them — especially at a time when conflicts are intensifying, widening and proliferating. Our work in Africa does not exist in isolation. It is a key part of broader efforts, globally, to help build a more just, inclusive, equitable and peaceful world. One where the local leads to change at national, regional and, ultimately, global level. And one where Africa asserts its place in the world as a continent of leadership, innovation and ideas, forging new paths, discarding outdated systems and redefining its future. Binaifer Nowrojee is the president of Open Society Foundations.
