Bipartisan efforts to expand property tax exemptions face pushback from Mills administration
The Legislature's Taxation Committee hears public feedback on bill proposals in Augusta. (Emma Davis/ Maine Morning Star)
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are trying to expand the state's tax exemption for homeowners. Some want increased exemptions for all Mainers, whereas others want to see expansion for certain groups, including seniors, veterans and those with low incomes.
There is bipartisan agreement that Maine's property tax system needs reform, with legislators saying it was the most common concern they heard on the campaign trail this fall and sharing stories of Mainers who have lost their homes because of the tax. Maine has the highest property tax burden in the country, a statistic Republicans have reiterated throughout the session when voicing opposition to tax increases of any kind.
However, the projected cost of expanding this exemption in any way remains a barrier to change, evidenced by opposition from Gov. Janet Mills' administration during public hearings on the proposals Wednesday.
Currently, the Homestead Property Tax Exemption provides a reduction for property tax purposes of up to $25,000 from the value of a home. In order to qualify, a homeowner must be a permanent resident of Maine, the home must be their permanent residence and they have to have owned a home in the state for at least one year before applying.
The state previously tried to provide tax relief for Maine's oldest residents in 2022.
The Property Tax Stabilization Program allowed those at least 65 years old to freeze their property taxes at the previous year's level regardless of income, as long as they owned a permanent residence for at least 10 years and were eligible to receive a homestead exemption. Mills allowed the law to take effect without her signature.
Taxes take center stage in budget debates
However, the Legislature repealed that program after just one year in effect, following skyrocketing cost projections, concern about wealthy property owners taking advantage due to a lack of income restrictions and the administrative burden it left on municipalities.
While lawmakers last year tried to soften the blow by expanding eligibility to the Property Tax Fairness Credit and creating a Property Tax Deferral Program, the relief from those changes has done little to address the huge property taxes that remain for many seniors, lawmakers argue.
However, some of the tax plans being considered this year borrow from the funding model of the Property Tax Stabilization Program, prompting concern among some who testified.
But while these bills seek to expand the existing exemption, others are eyeing a restructure. For example, the committee will consider a constitutional amendment to allow municipalities to divide taxes on real estate and personal property equally according to their value. A change to the state constitution would require the support of two-thirds of the Legislature to then send the proposal out to voters to ultimately decide.
Sen. Joseph Baldacci (D-Penobscot), along with two other Democratic co-sponsors and one Republican, proposed LD 140, which will increase the tax exemption by $10,000 of the just value of a home starting on or after April 1, 2026.
The increases will stop once the total exemption reaches $95,000, but afterwards the exemption amount would be adjusted annually for inflation.
Baldacci argued that incrementally increasing the tax exemption would be the most fiscally responsible method because it will be more feasible for the general fund to absorb costs.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'By staging these annual increases over a six-year period, we can deliver property tax relief in a completely fiscally responsible manner based on our current state budgetary resources,' Baldacci said.
House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham (R-Winter Harbor) has proposed a smaller overall increase all at once.
LD 658, which has nine Republican co-sponsors, would double the exemption from $25,000 to $50,000 of the just value of the home.
'This disconnect between the rising cost of property taxes and stagnant incomes is putting pressure on homeowners,' Faulkingham said. 'Increasing the homestead exemption would provide much needed relief.'
While the bill as currently drafted states that this change would begin on or after April 1, 2025, the committee discussed pushing that start date back given the quick turnaround it would require, and Faulkingham said he was open to doing so.
'Many residents, particularly seniors and low to moderate income homeowners, struggle with property tax burdens that exceed their ability to maintain or afford their homes,' Faulkingham said.
Those specific groups, as well as veterans, are the focus of the other bills that seek to change this tax exemption.
'Every bill heard today offers the committee potential tools to bring about property tax relief, as has been well established property taxes are on everyone's mind,' said Amanda Campbell, legislative advocate for the Maine Municipal Association, a nonprofit that provides professional services to local governmental entities across the state.
However, Campbell said the association is only supportive of LD 140 and LD 658 because it is opposed to targeting such relief to limited groups.
Three bills seek to increase the tax exemption for seniors, though by different means and to different degrees.
The exemption would increase to $75,000 for residents who are 65 years old or older who have owned a home in Maine for at least 10 years under LD 7, which Sen. Rick Bennett (R-Oxford) proposed along with three other Republican co-sponsors and one Democrat.
'Expanding the homestead exemption, which is a tried and true program that Mainers are already familiar with, simply makes sense,' Bennett said. 'It's administratively very simple.'
Michael Allen, associate commissioner for tax policy for the Maine Department of Administrative and Financial Affairs, said the Mills administration opposed this bill and others because of projected costs it would incur the state and because of the 10-year residency requirement, which he argued could be unconstitutional. That residency requirement had been in the Property Tax Stabilization Program.
Alternatively, Sen. Donna Bailey (D-York) wants to see changes to the tax exemption made at the local level.
Through LD 559, Bailey and six Democratic co-sponsors are seeking to allow municipalities to adopt a property tax stabilization program for their senior residents approved by ordinance.
The Property Tax Deferral Program, which Bailey advocated for last year, is often seen as a last resort for Mainers who cannot pay their property taxes. Bailey described LD 559 as a 'next to last resort.'
Similar to Bennett's bill, a municipality adopting such an ordinance would have to require the person has owned a home in Maine for at least 10 years. However, the age threshold for this bill is anyone who is at least 62 years old.
This bill would allow a municipality to offset the loss of revenue through a local option sales tax approved by referendum. This funding model raised several objections.
Campbell from Maine Municipal Association argued it mimics the model used by the Property Tax Stabilization Program, which was repealed due to insufficient funding.
Linda Caprara, vice president of advocacy for the Maine State Chamber of Commerce, argued the model would result in some municipalities having more funds than others and not account for seasonal fluctuations or unexpected changes such as tariffs and natural disasters.
Rep. Stephen Wood (R-Greene), along with nine Republican co-sponsors, proposed LD 934 as another avenue to provide relief for seniors, as well as veterans.
Currently, the $25,000 exemption must be adjusted by the local certified ratio, generally the percentage difference between the fair market value of a home and the local assessed value.
This means that unless a municipality has a certified assessment ratio of 100%, the exemption is less than $25,000.
Under LD 934, 100% of the exemption amount would be provided regardless of the assessment ratio of the municipality, if a qualified applicant is either at least 65 years old or a veteran. The bill would also require the state to reimburse a municipality for 100% of the revenue lost, compared to the current 76%.
Greene told the Taxation Committee he knows the bill won't pass because of the high cost to the state. In addition to that concern, Allen with DAFS argued this proposal in particular would be administratively complex.
However, Greene emphasized, as many other lawmakers did Wednesday, that his constituents have voiced to him persistent fears of losing their homes due to the high tax burden.
'We have to do something,' Greene said. 'Especially the seniors and veterans who are on fixed incomes.'
Sen. Cameron Reny (D-Lincoln) took a different approach with her proposal to expand the exemption.
LD 570 would provide an additional tax exemption of $75,000 to families and individuals who make below a certain income, bringing the total tax exemption available for those eligible up to $100,000.
The higher exemption would be available to those who made a federally adjusted gross income for the prior income tax year of less than: $200,000 for a married couple filing jointly, $150,000 for heads of household, and $100,000 for single people or couples filing separately.
The Mills administration is also opposed to this plan, with Allen specifically recommending against the eligibility cliffs and estimating the fiscal impact would be an additional burden on the general fund of about $173 million per year.
'I have seen this committee produce really good compromises that can help all Mainers and I also know each committee member here is aware of the current property tax burdens that are causing a lot of stress,' Reny said. 'I offer this bill to you as a possible aide to our constituents, or as a property tax vehicle for the committee to use.'
The Legislature is also considering other tweaks to the Homestead Property Tax not discussed on Wednesday, such as removing the 12-month waiting period. The Taxation Committee already voted down a plan to change the definition of 'homestead' under this exemption law that sought to expand eligibility to irrevocable trusts.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
40 minutes ago
- New York Post
Ted Cruz was with president when Musk's barrage of attacks started: ‘Trump was pissed'
Sen. Ted Cruz was with a fuming President Trump as Elon Musk viciously attacked his former ally online Thursday — with the Texas Republican saying the spat made him feel like he was a kid in the middle of a divorce. 'I was sitting in the Oval as this unfolded. Trump was pissed. He was venting,' the Republican senator revealed on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz' Friday. 'I was sitting there, and the tweets were coming…. Elon was saying some really harsh things.' The SpaceX and Tesla billionaire went on a multi-day social media offensive against Trump, panning the president's 'big, beautiful' reconciliation bill 'disgusting' and urging Congress to kill it. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk fumed after Trump spoke out about the simmering feud. Cruz, who's friends with both former bros, called their very public break-up this week 'incredibly painful.' 'These are two men whom I know very well, they're both good friends of mine,' he said. 3 President Trump and Tesla billionaire Elon Musk came to blows on social media this week, ending their bromance. AFP via Getty Images 'I feel like the kids of a bitter divorce where you're just saying, 'I really wish mommy and daddy would stop screaming.'' 3 Ted Cruz talked about the break-up this Friday on his podcast 'Verdict with Ted Cruz.' Verdict with Ted Cruz/Facebook Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week — with Trump threatening to cancel billions of dollars in government contracts to Musk's companies and Musk claiming Trump was holding out on making the Jeffrey Epstein files public because he's in them. 3 Trump and Musk's tiff escalated later in the week. Getty Images 'It just went from zero to 11 instantaneously,' said Cruz. 'These are two alpha males who are pissed off. And unfortunately, they're unloading on each other … They're angry, it's not complicated.' Cruz and his co-host commented that they thought both men are right — Trump's big beautiful budget bill has to get passed but the government has to tackle the deficit more as Musk argued. 'Unfortunately, Elon is working under the assumption that Congress actually wants to do the job and save our country,' said podcast co-host Ben Ferguson. 'And I think Trump is working under the reality that there's a lot of people in Congress that actually aren't looking out for the American people.' Musk on Saturday deleted his post about the Epstein files in a sign he was ready to throw in the towel. But Trump made it clear he wasn't interested in kissing and making up anytime soon. 'I have no intention of speaking to him,' he told NBC News.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump warns Musk will face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
President Donald Trump vowed his former friend Elon Musk will face 'very serious consequences' should he choose to support the Democratic party following their very public feud. Trump delivered the warning in an interview with NBC News, during which he also said he had 'no intention of speaking to' the tech billionaire any time in the near future, citing the online threats and insults he hurled in recent days. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Trump said Saturday. 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful,' he added. 'You could not disrespect the office of the president.' Asked directly whether he believes their relationship to be permanently over, Trump replied: 'I would assume so, yeah.' The world's richest man backed Trump and Vice President JD Vance in the 2024 election, shelling out nearly $300 million in a bid to land them in the White House. In the months following their win, Musk cemented himself by Trump's side, appearing at press conferences, parties and public events, while professing his 'love' for the president. But relations ruptured between the pair on Tuesday, when Musk ripped into the Republicans' 'Big, Beautiful' budget bill aimed at enacting much of Trump's agenda. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on his X social media platform. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He said the bill would undermine much of his efforts to trim federal spending during his brief period with Trump's Department of Government Efficiency. On Thursday, he then blasted the president and accused him of being an ingrate, saying, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Mere hours later, the SpaceX founder dropped the 'really big bomb' when he alleged Trump appeared in the 'Epstein files,' referring to a trove of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sex trafficking crimes, including those who were involved. That post was deleted Friday night. 'That's called 'old news,' that's been old news, that has been talked about for years,' Trump said Saturday when asked about his reaction to Musk's allegation. 'Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it. It's old news.' The president also fired back in a series of press appearances and social media posts. He threatened to not only terminate Musk's government contracts, but to get rid of his Tesla as well. Sources told NBC News the electronic vehicle is still parked outside of the White House. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to federal contracts with SpaceX. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' As for his budget bill, Trump believes his feud with Musk has actually been positive, telling NBC the Tesla CEO helped bring it to the public's attention. 'I think, actually, Elon brought out the strengths of the bill because people that weren't as focused started focusing on it, and they see how good it is,' Trump said. 'So in that sense, there was a big favor. But I think Elon, really, I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken.'


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers
Trump threatens 'very serious consequences' if Elon Musk finances Republican challengers The threat culminated a week of clashes between Trump and Musk over federal policy. Show Caption Hide Caption Six takeaways from the President Donald Trump, Elon Musk feud From disappointment to threats, here are six takeaways from the public spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Trump told NBC News there would be 'very serious consequences' if Musk financed challenges to Republicans who support his legislative priorities. Musk, who contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans including Trump win the 2024 election, has harshly criticized the legislative package. President Donald Trump said his former adviser, billionaire Elon Musk, would face 'very serious consequences' if he financed candidates to challenge Republicans who support the president's legislative package for tax cuts and border security. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News on June 7. He declined to share what those would be. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that.' The rupture between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man reaches far beyond their own relationship. Musk contributed nearly $300 million to help Republicans, including Trump, win the 2024 elections. He was a special White House adviser recommending ways to dismantle federal agencies and lay off workers. Trump thanked him repeatedly for his service and presented him with a gold key in the Oval Office on May 30. But in the week after, Musk harshly called the House-passed legislative package of Trump's top priorities a "disgusting abomination" and urged lawmakers to kill it, as the Senate debates the measure. In response, Trump has already threatened to cancel Musk's government subsidies for electric carmaker Tesla and contracts for rocket company SpaceX. Trump said he thought Musk turned on him because the legislation would end subsidies for electric vehicles and because Trump discarded Musk's choice to lead NASA. Musk replied by threatening to shut down the Dragon spacecraft program that helps the U.S. transport astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station. Trump has seemingly tried to temper his public comments about Musk, wishing his companies well. But he told reporters on Air Force One on June 6 that retaliation was possible. 'He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look at that,' Trump said. 'Only if it's fair for him and for the country, I would certainly think about it. But it has to be fair.'