logo
Mary MacSwiney by Leeann Lane: A revealing, well-researched and compelling biography of this patriot

Mary MacSwiney by Leeann Lane: A revealing, well-researched and compelling biography of this patriot

Irish Times02-05-2025
Mary MacSwiney
Author
:
Leeann Lane
ISBN-13
:
9781739086381
Publisher
:
UCD Press
Guideline Price
:
€30
In September 1922, amid the Irish Civil War, Sinn Féin leader Éamon de Valera bared his soul to his confidante, the Cork Sinn Féin TD
Mary MacSwiney
.
He told her he was struggling because 'Reason rather than faith has been my master ... I have felt for some time that this doctrine of mine ill fitted me to be leader of the republican party'. MacSwiney retorted that 'Faith and Unreason are not synonymous terms. I plead guilty to the former. I resent the latter.' She praised those who understood 'the Spiritual and psychological aspects of the struggle ... men who BELIEVED in the Republic ... Theirs was the Faith that moves mountains.'
MacSwiney was a titan of that school of faith and this book does justice to the depth of her belief. As a TD, suffragette, educator and tireless republican activist, she was a lot more than the sister of Terence MacSwiney, the Lord Mayor of Cork who died in October 1920 after a 74-day hunger strike in Brixton prison, though Lane underlines the centrality of that event to Mary's life, career and ultimate disillusionment with her peers.
Her uncompromising stance led to her being caricatured as unhinged by her erstwhile comrades. This was unsurprising given the prevailing cultural ethos and fear of loud, assertive and politically charged women; what this book provides, in admirable detail, is a layered overview of what drove her and the perception of her.
READ MORE
The book draws on a wealth of valuable source material, including MacSwiney's collection of papers in the UCD archives. Born in London in 1872 to an English mother, a teacher, and a Cork father, Mary was the eldest of seven children. The family returned to Cork in 1879 where her father started a tobacco business that failed. Education for members of this tight-knit family was a priority (Mary received a BA from UCC in 1912) as was cultural nationalism and for Mary, the Munster Women's Franchise League. She became a teacher in St Angela's Ursuline College but was dismissed from that position in April 1916 due to her central position in Cork's Cumann na mBan (CnB).
Terence was one of the founders of the Cork branch of the Irish Volunteers, but Cork's failure to rise in 1916 in tandem with Dublin was to remain a sore point and some of Mary's snobberies were reflected in her comment to Cork CnB members that it was only 'the scum of Dublin, Larkin's crowd' who fought, an early indication of her penchant for invective.
Nonetheless, she threw herself into prisoner welfare work and opened her own school, St Ita's in Cork, to 'eradicate the slave mind from Ireland'. While deeply committed to Catholicism, she was prepared to challenge religious authority. Her fractiousness was also reflected in post-1916 splits in CnB, some of whose members in Cork saw her as overbearing, one contemporary recalling her being 'very annoyed at her wishes being questioned'.
As a republican activist during that period, she was heavily influenced by Terence and it was his hunger strike during the War of Independence that led to the life she had lived until then being 'viscerally sundered', a trauma illuminated in powerful detail. Lane draws on the memoirs of Mary's sister and fellow activist Annie, who recalled of Brixton prison, 'none of us will ever forget the horror of that place'.
This was political and personal for Mary and in London, she displayed the vigorous energy, resilience, talent for propaganda and rhetoric and disregard for barriers that were the hallmark of her career. She harried officialdom - prison governors, politicians, medical officers and churchmen - and good use is made of British Home Office files to document Terence's demise (in his coffin his body appeared 'like that of a child of twelve') and capture her wrath.
If he were let die, Mary told the home secretary, 'we shall hold you personally responsible for murder'. One medical officer found her to be 'troublesome ... unpleasant and disorderly.' She was successful in ensuring Terence's hunger strike 'reached the world' and this was not unrelated to the shame still felt about Cork's passivity in 1916. Her profile and volubility stood in contrast to Terence's wife Muriel, who struggled with her mental health, and who Mary believed 'had not the inner stoicism of the MacSwineys'.
With the death of Terence, unwillingness to compromise and determination to honour and vindicate his sacrifice defined Mary to an overwhelming degree and the emotional weight of the loss was channelled into spreading the republican gospel. She criss-crossed the United States from December 1920 to August 1921, where she had a powerful impact and honed her speaking skills, taking precedence over Muriel, who also travelled. There is fascinating detail here on the scale of this tour of 58 cities involving more than 300 meetings, fundraising, confronting infighting among Irish-American groups and the struggle to get access to senior American politicians ('Americans like to be flattered and I don't flatter them,' she wrote). She was also elected a Sinn Féin TD in her absence.
One of the values of this book is the extensive documenting of her relationship with de Valera; their letters reveal an intimacy but also her frustration at her lack of involvement in the moves towards a ceasefire and negotiation. She told him in July 1921 she was 'longing for a peep at the inside negotiations', but the Anglo-Irish Treaty, negotiated without de Valera, shattered, in her words, 'the cause for which Brixton was endured'.
Mary became the most vociferous opponent of the Treaty.
She spoke for more than 2½ hours against it during the Dáil debates
. Her speech was, as Lane notes, fanatical; if all the Irish were exterminated, she declared, 'the blades of grass dyed with their blood, will rise, like the dragons' teeth of old, into armed men'. Her words rested on the assertion that Terence's deathbed scene was 'the like of which has never been known in the world before'. She did not care if her constituents were pro-Treaty because she would only adhere to, as she told CnB members, 'the sacred question of principle'. This was also a period that marked a ferocious reaction to her from men such as Dublin TD Batt O'Connor, who decried women 'frothing to the mouth like angry cats'.
For Mary, the Civil War was about reclaiming 'the worth and meaning of her brother's sacrifice'; she was arrested four times and endured two gruelling hunger strikes - the first lasted 24 days - during which she lambasted the Catholic Archbishop of Dublin for the refusal to allow her receive communion. She compared herself to Joan of Arc, and in parallel, spent much time pleading with de Valera to 'stand firm' and 'not break our hearts'.
Her criticisms of Treaty supporters, and indeed its opponents, whom she regarded as not firm enough, became increasingly severe. WT Cosgrave's assertion that her 'ambition is, I believe, to be Queen of Ireland' is seen by Lane as a sexist slur, but it was hardly an unreasonable claim given Mary's language and dismissal of democracy ('we shall win out, even if only a few are faithful'). She was well able to dish out the insults herself, declaring proudly she was 'the most extreme of the extreme'.
This is an intense, revealing, well-researched and often compelling biography. Lane, author of previous biographies of Dorothy Macardle and Rosamond Jacob, has made a profound contribution to our understanding of the republican women of that generation and their intimate and public lives.
This book is, however, somewhat undermined by poor editing, repetition and unnecessary didactic interventions about gender and trauma themes. Readers are well able to see, in the copious contemporary correspondence and commentary the author uncovers, the forces that were at work in relation to how politicised, campaigning women were viewed. They do not need it constantly pointed out to them; likewise, the narrative of Terence's agonising death is gripping and tragic enough without the need for heavy-handed authorial interjections to remind us how it traumatised his family; again, that is painfully apparent in the quoted accounts and their own words.
Mary's mindset led to increasing resentment against her, including from many women; Macardle criticised her 'sense of our moral inferiority'. Loyal to the second Dáil elected in 1921, and anti-Treaty Sinn Féin, she lost her Dáil seat in 1927. There was an inevitable parting of the ways with de Valera, and eventual resignation from senior positions in both CnB and Sinn Féin for their members' perceived compromises in tolerating certain dealings with the Free State she regarded as illegitimate.
She was still desperately pleading with de Valera in 1936, when he was ensconced in power with the Fianna Fáil party she scorned, to 'come back to the Republic before it was too late'. But the response from de Valera was a refusal to engage in a 'futile controversy on matters of past history'. Mary never relented; her constant focus on that history made her increasingly politically marginalised, but this book makes us understand why she would not compromise.
Diarmaid Ferriter is Professor of Modern Irish History at UCD. His most recent book is The Revelation of Ireland 1995-2020 (Profile Books).
Further reading
Margaret Ward's groundbreaking
Unmanageable Revolutionaries: Women and Irish Nationalism (Pluto, 1983), quotes the memorable summing up by Sheila Humphreys of the bleak new Free State dawn for women republican activists: 'We felt the Irish public had forgotten us. The tinted trappings of our fight were hanging like rags about us.'
The long-neglected memoir of another anti-Treaty republican, Máire Comerford's On Dangerous Ground (Lilliput, 2021) was edited by Hilary Dully to preserve the 'authenticity of Máire's voice in the telling of her story'. At the outset of the Civil War Máire wrote, 'I was in a place where there was no need for argument, and among people whose unanimity was like a distilled spirit of highest concentration.'
Síobhra Aiken's Spiritual Wounds (Irish Academic Press, 2022) is also strong on trauma and argues strongly that 'The many voices that broke the silence can no longer be overlooked. Civil wars engender vibrant bodies of competing discourses.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Putin end meeting in Alaska with no deal on Ukraine but insist 'progress' was made
Trump and Putin end meeting in Alaska with no deal on Ukraine but insist 'progress' was made

The Journal

timea day ago

  • The Journal

Trump and Putin end meeting in Alaska with no deal on Ukraine but insist 'progress' was made

DONALD TRUMP AND Vladimir Putin made no breakthrough on ending the Ukraine war at their highly anticipated meeting in Alaska last night. They have indicated they found areas of agreement and improved their relationship at the meeting but offered no news on a ceasefire. After an abrupt ending to three hours of talks with aides, Trump and Putin spoke to media but took no questions from reporters, something highly unusual for Trump. 'We're not there yet, but we've made progress. There's no deal until there's a deal,' Trump said. He called the meeting 'extremely productive' with 'many points' agreed, although he did not offer specifics. 'There are just a very few that are left, some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant,' Trump said without elaborating. Putin also spoke in general terms of cooperation in a joint press appearance that lasted just 12 minutes. 'We hope that the understanding we have reached will… pave the way for peace in Ukraine,' Putin said. Advertisement As Trump mused about a second meeting, Putin smiled and said in English: 'Next time in Moscow.' The two presidents shook hands on the runway tarmac in Anchorage, Alaska. Alamy Alamy Putin told Trump he agreed with him that the Ukraine war – which is of Putin's making – would not have happened if Trump had been US president in 2022 instead of Joe Biden. Trump for his part again complained of a 'hoax' that Russia intervened to help him the 2016 election, a finding which has been backed by US intelligence. Before the summit, Trump had warned of 'severe consequences' if Russia did not accept a ceasefire. But when asked about those consequences during a Fox News interview with Sean Hannity after the talks, Trump said that 'because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that now.' The friendly reception contrasted with Trump's berating of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy when he met him at the White House in February. After the meeting, Trump said he would now consult Zelenskyy as well as Nato leaders, who have voiced unease about his warm outreach to Putin. 'Now it's really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done,' Trump said in the Fox News interview after the summit. Putin warned Ukraine and European countries to 'not create any obstacles' and not 'make attempts to disrupt this emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigues.' Related Reads Trump and Putin shake hands on the tarmac in Alaska ahead of high-stakes Ukraine summit The meeting lasted around three hours. Alamy Alamy Ahead of the meeting, the two leaders arrived in Anchorage, Alaska on their respective presidential jets and descended on the tarmac of an air base, with Trump clapping as Putin appeared. Russia in recent days has made battlefield gains that could strengthen Putin's hand in any ceasefire negotiations, although Ukraine announced as Putin was flying in that it had retaken several villages. Trump had insisted he would be firm with Putin, after coming under heated criticism for appearing cowed during a 2018 summit in Helsinki. While he was traveling to Alaska, the White House announced that Trump had scrapped a plan to see Putin alone and he instead held the talks alongside Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his roving envoy Steve Witkoff. Zelenskyy was not included and has refused pressure from Trump to surrender territory seized by Russia. 'It is time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America,' Zelenskyy said in a social media post. © AFP 2025

Watch: 'Next time in Moscow?' Vladimir Putin asks Donald Trump for next summit
Watch: 'Next time in Moscow?' Vladimir Putin asks Donald Trump for next summit

RTÉ News​

timea day ago

  • RTÉ News​

Watch: 'Next time in Moscow?' Vladimir Putin asks Donald Trump for next summit

Russian President Vladimir Putin invited US President Donald Trump to Moscow for further talks after a summit in Alaska yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine. After the meeting yesterday, Mr Trump told Mr Putin, "I'd like to thank you very much, and we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon." "Next time in Moscow," a smiling Mr Putin responded in English. Mr Trump said he might "get a little heat on that one" but that he could "possibly see it happening".

‘Drastic reduction' in funding for housing scheme will have ‘real and painful consequences' for tenants in Wexford
‘Drastic reduction' in funding for housing scheme will have ‘real and painful consequences' for tenants in Wexford

Irish Independent

timea day ago

  • Irish Independent

‘Drastic reduction' in funding for housing scheme will have ‘real and painful consequences' for tenants in Wexford

Now, following WCC's confirmation that just 20 homes will be purchased under the scheme this year – compared to 35 in 2024 - local Sinn Féin councillor Tom Forde has accused Minister Browne of directly impacting those at risk of homelessness. 'As a public representative for the people of Wexford, I want to express my deep disappointment at the significant reduction in the capacity of WCC to acquire homes under the Tenant-In-Situ scheme in 2025,' said Cllr Forde. 'Under new directives from the Department of Housing, the council is now expected to acquire a possible 20 units in 2025, with some of those acquisitions coming from 2024 applications. "This drastic reduction—potentially more than 50 per cent — is a direct result of diminished funding allocated by the Minister for Housing, James Browne. WCC availed of just over €8m for this scheme in 2024, with funding reduced to just over €6m for 2025. The minister is clearly moving in the wrong direction.' Under the changes to the scheme local authorities and approved housing bodies have been requested to prioritise buying houses for families with children, older people, or people with disabilities. Furthermore, WCC can only enact a purchase in cases where a landlord has issued a no-fault eviction notice with the intent to sell the property. Previously, councils were permitted to buy any property where a tenant was facing eviction due to a landlord selling the property, provided they were in receipt of housing supports like Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) or Rental Accommodation Scheme (RAS). 'This decision will have real and painful consequences for people in our community,' continued Cllr Forde. 'The Tenant-In-Situ scheme has been one of the few effective tools to prevent homelessness and protect renters caught in an increasingly hostile housing market. Reducing its scope at a time when no fault eviction rates remain high is both unacceptable and unjust. 'WCC has worked hard to make this scheme a success, but we cannot do it without the necessary support from central government. The reduction in funding severely hampers our ability to intervene and offer housing security to families and individuals who need it most. I am calling on the Minister for Housing to immediately review this short-sighted decision and restore full funding for the Tenant-In-Situ (TIS) scheme in Wexford and across the country. "We must not turn our backs on those at risk of homelessness. Everyone deserves a secure place to call home.' Confirming that WCC will 'acquire possibly 20 properties' through the scheme in 2025, a spokesperson for the council said, 'We will continue to accept any applications for TIS from eligible applicants who are in receipt of a valid notice to quit (NTQ), however, we are yet to receive confirmation from the department on whether the scheme will continue or if funding will be available in 2026.' Funded by the Local Democracy Reporting Scheme.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store