The Making of HBO Doc ‘The Yogurt Shop Murders' Was So Traumatic That A24 Paid for Film Team's Therapy
The 1991 slayings of Amy Ayers, sisters Jennifer Harbison and Sarah Harbison, and Eliza Thomas mystified police, haunted the victim's families, and eventually became 'part of the fabric of Austin,' according to Brown.
More from Variety
Yance Ford Named Visiting Artistic Director of True/False Documentary Fest (EXCLUSIVE)
Kenny Loggins Says Making a Doc About His Life and Career Was a 'Version of Therapy'
Music Box Films Acquires U.S. TVOD Rights to 'Secret Mall Apartment' Documentary (EXCLUSIVE)
'It's something you can't really get away from in Austin,' said Brown.
Although Brown ('Descendant') knew about the crime, the idea for a four-part docuseries came from Emma Stone and her husband Dave McCary, who used to live in Austin. The couple brought the docuseries to A24 to produce.
Brown spent over three years interviewing the crime's investigative teams and the victims' parents and siblings. The director and her producing team also tracked down interrogation room footage of four teenaged boys who served time for the crime. In addition, Brown interviewed '48 Hours' correspondent Erin Moriarty, who covered the case, and documentary filmmaker Claire Huie, who attempted to make a film about the murders. Huie's abandoned footage, which is featured throughout 'The Yogurt Shop Murders,' included Interviews with the victim's family members, detectives and Robert Springsteen, one of the men who sat on death row for the crime after falsely confessing to participating in the widely publicized killings.
Variety spoke with Brown about 'The Yogurt Shop Murders' ahead of the series' Aug. 3 release on HBO.
One thousand percent yes. I was terrified. I didn't really know what I was getting into, to be honest. I thought, 'Oh, I've made films about deep trauma before.' I mean, a lot of my films are about horrible things that happen to people, but I wasn't really prepared for the unresolved rape and murder of teenage girls, and the effect it continues to have on (the victim's) families. I wasn't aware of the emotional weight of sitting in the rooms with (the family members) for hours at a time would have on me. Then I thought, if I'm having a hard time, just imagine what they are going through. It was just like a loop in my head.
No. I knew from living in Austin and having a lot of friends who are reporters who were utterly obsessed with this case and its twists and turns that it would work.
That footage was a gift. It would have been a different film without it. Claire is an incredible filmmaker, but making the film she was trying to make made her stop being a filmmaker. It consumed her, and she had to quit. Now she's a meditation teacher.
Oh yeah, but he declined.
When the project came to me, I asked what the (archival) footage they had, and so they sent me all this footage. It was like a David Lynch movie as a documentary. It was like 'Twin Peaks.' There was a kind of eeriness to it. I could hear the soundtrack in my head, and I had this whole idea of how I would make the series. Then I met the families, and it was like, 'Oh. I can't make it like that. I can still employ some of it, but it can't be that stylized.' It would have been a disservice to make it overly stylized.
Those photos are so bad. My editorial team was like, 'You can never look at them.' They were all so traumatized by the photos. I've seen some of them, but not all of them, because (the editorial team) said, 'They will haunt you for the rest of your life.' A24 paid for some of (the film team's) therapy because it is really hard on the system if you take it in, and it's really hard not to take it in. It was hard to live in that darkness for such a long time.
It was just really hard for us to make it because it was just so dark, but we thought that the right way to make the series was to look at that. Because everyone has darkness in their life, and everyone deals with trauma. This case is a pretty extreme case of people dealing with trauma, but I felt like there was something instructive about it. Each family dealt with the trauma in really different ways, and I found that fascinating.
Best of Variety
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025
What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shocking verdict out on Tornado Cash case
Shocking verdict out on Tornado Cash case originally appeared on TheStreet. A Manhattan jury found Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm guilty of conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business in a split verdict on Aug. 6, the Inner City Press reported. However, there are still two charges on which they couldn't reach a verdict: money laundering and sanction violations. We will know in the next few days if the Department of Justice (DoJ) will pursue these charges in a new trial. Launched in 2019, Tornado Cash is an open-source, non-custodial, and fully decentralized cryptocurrency mixer that pools different crypto funds together so as to obscure the trail of the money flow. While the authorities have frequently criticized the service for concealing funds belonging to malicious actors, those championing Tornado Cash underline the value of privacy and individual freedom in on-chain witnesses from the prosecutor's side included officers belonging to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service, etc., and hackers, who argued that Storm was competent enough to modify the code to prevent Tornado Cash's misuse by bad actors, but he chose not to act. The defense's side put forth Ethereum core developer Preston Van Loon and NAXO co-founder Matthew Edman, among other experts, who testified in the developer's defense. Storm has been found convicted of the charge of unlicensed money transmitting, which carries a maximum sentence of up to five years in prison. 3 years ago... It was nearly three years ago on Aug. 8, 2022, that the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), a financial intelligence and enforcement agency of the Treasury Department, sanctioned Tornado Cash. It alleged that Lazarus Group, the notorious hacking group linked to North Korea, had used the service to launder stolen crypto assets worth $455 million. The mixer facilitated laundering of assets worth over $7 billion, the OFAC Nov. 20, 2024, a federal appeals court ruled that the Treasury had overstepped its authority while sanctioning the service. Smart contract-based services do not inherently violate laws, the court ruled. On March 21, 2025, the Treasury lifted sanctions against the crypto mixer. However, the case for which the verdict has just come out began on Aug. 23, 2023, when the DoJ charged Storm, along with another Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Semenov, for laundering funds worth more than $1 billion. Crypto community throws support behind Storm So far, Storm has argued that developers should be able to freely write code without fearing consequences due to misuse by any third parties. "If I lose, DeFi dies with me. The dream of financial freedom, the code I believed in—it all fades into darkness. I'm fighting, but the weight is unbearable," Storm wrote on X on June 13 as the trial loomed. The crypto industry has taken the same line of defense. In fact, the idea for Tornado Cash itself had come from Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin himself, who had engaged in discussions around on-chain privacy with Storm. The crypto mixing service runs on Ethereum Virtual Machine-compatible has found support among the ranks of Buterin and the Ethereum Foundation. Supporters raised over $3 million to put up the legal defense. Needless to say, the latest verdict has shocked the crypto community. Bitwise's research analyst Danny Nelson called it "a disaster for DeFi developers." The crucial question still remains if a developer can really control the use of a code or a program by third parties and be held accountable for its misuse. Shocking verdict out on Tornado Cash case first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 6, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 6, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Does More Freedom Equal Less Screen Time? Experts Think So
In a screen time battle, there are no winners. Either you give in and let your kids have way too much screen time, leading to increased mental health problems and other issues, or you strictly control their screens so much that they end up feeling ignored, misunderstood, and babied. It's a lose-lose situation. My oldest child is only 7, and it's already a struggle for my family. But what are we supposed to do? A new study asked experts how to actually lower screen time in kids, and the answer is something that feels completely counter-intuitive: give your kids more freedom. The Anxious Generation author Jonathan Haidt, along with Lenore Skenazy and Zach Rausch, recently partnered with Harris Poll to survey 500 U.S. kids ages 8 to 12 about their phone habits and wrote about the results in The Atlantic. They found that the majority of kids already owned smartphones, with about half of 10-to-12-year-olds reporting that 'most' or 'all' of their friends use social media, despite the minimum age being 13. (Haidt advocates that kids don't have phones until high school and social media until they are 16.) More from SheKnows Gen Z Is Bragging About 'Getting Cracked' on TikTok - & It May Not Mean What You Think Additionally, about 75 percent of kids ages 9 to 12 play the online game Roblox, where they can interact with friends and internet strangers. However, most of the children said they aren't allowed to be in public at all without an adult. Fewer than half of the 8- and 9-year-olds have gone down a grocery-store aisle alone and more than a quarter aren't allowed to play unsupervised in their front yard. When asked how they would prefer spending time with friends, the majority said unstructured play in real life. 'Children want to meet up in person, no screens or supervision,' the authors wrote. 'But because so many parents restrict their ability to socialize in the real world on their own, kids resort to the one thing that allows them to hang out with no adults hovering: their phones.' In fact, nearly three-quarters of kids in the study said they would spend less time online if there were more friends in their neighborhood to play with in person. Kids Want More Freedom Too Members of our SheKnows Teen Council shared how they enjoy stepping away from their phones for hands-on 'adventuring,' such as building a tiki hut, shooting hoops, and connecting with their friends. 'You're going out with your friends, you're finding activities to do, you're exploring, you're building something — it can really be anything,' 16-year-old Clive told us. And as a result? 'You feel double satisfaction. You had fun, and you're proud of yourself for not scrolling on your phone all day.' 'If there's a way that a kid can walk a few blocks to a store and buy something, at age 8, they should be doing that,' Haidt previously told SheKnows. 'And the kids who go out and do something, they come back and they're jumping up and down. They are so excited. It has a huge impact on the kids, but the really important thing is that it has an impact on the parents, because we don't know what the right age is to let them out. We're afraid.' Over-policing of Parents Short of getting in a time-machine and raising kids in the '80s, it's hard to let your kids roam the neighborhood when no other kids are doing it — or parents are watching out the windows and calling the police if they see unsupervised kids out and about. Take this tragedy from a family in North Carolina. Jessica and Sameule Jenkins let their 7-year-old son Legend and 10-year-old son Brandon walk to the neighborhood Food Lion supermarket and Subway sandwich shop, which was less than 10 minutes away from their apartment. In an interview with The New York Times, the parents revealed they were hesitant. 'I really thought against it,' said Mr. Jenkins. He added that he and his wife are 'very protective of our kids.' But they compromised: the boys could walk their if they stayed on the phone with their parents the whole time. 'They made it there safe,' Mrs. Jenkins said. But on the way back, Legend stepped off a grass median and was tragically hit and killed by an SUV driver. Although the driver faced no charges for the incident, the parents were charged with involuntary manslaughter with bail set at $1.5 million each. 'As many parents now control their children's every move, transgressions by parents who take a freer approach — one that used to be normal — can result in criminal charges,' stated the outlet. 'Just because parents don't have their eyes on their kids every single second doesn't mean they are bad parents,' Lenore Skenazy, who chronicles such cases as president of Let Grow, which advocates for more childhood freedom, along with Jonathan Haidt, told the outlet. 'We're blaming these parents, but they've done everything as good as they can for 10 years, and then something terrible happens.' When parents do let kids have more freedom, everyone benefits. How Parents Can Help Screen Addiction A March 2025 Common Sense Media report found that by the time kids are 2 years old, 40 percent have their own tablet. By age 8, nearly 1 in 4 kids have their own cell phone. Overall, 51 percent of children age 8 and younger have some sort of mobile device. And kids ages 5-8 spend about three and a half hours daily on screens. Other studies have shown that kids are addicted to their screens, which interferes with schoolwork, relationships, and life because they only want to be on their devices. Psychologist and author Dr. Becky Kennedy (known as 'Dr. Becky') previously talked to SheKnows about kids and screen time. She reminded us that we have to think about both short- and long-term needs for our kids. 'Sometimes short-term needs are, 'I need my kid to be fully occupied for an amount of time, so I can fill-in-the-blank: decompress, cook, answer emails, work out, have time to myself,' whatever it is. I totally understand this!' she told us. Long term needs might be: ''I want my kid to be able to access their own creativity and turn that creativity into action. I want my kid to learn to be bored, and to wait, and to know that that's part of human existence. I want my kid to learn that hard work and effort is what leads to good feelings, as opposed to only mindlessness and low effort leading to good, exciting feelings.'' '[I]t's not a way of saying long term needs should always trump short term needs,' Dr. Becky clarified. 'It's a way of saying we just need to think about them both.' No one is saying kids can never watch cartoons or play iPad games on a long car trip. But what experts are suggesting is that we also think about how we want to raise our kids to prepare them for the future. Teaching them how to explore and entertain themselves when they're bored. Help them gain skills to be independent and work hard at what they want. And it starts with loosening the leash and giving them a little more freedom. It's like what Clive previously told us. 'I don't know if being on my phone makes me unhappy,' the teen shared. 'But I'm 100 percent sure that when I'm really happy — like during the summer when I have things to do and I'm in my best place — I don't want to be on my phone.' Let's work together to start giving our kids more freedomsBest of SheKnows These Raw & Beautiful Breastfeeding Photos Show There's No 'Right' Way to Nurse 'But I Hate School': What To Do When Your Teen Dreads Going Back Rugged Meets Romantic in These 'Quiet Western' Names: All the Charm, None of the Grit Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mike Colter to Star in Cupertino Legal Drama From Evil's Robert and Michelle King
Mike Colter has reunited with some of his Evil colleagues. Colter will star in Cupertino, a legal drama based in Silicon Valley that hails from Evil's Robert and Michelle King, TVLine has confirmed. More from TVLine Casting News: Logan Marshall-Green Joins Yellowstone Spinoff, The Boys Prequel Cast Expands and More Law & Order Toronto: Criminal Intent Trailer: 'The Dead Do Speak' in Season 1 Sneak Peek (Exclusive) Casting News: Molly Shannon Reunites With Will Ferrell, Trying Adds 5 and More In May, CBS ordered 12 episode scripts for the potential series; it later commissioned a writers' room that is slated to open this fall. Titled after the city that houses Apple's headquarters, Cupertino is described as a 'David vs. Goliath legal show' set in the San Francisco Bay Area's high-tech hub. Dream Roles for Stars of Cancelled Shows View List Colter will play a lawyer fired by a Silicon Valley start-up intending to cheat him out of his stock options. 'Refusing to back down,' the official character description reads, 'he joins forces with another recently fired attorney to represent those taken advantage of by the tech elite, and help them fight back in a high-stakes battle against the Goliaths controlling Silicon Valley.' Fans of the Kings will remember that they also created legal dramas The Good Wife and The Good Fight; Colter appeared on both as Chicago drug lord Lemond Bishop. The Kings are writing Cupertino's pilot script and will executive-produce. Liz Glotzer is also on board as an additional EP. The series is currently slated to make its debut on CBS during the 2026-27 TV season, along with the delayed Einstein. In addition to playing Evil's beleaguered priest David for four seasons, Colter's TV work includes Luke Cage, Jessica Jones, The Defenders, The Following, American Horror Story and Ringer. Has piqued your interest? Let us know in the comments! Best of TVLine Stars Who Almost Played Other TV Roles — on Grey's Anatomy, NCIS, Lost, Gilmore Girls, Friends and Other Shows TV Stars Almost Cast in Other Roles Fall TV Preview: Who's In? Who's Out? Your Guide to Every Casting Move!
