Australia Opens New PNG Naval Base Amid $300 Million Cost Blowout
Labor's Defence Minister Richard Marles confirmed the blowout during a rain-soaked opening ceremony on Manus Island alongside PNG Prime Minister James Marape.
The expansion, now officially His Majesty's Papua New Guinea Naval Base (HMPNGS) Tarangau sits north of mainland PNG and is the largest security infrastructure project Australia has delivered in the region
The project's inflated cost was partly due to the elongated delivery timeline.
'There have been a number of factors which have led to the cost, and part of that is the time that has been taken to deliver the project,' Marles told the ABC.
He cited COVID-19 disruptions and landowner disputes as key causes for the delay.
'But ultimately we're really pleased with what has been delivered—at $500 million this is the biggest infrastructure project that Australia has ever undertaken in the Pacific,' he added.
The redeveloped base includes new working and living accommodation for the PNG Defence Force (PNGDF) and a medical centre for the base and surrounding community.
It also features upgraded water and sewerage systems, enhanced maritime infrastructure, and combined mess facilities for about 200 personnel.
A government statement says the facility will significantly expand PNG's sovereign defence capabilities and allow greater cooperation with Australia through joint training exercises.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Blumenthal calls for firing of RFK Jr. ally over violent rhetoric
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) is demanding Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr 'immediately' fire a key ally from his role as vaccine advisor on a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention panel due to 'escalating and violent' rhetoric in the wake of an attack on CDC headquarters. Blumenthal wrote a letter to Kennedy on Aug. 13 calling for him to fire Robert Malone from the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Blumenthal said Malone 'issued a meme-filled post' on his personal blog 'that included violent and threatening images that appeared to be directed at government officials.' Hours before a gunman attacked CDC headquarters, Malone uploaded a post to his personal blog that included an image of a revolver loaded with a single bullet and the words 'Five out of six scientists have proven that Russian roulette is harmless.' Less than 48 hours after the attack, another of Malone's blog posts included images of guns and meme with the words 'if you need a disarmed society to govern, you suck at governing.' On Aug. 8, a gunman opened fire on the CDC in Atlanta, killing a responding police officer. Officials said almost 500 shell casings were recovered, and about 200 struck six different facilities on the agency's campus. The alleged shooter was motivated by his distrust of the COVID-19 vaccine, according to law enforcement. Kennedy tapped Malone as one of eight hand-picked replacement members of the ACIP in June after firing the 17 sitting panelists. Malone is a former researcher who helped lay the groundwork for mRNA vaccine technology, but has since turned into a self-professed anti-vaxxer, COVID-19 skeptic and close advisor to Kennedy. ACIP is an influential panel that recommends which vaccines go on the childhood and adult schedules after reviewing safety data. If ACIP endorses a vaccine, insurers must cover it. 'Malone has displayed an unfathomable failure of judgment and heartlessness for the family of slain Officer Rose, and for the thousands of CDC staff on whom the work of ACIP depends,' Blumenthal wrote in the letter. 'Dr. Malone's escalating and violent rhetoric—including in the aftermath of this tragic incident—has no place on a panel responsible for determining immunization recommendations for children and adults throughout our country,' he continued, before calling on Kennedy to fire Malone immediately. Malone did not immediately respond to requests for comment. 'Sen. Blumenthal's demand is nothing more than virtue signaling,' an HHS spokesman told The Hill. 'Dr. Malone was selected for ACIP based on his long-standing scientific credentials and we are grateful to him for taking the call to serve. This is not a moment for the media or democratic lawmakers to exploit a tragedy for political gain.'
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Rule by guerrillero: Petro's Colombia is reversing the logic of justice
Former Colombian president Álvaro Uribe was sentenced to twelve years of house arrest earlier this month for alleged bribery and procedural fraud — a sentence he denounced as a political sham. It might just seem like a classic case of leaders weaponizing the judiciary against the political opposition. But it has an even darker twist to it, as the recent shooting death of the main opposition candidate for president, Miguel Uribe (no relation), demonstrates. In a nation now governed by former communist guerrillas, those who once fought against a narco-insurgency are being confined, whereas the kingpins who trafficked the drugs and roiled the nation with violence are being ushered into palaces and introduced into the vocabulary of reform. The threat in Colombia no longer radiates from stateless cartels and guerrilla armies in the jungle, but from Colombia's very presidency. For the U.S., partnership without strategic recalibration is no longer viable. Under Petro, a former M-19 guerrillero, Colombia's Ministry of Justice is giving away the store to his leftist friends and allies who did so much damage during their decades-long insurgency. It has proposed revisions to the 2005 Justice and Peace Law that extend benefits to narco-commanders, urban mafia leaders, and recidivists. Sentences for these would drop to a maximum of eight years, served not in maximum-security prisons but in 'agricultural colonies' — low-security compounds where their paramilitary command structures can persist. Confession and disarmament, once the moral core of these dangerous groups' demobilization, have been displaced by bureaucratic compliance — enrollment in 'territorial transformation' programs and good-conduct certificates. Under Petro, criminality is no longer being dismantled — it is instead being reclassified. The policy's symbolism is as revealing as its clauses. Petro recently shared a state stage with leaders of Medellín's most violent armed groups — some of them escorted from prison, one even addressing the crowd. Several had served five years, making them eligible for release under the proposed framework. To add insult to injury, the proposals would allow narcos who surrender assets to retain up to 12 percent of their ill-gotten gains. This will allow the nation's worst criminals to launder, legally, hundreds of billions of pesos into protected capital, labeled as reparation. Petro got himself elected despite being chummy with these criminals. This year, he made an unannounced visit to Manta, Ecuador — a trafficking hub associated with Los Choneros. Journalists reported a clandestine meeting with that organization's fugitive drug lord. Petro declined to answer questions about it directly and never released his itinerary. Colombian authorities did not investigate. To understand the pattern, one must trace M-19's relationship with drug trafficking. At first, they sought to selectively extort drug traffickers by kidnapping them. When the paramilitary group MAS formed in response to strike back violently, M-19 risked annihilation. So it adopted a strategy of leveraging the narco-economy instead. By 1985, that posture had matured into an alignment. In a covert pact with Pablo Escobar, M-19 received $2 million to storm the Supreme Court and destroy extradition records. Escobar supplied explosives and the late drug lord Fidel Castaño supplied rifles. More than 100 people died, including half of the justices. At that point, the boundaries between insurgency and narco-terrorism collapsed. Their joint logistics reinforced the fusion. They relied on maritime shipments — as on the Karina, one of the rare ships intercepted and sunk, laden with East German rifles. In the 'Zar' case, a Cuban-linked flight carrying armaments was intercepted. These operations, tolerated by Cuba and Nicaragua, brought the Cold War together with the Drug War. M-19 conducted fewer kidnappings than other leftist guerrilla groups like FARC and ELN — not from a sense of ethics, but because their cartel financing and smuggling routes made ransoms obsolete. For decades, Colombia's laws set a logical order: Armed groups had to stop attacks, follow basic humanitarian rules, and commit to compensating victims before the government would formally negotiate with them. Petro reversed that sequence with a series of warrant-suspension orders — first for 19 leaders of a FARC splinter group in March 2023, and later for six Clan del Golfo negotiators in July 2024. Each order paused arrests and extraditions before either group had been granted political status, turning a legal threshold into a discretionary amnesty. Colombia's intelligence service under Carlos Ramón González — now a fugitive believed to be hiding out in Nicaragua thanks to a corruption scandal — functioned less as a coordinator of intelligence and more as a tool of political control. Meanwhile, Petro shifted trillions of pesos to local committees operating in areas where criminal groups are entrenched — outside normal procurement rules. Sold as 'democratization,' this has outsourced authority to para-legal networks, diluting sovereignty where the state is already weakest. For the U.S., the consequences have been immediate. Colombia sits at the center of U.S. counternarcotics policy. If the presidency facilitates trafficking under the false pretext of peace, then the DEA, Justice Department and Southern Command face compromise of their surveillance activity, exposure of their sources, and contamination of their evidence. Cooperation with Colombia today is a liability. Washington has tools to deal with this. The Kingpin Act enables sanctions against those materially assisting traffickers; the alleged $100,000 'peace' entry to obstruct extradition meets that standard. The Global Magnitsky Act covers corruption and obstruction of justice. It authorizes visa bans for officials and relatives on credible evidence, no conviction necessary. The Foreign Assistance Act allows the suspension of aid if a government facilitates trafficking or fails to act; that only requires political judgment, not a court ruling. Petro has not passively tolerated convergence. He has orchestrated it, and people close to him are neck-deep in the corruption. In many regions, the state no longer suppresses but actually franchises armed governance. There are precedents for dealing with such situations. The most dramatic case was the 1989 indictment and ouster of Panama's Manuel Noriega. In a less dramatic case, Tareck El Aissami, Venezuela's vice president, was sanctioned under narcotics authorities. The test is no longer whether Washington can pressure cartels at the periphery, but whether it will use its legal arsenal when the center of impunity is the presidency of a partner state gone rogue.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judges debate Georgia's ban on giving snacks, water to voters
The Brief A panel of federal appeals court judges heard oral arguments over Georgia's ban on providing food and water to voters waiting in line outside their polling place. In 2023, a judge restricted part of the state's election bill, saying that the provision that bars people from offering food and drink within 25 feet of any person in line is probably unconstitutional because that zone is tied to the location of voters. Civil rights groups argue that the law shuts off expressive conduct and violates the First Amendment. The state argued that it was necessary to prevent voter distraction and intimidation. A federal appeals court is debating whether Georgia's ban on providing food and water to voters waiting in line violates the First Amendment. In court on Wednesday, the groups behind the lawsuit asked the panel of three judges to uphold a lower court's ruling that part of the restrictions were probably unconstitutional. The backstory The ban is just one piece of SB 202, a 98-page bill containing dozens of changes to state voting law passed in 2021. Other changes included shortening the time to request a mail ballot, rolling back the COVID-19 pandemic-driven expansion of ballot drop boxes and reducing early voting before runoff elections. Voting rights groups, who have filed a lawsuit challenging multiple parts of the law, argued that the provision infringes on their free speech rights and should be blocked. In 2022, a judge declined to restrict the ban, saying that, while the groups may prevail in part of their challenge, it was too close to the November general election to block any part of the provision. One year later, the judge chose to temporarily block one aspect of the restrictions, saying that the provision that bars people from offering food and drink within 25 feet of any person in line is probably unconstitutional because that zone is tied to the location of voters and could stretch thousands of feet from the polling place. As part of that ruling, US District Judge J.P. Boulee also stopped the requirement that voters put their birthdates on the envelopes of their absentee ballots. What they're saying During oral arguments, the debate centered on whether passing out snacks and water should be protected under the constitutional right to free speech. Attorney Davin Rosborough, who is representing the civil rights groups, told the judges that the sharing of food or drinks was a form of speech. "[The law] absolutely shuts off this form of expressive conduct," he said. "It absolutely prevents the voters." He said that the testimony they provided as evidence showed that the act was encouraging and did not show an attempt to sway voters to any political message. The other side The state had argued that the provision was necessary to protect against conditions at polling places that could raise worries over potential illegal campaigning or voter distractions. "The reason you have a buffer zone is because you don't want a situation where people get in line to vote and they are accosted by a bunch of confusing, distracting, and possibly intimidating things," Solicitor General Stephen Petrany said. He said there was no specific reason that distributing food and drinks would constitute freedom of speech that should be protected. "We want people to be able to stand in line and be basically unobstructed," he said. What's next The arguments are expected to take months before a final decision is made. The Source Information for this article came from oral arguments and previous FOX 5 reporting. Solve the daily Crossword
