Congressman Aderholt issues statement on Social Security Office changes in Alabama
You can read Aderholt's statement below:
'Recent reports about the closure of Social Security offices in Alabama do not tell the full story. While changes are being made, I want to reassure residents that these offices will remain open and continue serving the public as they always have.
It's our understanding the adjustments involve the cancellation of lease agreements for hearing spaces, not the areas used for daily operations. Social Security hearings are now done virtually, and these spaces have not been used for some time, but tax payers were still paying the rent. These changes will not impact residents' ability to access Social Security services at these locations.
It's also important to recognize that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) plays a necessary role in ensuring responsible management of federal resources. However, its actions are not aimed at cutting vital services like Social Security—programs that hardworking Americans have contributed to throughout their lives.
My office remains in close contact with the Social Security Administration to ensure that essential services remain accessible to the people of Alabama. I will continue working to protect these critical programs and advocate for the services our communities rely on.'
U.S. Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL)
Congressman Aderholt is a member of the House Committee on Appropriations, which oversees federal government funding. Each year, he assists hundreds of constituents in Alabama's Fourth District with issues related to Social Security, veterans' benefits, passports, and other federal agencies.
On January 3, 2025, Congressman Robert Aderholt took the oath of office to to serve another two-year term in Congress. He has represented Alabama's 4th congressional district since 1997.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I'm Retired and Regret Moving To Hawaii — Here's Why
Every year, Americans dream of retiring on the Hawaiian Islands. Many imagine living out the rest of their lives in an island paradise. That dream sounds perfect, but real experience can sometimes lead to the opposite of what was expected. Bob Haber knows this reality better than most people. Check Out: Read Next: Haber is retired and was a former resident of Pearl City, Hawaii. In his story, posted on the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, he shared: 'We moved to Hawaii in 1966 when I had finished sixth grade. I lived there until my second year of college, then went to the mainland for school. After so many years away, I retired in 2009 and moved back to the islands, only to finally leave in 2018 for good.' Although he loves culture and the people, Haber left Hawaii for these reasons. Cost-of-Living Shock 'The cost of living in Hawaii was too high for me,' Haber explained. According to CNBC, people need $2.21 million saved by age 65 just to cover basic living costs for 25 years in Hawaii, more than any other state in the U.S. This figure means everything — housing, groceries, transportation and medical care are twice or three times the average in other states. Most retirees in Hawaii must adapt to sharply higher prices or simply leave. Everything from food to electricity comes at a premium. Average home prices are more than $850,000, nearly double the price on the U.S. mainland. Discover More: What About Taxes? Haber pointed out another problem: Taxes are rising — in part to support the Honolulu rail project. This is a public works plan that keeps going overbudget and shows no sign of stopping, per a Civil Beat report. 'Taxes are crazy, and going up because of the rail, and politicians don't care and look at everybody else as if they are the problem,' he said. Retirement taxes in Hawaii come as a surprise for mainlanders expecting a better deal. Hawaii exempts some pension income and all Social Security earnings, making taxes manageable for some. However, most withdrawals from IRAs or 401(k)s end up being taxed at high state income tax rates, which can catch many retirees off guard. The top rate can climb as high as 11% on retirement distributions. Paradise Comes at a Price Living in Hawaii does mean daily exposure to world-class culture and stunning natural beauty. According to Haber, 'Otherwise, I love the culture, the grinds, the people and the aina!' Many Americans deeply value this aspect of island life, and the emotional pull of staying there to enjoy it runs strong. Still, reality can outweigh nostalgia for people on a limited income. According to Visual Capitalist, retirees in Hawaii spend nearly $130,000 per year to maintain the same lifestyle that costs only $52,000 in the most affordable U.S. states. This gap is too wide for many, despite the sunshine and scenery. More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact RetireesThe New Retirement Problem Boomers Are Facing This article originally appeared on I'm Retired and Regret Moving To Hawaii — Here's Why Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Syrian, Israeli diplomats met in Paris to discuss 'de-escalation': report
Syria's foreign minister met with an Israeli diplomatic delegation in Paris on Tuesday to discuss "de-escalation and non-interference in Syria's internal affairs", state news agency SANA reported. The latest in a series of US-mediated talks resulted in "understandings that support stability in the region", the agency said. Washington has been at work in recent weeks to try to resolve security issues in Syria and Lebanon, which its ally Israel says have prompted it to take military action. Despite a truce reached last November, Israel has continued to hit targets of the Iranian-backed Hezbollah group in Lebanon, and it has occupied territory and hit targets across Syria since last year's fall of dictator Bashar al-Assad. Tuesday's meeting in Paris follows one between Syrian Foreign Minister Assad al-Shaibani and Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer in Baku in late July, and another meeting in Paris before that. Israel and Syria have technically been at war since 1948, and the talks also discussed reviving a disengagement accord from 1974 that created a buffer zone between the two countries. "These talks are taking place under US mediation, as part of diplomatic efforts aimed at enhancing security and stability in Syria and preserving the unity and integrity of its territory," the agency said. The recent meetings between the two countries come after deadly sectarian clashes in July in southern Syria's Druze-majority Sweida province which left over 1,400 people dead. The clashes initially pitted local Druze fighters against Sunni Bedouin tribes but soon saw the involvement of Syrian government forces and Israel, with the latter saying it wanted to protect the Druze. Last month, Israel struck the Syrian presidential palace and the army headquarters in Damascus. The United States, an ally of Israel but who has expressed support for Syria's new leaders, announced a ceasefire between the two sides overnight on July 18. bur-lk/emp/rmb/gv/sla
Los Angeles Times
36 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump is undermining California's EV goals. The state has a new plan to fight back
From Donald Trump's first day back in office, he vowed to unravel California's sway over the nation's auto-emission standards by eliminating the state's progressive zero-emission mandates. He made good on that promise within the first several months of his second term. After a series of controversial congressional votes in May, Trump signed legislation that effectively nullified several of California's auto-emission standards, including the state's landmark regulation to ban selling new, gas-only cars statewide by 2035. Several weeks later, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order reaffirming California's commitment to its emissions goals, and effectively sending state agencies back to the drawing board in light of a newly antagonistic federal government. Their task: to reassert California's climate leadership and identify policies to boost zero-emission vehicle sales. At stake isn't just sales numbers for car and truck manufacturers, but California's ambitious climate agenda and the health of millions of its residents. Without the federal rebates and subsidies to support widespread adoption electric vehicles, the state will almost surely fall short of its greenhouse gas reduction targets and remain in violation of federal air quality standards. Unless, that is, Sacramento steps in, in a big way. On Tuesday, state officials delivered an eight-page report to the governor's office detailing several strategies to do just that. It focuses on boosting zero-emission vehicle adoption and reducing tailpipe emissions in communities dealing with some of the nation's worst air quality and most rapidly intensifying effects from global warming. In Southern California, alone, about 1,500 residents die annually due to exposure to unhealthy levels of air pollution, according to Liane Randolph, chair of the California Air Resources Board, one of the agencies that authored the report. 'Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,' Randolph said. 'California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health. We have a legal and moral obligation.' The report comes amid a statewide slump in electric vehicle sales, expiring federal clean-vehicle subsidies and widespread economic uncertainty from Trump-imposed tariffs. In the document, California officials argued that one of the most important ways to counteract federal actions is to find state funding to restore subsidies for zero-emission vehicles. Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' will end federal tax credits for zero-emission vehicles — up to $7,500 for car buyers — on Sept. 30. Because electric vehicles generally cost more than their gas-powered counterparts, government incentives were critical in encouraging Americans to buy cleaner cars. Not long after Trump's election, Newsom committed to restore funding for a state rebate program if Trump eliminated the federal tax credit. The previous state program, which ended in 2023, provided $1.49 billion in funding for more than 594,000 electric, hydrogen or plug-in hybrid vehicles, according to the state Air Resources Board. That offered thousands of consumers up to a $7,500 rebate for purchasing or leasing a new zero-emission vehicle or plug-in hybrid, and the initiative prevented drivers from burning more than 456 million gallons of fuel, according to estimates. A new round of state subsidies for zero-emission vehicles would likely require state lawmakers to introduce new legislation or to create a specific allocation for that purpose in California's budget bill next year. Daniel Villasenor, a spokesperson for Newsom's office, said the state's cap-and-trade program — the state's leading climate program that generates $4 billion annually — could be the source of new zero-emission vehicle incentives. 'The Governor and his team are reviewing the recommendations set forth in the report,' Villasenor said. 'As the Governor said when he signed the executive order, California will continue our world-leading transition to cleaner cars.' Last year, more than 1.75 million new cars were sold in California; over 25% of those were zero-emission or plug-in hybrids, according to state data. As of June 30, about 900,000 cars have been sold in 2025, and 22.3% are zero-emission or plug-in hybrids. Tesla registered only 76,000 new cars statewide, well off its pace last year, when it sold around 200,000. Adrian Martinez, director of the nonprofit Earthjustice's 'Right To Zero' campaign, said government subsidies are critical for California to not only meet its clean air and climate goals, but to also stay economically competitive. 'It's smart for California to think about how they can [counteract] some of the reckless behavior of the federal government,' Martinez said. 'It's incredibly important right now, because there's huge environmental need for these zero emission vehicles. But there's also huge economic benefits from facilitating and advancing electric vehicles, including a lot of jobs in California.' State officials have advised the governor's office to consider other financial inducements to zero-emission drivers, such as free or reduced costs to drive in lesser-congested toll lanes on California highways. Electric car owners, who are permitted to drive alone in carpool lanes with a state-issued decal, are poised to lose privileges on Sept. 30 without federal authorization. The report calls on the California Public Utilities Commission to explore financial incentives to make electric-vehicle charging less expensive as electricity prices have risen substantially. It also broadly proposes expanding and maintaining the state's electric-vehicle charging networking, which has been plagued by broken charge ports, long wait times and too few stations. In addition, state officials stressed the need to lead by example. The state operates a fleet of more than 35,000 vehicles, and it is essential, the report says, that new vehicles purchased be zero-emissions. 'One of the opportunities is whether or not the state fleet might be able to move even faster [than our requirements],' Randolph said. 'I think it's a wonderful opportunity for sate fleets to show how zero-emission vehicles can be deployed.' Beyond incentives and demonstrating its own purchasing power, environmental advocates say California and local regulators must continue to adopt innovative regulations within their own authority. California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta sued the federal government moments after Trumped signed legislation that overturned California's auto emissions standards, including the Advanced Clean Cars II — the regulation that which would have banned the sale of new gas-only cars by 2035. As Bonta continues to fight for the landmark rule, Newsom's executive order in June instructed the California Air Resources Board to begin drafting the state's next major regulation in the coming months: Advanced Clean Cars III. There aren't specifics, at this point, so it's unclear if it is intended to build on existing regulation or act as an alternative measure if Trump succeeds in defeating Advanced Clean Cars II. In either case, state officials are signaling that California does not intend to shelve its environmental agenda. 'The world is accelerating forward toward cleaner vehicle technologies, and is going to watch the U.S. fade into the rearview mirror because this administration is choosing to quit the race,' Randolph said. 'This report shows California is still going to keep up the momentum.'
