Posture Pandemic Declared as 1 in 3 Australians Now Suffer Chronic Neck Pain, Reports North Shore Family Chiropractors
SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA, July 20, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- North Shore Family Chiropractors has released a new analysis revealing a marked rise in chronic neck pain across the Australian population. One in three adults now experience ongoing symptoms linked to cervical spine dysfunction. The trend is being described by health experts as a 'posture pandemic,' reflecting the widespread nature of this emerging issue and its growing impact on daily life, productivity, and national healthcare costs.
The condition affects a broad demographic, spanning students, office workers, manual laborers, and adolescents. Lifestyle factors such as prolonged digital device use, sedentary routines, and elevated stress levels are cited as key contributors. The average working adult in Australia spends approximately 6.8 hours per day looking at screens, contributing to forward head posture and tension known as 'tech neck.' Extended time in fixed positions, especially with poor ergonomic setups, places sustained strain on the neck, upper back, and shoulders, leading to muscular imbalances, joint misalignment, and chronic pain patterns.
The report outlines several underlying causes of the condition. Poor workstation design, unsupported furniture, and lack of regular movement contribute to mechanical stress in the cervical spine. Mental stress and elevated workloads increase muscle tension, particularly in the neck and shoulders, compounding physical strain. Decreased physical activity reduces muscular support in postural stabilisers, weakening the spine's ability to absorb mechanical load. These factors together form a cycle that can evolve from temporary discomfort into long-term musculoskeletal disorders.
Dr Darren Leukefeld, principal chiropractor at North Shore Family Chiropractors, reports a significant rise in patients presenting with related symptoms, some as young as 14 years old. Persistent neck pain is no longer confined to older adults or those with previous injury. The shift in population-level habits and physical patterns has created new risks across age groups, occupations, and lifestyles. Without intervention, individuals may face long-term effects including recurring migraines, nerve compression, restricted mobility, and related mental health challenges.
In addition to the human toll, chronic musculoskeletal issues present a financial challenge. Current estimates place the cost of these conditions at over $55 billion annually in Australia, with neck pain contributing to lost productivity, increased absenteeism, and long-term disability claims. The cumulative effect on both the healthcare system and the workforce underscores the urgency for early recognition and targeted intervention.
North Shore Family Chiropractors emphasises the importance of postural awareness and preventative care. Early identification of symptoms and professional assessment are critical in reducing long-term complications. Simple changes such as improved ergonomics, regular stretching, movement breaks, and spinal health assessments may reduce the risk of progression. The clinic encourages individuals, employers, and educators to consider the long-term implications of sedentary routines and take proactive steps to address them.
To learn more about contributing factors and available management options, visit North Shore Family Chiropractors' educational guide Neck Pain: Causes, Symptoms, and Chiropractic Care for Relief.
Website: https://northshorechiro.com.au/
Helen
North Shore Family Chiropractors
[email protected]
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
6 hours ago
- New York Times
UnitedHealth's Profits Fall as Costs of Care Continue to Rise
UnitedHealth Group, the giant health care conglomerate, said on Tuesday that it continued to struggle with higher-than-anticipated costs of providing medical care to patients enrolled in its health plans, reporting a drop in earnings for the quarter ended June 30. While UnitedHealth remained profitable, its operating earnings for the three months fell to $5.2 billion from $7.9 billion in the same period of 2024. Revenues, however, increased to $111.6 billion for the three months of 2025, compared with $98.9 billion for the same period of 2024. The higher costs were felt across the company's vast health insurance operations, including one of its most successful businesses, selling private Medicare plans as an alternative to traditional Medicare. UnitedHealth owns the nation's largest health insurer, UnitedHealthcare, which covers 50 million people. Other insurance companies have also reported rising medical costs and disappointing profits. Last Friday, Centene, a for-profit insurance company that focuses mostly on patients who are enrolled in Medicaid and Obamacare plans, was the latest insurer to blame rising expenses for poor financial results. But UnitedHealth's stumble, which began earlier this year, has shocked many of its investors who have come to rely on steady increases of profits from the conglomerate. Since November, the company's stock has lost roughly half of its value. The company owns an assortment of health care businesses, including surgery centers, a vast network of medical practices, and a big pharmacy benefit manager as well as health insurance plans. In the new earnings report, UnitedHealth acknowledged that many of the businesses housed under its Optum unit were also underperforming, including its network of physicians and other clinicians who provide care under the privatized portion of the Medicare program, known as Medicare Advantage. UnitedHealth has experienced a series of misfortunes over the last two years, including the murder of the chief executive of its insurance operations, Brian Thompson. Investors have lost confidence in the company's business model, and patients have grown increasingly frustrated with its methods. In May, it abruptly replaced its chief executive, Andrew Witty, with Stephen Hemsley, who had stepped down from the position in 2017. Last week, the company confirmed the Department of Justice was investigating its Medicare operations. UnitedHealth announced its earnings before the stock market opened. Mr. Hemsley took steps to reassure investors. The company, which had withdrawn its profit outlook for the year, provided investors with an estimate of what it expected to earn for 2025. It estimated revenues of slightly under $450 billion with net earnings of at least $14.65 per share. The company said it expected to return to earnings growth in 2026. 'UnitedHealth Group has embarked on a rigorous path back to being a high-performing company fully serving the health needs of individuals and society broadly,' Mr. Hemsley said in a statement in the company's earnings release. 'As we strengthen operating disciplines, positioning us for growth in 2026 and beyond, the people at UnitedHealth Group will continue to support the millions of patients, physicians and customers who rely on us, guided by a culture of service and longstanding values.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Castle Biosciences to Present at the Canaccord Genuity 45th Annual Growth Conference
FRIENDSWOOD, Texas, July 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Castle Biosciences, Inc. (Nasdaq: CSTL), a company improving health through innovative tests that guide patient care, today announced that its executive management is scheduled to present a company overview at the Canaccord Genuity 45th Annual Growth Conference on Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025, at 12:30 p.m. Eastern time. A live audio webcast of the Company's presentation will be available by visiting Castle Biosciences' website at A replay of the webcast will be available following the conclusion of the live broadcast. About Castle BiosciencesCastle Biosciences (Nasdaq: CSTL) is a leading diagnostics company improving health through innovative tests that guide patient care. The Company aims to transform disease management by keeping people first: patients, clinicians, employees and investors. Castle's current portfolio consists of tests for skin cancers, Barrett's esophagus and uveal melanoma. Additionally, the Company has active research and development programs for tests in these and other diseases with high clinical need, including its test in development to help guide systemic therapy selection for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis seeking biologic treatment. To learn more, please visit and connect with us on LinkedIn, Facebook, X and Instagram. DecisionDx-Melanoma, DecisionDx-CMSeq, i31-SLNB, i31-ROR, DecisionDx-SCC, MyPath Melanoma, TissueCypher, DecisionDx-UM, DecisionDx-PRAME and DecisionDx-UMSeq are trademarks of Castle Biosciences, Inc. Investor Contact:Camilla Zuckeroczuckero@ Media Contact:Allison Marshallamarshall@ Source: Castle Biosciences while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Medscape
7 hours ago
- Medscape
Doctors' End-of-Life Choices Break the Norm
A new survey revealed that most doctors would decline aggressive treatments, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), ventilation, or tube feeding for themselves if faced with advanced cancer or Alzheimer's disease, choosing instead symptom relief and, in many cases, assisted dying. 'Globally, people are living longer than they were 50 years ago. However, higher rates of chronic disease and extended illness trajectories have made end-of-life care the need for improved end-of-life care an issue of growing clinical and societal importance,' the authors, led by Sarah Mroz, PhD, a doctoral researcher with the End‑of‑Life Care Research Group at Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, based in Brussels and Ghent, Belgium, wrote. Physicians play a critical role in initiating and conducting conversations about end-of-life care with patients, whose deaths are often preceded by decisions regarding end-of-life practices. These decisions may include choosing to forgo life-prolonging therapies or opting for treatments that could hasten death. Such choices have a significant impact on individuals, families, and the healthcare system. 'Since physicians have a significant influence on patients' end-of-life care, it is important to better understand their personal perspectives on such care and its associated ethical implications. However, existing studies on physicians' preferences for end-of-life practices are outdated and/or focus on a narrow range of end-of-life practices. Additionally, knowledge on whether physicians would consider assisted dying for themselves is limited, and no international comparative studies have been conducted,' the authors wrote. To address this gap, the researchers conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1157 physicians, including general practitioners, palliative care specialists, and other clinicians from Belgium, Italy, Canada, the US, and Australia. Physician Choices Physicians were surveyed regarding their end-of-life care preferences in cases of advanced cancer and end-stage Alzheimer's disease. Over 90% preferred symptom-relief medication, and more than 95% declined CPR, mechanical ventilation, or tube feeding. Only 0.5% would choose CPR for cancer and 0.2% for Alzheimer's disease. Around 50%-54% supported euthanasia in both cases. Support for euthanasia varied by country, from 80.8% in Belgium to 37.9% in Italy for cancer and from 67.4% in Belgium to 37.4% in Georgia, US, for Alzheimer's disease. 'Physicians practicing in jurisdictions where both euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are legal were more likely to consider euthanasia a (very) good option for both cancer (OR [odds ratio], 3.1) and Alzheimer's disease (OR, 1.9),' the researchers noted. The results show how laws and culture shape end-of-life choices. Practice Gap The article highlights a striking disconnect: While most doctors would refuse aggressive interventions for themselves at the end of life, such treatments are still commonly administered to patients. What explains this gap? 'The gap between doctors' preference for comfort-focused care for themselves and the aggressive treatments they often provide to patients highlights a deeper conflict between personal understanding and professional obligation,' said Andrea Bovero, psychologist at the University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza and faculty member in the Department of Neurosciences at the University of Turin, both in Turin, Italy, in an interview with Univadis Italy , a Medscape Network platform. Physicians, he explained, understand the limits of medical interventions and their real impact on quality of life due to their training and experience. 'When they become patients themselves or must make decisions for loved ones, they tend to choose less invasive options — prioritizing quality of life over simply extending it,' he added. However, the situation changes when treating patients. Doctors operate within a system that rewards intervention, action, and a 'fight the disease' mindset — often under pressure from families who want every possible option pursued and from the fear of appearing negligent to the patient. 'There's also the fear of legal consequences,' Bovero said. 'This drives a defensive approach to medicine, where taking action feels safer than choosing not to intervene.' According to Bovero, who was not involved in the study, bridging the gap between what doctors would choose for themselves and what they offer their patients requires a broader rethinking of the healthcare system. 'We need new cultural models, medical education that centers on the individual and the ethics of boundaries, and a healthcare system that prioritizes listening and support,' he said. Rethinking the Role of Death Deeper cultural factors influence the choice of end-of-life care. 'In many Western societies, death is still seen as a failure — even in medicine,' Bovero said. This mindset, he explained, contributes to the avoidance of honest conversations about dying and a preference for treatments that delay or deny death. As a result, physicians are often caught between what they know is clinically appropriate and what social or institutional norms they are expected to follow. 'Regulatory frameworks play a major role in defining what is considered possible or acceptable in end-of-life care,' Bovero said. He emphasized that clear, shared laws on practices, such as deep palliative sedation or euthanasia, could give physicians greater freedom to express and follow care decisions focused on patient comfort and relief. 'In countries where the law explicitly supports patients' rights to palliative care, informed consent, and advance directives, physicians are better positioned to align care with patient values,' Bovero noted. For example, Italy's legislation ensures access to palliative care and upholds the right to refuse treatment or plan future care, which promotes dignity and autonomy at the end of life. Individualized Care Good care doesn't always mean curative treatment; it often means focusing on quality of life,' Bovero said. He noted that this mindset becomes evident when healthcare professionals, as patients, opt for palliative care. However, he cautioned that physicians' personal preferences shouldn't be applied as a universal standard, because 'every patient has unique values, priorities, experiences, and goals that must be acknowledged and respected.' Placing the individual at the center of care is fundamental. Bovero emphasized that good clinical practice involves tailoring medical knowledge, evidence, and even a clinician's personal insights into the specific needs of each patient. Good communication between doctors and patients is key to providing thoughtful care to patients. From the beginning, there should be open, honest discussions between healthcare providers, patients, and families. It is not enough to list treatment options; doctors need to understand what truly matters to the patient, including their fears, desires, and values. This kind of communication requires time, empathy, and real listening qualities that are often overlooked in health systems prioritizing efficiency and technical fixes. 'When doctors and patients connect not only on a medical level but also around personal meaning and existential priorities, care becomes truly personalized,' Bovero said. His research, published in the Journal of Health Psychology , highlights the importance of addressing patients' spiritual needs and encouraging providers to reflect on their own spirituality to improve support for people at the end of life.
