South China Sea: Asean, Beijing need recalibrated approach to reach binding code of conduct
South China Sea have heightened insecurity in the
Indo-Pacific , with claimant nations pursuing diplomatic and legal resolutions, including arbitration, while non-claimant states have advocated for freedom of navigation and compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos).
Advertisement
Over the years,
Asean and
China have sought to maintain peace and stability by resolving long-standing territorial disputes peacefully, first with the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea in November 2002, and later through negotiations for a Code of Conduct (COC) framework adopted in August 2017.
However, a serious gap remains between the diplomatic efforts and the complex reality of drafting the binding COC.
Since negotiations started in March 2018, there have been no apparent breakthroughs for early conclusion of the COC. As a result, this lack of progress jeopardises the credibility of Asean and China, increasing tensions and the potential for conflict.
Although there was reason for optimism following the third reading of the Single Draft COC Negotiating Text, the Asean Foreign Ministers' Retreat held on January 19 in Langkawi,
Malaysia reiterated the importance of maintaining positive momentum towards the early conclusion of an effective and substantive COC that is in accordance with international law, including the 1982 Unclos treaty.
Advertisement
A revised strategy will be essential for progressing COC negotiations to more effectively address conflicting sovereignty claims among the claimants; otherwise, the dream of an effective binding code will remain problematic and elusive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
14 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Thai military shows what it says are landmines found on Cambodia border
Read more about this: The Thai army invited the media and Asean military attachés on August 20, 2025, to observe an area where it said landmines were planted by Cambodia. Four Thai soldiers have been injured by landmines near the Thai-Cambodia border over the past month, with the latest incident reported on August 12. The landmine controversy follows a ceasefire between the Southeast Asian neighbours reached in July following a deadly five-day conflict.
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- South China Morning Post
As the US and China compete, Asean could play arbiter
As Asean celebrates its 58th anniversary, it is inhabiting a liminal moment, one that straddles the unmarked border between two international eras. One era is lingering but on its way out as another is hobbling its way in. The Cold War is long gone and the subsequent period of American unipolar primacy is drawing to a close, albeit without a new global order to replace it. The great powers are in the throes of an inevitable transition. The United States and China each believe that history is on its side. Southeast Asian countries do not believe that the global highways of military and financial power have bypassed the US forever or that they should put all their eggs in China's basket. History is still in flux. The rules-based global order is like a highway under tensile stress, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region, perhaps the most congested junction on the highway between the US and China. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations stands at the heart of that junction. The safety of the highway depends on its structural integrity. The safety of regions along the highway depends on great powers following the rules of the road. However, there is no longer one set of rules. The traffic laws of international affairs now have many different interpretations. Increasingly, the US and China insist on adherence to a rules-based order on their own respective terms and for their respective interests. Interpretations must be reconciled so international traffic can flow safely and smoothly. Asean can encourage both sides to adopt a common highway code for mutual security. Of course, Asean is no global policeman. But it's precisely because Asean poses no economic, political or military threat to either the US or China, or to anyone else, that it can act as an informal and impartial interlocutor between the two great powers. That should be Asean's diplomatic purpose: to be an arbiter in the Indo-Pacific region. Southeast Asia is still a price-taker in international relations. However, the escalating Sino-US rivalry has turned the world from a seller's market into a buyer's one. The more intense that rivalry gets, the more that great powers feel the need to 'sell' themselves to others.
AllAfrica
3 days ago
- AllAfrica
Malaysia's bow to Moscow looking like a Faustian pact
Two weeks ago, Malaysian King Sultan Ibrahim Iskander embarked on his maiden trip to Russia at President Vladimir Putin's invitation, marking the first such visit by a sitting monarch ever since Malaysia formally established diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union in April 1967. His six-day exploratory tour of Moscow and Kazan came just three months after Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim had visited the Russian capital to drum up support for Malaysia's BRICS accession bid, strengthen people-to-people cooperation, boost direct air connectivity and attract greater foreign direct investment (FDI) from the Kremlin. Kuala Lumpur currently chairs the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) bloc with which dialogue partner Russia has, in recent years, sought to bolster both commercial as well as cross-cultural engagement given its declining influence across Central Asia and the South Caucasus. If anything, the Russian elite considers Southeast Asia an extension of Moscow's 'near abroad' or 'backyard.' The region's predominantly semi-authoritarian regimes feel a certain kinship with wartime Russia and, in particular, Putin, who they view as an anti-imperialist crusader trying to cut the collective West down to size. Yet for Anwar – a lifelong Islamist zealot garbed in reformist wares – the Hamas-led massacre on October 7, 2023, that left 1200 innocent Israeli civilians dead was a cue to reorient Malaysia towards Russia, China and BRICS writ large. Notwithstanding the roughly 1.3 million Russian speakers living in Israel as dual citizens and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's personal friendship with Putin, the Kremlin adopted an overtly pro-Palestine posture following Operation Al-Aqsa Flood to appease Muslim-majority states and give wind to his multipolarity push. As a guest of honour at the 2024 Eastern Economic Forum (EEF) in Vladivostok, Anwar used the platform to malign Western countries for their wilful blindness vis-à-vis the ongoing Gaza conflict while moving heaven and earth to rally the international community behind Ukraine. India's Minister of External Affairs S. Jaishankar cast similar aspersions on the EU's selective outrage and rank hypocrisy regarding the Russo-Ukrainian war when he argued how 'Europe's problems are the world's problems, but the world's problems are not Europe's problems' at the 17th GLOBSEC Forum in Bratislava, Slovakia. Russia, for its part, is more than happy to let this narrative of 'Western double standards' take root in the Global South, not least because it thrusts disaffected developing nations into the Greater Eurasian nexus. Beyond its unwillingness to denounce Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine or participate in Group of Seven (G7) sanctions against the Kremlin, Malaysia has allowed Moscow to obfuscate and stonewall its way out of accountability for the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) in mid-2014 that killed all 298 passengers on board. Having been involved in frontline Malaysian politics for nearly four decades, it is no secret that Anwar has the king's ear and likely convinced him to pay an official courtesy call on Putin earlier this month. What remains unclear, however, is the horse trading that went on behind the scenes and, more importantly, the concessions Malaysia's most influential figure likely made during his 'dream' in-person meeting with the Russian autocrat. Although Anwar continues to eat, breathe and sleep the Palestinian cause as a means of deflecting attention away from his own domestic failings and growing legitimacy crisis, the embattled 78-year-old appears equally preoccupied with extracting whatever political mileage he can from Malaysia's ever-closer alignment with BRICS. The fact that neighboring Indonesia expeditiously joined the multilateral organization, seen by many as an emerging anti-US and Western bulwark in global affairs, as something of a wild card on January 1, 2025, suggests another ASEAN state – three of which have already been accorded 'partner' status – may well be the next in line. Malaysia, in line with Anwar's intense lobbying efforts, fancies itself a frontrunner for full-fledged BRICS membership. Over the last 12 months alone, the Malaysian leader visited China and India to secure the two Asian giants' blessings for his nation's BRICS candidacy while also attending the group's latest summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Meanwhile and for the sake of ensuring Malaysia is on the best possible terms with most, if not all, existing BRICS members and participants. In that direction Anwar backed Iran's right to self-defense when its nuclear facilities and main metropolises were bombed by Israel in early June, endorsed South Africa's International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case against the Jewish state and has shied away from criticizing the UAE for its outsized role in foisting the world's worst humanitarian crises upon both Sudan and Yemen. That said, and despite creating the illusion of a highly democratized, consensus-based admission procedure, Russia does have the final say on welcoming new entrants into the BRICS fold. It is worth recalling that the landmark enlargement wave at the start of 2024 after a nearly 14-year hiatus occurred during the Kremlin's rotating presidency whereas the concept of 'BRICS+' was agreed upon at the coalition's 16th annual forum in Kazan. Mindful of how significant a foreign affairs win Malaysia's fast-track entry into the non-Western alliance would be for its increasingly unpopular prime minister, Putin will doubtless put forward steep demands to sign off on its full-fledged BRICS induction – chief among which is burying the MH17 affair once and for all. This is precisely what he might have been angling for by hosting the Malaysian king who can, with a stroke of a pen, issue a royal pardon that would effectively absolve the Kremlin of any wrongdoing and neuter recent unfavorable rulings brought forth by International Civilian Aviation Organisation (ICAO) as well as the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). In light of Azerbaijan Airlines (AZAL) 8243 plane crash en route to Grozny, Russia, late last year at the hands of Russian military forces and the subsequent Russo-Azeri diplomatic fallout over Putin showing no remorse for the 38 casualties or their families, Moscow can ill-afford to have two almost identical open wounds fester simultaneously. As such and owing to the lawsuit Baku has filed against Russia, there is a real sense of urgency on the latter's part to at least wish away the MH17 controversy and along with it any related public relations damage or legal obligation to compensate the victims' immediate relatives. Should Kuala Lumpur work hand in glove with Moscow to sweep this incident away by royal decree or otherwise, Europe will have no choice but to treat the Malaysian government as a hostile entity for practically condoning the murder of 196 Dutch nationals. Whereas China and India have been justifiably singled out for keeping Russia's economy afloat via their record consumption of heavily discounted Russian oil, the West must not lose sight of middle powers' skullduggery when it comes to replenishing the Kremlin's war chest. After all, wealthy Russians are not transiting through Beijing or New Delhi en route to Europe, nor are they snapping up luxury properties and stashing away their ill-gotten gains in Mumbai or Shanghai. Rather, the likes of Thailand, Turkey, the UAE and Kazakhstan bear some degree of culpability for sheltering Putin's subjects and insulating them from feeling the squeeze of unprecedented Western sanctions. As far as Malaysia is concerned, the EU does have a nuclear option at its disposal to strong-arm the country's Russophile upper echelons into reversing course. It would make eminently good sense for Brussels to issue Malaysia the same de facto 'with us or against us' ultimatum that Tbilisi found itself on the receiving end of over democratic backsliding and the ruling Georgian Dream party's borderline fetish for Kremlin-inspired governance. Much like Georgia, Malaysia is an Annex II state whose citizens enjoy short-term visa-free access to the Schengen Area and are bound to rise up against their Kremlin-friendly government if this privilege is yanked by the EU. Likewise, the UK can threaten to reimpose entry requirements on Malaysians – many of whom are enrolled in full-time education at British universities due to the 'Commonwealth' connection and will not want their visiting parents to face additional red tape. Unless smaller, albeit equally rogue and malevolent actors relative to China or India are made an example of, there is no silver bullet or panacea for achieving lasting peace in Ukraine. By giving Malaysia a pass for flaunting its camaraderie with Putin's Russia and globally-designated terrorist organizations such as Hamas, the West risks pushing the Southeast Asian nation and other like-minded Global South 'fence-sitters' further into emerging anti-Western blocs.
