Texas Floods Donald Trump Grilled About NWS Cuts After Deadly Texas Floods Texas News
Epstein Case | Where's The Epstein's Client List Pam Bondi Promised? | Epstein Case News | 4K | N18G
Texas Floods | Death Toll From Texas Floods Reaches At Least 43, Dozens Still Missing | N18G
Russia Ukraine War | Zelensky, Trump Hold Phone Call After Putin's Pledge To Continue War | N18G
White House Briefing on Jeffery Epstein's Client List Pam Bondi Promised? | Jeffery Epstein | N18G
Texas Floods | No Time To Run: The Texas Flood Tragedy | Texas Flood Latest Update | 4K Video | N18G
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Epstein Files: Was the US DOJ's Jeffrey Epstein prison cell video edited or tampered with? Technical details explained
The US Justice Department this week released over 11 hours of surveillance footage from the hallway outside Jeffrey Epstein's prison cell, taken the night before he was found dead. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It was meant to settle once and for all the long-running rumours that Epstein didn't die by suicide. But instead of putting the theories to rest, the release has only added fuel to the fire. Why? Because despite the Department calling it 'full raw footage,' a deeper look into the file's metadata reveals something else entirely. The video was processed through editing software, exported years after the event, and contains signs that it was stitched together. That doesn't mean it was faked—but it does mean it wasn't truly 'raw.' What the Video Shows The footage comes from a single hallway camera mounted outside Epstein's cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York. The video begins at 8:00 PM on August 9, 2019, and runs until around 7:00 AM the next morning. Over the course of 11 hours, you see staff passing by, routine movements, and long stretches of nothing happening. There's nothing dramatic. No obvious foul play. No shadowy figures entering the cell. Just grainy footage of a poorly lit corridor. So what's the problem? The Metadata Tells a Different Story Behind every digital file is metadata—a layer of hidden technical information that records when a file was created, how it was processed, and what software touched it. Experts examining this file found several red flags: 1. It Was Edited in Premiere Pro The file's metadata shows it was processed using Adobe Premiere Pro, a popular video editing programme. This alone means the video isn't 'raw.' Raw footage comes straight from the source—uncompressed and untouched by editing software. 2. Export Date Is From 2025 The metadata says the video was exported on July 4, 2025—almost six years after the footage was recorded. That's just days before the DOJ released it to the public. This shows that someone went into the original files, reassembled or converted them, and saved a new version before sharing it. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 3. Timecodes Have Gaps When analysts looked closer at the timecode (the internal clock embedded in video), they saw inconsistencies. Some segments had slight breaks or resets. That suggests the video may have been stitched together from several files, which could happen if the original recording was split into chunks—or if something was removed. 4. No Watermark or Camera ID Prison security footage usually contains watermarks or camera IDs burned into the video to prove authenticity and prevent tampering. This video has none. That makes it impossible to verify whether all frames are present or if the footage is in its original format. What the DOJ Says Officials have insisted the footage is complete. Speaking to WIRED, a senior DOJ source said: 'This isn't about hiding anything. The original recordings were in a proprietary prison system that had to be converted to a playable format. The video content was not altered, but yes, it was processed to make it public-friendly.' That explanation is technically plausible—but it doesn't match the language used in DOJ press statements. Calling it 'raw' when it was clearly re-exported and possibly reassembled is misleading. In a case with such intense public scrutiny, precision matters. Why It Fuels More Suspicion Jeffrey Epstein's death in 2019 has always been viewed with scepticism. A billionaire with connections to princes, presidents, and CEOs. A sex offender in a high-security federal facility. Guards who fell asleep. Two cameras that malfunctioned. A cellmate mysteriously transferred just hours before. In this context, releasing video that appears to be edited—no matter how innocently—will always raise eyebrows. Even former Trump allies are frustrated. FBI Director Kash Patel, who once led investigations into Epstein's network, has reportedly clashed with Attorney General Pam Bondi over the lack of transparency. Patel initially claimed there would be a 'client list' or further disclosures. Instead, the DOJ's July 7 memo confirmed Epstein died by suicide and stated no such list exists. Bondi, under pressure, released the hallway footage hoping it would calm the storm. But releasing a file with visible editing markers without fully explaining the technical steps taken has done the opposite. Final Thoughts There's no evidence—at least not yet—that the footage was intentionally manipulated to hide wrongdoing. But calling something 'raw' when it clearly isn't only makes things worse. In the digital age, truth is as much about how information is shared as what it contains. If the DOJ wants to rebuild trust, it must go beyond vague assurances. That means releasing the full unprocessed files, explaining every step of the video conversion process, and allowing independent forensic experts to review the source material. Until then, the question will remain unanswered—not just 'what happened to Jeffrey Epstein?' but 'why can't the government get the story straight?'
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Epstein Files Fallout: Kash Patel considers resignation; Pam Bondi vs Dan Bongino - the story so far
The Trump administration is facing its most volatile internal crisis yet, as FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino edges closer to resignation over Attorney General Pam Bondi's mishandling of the long-anticipated Epstein files. The fallout, driven by Bondi's broken promises and growing public outrage, has FBI Director Kash Patel reportedly prepared to follow Bongino out the door—setting the stage for a possible leadership implosion at the heart of American law enforcement. This internal war—once quietly brewing—is now on full display, with recriminations flying, alliances shifting, and MAGA loyalists turning on their own. The Flashpoint: DOJ Memo Torches 'Client List' Hopes On July 7, the Department of Justice issued a memo that decisively undercut the narrative Bondi had been peddling for months. The two-page document concluded there was no evidence of a 'client list,' no credible signs of blackmail, and reaffirmed the long-standing official position that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide in a federal jail cell in 2019. The memo, signed off by both DOJ and FBI leadership, included surveillance footage and investigative summaries that contradicted Bondi's earlier statements. For months, she had claimed the FBI was in possession of tens of thousands of hours of disturbing video footage, and had repeatedly promised bombshell disclosures. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Upto 15% Discount for Salaried Individuals ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan Get Quote Undo Those promises now appear to have been hollow. Conservative influencers, who had banked on explosive revelations implicating elites, were incensed. Bondi's office had built expectations with Phase 1 of the 'Epstein Files' back in February—a series of binders handed out to right-wing media figures that mostly repackaged previously leaked information. With the July memo's flat conclusions, fury erupted. Bongino vs Bondi: The Internal Explosion The conflict between Bongino and Bondi came to a head on July 9 during a closed-door White House meeting. Bondi accused Bongino of leaking frustrations to the press, an allegation he denied. Witnesses described the exchange as heated and personal, with Bongino storming out of the room. Two days later, Bongino took a personal day and has not returned. Multiple administration sources now say his resignation is imminent. One source described him as 'done,' and unwilling to work another day under Bondi's leadership. Bongino, a former Secret Service agent and a fixture in conservative media, had reluctantly endorsed the DOJ memo's suicide conclusion, only to be caught in the backlash from MAGA influencers who accused him of selling out. Kash Patel: Torn Between Loyalty and Fallout FBI Director Kash Patel is also said to be considering resignation. Once a key proponent of theories questioning Epstein's death, Patel has since aligned with the suicide explanation in his official capacity. However, insiders say he is privately furious at Bondi for damaging the Bureau's credibility and igniting a crisis within the administration. Patel's calculus is reportedly tied to Bongino's fate. If his deputy resigns, Patel may follow, seeing little institutional value in continuing under Bondi's divisive leadership. One aide close to the director said, 'He doesn't want to be left holding the bag. If Bongino goes, Kash walks too.' MAGA Mutiny: The Base Turns on Bondi Bondi, once lionised by MAGA world as a crusading truth-teller, now finds herself isolated. Online, influencers and activists who once supported her are accusing her of deceit. Hashtags attacking her flooded conservative corners of social media in the days following the memo's release. Even voices that typically defend the Trump administration have begun to call for her resignation. What makes the backlash particularly potent is that Bondi had personally staked her reputation on the idea that the Epstein files contained smoking guns. Now that official documentation has concluded otherwise, she has lost the confidence of both the public and senior officials inside the administration. Trump's Calculated Distance Donald Trump has so far refused to intervene. During a cabinet meeting on July 8, he reportedly urged his team to 'move on' from the Epstein issue, calling it a distraction from his legislative agenda. While the president continues to publicly back Bondi, insiders say he's well aware of her declining utility. Trump's political instincts have always been sharper than his personal loyalties—and Bondi may soon find herself on the wrong side of that calculation. Timeline of the Fallout February 2025: Bondi distributes 'Epstein Files: Phase 1' to influencers—mostly rehashed content May 2025: Bongino and Patel publicly align with suicide ruling July 7, 2025: DOJ memo affirms suicide, no client list, no charges pending July 9, 2025: Bondi and Bongino clash during White House meeting July 11, 2025: Bongino takes leave; resignation imminent July 12, 2025: Patel signals he may leave if Bongino quits The Big Picture This isn't just about Epstein. It's about trust, credibility, and the fault lines within the Trump-era security state. Bondi's promise of transparency has backfired, alienating the very audience it was meant to appease. Bongino's looming exit and Patel's wavering loyalty signal a broader collapse of cohesion at the top. With two of the administration's most prominent law enforcement figures ready to walk and the base in open revolt, Pam Bondi's position may no longer be tenable. And while the Epstein case may be officially closed, the political aftershocks are far from over.
India Today
7 hours ago
- India Today
FBI deputy director Bongino mulls resignation over Epstein memo fallout
FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino is said to be seriously considering resignation amid an intensifying rift between the FBI and the Justice Department over the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, according to several people familiar with the internal fallout exploded during a tense White House meeting on Wednesday, pitting Bongino against Attorney General Pam Bondi in a fiery exchange over the government's refusal to release additional records tied to the Epstein sex trafficking investigation, a move that has enraged right-wing influencers and further fuelled conspiracy of us signed off on the contents of the memo,' Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche later said in an attempt to downplay the tension. 'The suggestion by anyone that there was any daylight between the FBI and DOJ leadership is patently false.' Sources say Bongino clashed with Bondi over a conservative media report suggesting the FBI had been prepared to release the files months earlier but was blocked by the Justice Department. While Bondi, Blanche, and FBI Director Kash Patel publicly refuted the premise, Bongino was conspicuously absent from the to far-right activist Laura Loomer, who is close to President Donald Trump, Bongino has told people he is 'seriously thinking about resigning' and even took Friday off to weigh his options. The normally outspoken Bongino has been unusually silent on social media since Wednesday.'The search for truth in the Epstein case should never be about political theatre,' said a senior DOJ official who spoke on condition of anonymity. 'But unfortunately, that's where this has landed.'The dispute stems from the release of a two-page memo this week stating that Epstein had no 'client list,' contradicting Bondi's earlier claim that such a list sat on her desk. The memo also said no further documents would be released, citing court orders and victim privacy. A video purporting to show Epstein's suicide was included in the release but was quickly met with scepticism due to a minute of missing footage reigniting speculation among conspiracy-minded Trump supporters.'The cascade of disappointment and disbelief lays bare the struggles of FBI and Justice Department leaders,' one official said, noting the administration had stoked expectations of a bombshell February, conservative influencers were invited to the White House and handed binders labelled 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1' and 'Declassified' most of which included material already publicly those underwhelming disclosures, Bondi had promised that a 'truckload' of new evidence was still being reviewed by the FBI. But this week's memo concluded that no further disclosures were appropriate.- EndsInputs from Associated PressMust Watch
