logo
Who Are Assam's Indigenous Muslims And How Are They Different From Miya Muslims?

Who Are Assam's Indigenous Muslims And How Are They Different From Miya Muslims?

News1804-08-2025
Last Updated:
While indigenous Assamese Muslims and Miya Muslims share a religion, their histories, languages, settlement patterns, and political affiliations are sharply different
Assam's Muslim population, now estimated at over 1.18 crore, accounts for nearly 34 per cent of the state's total population. Yet, they are far from a singular group. Broadly, Assam's Muslims fall into two categories — the indigenous Assamese Muslims, who have lived in the region for centuries and are culturally part of the Assamese-speaking mainstream, and the Miya Muslims, who trace their roots to Bengali-speaking migrants who settled in the state during and after colonial rule.
While the two communities share a religion, their histories, languages, settlement patterns, and political affiliations are sharply different. Over the last few years, the Assam government has taken formal steps to underline this difference and, in the process, stoked fresh controversy around who is indigenous, who is not, and what that means in one of India's most politically sensitive states.
Who Are The Indigenous Muslims?
The indigenous Muslims of Assam are groups that trace their presence in the region to well before British colonisation, some as far back as the 13th-century Ahom kingdom. In July 2022, the Assam Cabinet, based on recommendations from a government-appointed subcommittee, formally recognised five such sub-groups: Goria, Moria, Deshi, Syed, and Julha.
Each of these groups has a distinct origin. The Goria and Moria are believed to include war captives, local converts, and artisans integrated into Assamese society during the Ahom era. The Deshi community traces its ancestry to Ali Mech, a tribal chieftain who converted to Islam during Bakhtiyar Khilji's 1205 invasion. The Syeds are descendants of Sufi saints, most notably Azaan Pir, who settled in Assam in the 15th and 17th centuries. The Julhas were weavers brought from regions like Bihar, Odisha, and Bengal during both the Ahom and British periods.
Despite these varied lineages, what unites these communities is their language, Assamese or dialects like Goalpariya, and their cultural assimilation. Most follow local customs, observe Assamese festivals, and consider themselves part of the larger Assamese-speaking population, alongside Hindus.
The subcommittee estimated that these five groups account for around 42 lakh of Assam's Muslim population. But politically, they have limited influence. Their dispersed settlement means they do not form a majority in any single constituency, restricting their ability to assert themselves as an electoral bloc.
Who Are The Miya Muslims?
The Miya Muslims, by contrast, are Bengali-speaking Muslims whose ancestors migrated from East Bengal, now Bangladesh, in successive waves. The earliest of these migrations was encouraged by the British, who brought settlers to cultivate the fertile riverine islands of the Brahmaputra, known locally as char-chaporis. These were followed by post-Partition migration in 1947, and again during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War.
Today, the Miya Muslims are spread across Lower and Central Assam, forming the majority in over 30 of the state's 126 Assembly constituencies. Though the term 'Miya" originally meant 'gentleman," it has taken on a derogatory connotation in recent decades, often used to imply foreignness. While many in the community have tried to identify as Assamese Muslims or Bengali-origin Assamese, the label persists, both as a marker of community pride and of political othering.
The Miya community is often associated with the char-chaporis, where they've built agrarian livelihoods under precarious conditions. Despite contributing to Assam's economy, they are frequently stereotyped, particularly during debates around illegal migration and citizenship.
Many began listing Assamese as their mother tongue as early as the 1951 Census, in an attempt to integrate. Yet, suspicions persist, particularly over land rights, linguistic identity, and political alignment.
A Rising Political Demographic
In the most recent development, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma warned that the Muslim population in the state could soon rival that of Hindus if current growth rates continue. Citing Census data, he claimed that while Muslims made up 34 per cent of Assam's population in 2011, only three per cent of them were indigenous Muslims. The remaining 31 per cent, he said, were of migrant origin.
Sarma projected that if the current demographic trend holds, Assam could reach a 50:50 population split between Hindus and Muslims by 2041. 'This is not my take, it is just the Census result," he told reporters in Dibrugarh, adding that the data pointed to a clear demographic shift.
As per the 2011 Census, Assam's Muslim population stood at 34.22 per cent (1.07 crore), while Hindus made up 61.47 per cent (1.92 crore) of the state's 3.12 crore population. The BJP has repeatedly pointed to rising Muslim-majority districts as evidence of shifting demographics. The number of Muslim-majority districts rose from six in 2001 to nine in 2011. Some leaders claim the number has now risen to at least 11, though the 2021 Census data is yet to be released.
How The State Is Drawing The Line
The Assam government's recognition of indigenous Muslims came after years of internal demand. A subcommittee on their cultural identity recommended exclusive development schemes, identity certification, a separate census, and even reservation in jobs and education.
According to CM Sarma, these measures are necessary to preserve the distinctiveness of Assamese Muslims, a group he says has been clubbed unfairly with migrant-origin Muslims. Indigenous Muslim organisations like the All Assam Goriya-Moriya Deshi Parishad have welcomed the move, citing a long struggle to protect their cultural identity.
But critics argue that the policy serves political ends. Parties like the AIUDF, which draws much of its support from Miya-dominated areas, accuse the BJP of weaponising identity to divide the Muslim population. Groups representing Barak Valley's Kachari Muslims and Manipuri Pangals have also criticised their exclusion from the 'indigenous" label, despite claiming centuries of residence in Assam.
The Char-Chaporis And The Struggle For Belonging
The heart of the Miya community's settlement lies in the Brahmaputra's char-chaporis, islands that are constantly reshaped by the river's shifting course. Life here is precarious and often disconnected from the state's infrastructure and services. Yet, over decades, the Miya Muslims have built thriving agricultural communities through sheer resilience and labour.
Despite this, they continue to be viewed by many, including sections of indigenous Muslims, as outsiders. Even their attempts to assimilate, through language adoption or cultural participation, have often been met with scepticism.
A Fragmented Political Landscape
top videos
View all
The political influence of the two communities is also uneven. Indigenous Muslims, though officially recognised and long-settled, are spread out and seldom vote as a bloc. They have supported the Congress, Asom Gana Parishad (AGP), and sometimes the BJP, but without concentrated leverage.
In contrast, Miya Muslims have been a decisive voting group, often backing the AIUDF. In the 2021 Assembly elections, the party won 15 seats, mostly from Muslim-majority constituencies in Lower Assam.
About the Author
News Desk
The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d...Read More
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
Assam Muslims
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 04, 2025, 15:06 IST
News explainers Who Are Assam's Indigenous Muslims And How Are They Different From Miya Muslims?
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

40 years of Assam Accord: A lookback at gains and unfulfilled clauses
40 years of Assam Accord: A lookback at gains and unfulfilled clauses

Hindustan Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

40 years of Assam Accord: A lookback at gains and unfulfilled clauses

On Tuesday, leaders from Assam Jatiya Parishad (AJP), a regional party in Assam, met Congress MP and leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, in Delhi. Also present were Assam Congress president and the party's deputy leader in Lok Sabha, Gaurav Gogoi, and two other Congress MPs from the state Pradyut Bordoloi and Rakibul Hussain. Leaders from Assam Jatiya Parishad (AJP), a regional party in Assam, met Congress MP and leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, in Delhi. (@INCAssam) Among other issues including next year's assembly polls in the northeastern state and a likely alliance between AJP and Congress, the leaders discussed the Assam Accord and its implementation. The regional party's president Lurinjyoti Gogoi later told journalists that he urged Gandhi to raise the issue of non-implementation of critical clauses of the accord in Parliament. The accord, which was signed on August 15, 1985 to mark the end of a six-year agitation against illegal immigrants (especially those from Bangladesh), to which Gandhi's father, the then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, was also a signatory, will complete 40 years this Friday. The accord signed by the union government and All Assam Students Union (AASU) and All Assam Gana Sangram Parishad (AAGSP), the two organisations from the state that had spearheaded the 1979-1985 agitation, is considered as the most important deal to stop illegal immigration, detect and deport foreigners residing in the state and give constitutional, legislative and administrative safeguards for Assamese people. Over the past four decades many of the clauses in the accord have been fulfilled. But the core issues of fencing the entire border with Bangladesh to prevent entry of illegal immigrants, detection and deportation of all foreigners who entered the state after March 25, 1971 (the day Bangladesh came into being) and providing constitutional safeguards to Assamese people remain unfulfilled despite assurances by successive governments from different political parties including Congress, Asom Gana Parishad (formed after signing of the accord) and Bharatiya Janata Party. Assam has a separate government department, set up in 1986, to implement the accord The agitation and the accord The Assam Agitation started in 1979 after names of several thousands of dubious citizens got included in the electoral rolls of Mangaldai constituency ahead of the 1980 Lok Sabha polls. This led to fears among indigenous groups that if the influx from Bangladesh continued unabated, it would lead to political, social and demographic sidelining of the original inhabitants. The protests over the next six years were led by AASU and organisations like AAGSP and saw participation from all sections of society. Though the agitation was mainly non-violent, over 800 people were killed in police action and nearly 2,000 killed in a single night in 1983 when members of indigenous groups attacked villages in Nellie of Bengali-speaking Muslims with origins in Bangladesh. The agitation came to an end following signing of the accord. 'Foreigners who came to Assam on or after March 25, 1971 shall continue to be detected, deleted and expelled in accordance with law. Immediate and practical steps shall be taken to expel such foreigners,' stated one of the main clauses of the agreement. It added that the international border (with Bangladesh) shall be made secure against future infiltration by erection of physical barriers like walls. barbed wire fencing and other obstacles at appropriate places. Strengthening of security arrangements to prevent future infiltration adequate number of check posts would be set up, it mentioned. Clause 6 of the accord stipulates, 'Constitutional, legislative and administrative safeguards, as may be appropriate, shall be provided to protect, preserve and promote the cultural, social, linguistic identity and heritage of the Assamese people'. Over the past decades some of the demands raised by AASU and few included in the accord have been met. Establishment of the sprawling Srimanta Sankardeva Kalakshetra in Guwahati for preservation, promotion and upliftment of culture of the people of Assam is one. Setting up of the Numaligarh Refinery Limited, the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) in Guwahati and two central universities, Tezpur University in Tezpur and Assam University in Silchar are other such completed projects. But issues like fencing the 267-km border Assam shares with Bangladesh, which is crucial to put an end to infiltration from the neighbouring country, is yet to be completed. Of the total border around 61 km, most of which falls in riverine areas, remain unprotected. Minister for implementation of the accord, Atul Bora, told the state assembly that fencing has been completed while the rest 39-40 km still remain open. Implementation of another prominent clause regarding detection and deportation of illegal immigrants also remains partial. While there is no exact number of such persons residing in Assam some estimates say they could be anywhere from 1 to 4 million or even more. The final report on updation of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) for the state, which was supervised by the Supreme Court with the aim of weeding out illegal immigrants and got over in August 2019, had left out 1.9 million applicants. But that figure is debated, the list is yet to be ratified by the Registrar General of India and several petitions are pending in the apex court seeking partial or complete overhaul of the 5-year-long exercise. In the same reply to the assembly in February, Bora had mentioned that since signing of the accord, and until December 31, 2024, at least 165,531 illegal immigrants residing in Assam had been detected and declared as foreigners by tribunals specially set up for that purpose--cases against nearly 85,000 others who are suspected to be illegal foreigners are still pending. Bora had told the assembly that of those detected 30,115 were deported. Details on the rest are sketchy. In May this year, chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma had stated that nearly 30,000 of those declared foreigners by tribunals had gone missing with no details of their whereabouts at present. Contentious Clause 6 But the most highlighted and controversial of all things in the accord is Clause 6 that promised 'constitutional, legislative and administrative safeguards' to protect the identity and heritage of 'Assamese people'. But since the accord doesn't clearly define who would be considered as 'Assamese people', there's confusion on who would enjoy the constitutional safeguards. Implementation of Clause 6 remained in the backburner for over three decades till the BJP-led government in Centre formed a committee in 2019 to suggest recommendations. The 13-member committee headed by Justice (Retd) Biplab Kumar Sarma had submitted its report to the then chief minister Sarbananda Sonowal in February 2020. It had stipulated 1951 as the cut-off date to determine who an Assamese is (those who themselves or their ancestors were living in the state in that year). Other recommendations of the committee include protection of the state's culture, heritage and languages, job safeguards (100% reservation in Grade III and IV jobs and 70% in Grade I and II jobs for Assamese people), protection of land of indigenous people as well reservations in parliamentary and assembly seats for indigenous people. The recommendations again took a backseat for five years till the state government and AASU reached an agreement in February this year on implementing 38 of the 52 recommendations of the committee. CM Sarma stated that those would include mandatory inclusion of Assamese language as a subject in all schools of Brahmaputra Valley and Assamese and Bodo languages as subjects in all schools in the Bodoland Territorial Region (BTR). Similarly, all schools will have to teach students about Assam's history and geography mandatorily till Class 8. It was decided that the state government and AASU would continue deliberations on how to implement the rest of the recommendations and also urge the Centre to find ways to take forward some other recommendations like reservations in Lok Sabha and assembly seats for indigenous people, which don't fall under purview of the state government. With elections happening in few months and issues like illegal immigrants, evictions of 'suspected Bangladeshis' from government and forest lands, rights of indigenous people coming to focus again, the Assam Accord and its implementation will again hit headlines with parties doling out assurances and blaming rivals for the long delay in reaching its stated objectives.

Why PMs deliver Independence Day address from Red Fort
Why PMs deliver Independence Day address from Red Fort

Indian Express

time21 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Why PMs deliver Independence Day address from Red Fort

Early morning on Friday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will hoist the tricolour and address the nation from the ramparts of the Red Fort in Delhi. In doing so, he will be continuing a tradition that was started by Jawaharlal Nehru in 1947. But why was the Red Fort chosen as the venue for India's official Independence Day celebrations? As to why Delhi became a seat of power has been debated ad nauseum by historians. What is perhaps more interesting is that in the course of it assuming political significance, Delhi became more than just a physical location — it became an idea, a name associated with political power. In the 16th century, Babur, the first Mughal emperor, had referred to Delhi as the 'capital of all Hindustan'. More than a century later, Shah Jahan in 1648 would inaugurate Shahjahanabad, comprising a fortified citadel (the Red Fort) and a walled city surrounding it (Old Delhi), on the banks of the Yamuna. Shahjahanabad remained the Mughal capital till 1857 amid a rapid decline in the dynasty's authority over the 18th and 19th centuries. 'Yet, such was his (the Mughal emperor's) symbolic significance as the source of legitimate sovereign authority that many new states, including the East India Company, continued to rule in his name, and to issue coins in his name until well into the 19th century,' historian Swapna Liddle had written for The Indian Express in 2021. This would change after the rebellion of 1857. 1857 & stamping of British authority In 1857, the East India Company was ruling India from Calcutta. As such, there were only a few Europeans in Delhi, which was pretty unimportant for the grand scheme of the Company's economic and political interests designs in the subcontinent. For the natives, however, Delhi and the Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar remained the foremost symbols of indigenous authorities. After mutinying against their British superiors, the sepoys triumphantly marched to Delhi and declared the ailing emperor as their leader. The fall of Delhi to Company forces effectively sealed the fate of the rebellion of 1857. It also sealed the fate of the Mughal emperor, who was exiled to Rangoon, and the city itself. 'Delhi suffered severe devastation, 'both physically and psychologically'. Military destruction was followed by punitive damage, vindictive demolition, radical reconstruction, railway and industrial development in disregard of historic dwellings, and the mixed blessing of modem municipal government,' Frykenberg wrote. Initially, the British planned to raze all of Shahjahanabad to the ground and thus wipe out the memory of the Mughal Empire from the city. While they stopped short of doing that, Shahjahanabad, and specifically the Red Fort, was very deliberately stamped with British authority. 'About 80 per cent of the interior of the fort was destroyed (an area of about 120 acres). This had been densely covered with elaborate royal pavilions, gardens, store-rooms, barracks, and quarters of artisans and other court functionaries. Displacing a substantial residential population, the British converted the fort into a military garrison,' Samuel V Noe wrote in 'What happened to Mughal Delhi: A morphological study', a chapter in the aforementioned Frykenberg-edited book. In the decades after the rebellion, the British systematically harnessed Delhi's symbolic associations with power, most notably with the Delhi Durbars of 1877, 1903, and 1911, before deciding to shift the capital to Delhi from Calcutta in 1911. 'Besides its centrality and connectivity within the Great Indian Empire, Delhi carried in the minds of the colonial rulers a symbolic value — as the age old saying goes: 'he who rules Delhi rules India'…,' Suoro D Joardar, professor at the School of Planning and Architecture in New Delhi, wrote in his article 'New Delhi: Imperial Capital to Capital of World's Largest Democracy' (2006). It is this history of Delhi, and by extension the Red Fort, as a seat of empire that made it the venue of choice to celebrate India's independence. This is more so given that in 1946, the fort was the venue of the highly public trials of senior officers of Subhas Chandra Bose's Indian National Army. These trials, which led to an outpouring of nationalist sentiments, had firmly established the Red Fort as a symbol of power and resistance in the minds of the Indian public. As Swapna Liddle wrote in 2021: 'With the coming of Independence, it was necessary that the site of the Red Fort, over which the British colonial government had sought to inscribe its power and might, be symbolically reclaimed for the Indian people.' This is an edited version of an article which first appeared in 2023

India remains fully engaged with US on trade negotiations: Commerce Secy
India remains fully engaged with US on trade negotiations: Commerce Secy

Business Standard

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

India remains fully engaged with US on trade negotiations: Commerce Secy

Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal on Thursday said India remains fully engaged with the United States on trade negotiations, NDTV Profit reported. He said talks are ongoing across multiple channels, including at the level of the negotiating team, ministers, diplomats, and industry stakeholders. Speaking to journalists today, Barthwal also spoke on export growth, ongoing bilateral trade talks with the US, progress on FTAs with the United Kingdom and the efforts to counter the impact of fresh US tariffs while expanding India's market presence across countries. US is an important trade partner for India US President Donald Trump had slapped a 25 per cent tariff on India, with an additional 25 per cent penalty for importing discounted oil from Russia. While the 25 per cent tariff kicked in on August 7, the additional 25 per cent is set to come into effect from August 25. Barthwal confirmed that India remains fully engaged with the US on trade negotiations, as Washington is a very important trade partner for New Delhi. A US delegation is scheduled to arrive in New Delhi for the next round of negotiations on August 25. The commerce secretary said the status of the upcoming negotiations will become clearer closer to the date. He added that the 'Fall deadline' for signing a bilateral trade agreement with the US remains in place. Aware of sectors exposed to US tariffs: Comm secy Speaking on the US tariffs, Barthwal said he would not like to speculate on whether the developments will play out favourably for India. However, the ministry is closely engaging with stakeholders to assess the tariff impact and is aware of the sectors most exposed to the US. Various export promotion councils have been consulted, with a particular focus on labour-intensive industries. As reported earlier by Business Standard, the commerce and industry ministry has prepared support schemes worth about ₹25,000 crore under the Export Promotion Mission for six-year period, in response to the continuing uncertainties from higher US tariffs. The proposal has been sent to the finance ministry for approval and, once cleared, will be rolled out after the Union Cabinet's nod. Trade with the UK, EU and China On free trade agreements (FTAs), Barthwal said the UK deal is now in its final stages, with due processes underway in the British Parliament, and India has requested that it be fast-tracked so it can come into effect soon. On the EU front, he indicated that substantial progress has been made, with both sides working to conclude negotiations by December, and further meetings planned at various levels, including ministerial discussions. Trade negotiations with China are also moving at a positive pace, the commerce secretary said, adding that both imports and exports are developing with Beijing. Govt aims to improve FTA utilisation Barthwal stressed on the need to improve utilisation of existing FTAs, saying the ministry is fast-tracking facilitation measures to ensure better uptake. For example, the India-Australia FTA currently has a utilisation rate of 84 per cent for exports and 86 per cent for imports, but efforts are underway to push this closer to 100 per cent, he said. He added that the government is conducting exercises to ensure FTAs reach a certain saturation point, though he noted this would be a gradual process. India's exports continue to grow Despite existing global uncertainties and geopolitical conflicts, India's merchandise and services exports recorded substantial growth in July, as well as Q2FY26, said Barthwal, speaking to NDTV Profit. India's export growth has significantly outpaced global trends. Barthwal said the key drivers of this growth were engineering goods, electronics, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and gems and jewellery. Acknowledging the challenges posed by new tariffs, Barthwal noted the lack of clarity in the global trade landscape but stressed that India is focusing on areas within its control. The export strategy, he said, is built on four pillars: improving competitiveness, promoting exports, diversifying markets, and reducing import dependence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store