US private equity giant KKR wins takeover battle for Assura in £1.7bn deal
US private equity giant KKR has won a takeover battle for NHS landlord Assura after raising its bid to £1.7 billion.
Assura said it had reached an agreement on a 'best and final' bid led by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR) and Stonepeak Partners.
The medical property firm sparked a bidding war when it said it had agreed to be bought by the consortium back in April for a takeover price of £1.61 billion.
But healthcare investor Primary Health Properties (PHP) then swooped in with a higher bid worth £1.68 billion, saying its offer was 'compelling'.
Both bidders have upped their offers several times to try and clinch a deal.
Assura owns more than 600 buildings, including doctors' surgeries, with a portfolio valued at around £3.1 billion. It has about 80 members of staff.
The improved bid from KKR and Stonepeak offers 52.1p for each Assura share – valuing the entire company at about £1.7 billion.
Ed Smith, Assura's chairman, said the decision followed a 'careful and thorough evaluation of both offers'.
'KKR and Stonepeak are highly experienced investors in healthcare and infrastructure and I am confident that with their support, and the additional capital they will provide, Assura will continue to deliver the high-quality healthcare infrastructure our communities need,' he said.
KKR has been under the spotlight recently for pulling out of a possible rescue deal to inject much-needed cash into Thames Water, Britain's biggest water supplier.
Thames had chosen KKR at the end of March to be its preferred bidder under plans to invest around £4 billion of new equity to help keep the financially stricken company afloat.
But Thames Water said KKR was not 'in a position to proceed' with any offer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump ready to enact key parts of US-UK trade deal within days
Donald Trump is poised to sign off crucial parts of the US-UK trade deal that will deliver lower tariffs for British car exports to America Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Karen Millen breastfeeding controversy: ‘Selfish' remark sparks outrage and apology
As you may have seen all over your Instagram feeds yesterday, Karen Millen's comments on breastfeeding have faced huge backlash. Speaking on Channel 5 talk show, Vanessa, hosted by Vanessa Waltz, the designer was asked about her opinion on whether it's OK to breastfeed a three-year-old child. 'There's no benefit, is there, for a child to be breastfed beyond six months really,' she responded. 'I think it's quite a selfish thing on the mother's part.' When asked to explain what she meant, she said: 'I just think that's not good emotionally for that child. I mean, what does that child do later in life? The attachment – like you say it becomes an addiction and an addiction for that child too because they only know the boob. 'It's just not normal is it? I'm sorry, I find it very weird.' The NHS advises that those who can and want to should breastfeed exclusively for the first six months, then continue to breastfeed for two years and beyond, alongside giving their child other foods. It also lists the benefits of breastfeeding as: protecting your baby from diseases and infections; being free, convenient and always ready to use – you don't need to sterilise bottles and teats; being one way of helping you bond with your baby. It can also reduce the mother's risk of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, osteoporosis (weak bones), cardiovascular disease and obesity, it says. However, breastfeeding is a very personal choice, and those who don't breastfeed also have healthy babies and bodies. What's not OK is judging someone elses choice, as the backlash to Millen's comments has made clear. 'I feel more and more furious every time I hear that clip,' wrote Danielle Facey, aka @TheBreastfeedingMentor. 'I loved nursing my son for around three years, despite being shamed by all and sundry. But it was not about me – it was always about him.' Chessie King, content creator and founder of Welcome To Babyhood, also posted about the topic, saying she was 'flabbergated': 'I breastfed [her daughter] Auraelia for 11 months & let me tell you, it was the opposite of selfish. My milkshake makers were pumped with love & *patience*'Whether you did for 1 day, 6 months, 3 years or not at all, breastfeeding is SELFLESS not selfish.' In response, Karen has apologised for her comments. According to The Independent, she posted on social media (in a post that is no longer visible), saying: 'The question was aimed at a three-year-old being breastfed and my thoughts on that and my answers reflected that, not the subject of breastfeeding. And as a woman to women, I do respect your choices and I do want to support you.' Whatever you do, remember you know best about what's right for you and your baby. You Might Also Like 13 Buys To Help You Feel Great From £5 16 Speedo Swimsuits that Won't Flash Your Bum When Getting Swim-fit 11 Best Gym Trainers for Different Types of Workouts
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NHS makes major change to cervical cancer screenings for younger women
Women aged 25 to 49 who test negative for human papillomavirus (HPV) will be invited to cervical screening every five years instead of every three, under new NHS guidelines. The change, set to take effect next month in England, follows recommendations from the UK National Screening Committee. According to analysis from King's College London, extending the screening interval to five years for HPV-negative women is just as safe as the current three-year interval, with a similar rate of cancer detection. HPV is a sexually transmitted group of viruses, with around 13 high-risk types known to cause almost all cases of cervical cancer. Most people with HPV don't experience any symptoms. Women who test positive for HPV, or have a history of the virus, will continue to be invited for more frequent screenings to monitor the virus and check for any changes to cells in the cervix. In a written statement to Parliament, health minister Ashley Dalton said the new change 'increases the opportunities to test and recall women and people with a cervix who have HPV, while extending the cervical screening intervals from three to five years in England for individuals who have a negative HPV test. 'This will bring England's cervical screening intervals in line with those of Wales and Scotland.' She said the NHS screening programme in England provides all women between the ages of 25 and 64 'with the opportunity to be screened routinely to detect HPV infection or cervical abnormalities at an early, more treatable stage'. She added: 'The aim of the programme is to reduce the number of women who develop invasive cervical cancer and reduce the number who die from it.' Ms Dalton said testing negative for HPV means the chances of developing cancer within five years are very small, as it can take around 10 years or more from the time HPV is detected to developing cervical cancer. She added: 'Those who test positive for HPV are already being followed up with yearly testing. 'This is important to ensure that individuals are monitored for any early signs of cervical abnormalities and provided the necessary treatment.' Experts have been concerned about falling numbers of women under 50 attending cervical screening, with around a third in England not taking up their invitations. Dr Sue Mann, NHS national clinical director for women's health, said: 'Taking a more personalised approach to cervical screening will help ensure everyone eligible can make the most of these life-saving services, while sparing women appointments that they don't need. 'The NHS is following robust evidence on how often women need to be safely screened, and by putting invitations and reminders straight in women's pockets on their phones, we're making it easier than ever to take up screening appointments. 'Make sure you come forward for your screening when you're invited, even if it was weeks, months or years ago. If you think you are due but have not yet had an invitation, speak to your GP practice.' Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said: 'We welcome this change to cervical screening in England, which is the result of years of vital research to make screening more effective and has shown it is safe to extend the time between tests. 'Screening, alongside the roll out of the HPV vaccine – which Cancer Research UK scientists helped develop – have seen cervical cancer rates drop by around a quarter since the early 1990s, and we look forward to even more progress. 'If you notice any unusual changes for you, do not wait for a screening invitation – speak to your doctor.' Athena Lamnisos, chief executive of the Eve Appeal, said: 'We want every eligible person to feel empowered to attend a vaccination and cervical screening appointment when they are invited so we can achieve the brilliant ambition of eliminating cervical cancer.'
