
Rewriting the past: Indonesia's new history books spook scholars
The 10-volume account was ordered by the administration of President Prabowo Subianto, an ex-general accused of abducting activists in the unrest that preceded dictator Suharto's fall, claims he denies.
Scholars fear his government could use the exercise to rewrite history and cover up past abuses.
Draft volume summaries and a chapter outline seen by AFP do not include any specific section on the 1998 violence.
A summary of Suharto's rule in the volume dedicated to him only mentions how 'student demonstrations... became a factor' in his resignation.
'The writing was flawed since the beginning,' said Andi Achdian, historian at Jakarta's National University, who has seen the outline.
'It has a very strong tendency to whitewash history.'
Suharto ruled Indonesia with an iron fist for more than three decades after grabbing power in the wake of a 1965-6 massacre.
The culture minister overseeing the government's history project, Fadli Zon, told lawmakers last week the account 'does not discuss May '98... because it's small'.
Neither does it promise to include most of the 'gross human rights violations' acknowledged by former president Joko Widodo in 2023.
Jajat Burhanudin, a project editor, contradicted Fadli and dismissed concerns, telling AFP the new volumes would include 1998 events, with the draft outline just a 'trigger for discussion'.
Officials say the new historical account is needed to strengthen Indonesian identity, but warned that any omission about its darkest past will raise eyebrows over objectivity.
'What is feared is that... the cases that have been accepted by the previous government to be resolved will be ignored,' said Marzuki Darusman, a former attorney general and head of a civil society coalition opposed to the volumes.
'Updated' history
While it remains unclear how the government plans to use the books, Jajat said the volumes could be used as 'one of the main sources' for history books taught in schools.
Neither historian Susanto Zuhdi, who is helming the project, nor the presidential palace responded to requests for comment.
The revisionist history garnered renewed scrutiny after the culture minister questioned whether mass rape had occurred at the end of Suharto's rule.
Ethnic Chinese Indonesians bore the brunt of the bloodshed during the riots, when rape squads—purportedly led by army thugs—roamed Jakarta's streets.
'Was there really mass rape? There was never any proof,' Fadli told local media in an interview last month.
'If there is, show it.'
A 1998 fact-finding report, commissioned by Indonesia's first president after Suharto, found at least 52 reported cases of rape in the unrest.
'This project risks erasing uncomfortable truths,' said Usman Hamid, executive director of Amnesty International Indonesia.
Fadli told AFP the nation-building project would go ahead despite criticism.
'The consensus (is) we continue,' he said.
'This is an updated version of our history,' he added, saying there would be a public debate 'this month', without elaborating.
Indonesian students smash a portrait of former president Suharto in one of the offices of the parliamentary complex in Jakarta on May 21, 1998. — AFP pic
'Historical propaganda'
The project involves 113 academics including historians, but at least one of them has resigned.
Archaeologist Harry Truman Simanjuntak told AFP he quit in a dispute over language—the term 'early history' was used instead of 'prehistory' for Indonesia's ancient civilisation.
Fadli told lawmakers the phrase was avoided because it was created by Indonesia's former Dutch rulers.
But Harry said it showed the political influence over the text.
'It was very obvious that editors' authority did not exist. They were under the control of the government,' he said.
The furore around the project has caused some opposition lawmakers and critics to call for its suspension or cancellation.
Activist Maria Catarina Sumarsih, whose son was killed in a military crackdown after Suharto's fall, accused the writers of warping the past.
'The government is deceiving the public... especially young people,' she said.
Others said documenting Indonesia's past was best left to academics.
'If the government feel this nation needs a history that could make us proud... it can't be through the government's version of historical propaganda,' said Marzuki.
'It should be the result of the work of historians.' — AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
10 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Top cops of Johor, Riau Islands express commitment to strengthen cross-border security cooperation
JOHOR BAHRU, Aug 5 — Strategic cooperation in addressing maritime security issues, smuggling, human trafficking, and elements of terrorism in the waters of Johor-Riau Islands was the main focus of bilateral discussions between the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) and the Indonesian National Police (Polri) here today. The meeting involved the new Johor police chief CP Ab Rahaman Arsad, and Riau Islands Regional Police Chief Inspector General Asep Safrudin in efforts to strengthen cross-border security cooperation. 'Johor, as a maritime border state with the Riau Islands, remains committed to ensuring the safety of the region through close cooperation between the two regional enforcement agencies,' according to the official Facebook post by Johor police. Also present at the meeting was the police consul and assistant superintendent of police from the Consulate General of the Republic of Indonesia (KJRI) in Johor Bahru, ASP Riza Sativa, who serves as the official liaison officer between the Polri and Malaysian security agencies. Yesterday, Ab Rahaman, in his first press conference, said the state's strategic location bordering Singapore and near Indonesia makes it an important gateway for the country, thus requiring high preparedness from the entire PDRM team. He described the strength of over 10,000 police officers and personnel in Johor as a key asset in addressing various current security challenges, including cross-border crime and drug abuse. — Bernama


Malay Mail
11 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Malaysia reaffirms sovereignty over Sulawesi Sea blocks, rejects ‘Ambalat' term
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 5 — Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan said Malaysia has reaffirmed its sovereign rights over the maritime area known as Blok ND-6 and ND-7 in the Sulawesi Sea, rejecting Indonesia's use of the term Ambalat to describe the disputed region. Mohamad Hasan, also known as Tok Mat, said that Indonesia's claim which refers to Ambalat covers parts of the Sulawesi Sea. 'Malaysia maintains that Blocks ND-6 and ND-7 are within Malaysian sovereign territory and the country's sovereign rights based on international law, supported by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling in 2002. 'Therefore, the more accurate term for the area in question that aligns with Malaysia's position is the Sulawesi Sea, not Ambalat,' he told the Dewan Rakyat today. He explained that Ambalat is a term used by Indonesia to justify their claim to the area. To ensure clarity and prevent the issue from being politicised or exploited as campaign material particularly in the run-up to state elections, Mohamad Hasan said the ministry is ready to provide briefings to Members of Parliament and Sabah state assemblymen on the matter. 'We don't want this issue to be used to mislead the public, especially in Sabah and Sarawak. If there is a request, the ministry is prepared to arrange a suitable time for briefings to ensure all parties understand the issue,' he added.

Malay Mail
16 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Anwar earns respect from China and US by mediating Cambodia-Thailand peace talks — Phar Kim Beng
AUG 5 — Amid a shifting and uncertain global order, Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has achieved what few regional leaders have managed: gaining the respect of both China and the United States while elevating Asean diplomacy from ceremonial declarations to substantive peacebuilding. In hosting the historic Cambodian-Thai military talks in Kuala Lumpur, Anwar has not only asserted Malaysia's credibility as Asean Chair, but also demonstrated that principled neutrality, when anchored in regional responsibility, can earn international trust. The ongoing negotiations at the Malaysian Ministry of Defence between the military leaderships of Cambodia and Thailand mark the first time that defence officials from both sides have come together under third-party auspices to address their tense border dispute. These talks are no mere photo opportunity. Overseen by Malaysian Army Chief General Mohammad Nizam Jaafar, they are deeply technical and intentionally discreet, focusing on contentious flashpoints and the mechanics of sustaining the ceasefire agreed just days earlier. With military attachés on standby to monitor implementation and a parallel Asean-led mechanism under development, Malaysia is doing more than hosting; it is actively shaping the architecture of regional security. By convening these talks ahead of Thursday's General Border Committee (GBC) meeting — comprised of 54 senior representatives including Defence Ministers and Army Chiefs — Malaysia has created the preconditions for concrete deliverables. That this process is happening without fanfare, and yet with full awareness and tacit support from Beijing and Washington, is no accident. Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet, Malaysia's Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai shake hands as they pose for photos following a press conference, on the day of mediation talks on the Thailand-Cambodia border conflict, in Putrajaya July 28, 2025. — Reuters pic Both great powers — China and the United States — have vested interests in a stable Asean . For China, the Thai-Cambodian border serves as a critical corridor into mainland Southeast Asia and Indochina. For the U.S., stability in this region reduces the risk of further militarization and offsets the spread of spoilers aligned with anti-democratic impulses. By playing the honest broker and avoiding overt alignment with either camp, Malaysia under Anwar has demonstrated that Asean need not be a pawn in great power politics — it can be a partner. Malaysia's role here is fundamentally Asean in spirit but global in consequence. This is the type of conflict resolution that aligns with the original intent of the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation (TAC): non-violence, peaceful dialogue, and regional solutions to regional problems. Yet too often, TAC principles have remained aspirational. Anwar's facilitation of these military-to-military talks has moved them squarely into the realm of action. What sets this initiative apart is its firm foundation in confidence-building measures, not coercive diplomacy. No guns are drawn, no ultimatums issued — just serious, high-level engagements that involve both civilian and military chains of command. That this is happening in Kuala Lumpur — not Bangkok, Phnom Penh, Beijing, or Washington — speaks volumes about Malaysia's growing strategic capital. The regional silence that greeted the initial outbreak of violence between Thailand and Cambodia only underscored the urgency for credible intervention. With over 300,000 displaced and military tensions simmering since late July, there was a real risk that Asean 's credibility could collapse under the weight of its own indecision. That collapse has now been averted, thanks to Malaysia's resolve and the maturity of the Anwar administration's foreign policy apparatus. This moment is not just a win for Malaysia — it is a defining test for Asean 's evolution. If the current talks result in verified ceasefire compliance and long-term deconfliction measures, it would mark a milestone in Asean 's ability to contain bilateral disputes before they metastasize into regional crises. The long-criticized 'Asean Way' is being refined in real time: quiet, deliberate, but no longer impotent. For Malaysia, this is also a return to its long-standing tradition of behind-the-scenes diplomacy — from the days of Tun Hussein Onn's neutrality to Tun Razak's outreach to China. But under Anwar, there is a sharpened edge: the willingness to assume responsibility, invite the aggrieved parties to the table, and assume verification roles typically eschewed by Asean states. This is not just diplomacy — it is leadership. And the world is watching. From Beijing's calibrated approval to Washington's quiet endorsement, Malaysia's credibility is being affirmed. In an era where most peace efforts collapse under the weight of mistrust or great power rivalry, Malaysia's achievement offers a rare and valuable alternative: that a mid-sized Muslim-majority state in Southeast Asia, led by a Prime Minister with intellectual depth and moral clarity, can broker peace without playing patron or pawn. Anwar Ibrahim has elevated not only Malaysia's stature but also the potential of Asean as a regional peacemaker. In so doing, he has redefined the standards of statecraft in Southeast Asia — with the endorsement, if not the applause, of the world's most powerful capitals. * Phar Kim Beng PhD is Professor of Asean Studies, International Islamic University of Malaysia and Director of Institute of Internationalisation and Asean Studies (IINTAS). ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.