Gaza civil defence reports 14 killed by Israeli forces amid aid crisis
Spokesman Mahmud Basal stated that six people died near an aid distribution centre northwest of Rafah. Two more were killed near the Netzarim junction, while another two died in an airstrike near Gaza City's Church of the Holy Family. Four others perished near the Wadi Gaza bridge. The Israeli military said it would review the reports.
Media restrictions hinder independent verification of casualty figures. The war began after Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which killed 1,219 people, mostly civilians. Israel's retaliatory offensive has claimed at least 60,034 lives in Gaza, per Hamas-run health ministry data.
Under international pressure, Israel announced daily pauses in fighting to allow aid distribution. Over 200 truckloads of food aid were delivered by UN agencies, with additional airdrops from Jordan and the UAE. Both sides accused armed groups of looting supplies, blaming each other for security failures. - AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Egypt's Sisi says Israel's war in Gaza a 'systematic genocide'
CAIRO: Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi said Tuesday Israel was pursuing "a war of starvation and genocide" in Gaza, and denied accusations Cairo prevented life-saving aid from entering the Palestinian territory. "The war in Gaza is no longer merely a war to achieve political goals or release hostages," Sisi told a press conference in Cairo along with his Vietnamese counterpart. Israel launched its offensive in response to Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack, vowing to crush the Palestinian militant group and to free hostages. To Sisi, "this war has long since surpassed any logic or justification, and has become a war of starvation and genocide." "There is systematic genocide to eradicate the Palestinian cause," he said. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday Israel must "complete" the defeat of Hamas to free hostages held in Gaza, a day after Israeli media reported the army could occupy the entire territory. Israel has heavily restricted aid into Gaza which is slipping into a catastrophic famine 22 months into the war. It has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run Gaza Strip. Following mounting international pressure on Israel, in late May aid has only began trickling into Gaza, which borders Israel and Egypt. In response to what Sisi said were "bankrupt" accusations of Egypt's complicity in the siege, the president reiterated that the Rafah border crossing with Gaza was "never closed." The crossing at Rafah was a vital entry point of aid in the early months of the war, until Israeli troops took over its Palestinian side in May 2024, forcing it shut. "The crossing was able to bring in aid as long as there were no Israeli troops stationed on the Palestinian side of the crossing," Sisi said, adding that there are 5,000 trucks loaded with aid waiting to enter Gaza. He also defended what he said was Egypt's consistently "positive" role seeking an end to the conflict. Since the war began, Cairo has undertaken a delicate balancing act, retaining its position as a mediator between Israel and Hamas – along with the United States and Qatar – while repeatedly criticising Israel's assault. Cairo has also repeatedly refused US plans to displace Palestinians into Egypt, lobbying for a reconstruction plan for the territory that has fallen by the wayside as truce talks repeatedly folded. "Egypt will always remain a gateway for aid, not a gateway for the displacement of the Palestinian people," Sisi said on Tuesday. "We are prepared to allow aid in at any time, but we are not prepared to receive or displace Palestinians from their land." Last week, Sisi urged US President Donald Trump – who had touted the plan to displace Palestinians into Egypt – to intervene, saying he "is the one capable of ending the war, brining in aid and ending this suffering."
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Of Gaza genocide and EU inaction
A sizable number of countries are beginning to respond to Israel's slaughter of the Palestinians in Gaza and settler atrocities in the West Bank by taking concrete actions. But notably missing is a meaningful response from the European Union, a bloc proud of its human rights history. The deafening silence has forced 58 former ambassadors of the bloc to issue an open letter to the heads of the EU and member states, warning them that the lack of meaningful response is making it complicit in Israel's "genocide". "Silence and neutrality in the face of genocide constitute complicity. Inaction emboldens perpetrators and betrays every principle the Union and members claim to uphold." Something has stirred in this rare breed of souls and we think it is the daily genocide livestreamed to their smartphones. Rare breed given the West's habit of denying Israel's genocide. The open letter published by Al Jazeera on July 31 has been a global media story since an earlier version, signed by 34 former ambassadors, was published on July 23 by EUobserver, a news portal. The plea for the EU to do the right thing now is a developing story, as the growing number of signatories suggests. We are not surprised that so many ex-diplomats feel let down by the EU. As the 58 make it clear in the letter, "as former ambassadors of the EU, we dedicated our professional lives to upholding and promoting core European values and international law, building the reputation of the European Union and defending the rights of its peoples". Those interests and reputation, they go on to say, "are now in serious jeopardy as a consequence of EU inaction". Washington's position is clear: Israel can do no wrong, even when its military commits the crime of crimes. Its iron-clad support for the Zionist regime means it has given Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, and his extremist ministers, a free hand in committing all the genocide they want. When the United Nations Security Council members agree to a ceasefire — a rare feat indeed — Washington vetoes the resolution. Countries are condemned for criticising Israel. The International Court of Justice, the world's highest court, didn't fare any better. When it ruled that there was "a plausible risk of genocide in Gaza" and countries should stop supplying weapons to Israel, Washington dismissed the court's determination as not binding. The fate of the International Criminal Court was even worse; its officials were sanctioned for issuing arrest warrants against alleged war criminals Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, a former defence minister. But Brussels? Why the inaction, when it occasionally condemns Israel? Pretext for inaction? Some EU leaders seem to suggest a lack of consensus among the 27 member states as a reason for inaction. Even if this is true, why can't they act as individual states? The recent condemnation of Israel by 20 EU foreign ministers shows member states can, if they have the political will. The ex-diplomats have recommended a nine-point action plan, two of which are for the EU to immediately stop the supply of arms to Israel and recognise Palestinian statehood. If Brussels wants to stand on the right side of history, it must act now on the nine recommendations.
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
PM Anwar's four wins as Asean Chair, according to veteran Thai journalist
BANGKOK: (Bernama) Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's (pic) success in mediating a ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand, which resulted in an immediate halt to armed clashes along their disputed border, was hailed as a major diplomatic victory. The courageous and decisive move by the Malaysian premier has not only strengthened his position as a political leader and effective Asean Chair, but also elevated the regional bloc's profile on the global stage. Veteran Thai journalist and regional affairs commentator Kavi Chongkittavorn said when tensions escalated into artillery exchanges between the two neighbouring countries last month, Anwar seized the moment in his capacity as Asean Chair and emerged as a statesman on the regional stage. In an article titled "Four Wins For Asean Chair Anwar" published on Thai PBS World, Kavi said the Malaysian Prime Minister scored four wins with his decisive step to help de-escalate the ongoing tension between the two neighbours. The first win he noted was that Anwar, leveraging his position as Asean Chair, stepped up to act as a mediator, projecting himself as Southeast Asia's peacemaker. He attributed the second win to Anwar's ability to turn the crisis into an opportunity to boost Asean's centrality and relevance. "Major powers often ridicule Asean as a talk shop without action. The ceasefire deal - which still holds - changed that narrative. "Anwar used his chairmanship to show Asean could broker peace when it mattered. "He didn't just convene meetings; he actively facilitated the entire process. "The message is clear: Asean is performing a somersault. It just needs decisive leadership,' Kavi said. Veteran Thai journalist and regional affairs commentator Kavi Chongkittavorn. He said the Malaysian premier's third win was succeeding to not only break the deadlock of the armed clashes, but also to convince Thai acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet to come to Kuala Lumpur for an unprecedented face-to-face direct dialogue. For the record, previous confrontations from 2008 to 2011 saw Thailand completely decline Asean's invitation for mediation talks. The fourth win was balancing the two major powers and important players for Asean - the United States (US) and China, and most remarkably, engaging them to witness the ceasefire talks. "These superpowers rarely collaborate on anything these days. Yet both sent envoys to support the Asean chair's initiative. "Both powers were present, but neither dominated - exactly what Asean wanted,' he said. Anwar's balancing act was particularly impressive, given his recent regular vitriol against Washington. He has been vocal about Gaza (more so than Indonesia), criticising both Israeli and US policies. Kavi said this extraordinary achievement shows what Asean can achieve with active, credible leadership. "After all, Anwar is an old and astute Asean hand. Truth be told, Anwar understood this perfectly. "He saw that regional dynamics and global shifts had created an opening. He seized it with both hands,' he wrote. For Asean, Kavi said the crisis reminds us that actions speak louder than words, and louder than all the annual joint communiqués. "For Anwar, it is proof that skilled diplomacy can transform political fortunes. For the region, it is hoped that Asean-led solutions can still work in Trump's world,' he added. Kavi's full article can be read at . - Bernama
