
Delhi: No trauma centre for Uphaar Cinema fire later victims, ₹60cr fine missing
Twenty-eight years after the Uphaar cinema fire claimed 59 lives and wounded over 100 others, the trauma centre promised in memory of the victims remains missing. Victims' families said the absence of the facility — despite ₹60 crore collected from Gopal Ansal and Sushil Ansal, cinema owners who were convicted in the case, nearly a decade ago — on the Supreme Court's orders underscores the indifference to justice and public safety.
The trauma centre was to be built in west Delhi's Dwarka within two years of a 2015 SC directive, using fines paid by the Ansal brothers. The plan was clear: the Delhi government was to allocate at least five acres of land and construct a state-of-the-art trauma centre in one of the city's most accident-prone areas. Yet today, no foundation stone has been laid, and the ₹60 crore — now estimated to have grown to over ₹100 crore with interest — remains unaccounted for.
'For decades, we have fought a legal battle for only two things: one, to get justice for our children, and another, that the tragedy can help bring some change,' said Neelam Krishnamoorthy, whose children -- Unnati, 17, and Ujjwal, 13 -- were among the 59 who were killed in the fire in the south Delhi hall where Sunny Deol starrer Border was being screened. She leads the Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy (AVUT). 'We're not asking for favours. All we want is that the fine deposited by the Ansals be used to make the trauma centre, which will be very beneficial for the residents of Delhi and, in times of any incidents like this, can help save lives,' she said.
'AVUT members now fear that we are getting old, we do not know whether we will be here tomorrow or not, and so no one will be there to question the government. Hence, we are raising the issue and want the government to act on it,' she said.
In a landmark judgment in August 2015, the Supreme Court, instead of sending the Ansals back to prison, ordered them to pay ₹30 crore each. The court directed the Delhi government to use this money to build a trauma facility in memory of the victims. The order called for a 'Victims of Uphaar Memorial Trauma Centre' with a dedicated burns ward and accident services.
The money was deposited with the Delhi government in November 2015. Yet nearly 10 years later, the families say they have been met with silence and bureaucratic apathy.
In multiple RTI queries filed in 2019 and again in 2024, departments including the Chief Secretary's office, the health ministry, the law department, and the Directorate General of Health Services responded saying that the information 'is not available' or 'does not pertain' to them.
'The state has neither allotted land nor offered any explanation,' said Shekhar Krishnamoorthy, another AVUT member who lost both children in the fire. 'We are left wondering whether anyone will be held accountable, or if time and delay will again erase the promise of justice.'
AVUT has now approached the Supreme Court again, urging it to push for the implementation of its 2015 order. On April 22 this year, the court issued notice to the Delhi government, seeking a response. The next hearing is scheduled for July 16.
HT reached out to an official in the chief minister's office for a response, but the official did not respond till the time of going to print.
For the families, the centre is not merely symbolic. 'This is not just about memory,' Neelam said. 'This is about public health. This is about preventing the next Uphaar.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Plea seeks interim aid for victims, top court's probe into Air India plane crash
A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking urgent intervention and action in connection with the tragic crash of Air India flight 171 in Ahmedabad, which killed 265 plea was filed by two medical professionals who called for immediate steps to ensure justice and adequate compensation for the victims and their urged the Supreme Court to take note of the incident and direct the Centre to announce and disburse interim compensation of Rs 50 lakh to each family of the victims, including resident doctors who were present at BJ Medical College in Ahmedabad, where the Air India plane The plea sought the constitution of a high-level expert committee comprising retired Supreme Court or High Court judges, aviation experts, actuaries and economists. The committee would be tasked with assessing and awarding final compensation, in line with the principles laid down in Triveni Kodkany vs Air India Limited (Supra).The petition also called for directions to Air India Limited to expedite settlement of compensation claims, avoiding prolonged litigation for grieving families. Additional reliefs requested include government-provided rehabilitation measures such as employment opportunities for eligible family members of the the plea demanded a thorough investigation into the cause of the crash and necessary action to prevent similar tragedies in the India plane tragically crashed moments after taking off from Ahmedabad airport on Thursday afternoon. There were 230 passengers, including 169 Indians and 53 British nationals, and 12 crew members on the flight, of whom only one person far, at least 265 people were killed after the London-bound flight hit a resident doctors' hostel InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Supreme Court#Ahmedabad Plane Crash#Ahmedabad


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Congress MLA Vinay Kulkarni surrenders, shifted to central prison
Bengaluru: Congress' Dharwad Rural MLA Vinay Kulkarni surrendered before a special court for elected representatives in the city Friday following the cancellation of his bail by the Supreme Court. He has been remanded in judicial custody at Bengaluru Central Prison. Kulkarni is among 21 people arrested and chargesheeted by CBI in connection with the 2016 murder of Yogeeshgouda Goudar, a BJP member of the zilla panchayat from Hebballi constituency in Dharwad district. Kulkarni is arraigned as accused number 15. The Supreme Court granted conditional bail to Kulkarni in Aug 2021, which CBI challenged, saying he was threatening the witnesses and tampering with evidence. Passing the cancellation orders on June 6, a two-judge bench comprising Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma observed, "It would suffice to state that there is sufficient material on record to suggest that attempts have been made by Kulkarni to either contact witnesses or alternatively, influence such witnesses. Therefore, keeping in mind the totality of circumstances, this court is of the considered opinion that the bail granted to the respondent ought to be cancelled. Consequently, the bail granted to accused Kulkarni is hereby cancelled." Senior special public prosecutor Gangadhar Shetty said the special court will hear the case for three consecutive days from next Monday. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Why no FIR against Ponmudy? Madras high court orders notice to DGP, commissioner
Madras high court CHENNAI: Madras high court on Friday ordered notices to the Tamil Nadu DGP and the Chennai commissioner of police on a suo motu plea initiated against former DMK minister K Ponmudy for his obscene speech against Shaivism, Vaishnavism and women. On April 23, Justice N Anand Venkatesh decided to initiate the suo motu plea since the Tamil Nadu police failed to register an FIR against the former minister. After the approval of the chief justice, the petition was numbered and listed before Justice P Velmurugan, who handles the portfolio of cases against MPs and MLAs. When the plea came for hearing on Friday, Justice Velmurugan directed the registry to forward a copy of the order passed by Justice Anand Venkatesh to the DGP and the commissioner and adjourned the hearing to June 25. According to Justice Anand Venkatesh, the comments made by Ponmudy, on the face of it, were completely derogatory towards women and deliberately spewed venom and hatred on the two main sects of Hinduism. The judge directed the initiation of suo motu proceedings as the Tamil Nadu police failed to register an FIR against the minister, as suggested by high court. As per the Supreme Court order, police are mandated to register a case against such hate speech even in the absence of a formal complaint, high court pointed out. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Преносими лазерни заваръчни пистолети, 50% отстъпка LYH Купете сега Undo 'Tamil Nadu police must obey the orders of Supreme Court to check hate speeches in letter and spirit. They cannot perform lip service in these matters,' the judge said. Ponmudy submitted that the remarks were made in a closed-door meeting and that a truncated video clip was circulated. They added that the Madurai bench of the court already dismissed two petitions seeking action against the minister. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .