logo
Ukrainian POW branded with ‘Glory to Russia' says torture left him begging for death

Ukrainian POW branded with ‘Glory to Russia' says torture left him begging for death

New York Post3 days ago
A Ukrainian prisoner of war who was branded with 'Glory to Russia' has recalled begging his captors to kill him rather than take him in and torture him.
Andriy Pereverzev told United24 he was severely wounded on the battlefield when he was dragged to prison by Russian troops in February last year.
'While they were carrying me, I kept asking them, 'Finish me off. Just end it,'' he said in the new interview of his torture.
Advertisement
'But they didn't.'
3 Andriy Pereverzev, who Russia captured in February 2024 after suffering severe battlefield wounds, begged soldiers to 'finish' him off as they dragged him into prison.
UNITED24; e2w news
Pereverzev said he was then branded with 'Glory to Russia' with a 'metal cautery tool,' showing his jagged scars on the right side of his abdomen.
Advertisement
He said he woke disoriented from the horrific procedure and hadn't realized what the wound was until two Russian guards changed his dressings, leaving him 'gasping.'
He was also subjected to several other sick tortures, including one dubbed 'Calling Putin,' where an old phone is used to deliver devastating electric shocks to the hands, feet and genitals.
3 He was branded with 'Glory to Russia' by a surgeon after he was taken to an encampment.
UNITED24; e2w news
'Then they crank the phone handle, lift the receiver, and there is this old Soviet style rotary dial on it… the higher the number you dial from 0 to 9, the stronger the electric current,' he explained. 'And with each number, the power increases a lot.'
Advertisement
The prisoner of war, who was returned home earlier this year, was repeatedly shocked and brutally beaten by Russian soldiers.
'They used electric shocks on my open wounds a couple of times, and I started blacking out again,' he explained.
'Three hits to the head with a filled five-liter plastic bottle. My hands were tied, my eyes were covered.'
3 Pereverzev was subjected to several other sick torture tactics, including one called 'Calling Putin,' where an old phone is used to electrocute prisoners of war.
UNITED24; e2w news
Advertisement
Pereverzev and other soldiers were also forced to recite the Russian national anthem in captivity
'The guards came in and asked us to recite the Russian national anthem…those who didn't know it were beaten until they couldn't get up,' he said.
After suffering the horrific torture, Pereverzev weighed 35 pounds less when he returned home to his 9-year-old daughter.
She 'didn't recognise me, but I recognised her right away,' he said.
'I promised her then that no matter what condition I'd be in. Even without arms, without legs, I'd still come back,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North Sea 'Very Unprotected' Against Russia—NATO Admiral
North Sea 'Very Unprotected' Against Russia—NATO Admiral

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

North Sea 'Very Unprotected' Against Russia—NATO Admiral

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The North Sea is "very unprotected" and vulnerable to possible Russian sabotage attempts on critical undersea infrastructure NATO nations heavily rely on, according to a senior Dutch military official. Moscow's presence in the North Sea has increased, "and so the threat as well," said Rear Admiral Paul Flos, one of the founding members of the multinational Seabed Security Experimentation Center (SeaSEC) set up in The Hague to protect underwater infrastructure. The North Sea is "very much" at risk from Russian activity, Flos told Newsweek, adding: "They're not there because they like our waters." Critical Undersea Infrastructure Crisscrossing beneath our oceans and seas are cables and pipelines vital to everyday life, including ensuring the lights stay on and that bank payments are processed. Roughly 1.3 million kilometers of cables—equivalent to about 800,000 miles—are used for $10 trillion in financial transactions each day, NATO chief Mark Rutte said at the start of 2025. Undersea cables carry more than 95 percent of all internet traffic, Rutte said. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty But these networks are exposed, and there are simply too many cables and pipelines to shield at any one time, said Laurence Roche, from NATO's Italy-based Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation. It is "really hard to protect" critical undersea infrastructure, Roche told Newsweek. NATO is certainly trying. In 2024, the alliance established a new United Kingdom-based center, specifically tasked with developing strategies to protect undersea networks, reporting to NATO's Maritime Command. The alliance then launched its "Baltic Sentry" initiative to track ships moving through the Baltic Sea after several cables and pipelines were damaged or severed in late 2023. The U.K. also launched the Proteus, a first-of-its-kind surveillance ship, to monitor underwater activities and control uncrewed underwater vehicles (UUVs) nearly two years ago. North Sea and the Baltic The Baltic Sea is better known than the North Sea for highlighting the vulnerability of the alliance's critical undersea infrastructure. It is occasionally dubbed a "NATO lake," the water bracketed by alliance members and Kaliningrad, the Russian exclave home to a formidable military footprint and Moscow's Baltic Fleet. NATO countries have logged a spate of incidents involving critical undersea infrastructure in the past year and a half, largely blamed on suspected sabotage by Russia in the wake of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Accidental damage can, and often does, happen, but officials are increasingly speaking out about attacks blamed on Moscow. The most high-profile incidents include damage to a power cable and two communications lines in the Baltic Sea on December 25, 2024. Authorities quickly cast suspicion on the Eagle S, a Cook Islands-flagged oil tanker believed to be part of Russia's "shadow fleet" of vessels used to circumvent sanctions. Finnish authorities stated in mid-June that they had concluded a criminal investigation and suspected senior officers aboard the ship of "aggravated criminal mischief and aggravated interference with telecommunications" in connection with the dragging of an anchor. Helsinki's prosecutor general is weighing up charges, the country's National Bureau of Investigation said in a statement. Unnamed Western intelligence officials told the Associated Press in January that the recent damage to undersea infrastructure could be caused by anchors accidentally dragging on poorly staffed and decrepit ships. High-voltage cables that connect electricity systems between countries, when disrupted, can cost around $14 million each day, according to the Rand think tank. The total bill for oil and gas pipelines being knocked out for months can reach the tens of billions, the organization said in June. Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the U.K.'s top military official, said in early 2022 that there had been a "phenomenal increase" in Russian underwater activity in the past two decades, with Moscow able to "potentially exploit the world's real information system, which is undersea cables that go all around the world." Former British Defense Minister Ben Wallace, still in post in 2023, stated that Russian submarines had taken "strange routes that they normally wouldn't do," including in the North Sea. The Baltic and North Seas have a relatively similar shallowness, but the North Sea is more sandy where the Baltic is rocky, said Flos. "So, often, cables are easier to destroy in the Baltic than in the North Sea," Flos said. "But the threat is the same," he said. Sabotage acts like dragging anchors can only be used at certain places in the world because of the shallowness of the water, like in the Baltic, said Sidharth Kaushal, a senior research fellow for sea power at the U.K.-based Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think tank. To the west, several NATO countries look out onto the North Sea, including the U.K. and the Netherlands. British Defense Secretary John Healey said at the start of the year that the Yantar, a Russian vessel spotted in the North Sea, was a "spy ship" on a mission to gather intelligence and map the U.K.'s seabed network. The Yantar was spotted in November 2024 "loitering over U.K. critical undersea infrastructure," Healey said. The Russian embassy in London hit back at the remarks, stating in January that the claims were "completely groundless." "Russia has never posed such threats," the embassy added. The Yantar is one of the vessels operated by Russia's Main Directorate of Deep-Sea Research, or GUGI, a shadowy branch of the military that answers directly to the Russian defense minister and, ultimately, to Russian President Vladimir Putin. The GUGI has a collection of submarines and surface ships, such as the Belgorod submarine, that can simultaneously carry nuclear-armed torpedoes and control small submersibles capable of diving deep underwater. GUGI performs a variety of roles for the Kremlin, ranging from laying sensors on the seabed to surveillance, espionage, and larger strategic functions, Kaushal told Newsweek. In the North Sea, rather than relying on anchor dragging, GUGI could use ships like the Yantar to detect critical infrastructure before deploying UUVs or remotely operated vehicles, he said. Within GUGI's ranks, Kaushal said, the organization has hydronauts—specialized personnel who pass "punishing" entrance criteria to steer submersibles at extreme depths. These hydronauts are pulled from Russia's 29th Separate Submarine Division, based at the submarine hub of Gadzhiyevo in the northwestern Murmansk region and close to the Northern Fleet headquarters. Who's Responsible for Protecting Cables and Pipelines? "We see you," the U.K.'s Healey told lawmakers in January this year. "We know what you are doing." Flos is less sure. "What they're doing there, nobody knows," he said. "That's the challenge." Although allied militaries can detect where Russia is poking around in the North Sea, their goals are murky, but there is "very strong evidence that they also used unmanned underwater vessels," Flos said. Reports in British media earlier this year indicated the U.K. military had found Russian drones close to critical undersea infrastructure. Western militaries are well-acquainted with unarmed surveillance ships like the Yantar, making this type of vessel much easier to track than some of Russia's advanced submarines, Kaushal said. And there has been rapid improvement on what the alliance can observe of Russia's activity in the North Sea, even since the start of the year, Flos said. "We're not blind anymore," he said. Cooperation between allied countries has improved over the last year, particularly in cultivating a better understanding of how civilian ships and support vessels are utilized by the Kremlin, Kaushal said. But a big question remains: Whose job is it to bat away Russia's interest in the North Sea's critical undersea infrastructure? Cables and pipelines are, the vast majority of the time, owned by private companies. "Are the asset owners responsible? Are the nations responsible? Is the Coast Guard responsible?" Flos asked. It's "hugely complicated," he said, adding that the conversations were still happening. NATO has emphasized the need to establish rapid connections with private companies and industrial players to more effectively detect threats to pipelines and cables, as well as to maintain infrastructure. "We have to increase out cooperation with industries on all kinds of levels," Flos said. The Dutch Navy official said he had emphasized in recent days that there needed to be more trust between governments, militaries and industry. There does seem to be a growing consensus within NATO that protecting infrastructure used by its members is a "collective military responsibility," added Kaushal. But it's often opaque which powers exist to stop suspicious ships operating in international waters, he said.

Arson attack on a Ukrainian restaurant in Estonia was ordered by Russian intelligence, a court says

time14 hours ago

Arson attack on a Ukrainian restaurant in Estonia was ordered by Russian intelligence, a court says

An arson attack on a restaurant and supermarket in Estonia last year were ordered by Russian intelligence, an Estonian court said Wednesday. The attack was one in a series across Europe tracked by The Associated Press and linked to Russia by Western officials. The goal, they asserted, is to sow division in Western societies and undermine support for Ukraine. The Harju County Court in Estonia said the perpetrators were two Moldovan men who are cousins, both named Ivan Chihaial. One was sentenced to 6 1/2 years in prison for the arson attack on the restaurant and supermarket, which the court said was carried out on behalf of Russia's security services. The other Ivan Chihaial was an accomplice and sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison. In a statement, the court said the first Chihaial was tasked with the operation by Russian military intelligence, known as the GRU. It said he carried out a trial operation on behalf of the GRU in January 2024, setting fire to a Co-op supermarket in the village of Osula in southeastern Estonia. The next day someone acting on behalf of the GRU tasked him with setting fire to the Slava Ukraina restaurant in the capital, Tallinn. Chihaial drove with his cousin to the restaurant on the night of Jan. 31, 2024, then they set fire to it and left Estonia. The court said Chihaial's cousin was unaware he was working for the GRU. The court said the defendants set fire to the supermarket and the restaurant by breaking a window, pouring in gasoline, placing a bag with a gasoline can inside and igniting it. Authorities in Latvia, Lithuania and Poland worked to detain the men who were apprehended in Italy before being sent to Estonia to face trial, said State Prosecutor Triinu Olev-Aas. The arson is the latest attack on Estonia since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In prior cases, Estonia suffered cyberattacks and the windows of cars belonging to a politician and journalist were smashed. Previous attackers have been recruited inside Russia, which shares a border with Estonia. The Estonian Internal Security Service said the fact that Russia's intelligence agencies used Moldovans who were sent to the country showed they are finding it increasingly difficult to recruit, including among dual citizens. Russia has been accused of a widespread sabotage campaign by Western officials since its invasion of Ukraine. As well as cases of arson, the attacks across Europe range from stuffing car tailpipes with expanding foam in Germany to a plot to plant explosives on cargo planes, hacking that targeted politicians and critical infrastructure and spying by a ring convicted in the U.K. President Vladimir Putin's spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, has told the AP that the Kremlin has never been shown 'any proofs' supporting accusations of a broader sabotage campaign and said 'certainly we definitely reject any allegations.'

French fishing trawler came ‘face to face' with Russian sub
French fishing trawler came ‘face to face' with Russian sub

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

French fishing trawler came ‘face to face' with Russian sub

A French fishing trawler came face to face with a Russian attack submarine when it surfaced in the English Channel off the coast of Brittany. The crew of the 25 metre Belenos trawler were shocked to see the Kilo-class vessel break the surface of the water just metres away from their boat as they were fishing near the Channel Islands of Jersey and Guernsey. One image, taken by a crew member, appears to show a figure emerging from the front of the conning tower, the raised structure that acts as the command centre. Reports of the Russian craft's presence came as a French admiral on Wednesday revealed that a shadow fleet of 'around 900' ghost ships run by Russia, North Korea and Iran, ply the waves, with 'a dozen' passing through the Channel every day. According to data from MarineTraffic, a ship tracking tool, the Belenos left Roscoff in Brittany at about 9am on Saturday. It then fished north of Roscoff, approaching the west coast of the Channel Islands of Jersey and Guernsey when the encounter took place. Ouest-France, the regional paper that broke the story, cited the Atlantic Maritime Prefecture, based in Brest, as playing down the incident. It said: 'It's a submarine that had been tracked for some time; it was simply in transit.' However, the paper said it was 'very unusual for such a vessel to surface so close to a fishing boat'. The prefecture said: 'A French frigate accompanied it as it headed south to enter the Mediterranean or sail along the African coast, as Russian units from the Northern Fleet [based in Severomorsk] or the Baltic Fleet [in Kaliningrad] regularly do. 'In general, Russian submarines do not hide because they know [we] are aware of their presence.' 'Only France dispatched a ship, but the information 'was passed on to allies', as required by protocol.' The name of the submarine has not been disclosed but it appears to be a conventional diesel-electric attack submarine, such as those of the Kilo-class, which are produced in large numbers by Russia. Breton fishermen are wary of clashing with submarines since the sinking of the Bugaled Breizh trawler on Jan 15 2004, which caused the death of all five crew members. For years, the cause of the sinking was thought to be a collision with a Western submarine, but an inquest in 2021 found that the vessel was likely to have sunk because of a snagging of its equipment on the seabed, which forced it to stop and take on water. The trawler sank in the waters off Lizard Point, not far from the area where the Belenos was operating on June 28. The incident came as a French admiral told MPs that a ghost fleet of boats used to transport petrol in circumvention of sanctions may number 'around 900 ships'. Admiral Benoit de Guibert, the maritime prefect for the Channel and the North Sea, said: 'The state's action is primarily to keep a particularly close watch on this fleet, which is estimated to consist of around 900 ships, including a dozen that are tracked daily in the English Channel.' The clandestine fleet 'does not only concern Russian interests, but also those of other countries such as Iran and North Korea', he told MPs. His assessment came after it emerged that a Russian warship disguised itself using a fake ID signal while travelling through the English Channel with two sanctioned oil tankers. The Boikiy – a corvette armed with guided missiles – broadcast the fake ID code as it passed through the Channel earlier this month, according to the BBC. It travelled alongside two vessels known to be part of Russia's 'shadow fleet' – a network of tankers whose ownership can be obscured and are used to transport sanctioned oil products. It is thought that recent Western moves against the shadow fleet may have prompted Moscow to use its military to protect the tankers. Last month, a Russian Su-35 fighter jet flew past a shadow fleet vessel and entered Estonian airspace after the country attempted to intercept the ship, which was suspected of carrying sanctioned oil. Dmitry Gorenburg, a senior research scientist at the Centre for Naval Analyses, told the BBC: 'The action seems designed to deter the UK and other Nato states from attempting to board and, or, seize these vessels, since the presence of a military escort heightens the risk of confrontation and further escalation.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store