New Mexico set to become third state to implement full PFAS product ban
New Mexico is poised to become the third state to institute a full-fledged ban on products that contain toxic 'forever chemicals,' as two key bills head to the governor's desk.
The concurrent pieces of legislation, which have both passed through the state Legislature, would prohibit most items that contain these compounds, while also deeming specific types of discarded firefighting foam as hazardous waste.
The chemicals in question, called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), are notorious for their propensity to linger in the human body and in the environment. Linked to various types of cancers and other serious illnesses, PFAS are found in numerous household products, as well as in certain kinds of firefighting foam.
The first bill, H.B. 212, would ban products that contain intentionally added PFAS and would authorize the state's Environmental Improvement Board to adopt relevant rules.
Starting on Jan. 1, 2027, manufacturers would not be able to sell or distribute cookware, food packaging, dental floss and juvenile products that have intentionally added PFAS. The same would apply to carpets, cleaning fluids, cosmetics, fabric treatments, menstrual products, textiles, ski wax and upholstered furniture on Jan. 1, 2028.
With respect to pesticides, fertilizers and other agricultural materials — many of which contain PFAS — the Environmental Improvement Board would consult with the New Mexico Department of Agriculture before setting rules on these subjects.
There would be some exceptions to the prospective ban, such as those items that the board has determined 'to be essential for health, safety or the functioning of society and for which alternatives are not reasonably available.'
The accompanying piece of legislation, H.B. 140, focuses on a range of chemicals, including PFAS, and provides new clarity on the meaning of the term 'hazardous waste.'
The bill would redefine hazardous waste as 'any solid waste or combination of solid wastes' that because of its amount, concentration or characteristics could 'cause or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible or incapacitating reversible illness.'
Among the specific hazardous waste items mentioned is 'discarded aqueous film-forming foam containing intentionally added [PFAS].'
If Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) signs the two bills as anticipated, New Mexico would become the third state to implement a near-complete prohibition on PFAS-containing products.
The state would follow in the footsteps of Maine and Minnesota, which passed their respective laws in 2021 and 2023. Numerous other states have approved legislation forbidding PFAS in certain product categories, rather than instituting bans across the board.
While the three-year price of preventing PFAS pollution via such a ban would climb to about $2.8 million, the cost of removing and destroying just one pound of PFAS from water could be up to $18 million, according to an analysis of the legislation from the New Mexico Environment Department.
'With approximately 1,100 public drinking water systems in New Mexico serving 94 percent of our residents, preventing contamination is the only affordable means of securing our drinking water supply,' the analysis concluded.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
City of Spokane releases its 2024 report on drinking water quality
Jun. 10—The city of Spokane met all state and federal drinking water standards last year, according to its required 2024 report on drinking water quality measuring levels of contaminants and "forever" chemicals in its source wells. PFAS, also known as polyfluoroalkyl substances, refers to a group of human-made chemicals that has been used in consumer products since the 1950s. Think nonstick cookware, water-resistant fabrics, certain cleaning products or fire-fighting foam. Exposure to high levels of these chemicals has been linked to detrimental health effects, including decreased fertility, developmental delays and a higher risk of some type of cancers, such as kidney and prostate cancer. The components of these substances usually take hundreds or thousands of years to break down, and their widespread use has resulted in their prevalence everywhere — including in our drinking water. Washington established state action levels in 2022 to address PFAS, providing thresholds for the amount of contamination drinking water can contain before specific state actions must take place. In April 2024, the EPA announced a new federal standard: a maximum containment level of 4 parts per trillion of PFAS. Although the EPA requires water purveyors to meet this federal regulatory standard by 2027, the city has already updated its testing and monitoring procedures to account for the contaminants. "We're all kind of learning together," public works communications manager Kirstin Davis said. "Some of the prior standards didn't have as complicated and as detailed of testing as what's available now." The city of Spokane detected low levels of PFAs in three well locations: Havana Well, Nevada Well and Ray Street Well. During a test in February, the Ray Street Well measured slightly above the federal standard at 6.1 parts per trillion of PFOS, a specific type of PFA. EPA rules, however, measure compliances based on a four-quarter rolling average of test results. Further testing of that well in June and October resulted in lower levels of PFAs detected, making the average just below the federal limit. The report also analyzed other levels of inorganic chemicals and found traces of arsenic, barium, lead, copper, nitrate and radionuclides in the source wells, all below the federal limit. This year's Spokane City Water Quality report is accessible on the City's water quality webpage.
CBS News
9 hours ago
- CBS News
"Forever chemicals" found in fish caught in San Francisco Bay, report warns
A warning to anglers who eat their catch from the San Francisco Bay, fish pulled from the waters may contain dangerous levels of so-called "forever chemicals." In a recent report by the San Francisco Estuary Institute, scientists detected 20 types of polyfluoroalkyl substances, known as PFAS in fish caught in the bay. Their research and testing of fish began in 2009, and a revised study was published in the American Chemical Society this past March. "PFAS have been known to harm us in a variety of different ways, they've been known to cause cancer," said Miguel Mendez, the lead author of the SFEI study. "It affects us in variety of different organs, including the liver, and over time can cause some severe health effects." Along the docks of San Francisco's Embarcadero, one will find a variety of fisherman who are there for sport or relaxation, but a number of people fish the docks for food. "I think for communities, especially those that are eating every day from the Bay, that is a huge concern and likely leading to a higher load of PFAS and other contaminants, for these populations," said Mendez. Along Pier One, longtime anglers Danny Tran and Nick Hayden were posted up on a sunny afternoon, and both say while they love to fish, they are careful about how much of their catch they consume. "I don't eat too much fish, so I'm okay with it," said Tran. "I probably eat once a month, twice a month and that's about it." "You have to choose what you eat, the smaller (younger) the better, because there's less chemicals in them," said Hayden. "The bigger ones have higher levels of mercury, or whatever they have inside of them." Currently there are no specific state guidelines on the consumption of fish in relation to PFAS. But since 2011 the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessments has offered recommendations on 18 fish species on which types of fish to avoid, which fish are safe to eat, and how many servings are recommended per week, along with gender and age advisories. They updated their recommendations in April of 2023, and have posted signs along local docks. Where anglers catch their fish, can also determine the level of "forever chemicals." SFEI conducted tests in 12 different locations and found higher levels of PFAS in the South Bay. "The South Bay is a hotspot for PFAS, but that doesn't mean that the North Bay is the immune or doesn't have PFAS at all, because fish can swim for location to location," said Mendez. "To those who may have a seafood heavy diet, you should really think about where is my seafood coming from."
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Louisiana Legislature targets out-of-state doctors who provide abortion pills
Packages of Mifepristone tablets are displayed at a family planning clinic on April 13, 2023 in Rockville, Maryland. (Photo illustration by) The Louisiana Legislature has approved a bill targeting out-of-state abortion-inducing drug providers, giving more time to individuals who want to sue someone who performed, attempted to perform or substantially facilitated an abortion. The legislation is part of an effort from anti-abortion advocates to crack down on doctors who ship abortion-inducing medication to states where the procedure is illegal. In nearly all instances, abortion has been illegal in Louisiana since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022. House Bill 575 by Rep. Lauren Ventrella, R-Greenwell Springs, easily passed both chambers. She dubbed her proposal the 'Justice for Victims of Abortion Drug Dealers Act,' though it would apply to all forms of the procedure. It extends the window for abortion lawsuits from three years to five years and allows out-of-state doctors and activists to be sued. The bill will become law unless vetoed by Gov. Jeff Landry, which is unlikely. Ventrella's bill has the support of Attorney General Liz Murrill, who is currently prosecuting a case against a New York doctor accused of providing abortion-inducing medication to the mother of a pregnant minor in West Baton Rouge Parish. Gov. Kathy Hoschul has refused to extradite the doctor to Louisiana to face charges, citing New York's shield laws. The doctor and the minor's mother were both indicted. Murrill has alleged the minor was coerced to take the medication, though her mother was not charged with this crime. Ventrella's legislation was substantially whittled down throughout the legislative process. In its original state, it would have allowed the 'mother of the unborn child,' her parents, the man who impregnated her and his parents as potential plaintiffs. The man would have been unable to sue if the pregnancy was the result of rape, sexual assault or incest. The measure also would have allowed the plaintiffs to sue anybody who facilitated the abortion, with this term originally being undefined. It also would have allowed drug manufacturers to be sued. The legislation received bipartisan pushback, with multiple lawmakers raising privacy concerns. Last year, Louisiana lawmakers classified mifepristone and misoprostol as controlled dangerous substances. Both are used in medication abortions but also have other uses, including to stop life-threatening postpartum hemorrhages. Medical professionals opposed the move, warning the designation could make the drugs more difficult to access in time-sensitive medical crises. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
