No place to hide from any China-Taiwan conflict, investors say
By Ankur Banerjee
SINGAPORE (Reuters) -Foreign investors could once barely imagine that China would invade neighbouring Taiwan, but with Donald Trump as president of the United States, many view it as a tail-risk scenario they must prepare for, although they cannot find ways to do so.
The democratically-governed island has long been a point of contention in U.S.-China relations, which have worsened since Trump entered the White House in January and launched trade tariffs that have rattled markets.
Investors fear that if China attempts to take over what it considers "sacred" territory, it risks a war that ushers in the end of Taiwan as a market with its own currency and identity, while the only other alternative is peace and the status quo.
For investors, the choice therefore is to stay out completely or stay invested and hope for the best.
The risk of any invasion is difficult to hedge, said Mukesh Dave, chief investment officer at Aravali Asset Management, a global arbitrage fund based in Singapore.
"You can't settle any trades, the currency might disappear altogether," he said. "You either carry on like it's business as usual, or stay away."
The odds of China invading Taiwan have risen to 12% on betting platform Polymarket from close to none earlier this year.
Skittish foreign investors have pulled nearly $11 billion out of Taiwan stocks this year, although much of that was fuelled by concerns over tariffs and the economy and they made a tentative return in May.
The benchmark index is down 6% this year.
While the United States has long stuck to a policy of "strategic ambiguity," on Taiwan, not making clear whether it would respond militarily to an attack, Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, said during his time in office that U.S. forces would defend the island if China were to attack.
Rising geopolitical tensions from Trump's talk of a new global order and his disregard for Russia's takeover of swathes of Ukraine have raised doubts about such U.S. protection for Taiwan.
While Taiwan has lived under the threat of Chinese invasion since 1949 when the defeated Republic of China government fled there after losing a civil war with Mao Zedong's communists, the two sides have not exchanged shots in anger for decades.
Yet, tension has simmered across the Taiwan Strait that separates the island from China. China's two-day war games around Taiwan in April further fuelled investor worries.
The latest barbs came this week as Taiwan President Lai Ching-te used a news conference marking his first year in office to pledge peace with China, only to have China's Taiwan Affairs Office say his remarks were a "two-faced tactic" and that Taiwan cannot "stop the inevitable trend of national reunification".
Lai, whom China calls a "separatist", rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future.
Goldman Sachs' Cross-Strait Risk Index, which gauges the intensity of geopolitical risk by counting the number of news articles mentioning tension, has been rising since Trump won the U.S. election last year.
"If aggression toward Taiwan occurs, the investment decision becomes binary: stay exposed and absorb extreme volatility, or exit swiftly to preserve capital," said Steve Lawrence, chief investment officer of Balfour Capital Group.
CROWN JEWEL
The Taiwan investment rationale centres on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the world's largest contract chipmaker and the semiconductor industry's crown jewel.
TSMC, which counts Nvidia and Apple as major clients and whose stock is listed in Taipei and New York, powered the stock market to record highs earlier this year.
"TSMC is so big that the expectation among investors is the United States will defend Taiwan, and defend it strongly," said Dave of Aravali. "That is the hope."
Yet TSMC has been in Trump's crosshairs as he unleashed tariffs in April and later delayed some duties to negotiate with foes and allies alike.
Local fund managers say while there may be no way for investors to hedge against an actual war, they do have options to hedge against possible market declines driven by fear of war.
However, Li Fang-kuo, chairman of Uni-President's securities investment advisory unit in Taiwan, is sceptical of the need for such hedging, as he believes foreign investors are misreading the level of risk of a cross-strait war. "We shouldn't interpret it from a geopolitical risk perspective. The key issue is the tariffs."
Rich Nuzum, global chief investment strategist at pension fund adviser Mercer, said his clients that have looked at the risk found the best option was to diversify.
"I think stress-testing for crisis is being done more and more."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Senate to Keep Spectrum Sales in Tax Bill, Key Republican Says
A key Republican said senators have reached an agreement to reauthorize spectrum sales to internet companies that would generate billions of dollars in revenue toward funding US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cuts and spending bill. Spectrum sales were included in the House version of the reconciliation package but the provision had drawn objections from South Dakota Republican Senator Mike Rounds, who previously said they risked undermining the US military's communications capabilities.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's travel ban could drive some African nations closer to America's adversaries
Donald Trump's travel ban, a purportedly security-focused measure largely targeting African nations and Muslim-majority countries, underscores his administration's ignorant and potentially destructive approach to a continent with growing global influence. In announcing the ban, Trump said it's meant to ensure the U.S. only allows people to enter who 'do not bear hostile attitudes toward its citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles.' Whereas the Biden administration took steps to ingratiate itself with African leaders and slough off some of the American paternalism that has driven some African nations closer to Russia and China in recent years, Trump's administration seems to have doubled down on an outmoded strategy of exploitation, conspiratorial brow-beating and ostracism. In just the first few months of Trump's second term, his administration has pressured African nations to permit Elon Musk's Starlink internet service to operate within their borders and has sought to use war-torn nations in Africa — including a country known for its human rights abuses — as landing spots for people booted from the U.S. as part of Trump's mass deportation plan. The president also personally turned the Oval Office into a screening room for bigoted conspiracy theories when he invited the president of South Africa to the White House and then bombarded him with false allegations of 'white genocide' being committed in his country. Needless to say, this hasn't helped the U.S. build on its rapport with African nations. And fundamentally, what that could mean for the U.S. is that a continent full of countries that American officials have pinpointed as crucial partners in our geopolitical strategies related to security and commerce could drift further toward our adversaries. That's certainly the vibe given off by the African Union Commission and its dozens of member states, which denounced Trump's travel ban and warned about its potential impacts. 'The Commission remains concerned about the potential negative impact of such measures on people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and the broader diplomatic relations that have been carefully nurtured over decades. Africa and the United States share mutual interests in promoting peace, prosperity, and global cooperation,' the commission said in a statement, adding: 'The African Union Commission respectfully calls upon the U.S. Administration to consider adopting a more consultative approach and to engage in constructive dialogue with the countries concerned.' University of Michigan economics professor Justin Wolfers identified one clear way that Trump's travel ban could harm the American economy. 'One obvious economic implication of the latest travel ban is that genuinely international conferences will no longer be held in the U.S.,' he wrote on X. And that may just be the tip of the iceberg. It's also true that the materials used to make batteries in everything from cutting-edge cars to phones and computers most often come from African mines. Which is to say: Trump's cold shoulder toward African nations could have dire consequences for America's future, particularly with regard to the economy and U.S. national security. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DHS expedites 36 miles of border wall, waiving environmental laws
June 5 (UPI) -- The Department of Homeland Security on Thursday issued three new waivers for roughly 36 miles of a new border wall in Arizona and New Mexico. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem approved the waivers, which allow environmental laws to be disregarded for border wall construction. DHS said in a statement, "The Secretary's waiver authority allows DHS to waive environmental laws -- including the National Environmental Policy Act -- to ensure the expeditious construction of physical barriers and roads, by minimizing the risk of administrative delays." DHS said the waivers to expedite the border wall project "are critical steps to secure the southern border and reinforce our commitment to border security." The project list for border wall construction under these waivers includes three in the El Paso sector, one in the Yuma sector and three in Tucson. Funding is provided through U.S. Customs and Border Protection's Fiscal year 2020 and 2021 appropriations. President Donald Trump pushed for a border wall during his first term, promising that he would build a wall along the Mexico-U.S. border and that Mexico would pay for it. Mexico did not pay for it. About 500 miles of border wall was built during Trump's first term.