NS&I launches new one-year British Savings Bonds offering higher interest rates
Savings giant NS&I has launched new versions of its one-year British Savings Bonds with increased interest rates. One finance expert described the move as bucking 'the trend in a falling market'.
British Savings Bonds are fixed-term issues of NS&I's Guaranteed Growth Bonds and Guaranteed Income Bonds. They are available to new customers and those with existing bonds which are due to mature. The new rate for the one-year Growth and Income options is 4.18 per cent AER (annual equivalent rate), the previous rate was 4.05 per cent AER.
NS&I is backed by the Treasury, so money held with it has 100 per cent security.
Andrew Westhead, NS&I retail director, said: 'I am pleased that we can offer savers - both new and those with our existing one-year bonds which are about to mature - this new opportunity to save.
'In launching this new issue, NS&I continues to balance the interests of its savers, taxpayers and the broader financial services sector - and to work towards its annual net financing target.'
Guaranteed Growth Bonds and Guaranteed Income Bonds are available to customers wanting a guaranteed rate for a fixed-term of one, two, three or five years.
Funds cannot be withdrawn early with fixed-term accounts. Savers need a minimum investment of £500 and can invest a maximum of £1 million per person in each issue.
After the fixed-term period, savers have the choice to withdraw their cash or reinvest into a new term.
Guaranteed Growth Bonds are a lump sum investment that earns a fixed rate of interest over a set period. Interest is added to the bond on each anniversary of the investment.
Guaranteed Income Bonds are a lump sum investment that pays out monthly income at a fixed rate of interest over a set period.
Earlier in July, NS&I launched some new versions of its two, three and five-year British Savings Bonds with lower rates than previously offered.
It also lowered the rate on a Junior Isa from July 18, from 4.00 per cent to 3.55 per cent. Many commentators expect the Bank of England base rate to be cut further this year, which could be a further blow to savers.
Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'NS&I has bucked the trend in a falling market and boosted the rate on its one-year bonds.
'Elsewhere, savings have been gradually dropping across the board. Fixed terms have generally held up slightly better than easy access accounts, but they're still trending downwards.
'NS&I itself cut the rate on its bonds fixed for two, three and five years earlier this month – along with cuts to the Premium Bond prize rate in August.
'It's not worth getting too excited about though. The one-year bond went back on sale in April this year, and the rate at the time was a dismal 4.05%.
'NS&I has to offer a rate somewhere in the middle of the pack, so it doesn't tend to be market leading, but clearly at this rate it wasn't pulling in enough cash.
'The rise today still leaves it well behind the market leaders - which offer more than 4.5 per cent - but it will be hoping it has done enough to retain savers with maturing one-year bonds and to attract new cash.'
Laura Suter, director of personal finance at AJ Bell, said: 'The rate on offer is a far cry from the original one-year British Savings Bond that launched two years ago which proved to be a sell-out success, being pulled from sale after just five weeks.
'But back then savers were offered a generous 6.2% – a rate that now looks like a relic from another era. With interest rates edging down and other providers trimming their fixed-rate deals, NS&I has clearly tried to find a middle ground that will be attractive enough to draw in some money but not so generous that it's swamped by demand.
'For some savers, the government-backing of NS&I will be the main draw. With full protection on deposits up to £1 million, it removes the hassle of having to split savings across multiple banks to stay under the FSCS (Financial Services Compensation Scheme) limit of £85,000.
'But for others, that safety net comes at a cost. You can get better returns elsewhere if you're willing to forgo the government guarantee.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Treasury targeting inheritance tax reforms to help plug UK deficit
The Treasury is looking at ways to raise more money from inheritance tax amid growing pressure on the country's finances ahead of the autumn budget, sources have told the Guardian. Officials have been tasked with examining whether tightening rules on the gifting of money and assets could be one way of addressing a gap between revenue and spending that is estimated to reach more than £40bn. Although no decisions have been taken, the government has been careful not to rule out tax rises later this year amid slowing economic growth, higher-than-hoped inflation and unemployment at a four-year high. Labour MPs have been pushing the idea of a wealth tax, but changes to inheritance tax (IHT) thresholds could be similarly controversial. Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer have already prepared the ground for tax rises in recent interviews, suggesting the pressure on public finances is too great to rule them out. However, the government's pledge not to raise taxes on 'working people' in its election manifesto has left the chancellor with limited options for how to tackle a yawning deficit cause by factors including Donald Trump's tariffs, higher debt interest payments and a series of U-turns on welfare cuts. Among the moves being considered are changes to how wealth or assets can be given away prior to death to reduce inheritance tax liablities. This includes examining the possibility of a cap on lifetime gifting. At present, gifts made seven years before someone dies are not subject to IHT, while those given three to seven years before death are taxed on a sliding scale known as 'taper relief', with the rate reducing each year from 32% to 8%. A lifetime cap could be introduced to limit the amount of money or value of assets an individual can donate as part of their IHT planning and the Treasury is also reviewing rules around the taper rate, people familiar with the matter said. A source with knowledge of the work told the Guardian: 'With so much wealth stored in assets like houses that have shot up in value, we have to find ways to better tap into the inheritances of those who can afford to contribute more. 'It's hard to make sure these taxes don't end up with loopholes that undermine their purpose. But we are trying to work out what revenue might be raised and how to ensure it's a fair approach.' The source added: 'IHT can raise more, and even if we do nothing, it will raise more money as the threshold for paying it stays frozen. But we have to look at the levers for taxing wealth if the aim of the government is to avoid hitting earnings from work as much as possible.' IHT changes have provoked a strong public response in the past, even though fewer than one in 20 estates paid it in recent years. In the late 2000s the Conservatives enjoyed a significant swing in opinion polls when they proposed raising the threshold at which IHT would kick in. Then party leader David Cameron made it a hot-button issue, putting pressure on the Labour prime minister, Gordon Brown, with headlines about the 'death tax'. More recently, Reeves has faced fierce criticism and protests over the past year in response to her decision in last autumn's budget to slash tax breaks for farmers passing on their businesses. She defended her decision in an interview in Northern Ireland on Tuesday, saying she believed those farmers with more than £3m to pass on 'should make a contribution' and would still continue to pay a lower rate of IHT than others. Only 4.6% of deaths resulted in IHT being paid in the tax year 2022-2023, according to the latest figures from HMRC. The average effective tax rate was 13%, after accounting for all the different reliefs and exemptions that might apply depending on the individual circumstances. That compares with the headline rate of 40%. The government is trying to work out how it can tap into the vast wave of wealth that will be transferred from baby boomers when they die, fuelled by large pension pots, as well as house prices that have risen sharply over their lifetimes. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion It already took steps to bring these pensions into the scope of IHT late last year. From April 2027, most unused pension pots and death benefits will be subject to the tax. This leaves large loopholes, however, if sums are withdrawn and gifted instead, and officials are increasingly concerned about large cash sums being extracted from these pots. Another possible revenue stream being looked at is whether to increase capital gains tax rates by a few percentage points. However, this would be accompanied by some kind of CGT allowance for investors who put money into British businesses, as the Treasury tries to strike a balance between tapping into wealth to fund public services without deterring investment into the UK. There is growing anecdotal evidence that some wealthy people and company directors may have already left the UK following recent tax changes, including the end of the 'non-dom' status, though there is no official data yet available. The Guardian was first to reveal that the government was considering major changes to business property relief and agricultural land tax in 2024, a step then brought in by Reeves. These changes may have a significant impact on how much money is raised by IHT going forward, but it is unclear how they might alter behaviour. Meanwhile CGT rates were not raised as high as many senior Labour party figures had hoped in 2024, with the government stepping back from bringing it closer to levels of income tax. Still, some senior government figures believe that there is a political deal to be done to create a path towards equalising its levels with income tax. They believe there is room for this a compromise after Reeves signalled that a flat rate wealth tax – of the kind proposed by backbenchers last month of 2% on assets over £10m – had more or less been ruled out. In a recent interview, Reeves pointed to IHT and CGT as the UK alternatives to a headline wealth tax such as that in countries like Switzerland. 'We have inheritance tax. We have capital gains. We've just got rid of the non-dom tax status that doesn't exist any more in our tax system. So we do have taxes that tax the wealthy. I'm not keen to do what Switzerland has done and replace those with a wealth tax because I think there's the risk of actually losing money by doing those things,' she told LBC's Iain Dale on 2 August. A Treasury spokesperson said: 'As set out in the Plan for Change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn. 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn's budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance or VAT.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Rumoured tax raid spooks another industry
A new tax has appeared on the horizon, its advocates claiming it could raise £3.2bn for the Treasury. On Wednesday, Gordon Brown took to the airwaves, championing a tax rise on the 'undertaxed' gambling industry. The former Prime Minister is backing calls from the think tank Institute for Public Policy Research, which is claiming raising various gambling taxes could earn the Treasury enough money to cover the cost of scrapping the two-child benefit cap. The policy – perhaps unsurprisingly – is relatively popular. A YouGov survey found 42 per cent of respondents polled to be strongly in support of higher taxes on online gambling, while 28 per cent would somewhat support the increase. Dr Christopher Snowdon of the Institute of Economic Affairs warns against the seduction of supporting a so-called sin tax to fund a noble cause, or the hypothecation of a particular tax stream. If the tax works and reduces consumption, it reduces the Treasury's tax intake, leaving less money for the cause it was meant to fund. 'HMRC have made it clear that hypothecation is the antithesis to everything they believe in', he tells me. But also, is the industry about to be decimated before Rachel Reeves manages to collect her golden eggs? Such is the jitter across businesses as the Chancellor hunts around for tax revenue to plug a black hole worth as much as £50bn in the economy that by Friday the country's biggest gambling companies had lost over £4bn in value, ' amid fears of a tax raid on the sector in the next Budget '. One of these companies, Flutter, which lost over £4.2bn in value, paid nearly £750m in taxes in 2024. Never mind raising more money, is the Treasury about to lose a chunk of its tax take as some of these companies fold or move their operations off-shore to escape a tax raid? Back in November, when the rumours of a so-called Gambling Tax had first surfaced, the Betting and Gaming Council had set out the case for its members: '[t]he proposed levy rate for independent bookmakers is a hammer blow to the 500 small independent betting shops and the 2,500 people who work in them, which risks job losses and venue closures, while contributing a small amount to the overall levy total.' Dr Snowdon shares these concerns. Rachel Reeves has a habit of pursuing policies 'without looking at third-order effects', he tells me. If the anticipated tax rise pushes up the cost of gambling online on UK websites, punters could very easily make use of a Virtual Private Network or VPN to access gambling sites in other countries. There may be public support for taxing the gambling industry into oblivion. But who does the Chancellor then turn to in order to fill the resulting hole in her tax intake? Rachel Reeves cannot afford a repeat of the non-dom debacle, nor can ordinary taxpayers.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Albo's radical plan for cash as fewer Aussies pay with banknotes
Anthony Albanese's government is considering a takeover of Australia's cash distribution channels based on a Covid-era assumption that cash is dying. The Council of Financial Regulators - which includes the Reserve Bank, Treasury and the Australian Prudential Regulator Authority - has recommended a Minister for Cash be appointed. Its consultation paper also implied the government would have to intervene in the cash distribution business, based on the fear Armaguard would financially struggle, even with a near monopoly, as fewer Aussie consumers used cash. 'The decline in the use of cash for payments in Australia has challenged the economics of the cash distribution sector, upon which access to cash relies,' it said. 'Challenges in the cash distribution sector include the long-term decline in the use of cash for payments, and a high degree of concentration and limited competition in parts of the market.' The minister would have the power to 'designate specific registered entities' to deliver cash. 'To be designated, a registered entity would provide critical cash services to a significant part of the market,' the paper said. 'To ensure crisis readiness, a regulator may need ongoing powers enabling it to assess a designated entity's crisis preparedness and to improve that entity's resolvability in a crisis' Anthony Albanese's government is considering a takeover of Australia's cash distribution channels based on a Covid-era assumption that cash is dying (pictured are Commonwealth Bank customers in Melbourne) But Cash Welcome founder Jason Bryce said the proposal for the government to take over cash distribution was a bridge too far. 'This is massive overkill - what I'm saying in my submission is cost-free for the government, the best solution is pass a law that says cash is legal tender in Australia and all retailers must accept cash,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'Pass a law that says banks must provide an ATM or a bank branch in every town or community. 'If you do those two things, there will be no cash crisis, the market signals will be clear, banks will stop talking, talking, talking about going cashless.' He argued the government proposal was based on flawed and outdated Reserve Bank data from 2022 that found only 16 per cent of in-person transactions were still done in cash, based on the pandemic idea that banknotes are 'dirty'. 'That number - 16 per cent of in-person transactions - dates from that period and is no longer relevant and should not be used by policymakers,' he said. The RBA's Consumer Payments Survey is only released every three years, which means data showing fewer Australians are paying with cash could be failing to reflect changing behaviour in the years after Covid. 'What's going to happen if it jumps up from 16 per cent?' The Council of Financial Regulators - which includes the Reserve Bank, Treasury and the Australian Prudential Regulator Authority - has recommended a Minister for Cash be appointed Mr Bryce said the banks were to blame for scrapping $2 fees in 2017 for customers using rival ATMs and forfeiting $500million in revenue that could be used to pay the likes of Armaguard. 'Banks need to pay for cash distribution - they gave up $500million annually, revenue, and now they're complaining like stuck pigs about having to pay Armaguard $25million every six months,' he said. Australia's Big Four banks, supermarket giant Woolworths and retail group Wesfarmers - the owner of hardware chain Bunnings, Kmart and Officeworks - last month announced they would provide a $25.5million lifeline to Armaguard from July to December. 'Major banks and major retailers have reached an agreement with Armaguard to extend their financial contribution for a further six months,' the Australian Banking Association said. In the seven years after the $2 rival ATM fee was scrapped, the number of ATMs has more than halved, plunging from 13,814 in June 2017 to just 5,476 in June last year, APRA data showed. The number of branch branches fell from 5,694 to 3,360 and the Commonwealth Bank last year scrapped plans to charge customers $3 to withdraw cash from a bank branch. Linfox Armaguard and Spanish group Prosegur were given permission from the competition regulator to merge in 2023. The consultation paper suggested new laws to ensure the future of cash. 'Given the government's commitment to maintaining access to cash and the subsequent announcement of its intention to implement a cash acceptance mandate, it is necessary to consider whether existing regulatory regimes can support the cash distribution sector continuing to perform its critical role in facilitating long-term, sustainable and adequate access to cash across Australia,' it said. Submissions close this Friday the Regulating Cash consultation paper.
