&w=3840&q=100)
In Bihar, dog gets 'residence certificate'; officials under scanner
Rahul Goreja New Delhi
Authorities in Patna's Masaurhi circle have filed a first information report (FIR) after a residence certificate was reportedly issued in the name of a stray dog called 'Dog babu.'
What happened?
The certificate, dated July 24, reportedly bore a photograph of 'Dog babu,' whose parents are recorded as 'kutta babu' and 'kutiya devi", the report added.
According to a report by The Times of India, the certificate was issued through the Bihar government's Right to Public Service (RTPS) portal. Under the state's Right to Public Service Act, residents can submit online applications for a certificate of residence, which is issued by the relevant authorities following verification.
Screenshots of the purported certificate went viral on social media, raising questions about the government's verification process.
What did the administration do?
The district administration stated the certificate 'was cancelled as soon as the matter came to light", reported PTI.
'Besides, an FIR has been lodged at the local police station against the applicant, the computer operator who fed the information in the system and the official who went on to issue the certificate,' they said.
The Sub-Divisional Officer of Masaurhi has been directed to carry out a thorough investigation and submit a report within 24 hours, and 'departmental and disciplinary action will be initiated against the erring officials", the statement added.
An intensive revision of Bihar's electoral rolls
The incident comes amid a special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of Assembly elections later this year. The Supreme Court recently urged the Election Commission to also accept Aadhaar and ration cards as valid identity documents during the verification process.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Decomposed body of rickshaw puller found hanging from tree in Delhi's Inderlok
The decomposed body of a man, which was found hanging from a tree in a park in north Delhi's Inderlok area, has been identified as that of a 43-year-old rickshaw puller, an official said on Wednesday. A police team found a decomposed body, estimated to be four to five days old, suspended from a branch about 10 feet high with a rope.(Screengrab/X/@ANI) On Monday, at around 6 pm, the police received information regarding a male body hanging from a tree inside the kachra park in Shehzada Bagh, he said. During local inquiries, a rickshaw puller named Sushil identified the deceased as Manoj, who was also a rickshaw puller and allegedly an alcoholic, the police said, adding that efforts are being made to trace his family. A team rushed to the spot and found a decomposed body, estimated to be four to five days old, suspended from a branch about 10 feet high with a rope, a senior police officer said. The crime team and forensic experts were called to the site for inspection. During a personal search of the body, police recovered a mobile phone and a copy of an Aadhaar card identifying him as Manoj, a resident of Azamgarh in Uttar Pradesh, the officer mentioned further. The body has been preserved at the Sabzi Mandi mortuary for post-mortem examination. A case has been registered, and further investigation is underway.
Scroll.in
6 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Rush Hour: SC says Bihar electoral revision is voter-friendly, Army soldier killed along LoC, & more
We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. The Supreme Court has verbally observed that the ongoing electoral roll revision process in Bihar appeared to be voter-friendly, and not exclusionary. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymala Bagchi said that the Election Commission has listed 11 acceptable documents for the ongoing exercise, compared to only seven in 2003. A group of petitioners have challenged the voter roll revision in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections, expected in October or November. They have raised concerns about the exclusion of Aadhaar cards as standalone valid proof for the revision process, contending that Aadhaar is the most widely held identity document. Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the petitioners, argued on Wednesday that while the number of permissible documents had increased, most had low coverage in Bihar. He added that only 1% to 2% voters held passports in the state. Read more. A soldier, Havildar Ankit Kumar, was killed in a gunfight as the Army foiled an infiltration attempt by suspected militants along the Line of Control in Uri, in north Kashmir's Baramulla district. The Army had killed two suspected militants in the same area a few days ago, unidentified officials said. Search operations after the gunfight are underway. This was the fourth Army casualty in the line of duty in Jammu and Kashmir over the past week. Two soldiers were killed on August 9 during a gunfight with suspected militants in Kulgam, while one was killed along the Line of Control in Baramulla. Read on. The mother of a 19-year-old who was killed in police firing in July in Assam's Goalpara has urged the chief justice of the Gauhati High Court to order a judicial investigation into the death. Shaukar Ali was killed during a clash between protesters and authorities days after authorities cleared 140 hectares of land in the Paikan Reserve Forest. In a letter to the High Court's registrar general, Ali's mother, Nachiran Bibi, described the police firing as 'unprovoked, excessive and disproportionate'. She said that her sons Shakaur Ali and Noser Ali had gone to the spot to watch the unfolding developments 'out of curiosity' but came under police fire. Bibi said that she had lost trust that the police would conduct an impartial investigation. Read on. The Supreme Court has cancelled the bail granted to wrestler Sushil Kumar in an alleged murder case. It ordered the two-time Olympic medallist to surrender within a week. Kumar, along with 17 others, has been accused of fatally assaulting Sagar Dhankar, a former junior national wrestling champion, and his friends in May 2021 because of an alleged property dispute. The incident took place at the Chhatrasal Stadium in Delhi. Kumar was arrested in May 2021 and was granted bail by the Delhi High Court in March.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
12 hours ago
- Business Standard
Aadhaar, PAN, Voter ID not proof of citizenship: Bombay HC ruling decoded
The Bombay High Court on 12 August ruled that owning an Aadhaar card, PAN card, voter ID, or even a passport is not enough to prove you are an Indian citizen. This decision came while rejecting the bail plea of an alleged Bangladeshi man accused of illegally entering India and obtaining forged documents. The bench emphasised that under Section 9 of the Citizenship Act, 1955, the burden of proving citizenship lies with the individual. The accused had claimed to be Indian but failed to produce valid citizenship documents such as a passport or a certificate issued under Indian law. The ruling reinforces that possession of commonly used identity documents does not override the legal requirement to prove nationality. What the Case Was About The man in question, Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar, was arrested on charges of: Illegal entry into India Possessing forged Indian identity documents Potential national security violations During the investigation, authorities allegedly found Bangladeshi birth certificates on his phone. While he claimed Indian citizenship and produced Aadhaar, PAN, and voter ID, the court found these insufficient as proof of nationality. Justice Amit Borkar, after reviewing the evidence, observed that citizenship claims must be tested strictly under the Citizenship Act and that the burden of proof lies with the accused when credible evidence raises doubts about nationality. 'The allegations in this case are not small. It is not just about staying in India without permission or overstaying a visa. It is about making and using fake and forged identity documents like Aadhaar card, PAN card, and Voter ID, with the aim of pretending to be an Indian citizen.' "The Bombay High Court rejected regular bail for the applicant, booked under BNS u/s 335, 336(3), 340/3(5), Passport Act u/s 3(a), 6(a) and Foreigners Order u/s 3(1), 3(2), 14, after forensic extraction from his phone disclosed Bangladeshi birth certificates (his and his mother's) and CDR/IPDR logs revealed persistent cross-border calls to Bangladesh-linked numbers. Invoking section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946, the Court held that this credible prosecution evidence shifts the burden to the applicant to prove Indian citizenship; until such proof is furnished, mere possession of unverified Aadhaar, PAN or Voter ID cards whose authenticity is still under UIDAI scrutiny cannot establish nationality or justify release," said Rahul Sundaram, Partner, IndiaLaw LLP. What the Court Said Justice Amit Borkar, delivering the order, made three key points: Identification ≠ Citizenship Aadhaar, PAN, voter ID, and passports are meant to verify identity for services and voting, not to establish nationality. Citizenship Must Be Proven Under the Citizenship Act, 1955 To prove you are an Indian citizen, you must show eligibility through: Birth in India before a certain cut-off date Indian parentage Registration or naturalisation as per law "Under Indian law, documents like Aadhaar, PAN, or Voter ID establish identity or residence—not citizenship—and the Bombay High Court has rightly held that citizenship must be proved strictly in accordance with the Citizenship Act, 1955 and recognised legal evidence," said Athira Sajan, Associate Partner, King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates and Attorneys. Burden of Proof Is on the Individual Under the Foreigners Act, if the state presents credible evidence that raises doubt about a person's citizenship, it is the individual's responsibility to prove they are Indian. The Laws Involved Citizenship Act, 1955 — Defines how citizenship is acquired and the documents needed to prove it. Foreigners Act, 1946 (Section 9) — Places the burden of proof on the person suspected of being a foreign national. Representation of the People Act — Governs voter ID issuance, which is not linked to a citizenship verification process as rigorous as the Citizenship Act. Why Your Aadhaar or Voter ID May Not Be Enough Aadhaar is issued based on proof of identity and residence — not nationality. PAN card is for tax purposes — foreign nationals can also obtain one. Voter ID is linked to electoral rolls — errors or fraudulent enrolment can occur. Passport requires some citizenship verification but can be obtained fraudulently. In short: These documents are valid for day-to-day identification but are not decisive proof of nationality in a court of law. Implications of the Ruling Legal Scrutiny in Citizenship Disputes If your citizenship is challenged, you'll need documentary evidence like birth certificates, parentage records, or official nationality certificates. Stricter Checks for Border Cases
