&w=3840&q=100)
Aadhaar, PAN, Voter ID not proof of citizenship: Bombay HC ruling decoded
The bench emphasised that under Section 9 of the Citizenship Act, 1955, the burden of proving citizenship lies with the individual. The accused had claimed to be Indian but failed to produce valid citizenship documents such as a passport or a certificate issued under Indian law. The ruling reinforces that possession of commonly used identity documents does not override the legal requirement to prove nationality.
What the Case Was About
The man in question, Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar, was arrested on charges of:
Illegal entry into India
Possessing forged Indian identity documents
Potential national security violations
During the investigation, authorities allegedly found Bangladeshi birth certificates on his phone. While he claimed Indian citizenship and produced Aadhaar, PAN, and voter ID, the court found these insufficient as proof of nationality.
Justice Amit Borkar, after reviewing the evidence, observed that citizenship claims must be tested strictly under the Citizenship Act and that the burden of proof lies with the accused when credible evidence raises doubts about nationality. 'The allegations in this case are not small. It is not just about staying in India without permission or overstaying a visa. It is about making and using fake and forged identity documents like Aadhaar card, PAN card, and Voter ID, with the aim of pretending to be an Indian citizen.'
"The Bombay High Court rejected regular bail for the applicant, booked under BNS u/s 335, 336(3), 340/3(5), Passport Act u/s 3(a), 6(a) and Foreigners Order u/s 3(1), 3(2), 14, after forensic extraction from his phone disclosed Bangladeshi birth certificates (his and his mother's) and CDR/IPDR logs revealed persistent cross-border calls to Bangladesh-linked numbers. Invoking section 9 of the Foreigners Act, 1946, the Court held that this credible prosecution evidence shifts the burden to the applicant to prove Indian citizenship; until such proof is furnished, mere possession of unverified Aadhaar, PAN or Voter ID cards whose authenticity is still under UIDAI scrutiny cannot establish nationality or justify release," said Rahul Sundaram, Partner, IndiaLaw LLP.
What the Court Said
Justice Amit Borkar, delivering the order, made three key points:
Identification ≠ Citizenship
Aadhaar, PAN, voter ID, and passports are meant to verify identity for services and voting, not to establish nationality.
Citizenship Must Be Proven Under the Citizenship Act, 1955
To prove you are an Indian citizen, you must show eligibility through:
Birth in India before a certain cut-off date
Indian parentage
Registration or naturalisation as per law
"Under Indian law, documents like Aadhaar, PAN, or Voter ID establish identity or residence—not citizenship—and the Bombay High Court has rightly held that citizenship must be proved strictly in accordance with the Citizenship Act, 1955 and recognised legal evidence," said Athira Sajan, Associate Partner, King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates and Attorneys.
Burden of Proof Is on the Individual
Under the Foreigners Act, if the state presents credible evidence that raises doubt about a person's citizenship, it is the individual's responsibility to prove they are Indian.
The Laws Involved
Citizenship Act, 1955 — Defines how citizenship is acquired and the documents needed to prove it.
Foreigners Act, 1946 (Section 9) — Places the burden of proof on the person suspected of being a foreign national.
Representation of the People Act — Governs voter ID issuance, which is not linked to a citizenship verification process as rigorous as the Citizenship Act.
Why Your Aadhaar or Voter ID May Not Be Enough
Aadhaar is issued based on proof of identity and residence — not nationality.
PAN card is for tax purposes — foreign nationals can also obtain one.
Voter ID is linked to electoral rolls — errors or fraudulent enrolment can occur.
Passport requires some citizenship verification but can be obtained fraudulently.
In short: These documents are valid for day-to-day identification but are not decisive proof of nationality in a court of law.
Implications of the Ruling
Legal Scrutiny in Citizenship Disputes
If your citizenship is challenged, you'll need documentary evidence like birth certificates, parentage records, or official nationality certificates.
Stricter Checks for Border Cases
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
21 minutes ago
- NDTV
Rs 8.3 Lakh Crore Market: Inside India's Illegal Online Betting Apps
New Delhi: Cricketer Suresh Raina was questioned by the Enforcement Directorate Wednesday over his endorsement - he is reportedly the brand ambassador - of 1xBet, an illegal online betting app. The ED is investigating money laundering charges against several such apps - including Lotus65 and FairPlay, and associated betting platforms like 1xBat - and has expanded inquiries to include celebrities, like Mr Raina and Bollywood actor Urvashi Rautela, who endorse them. Among the questions Mr Raina will be expected to answer are: What role did you play in the promotion of 1xBet? Did you promote any other such platform? Do you have any contract with, or records of monetary transaction related to, 1xBet or 'surrogate' platforms like 1xBat? How, and through which company and account, were you paid? Did you or your representatives check the legal status of these platforms? Were you aware their algorithms are written in a way that classifies them as 'gambling' and not 'skill-based games'? Did you know that this makes platforms like 1xBet illegal under Indian law? Did you, directly or indirectly, interact with the operators of 1xBet? Did you promote these platforms even in states where online betting is completely banned? At least two other cricketers - Yuvraj Singh and Harbhajan Singh - are also being investigated, as are popular actors like Rana Daggubati, Prakash Raj, Vijay Devarakonda, and Manchu Lakshmi. Sources told NDTV the purpose is to establish if they, and other celebrities promoting these and other illegal online betting apps and websites, were aware of their illegal nature. Online Betting Apps: The Numbers Sources told NDTV a staggering 22 crore people across the country have downloaded these illegal apps on their smartphones, and at least half are regular users, i.e., they bet every day. And access isn't restricted to mobile devices. In January-March 2025, illegal betting websites received over 150 crore visitors. Overall, this 'market' is now worth Rs 8.3 lakh crore and is growing at a rate of 30 per cent every year. And top-tier betting apps cost the government Rs 27,000 crore in taxes every year. Online Betting Apps: The Tragedy The ED has said these platforms present themselves as hosting 'skill-based' games but use rigged algorithms that mean they run 'gambling' games under Indian laws. And the lure of that 'fast money' - advertisements routinely show celebrities making tens of thousands, if not lakhs, in mere seconds - leads individuals and families to financial ruin. In December last year the World Health Organization said gambling can 'threaten health, lead to increased incidence of mental illness and suicide'. In its advisory, the health body said gambling 'drives poverty by diverting household spending from essential goods and services'. The WHO also called out 'the rapid normalization of gambling... through commercialization and digitization' and said 'sponsorship and marketing are also key factors in rapid global growth'. In India there are reports, almost daily, of deaths due to gambling debts. In June, for example, a young Rajasthan couple allegedly died by suicide after incurring debts of Rs 5 lakh. Deepak Rathore from Kota used to bet on his smartphone. A day before his wife and he were found dead, Mr Rathore told his sister, 'I have no option left except to die...' Last month a 24-year-old software professional from Hyderabad died by suicide after running up multiple debts playing rummy, the card game, online. And in January two men allegedly died by suicide, in separate incidents, after struggling for years with their gambling problems. Online Betting Apps: The Focus Preliminary inquiries by the federal agency - in these and other cases - suggest multiple laws are being violated, including the Information Technology (IT) Act, the Foreign Exchange Management Act, and the stringent Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Investigations into this murky space have been hampered by the 'here today, gone tomorrow' nature of these platforms. Should suspicion fall on one, for example, that website or app is simply shut down and a new one is then launched, often with only marginally different branding. And the owner/operators of these platforms are routinely based abroad, making it difficult for Indian law enforcement, whether the ED or the Central Bureau of Investigation, to catch them. They often set up base in countries with lax gambling laws or where gambling is legal. READ | Juice Seller To Millionaire Scammer: Mahadev Betting App Accused's Empire And when Indian authorities close in, as they did in the Mahadev betting app case, in which former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel was named, they shift base to another. Mr Baghel denied any link to the scam and called the allegations 'politically motivated', coming, as they did, before a state election in 2023 and the 2024 Lok Sabha poll. Against that backdrop, the ED is also looking at the responsibility of software companies and social media platforms that host or promote these illegal betting apps and websites. Some of the questions the agency is now asking are: Did companies like Google and Meta deliberately promote betting apps? Did these platforms profit from advertisements? Specifically, the agency suspects tech firms like these may have played a role, inadvertently or otherwise, in enabling these apps by not vetting advertisers and allowing promotional content. So far, neither Google nor Meta has publicly commented on the investigation.


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Salim Pistol' brought back to Delhi: India's most wanted arms supplier arrested from Nepal; linked to Pakistan's ISI, name surfaced in Moose Wala case
NEW DELHI: India's most wanted illegal arms supplier, Sheikh Salim alias 'Salim Pistol', has been brought back to Delhi after being arrested in Nepal in a joint operation by the Delhi Police Special Cell, Indian security agencies, and Nepal Police. Salim, who had been on the run since 2018, is now in the custody of the Delhi Police Special Cell. He allegedly smuggled sophisticated weapons from Pakistan into India and had close links with Pakistan's ISI and Dawood Ibrahim's D-Company. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi His arms network supplied gangsters such as Lawrence Bishnoi and Hashim Baba, and his name surfaced during investigations into the Sidhu Moose Wala murder. Originally from Jafrabad in Delhi, Salim dropped out after Class 8 and worked as a driver before plunging into crime. His record stretches back to 2000, when he was arrested for vehicle theft. In 2011, he was accused in a Rs 20 lakh armed robbery in Jafrabad, leading to his arrest in 2013 under IPC sections 395 and 397. Despite being arrested in 2018, Salim managed to flee abroad. Recent intelligence tipped off agencies about his hideout in Nepal, prompting the coordinated cross-border operation. Police said he will be produced in court in Delhi, where cases against him for arms trafficking and organized crime are pending. (With agency inputs) Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
Bangladesh intruder assaulted by locals in Meghalaya village, dies
A Bangladeshi allegedly involved in a cross-border intrusion and abduction bid in Meghalaya's South West Khasi Hills district died after being assaulted by local villagers, police said on victim, identified as Akram from Jenaghati in Sherpur district of Bangladesh, was caught by residents of Kaitha Kona village around 4.30 pm on of Police Banrap Jyrwa said the villagers handed over the injured man to the police, who was then taken to Maheshkhola Primary Health Centre. He succumbed to his injuries Akram was the sixth person arrested in connection with a reported attempt to abduct a local from Rongdangai group of at least eight intruders reportedly vandalised property in the village before being repelled by of the arrested men is an armed personnel of the Bangladesh recovered from the accused include a revolver, a Bangladesh Police identity card, three wireless sets and a magazine pouch, Jyrwa of the arrested individuals have been produced in court, while two others are under treatment in a operations by Meghalaya Police and the Border Security Force (BSF) had earlier led to the arrests in the Khonjoy and Gilagora authorities continue search operations to trace the remaining two investigation is underway to ascertain the motive behind the attempted abduction and the possible cross-border implications involving Bangladeshi law enforcement personnel.- EndsTune InTrending Reel IN THIS STORY#Bangladesh#Meghalaya