logo
S&P 500 hits all-time high - Now what?

S&P 500 hits all-time high - Now what?

Yahoo6 hours ago

S&P 500 hits all-time high - Now what? originally appeared on TheStreet.
The naysayers were once again proven wrong.
Despite an economy in turmoil, an uncertain Federal Reserve, and geopolitical unease, the S&P 500 has climbed the proverbial wall of worry and notched a new all-time high, surpassing levels last seen in February before President Trump's tariff announcements sent stocks reeling.
The S&P 500's returns have been impressive, gaining more than 23% since Trump on April 9 switched gears and paused reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to hammer out trade deals.
💸. 📈
It's been an even more dramatic run for the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite.
Since its early April low, that index has shot up more than 32%, largely on the back of AI powerhouses like Nvidia and Palantir, which have gained 64% and 95% over the period.
The moves will likely have many scratching their heads, wondering what could happen next to the benchmark index.
Fortunately, longtime analyst Ryan Detrick, chief strategist of Carson Group, has crunched the numbers to see what the S&P 500 historically has done in the wake of similar record-setting highs.
The lifeblood of stock market returns is revenue and profit growth. The more sales and earnings, the more willing investors are to pay up for shares.
Because of this, economic health is key to the S&P 500's performance. If households and businesses are expected to open their wallets more in the future, it's good for business, and that's good for stock market returns.Earlier this year, worries that tariffs would spike inflation, crimping spending, led many to believe we were on the cusp of stagflation (inflation without GDP growth) or an outright recession.
Those worries were compounded by the fact that the Fed hit the brakes on interest-rate cuts this year due to concerns that lower rates alongside tariffs would cause inflation to skyrocket.
The concerns haven't fully disappeared, but they've retreated.
While US GDP growth in the first quarter was slightly negative, most expect GDP to recover in the second quarter and for full-year GDP to be positive.
The Federal Reserve pegs GDP growth at 1.4% this year, and the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tracking tool suggests second-quarter GDP increased by 3.4%.
Of course, the GDPNow measure will change as more data arrive, but the Q2 numbers are likely to be solid.
More Experts
Analyst makes bold call on stocks, bonds, and gold
TheStreet Stocks & Markets Podcast #8: Common Sense Investing With David Miller
Veteran fund manager sends dire message on stocks
If so, the US might sidestep a profit-busting economic reckoning, allowing investors to ratchet higher their models for corporate profit.
Additionally, the stock market has become more optimistic about the likelihood of Fed rate cuts later this year.
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is under intense pressure from Trump to cut rates, and a wobbly jobs market could mean the Fed won't stay sidelined much longer as long as inflation remains in check.
In April, core Personal Consumption Expenditures inflation, the gauge favored by the Fed, showed prices rose 2.5% from one year ago. That's above the Fed's 2% target but arguably not overly concerning, given that the Fed cut rates by 1 percentage point last year when inflation was higher.
The S&P 500 may have priced in a lot of the potential upside associated with a healthier-than-expected economy.
The S&P 500's price-to-earnings multiple, a key valuation measure investors use, peaked at more than 22 in February 2025 when the S&P 500 last made a new high.
After retreating to 19 in April, the runup in stock prices has outpaced upward earnings revisions, causing the S&P 500's p/e multiple to swell again. According to FactSet, the benchmark index trades with a forward one-year p/e multiple of nearly 22.
Historically, when the S&P 500's p/e multiple has been this high, gains in the following year have been harder to come by, with a negative average return from 1971 through 2020.
History certainly isn't a guarantee, but Ryan Detrick considered what'd happened in the past when stocks behaved similarly, and his study also suggests lackluster returns are possible from here.
"The S&P 500 hasn't hit a new high in more than four months, but that could end any day now," wrote Detrick on X. "Turns out, when it goes between 4-12 months without a new [all-time high] and then hits one, the forward returns are quite muted. Not once up double digits a year later. Hmm."
Detrick spotted four prior instances that met his criteria for similarity. The average return one year after notching the new high after not having a new high for between four and 12 months is just 4.4%, significantly below the stock market's average 11%-plus annual return over the past 50 years.
The shorter-term returns are potentially more concerning, though. In his study the average 3-month and 6-month returns for the S&P 500 were negative 5% and negative 1.3%, respectively.
Of course, anything can happen. Much will depend on what actually happens with inflation, jobs, the Fed, and trade deals. Still, the data may suggest that investors should temper their outlook, at least for now.
It's not all bad news for most investors, though. Remember, stock market weakness can provide a great opportunity to buy the dip on the market or individual stocks. Just ask anyone who bought stocks in April.S&P 500 hits all-time high - Now what? first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 27, 2025
This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 27, 2025, where it first appeared.
Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Best money market account rates today, June 27, 2025 (up to 4.41% APY return)
Best money market account rates today, June 27, 2025 (up to 4.41% APY return)

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Best money market account rates today, June 27, 2025 (up to 4.41% APY return)

Find out which banks are offering the best MMA rates right now. The Federal Reserve cut the federal funds rate three times in 2024 for a total reduction of one percentage point. As a result, deposit interest rates — including money market account rates — have been falling. It's more important than ever to compare MMA rates and ensure you earn as much as possible on your balance. Although money market account rates are elevated by historical standards, the national average rate for MMAs is just 0.62%, according to the FDIC. The good news: Top high-yield money market accounts offer well over 4% APY — more than six times the national average. That's why it's important to shop around before opening a money market account. Interest rates vary widely, but there are several banks (in particular, online banks) and credit unions with highly competitive offers. Here's a look at some of the top MMA rates available today:Additionally, the table below features some of the best savings and money market account rates available today from our verified partners. Online banks operate exclusively via the web. This significantly reduces their overhead costs, so they're able to pass those savings onto customers in the form of high deposit rates and low fees. If you're searching for the best money market account rates, online banks are a great place to start. That said, online banks aren't the only place you can find savings accounts with rates of 4% to 5% APY. Credit unions are not-for-profit financial cooperatives, and are also know for providing competitive rates and fewer fees. Many credit unions have certain requirements that must be met in order to become a member, though there are some that allow just about anyone to join. Read more: Are online banks really safe? Money market accounts can be a great option for short-term savings goals, like building an emergency fund or setting aside money for an upcoming expense. They generally offer higher interest rates than regular savings accounts, and they provide easier access to your money compared to some other options like certificates of deposit (CDs). Money market accounts are also considered low-risk, and they are FDIC-insured up to the standard $250,000 per depositor, per institution. This makes them safer than money market funds, which can be subject to market risk. However, keep in mind that many money market accounts require a minimum balance to open the account and earn the highest advertised rate. If you can't maintain this balance, you might incur fees or miss out on the best rates. And although you can generally access your funds as needed, MMAs may limit the number of transactions you can make each month. If you need frequent access to your money, this might be a consideration. Read more: Is there a penalty for withdrawing from your money market account? When a money market account makes sense: You want to earn more interest than a regular savings account without locking up your money in a CD. You can maintain the minimum balance to avoid fees. You want to keep funds easily accessible for emergencies or near-term expenses. Currently, the average money market account rate is 0.63%. However, several high-yield accounts pay upwards of 4% or more. If you're considering opening a money market account, be sure to shop around and compare rates. There is no one account or investment that guarantees a 12% return. However, if your goal is to earn a strong return on your money and grow your wealth significantly, investing in market securities such as stocks, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds is the best strategy for doing so. The stock market returns about 10% per year, on average. If you aren't sure where to start, it can be helpful to speak with a financial advisor about your financial goals and priorities. Alternatively, you can sign up with a robo-advisor, which is an automated, cost-effective option for managing your portfolio. Read more: Robo-advisor: How to start investing right away

Heard on the Street Recap: What Wall Street Is Talking About
Heard on the Street Recap: What Wall Street Is Talking About

Wall Street Journal

time24 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Heard on the Street Recap: What Wall Street Is Talking About

Trump terminated trade talks with Canada. Trade tension reared its head again in the afternoon with President Trump's declaration that discussions with Canada were off. Stocks had hit record highs in earlier trading, after the president said he'd signed a trade deal with China and administration officials indicated more were on the way. Stocks hit record highs before losing ground. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq ended 0.5% higher. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 432 points, or about 1%. Nike rose. The sneaker maker said tariffs would add $1 billion to its costs this fiscal year, which the company plans to partly recoup by raising prices on some of its products. But the company's quarterly results on Thursday came in ahead of expectations. The stock ended 15% higher.

Large Banks Could Easily Weather a Massive Recession, Fed's Annual Stress Test Finds
Large Banks Could Easily Weather a Massive Recession, Fed's Annual Stress Test Finds

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Large Banks Could Easily Weather a Massive Recession, Fed's Annual Stress Test Finds

The Federal Reserve's annual stress test found that large banks would remain resilient during an extreme recession. The annual stress test is designed to examine whether big banks could survive a hypothetical downturn without government assistance. The test results come as the central banks mulls over changes to the test that would make it more country's biggest banks can comfortably stay afloat if a severe recession hits due to their sizable cushions, the Federal Reserve said in its latest health check on the industry. The annual stress tests design a nasty scenario for the economy and examine whether big banks could survive it—without the need for government help, as in 2008. The latest results showed that banks such as JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, and Bank of America could comfortably withstand those blows and keep lending to households and businesses. "Large banks remain well capitalized and resilient to a range of severe outcomes,' Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said in a press release. This year's scenario was a little easier than in 2024, but it featured a brutal recession nonetheless. The Fed tested banks' resilience under an unemployment rate that peaked at 10%, stock prices falling 50% and a roughly 30% drop in housing prices and commercial real estate values. That hypothetical recession would inflict losses of $550 billion on the 22 banks the Fed tested, as credit card users, businesses and other borrowers default on their loans. However, all those banks would maintain cushions far above the minimum levels the Fed requires. One key ratio the Fed uses to determine whether banks have enough capital would drop to 11.6% across the industry in its scenario, down from 13.4% at the end of 2024. But that is far above the minimum requirement of 4.5%. Other banks the Fed reviewed this year include lenders such as PNC Financial Services, Capital One Financial, U.S. Bancorp, M&T Bank and Truist Financial. The exams also include major Wall Street banks such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, as well as the U.S. branches of several big foreign banks. The Financial Services Forum said in a statement the results 'confirm the strong capital positions of the largest U.S. banks,' which have stayed resilient in the annual tests after more than a decade. But Better Markets, an advocacy group that seeks stronger regulations, said that the tests' 100% track record shows they are 'stressless, ineffective and endanger all Americans' by improperly measuring banks' risks to a downturn. The results come as the Fed weighs a proposal to make banks' yearly results less volatile and other changes that are likely to be industry-friendly. Banks have long argued the Fed's process is opaque and subject to unpredictable results, making banks less able to lend. However, critics say some opaqueness is precisely the point—since it makes the tests rigorous and limits banks' ability to find workarounds. Trade groups sued the Fed in December over the issue, a battle that's since been paused now that the Fed is weighing changes to the annual exams. The Fed was partly hamstrung by a Supreme Court case last summer, which reined in federal regulatory agencies' power. On Friday, the Fed reiterated that it 'intends to improve the transparency of the stress test process' by disclosing models to determine banks' losses ahead of time. The agency says it would lead to valuable feedback that could improve whether the tests will adequately gauge risks. The regulator is also proposing to reduce year-to-year volatility of stress test results by averaging out outcomes over two years. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store