Cash discovery row: Uploading of burnt cash video on website doesn't mean process is vitiated: SC to Justice Varma
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed with Justice Yashwant Varma 's submission that the video of burnt wads of currency notes found at his residence should not have been uploaded on the apex court website.However, a bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and A G Masih said just because tapes have been published on the website, it does not mean the process is vitiated and Justice Varma can go "scot-free".The top court said the impeachment proceedings will be held independently in the Parliament, without reference to the in-house report.On the question of delay in approaching the top court, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, arguing for Justice Varma, said a tape was released on the SC website and the judge's reputation was already damaged."Tape was released. It was already released, my reputation already damaged. What would I come to court for?" Sibal said.Justice Datta remarked, "We are with you on this for the time being. It should not have been done."However, Justice Datta said, "It does not mean that there has been some lapse in the procedure, which affects the powers of the Parliament to take action against you, because Parliament, I need not to say with any emphasis, it has its own powers."Parliament is not supposed to be guided by what judiciary says or what CJI recommends. They are supposed to act independently and if, at all, Parliament admits the motion and if an inquiry committee is set up, you know who can be the members of the committee."Do you think those members, people of high calibre, would be influenced by preliminary report where you will have whole opportunity to demolish what are the findings," he said.The top court was hearing Justice Varma's plea seeking invalidation of a report by an in-house inquiry panel which found him guilty of misconduct in the cash discovery matter. The in-house inquiry panel report indicted Justice Varma over the discovery of a huge cache of burnt cash from his official residence during his tenure as a Delhi High Court judge In an unprecedented move, the top court on Mach 22 uploaded on its website an in-house inquiry report, including photos and videos, into the discovery of a huge stash of cash at the residence of Justice Varma who was then Delhi High Court judge.The report contains photos and videos of the cash discovered at a storeroom at Justice Varma's house during a firefighting operation on the night of Holi, March 14.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a few seconds ago
- Business Standard
Govt rules out changes to DPDP act, FAQs to address concerns soon: Report
The government does not see any scope for making changes in the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 and may issue a detailed reply soon to explain issues raised by journalists and civil rights bodies, an official source said on Friday. Civil rights and journalists' bodies on Wednesday expressed apprehension over the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, saying the provisions under it may fail the Right to Information (RTI) Act and end press freedom. "The (DPDP) Act has been passed by Parliament. Therefore no changes can be made now. Rules are being processed which can only be framed within the ambit of the Act," the source said. Government sources said the DPDP Act and draft rules under it have been framed after receiving thousands of inputs from multiple entities. About government assurance on frequently asked questions (FAQs), the source said it will be issued soon. Senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh on Sunday said deletion of the proviso in the RTI Act that recognises citizens' right to information as being at par with that of legislators is "completely unwarranted", and urged IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw to pause, review, and repeal the amendment made to the original legislation of 2005. Vaishnaw had responded to Ramesh, saying that personal details that are subject to public disclosure under various laws will continue to be disclosed under the RTI Act after the implementation of the new data protection rule. Supreme Court lawyer and convenor of The Campaign for Judicial Accountability & Judicial Reforms (CJAR) Prashant Bhushan alleged that the Act bars and amends RTI Act to stop sharing of personal identifiable information without consent. According to the civil rights bodies, the provision not only kills the RTI Act but also discourages journalists and whistleblowers from exposing names of corrupt officials without their consent. According to civil rights bodies and activists, the DPDP Act removes provisions under the RTI Act that will enable government bodies to withhold information under the garb of personal information. Former High Court Justice A P Shah in an open letter to Attorney General of India on July 28 said Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act replaces the narrowly tailored exemption in Section 8(1)(j) with an overbroad provision for withholding information, and removing the "public interest" override. "This enables public authorities to deny information simply by classifying it as 'personal,' regardless of its public relevance or importance," he said. National Campaign for People's Right to Information (NCPRI) Co-Convenor Anjali Bharadwaj last month said that RTI empowers people to get to know where their files are stuck, details of contractors associated with public projects, surveys to check beneficiaries under the scheme and to verify if they have received the benefits, etc. She said all these information will stop under the garb of restrictions imposed on seeking personal identifiable data under data protection rules. "There are no specific exemptions to journalists under the Act which was clearly mentioned under the previous drafts. There is a clear demand to add exemptions for journalists under the rules, or else press freedom will end," Bharadwaj said. She said the Act gives complete power to the government to control the Data Protection Board that has power to impose up to Rs 500 crore. "No government should be given as much discretion as this Act gives to them. At present, there is a BJP government; tomorrow, there may be some other government. The Act should not give excess power to any government to use the provisions at their sole discretion," Bharadwaj said. Press Club of India Vice-President Sangeeta Barooah Pisharoty said journalist bodies have handed over a memorandum to Ministry of Electronics and IT Secretary that was signed by over 1,000 journalists expressing concern over the DPDP Act. "Earlier drafts had a line which said that journalistic work will be exempted but it was dropped. We are asking the government to bring in an amendment that is our primary demand and include that line because it will directly impact our works," Pisharoty said. She said there is hope that the ministry will listen to journalists' demands. "This is a rightful demand. This is something that we are very keen on and we are not going to step back. We also told the authorities that we should not be pushed to a situation where we come to the street or go looking for a legal option," Pisharoty said. The DPDP Act, 2023 is a comprehensive data privacy law to regulate the processing of digital personal data. Draft DPDP Rules, 2025, which aim to operationalise the Act, were published for public consultation, receiving 6,915 feedback/inputs from citizens and stakeholders, according to an official release. Civil rights bodies have expressed apprehension that the centre may selectively target media by misusing the power under the DPDP Act.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC directs govt to appoint ‘competent authority' under cow slaughter Act
Cuttack: Taking exception to the non-implementation of the Odisha Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1960, Orissa high court on Thursday directed the state govt to appoint a 'competent authority' under the Act within three weeks. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court observed that Section 3 of the Act imposes absolute prohibition on the slaughter of cows, overriding any custom or tradition. It noted that while slaughter of bulls or bullocks may be allowed under specific conditions, it requires a certificate from a competent authority — a position that has remained vacant since the Act came into force. The direction came while a division bench of Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice M S Raman was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) that had alleged continued cow slaughter in the state, despite the ban. "The 1960 Act cannot be a dead letter nor be put in cold storage taking into account the objects and purpose behind the said legislation," the bench said, adding that the absence of a designated authority had rendered several provisions of the Act 'unworkable'. The court also examined the Odisha Municipal Act, 1950, and the Odisha Municipal Corporation Act, 2003, and held that the 1960 law, being a special legislation, would have an overriding effect even over other state enactment. It maintained that any provision in the municipal laws contrary to the cow slaughter Act would have to yield to the latter's special status. Reiterating the urgency of the matter, the bench said, "The state govt cannot shrug off its responsibility. We direct the appointment of the competent authority within three weeks from the date of communication of this order and submit a report on the next date of hearing." The matter has been listed for further hearing on Sept 1.
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Opposition links SIR protest to 'vote theft', Trump tariffs
INDIA bloc MPs on Friday expanded their canvas of protest in Parliament by adding to the issue of the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar the " vote theft " charge levelled by the leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi and the 50% tariff announced by the US on Indian imports. The MPs held a protest outside Parliament by carrying placards about these three issues, before they staged a vociferous protest in the Lok Sabha, prompting the chair to adjourn the House after 11 am, following a brief attempt to proceed with the question hour, and later at 12 noon. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program The Opposition MPs will intensify their protest on the SIR and "vote theft" issues on Monday, when they plan to take out a march from Parliament House. With the ruling side starting deliberations on its vice presidential candidate, the INDIA bloc could announce its candidate after BJP declares its nominee, people in the know said after the bloc's Thursday night meeting. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Rare, Refined, and Ready Soon – Monte South is the Answer Monte South A Joint Venture between Adani Realty and Marathon Realty Learn More Undo On Friday, the opposition MPs alleged that the government was blocking House discussion on SIR and "vote theft" issues. "The entire country is saying that the Election Commission should conduct an inquiry and tell the country what is happening. The government doesn't have the courage to discuss SIR in the House, so why would they allow a discussion on this (vote theft) issue in the House?" said Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. NCP-SCP MP Supriya Sule said the Opposition had plans to hold presentations on vote theft in more states. "Rahulji gave a detailed presentation before us (at INDIA bloc leaders' meeting on Thursday) and a discussion was held, on which (Sharad) Pawar sahib gave a suggestion that such a presentation should be presented in every state, district and talukas before all those who believe in democracy," she said. Live Events The Opposition also said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi vowing to protect Indian farmers from the US tariff mattered little given his government's silence on the demands of the farmers, including a legally guaranteed minimum support price for their crops.
