
How to talk politics at work when you disagree
'I couldn't help myself if anyone spoke against India," says the Mumbai-based sales professional at an IT company. 'While I usually refrain from contributing to political conversations at work, it felt like the right step to defend my country now. It resulted in several arguments with my colleagues."
Unlike Kanoi, Ananya Banerjee has always been vocal about her political ideologies at work. In recent weeks, though, her views have resulted in several confrontations, impacting her relationship with co-workers. She has regrets about this.
'There have been several repercussions—a former manager blocked me on social media and started to ignore me at work. He was otherwise very appreciative of my achievements but we now don't see eye to eye. Some other colleagues also choose to ignore me," says Delhi-based Banerjee, 41, who works as a content head at an advertising agency.
Also read: The power of hitting pause during a workday
Given the political upheaval across the world, it's becoming harder to keep politics out of the workplace. Organisations and employees are embedded in the larger socio-political structure of the country, so they are impacted by it as well, says Ankita Tandon, associate professor (organisational behaviour and human resources), International Management Institute, Delhi. When people come to work, they bring their whole selves: their professional expertise, their personality, their beliefs, their mental models, and their opinions, she adds. 'Political discussions are a kind of social interaction. Organisations cannot stop people from engaging in social and political discussions as it might be looked upon as curtailing the right to free speech."
Discussing politics at work, however, can be a double-edged sword. While it can serve as an ice-breaker, it can also cause damage. The 2024 State of the Global Workplace Report by analytics and advisory company Gallup, which surveyed 10,000 employees, suggests the same.
About 14% of employees in the report claim having political discussions with co-workers has helped them feel included. But 12% say political conversations at work have made them feel uncomfortable.
'In this scenario, organisations can set guidelines for such discussions to happen within certain boundaries," suggests Tandon.
'Us Versus Them' Talk
With social media providing a constant stream of political news and commentary, it's natural that employees will bring their political views into the office, says Vigil Thomas, head of human resources at Bengaluru-based digital payments startup, ToneTag.
There's another caveat—unchecked political opinions or the spread of misinformation can subtly but significantly, erode team dynamics.
'What starts as a casual remark or a shared link can quickly spiral into deeper issues that affect trust, collaboration and morale," says Thomas. 'When employees share biased or inaccurate political content, it can damage their credibility."
Also read: Can AI help employees be happier at work?
Heated political discussions also disrupt focus. Meetings can veer off track, time is lost debating unrelated topics, and productivity suffers. Over time, teams may begin to polarise, forming cliques based on ideological alignment. This creates an 'us versus them" environment, making some employees feel excluded and less likely to contribute.
So, how can HR professionals and managers manage political discourse in a way that maintains a professional, productive and respectful work environment?
'While fostering an inclusive, open environment where employees can freely express themselves is essential, the workplace must also be a space where focus remains on collaboration, performance and shared goals," says Thomas. 'Disagreements over political views often escalate into personal conflicts."
Tandon agrees, adding that verbalisation of strong political opinions and discussion of information circulating on social media can easily escalate into conflicts and confrontations at work. Once that happens, interpersonal relationships can get affected which, in turn, can reflect in changes in team dynamics and team.
The involved employees may form negative opinions and lack trust in each other, which is likely to spill over into work. 'There is a strong relationship between interpersonal relationships at work and team cohesion, happiness, satisfaction and performance," says Tandon.
Setting an Example
Establishing a strong foundation starts with setting clear guidelines about workplace behaviour during the onboarding process, suggests Thomas. 'Emphasise the importance of maintaining respect for differing views while making it clear that political discussions should not overshadow professional responsibilities," he adds. 'Make sure these expectations are reinforced regularly."
The goal is not to silence voices but encourage conversations where diverse perspectives are respected, says Sahil Sharma, global chief human resource officer at RateGain, a global provider of AI-powered travel and hospitality SaaS solutions. 'The senior leadership must set the tone that the goal is understanding, not persuading. Provide team members with resources on empathetic listening and constructive communication," he adds.
Also read: Be goal-oriented, not task-focused, to get ahead at work
In industries where political discourse may be part of the work, such as public policy, social justice, or media, creating designated spaces for employees to express their views is a smart decision. Thomas says, 'These discussions should be voluntary, structured, and moderated to ensure they remain respectful and productive."
Organisations must also communicate to their staff that all political opinions are welcome during interpersonal interactions, says Tandon.
However, employees must be willing to be sensitive towards each other's viewpoints and emotions, and know when to de-escalate discussions before they become too heated. 'Organisations must firmly communicate that political opinions should not be entertained during work related discussions," she adds.
In any case, leaders and managers should model the right behaviour by staying neutral about politically sensitive topics at work, focusing conversations on shared goals and business objectives rather than personal beliefs, suggests Sharma. 'Besides, leaders must consider hosting short awareness sessions on digital literacy and responsible information sharing to prevent the spread of fake news," he says.
There must also be a mediation mechanism for conflict resolution should any differences in personal opinions lead to interpersonal conflicts. 'Plus, organisations must create clear guidelines regarding consequences for employees who let interpersonal differences of political opinions seep into workplace coordination and productivity," says Tandon.
Lastly, regular training and workshops to foster team trust, open communication and team cooperation across hierarchies can help maintain a positive team environment. 'Proactive policies and respectful boundaries are essential to keep the workplace focused, inclusive and collaborative," says Thomas.
Write to us at feedback@livemint.com
Also read: Do Gen Z workers need etiquette training?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
11 minutes ago
- The Hindu
After CSDS psephologist deletes X post, BJP accuses Congress of making 'baseless claims' on voter fraud
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday (August 19, 2025) accused the Congress of making 'baseless' claims about 'vote theft' and targeting the Election Commission of India in 'collusion' with a Delhi-based think tank. This came after Sanjay Kumar, a psephologist and a professor with the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), who had shared voter data from two Maharashtra Assembly seats related to last year's State election in a post on X on Sunday (August 17, 2025), subsequently deleted his post on Tuesday (August 19, 2025), apologising for posting erroneous data. The post had claimed a significant decrease in voter numbers in two Assembly seats in the State election compared to the 2024 general election, which was held nearly six months earlier. 'Fake data' Reacting sharply, BJP national spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia lashed out at Mr. Kumar for posting 'false data' which he claimed was used by the Opposition to target the EC, calling it a 'dangerous game'. 'This survey organisation [CSDS] is nothing but a puppet at the hands of leaders like Rahul Gandhi who could not win people's trust. He needs such an organisation which can provide fake data and facts so that he can make baseless allegations,' Mr. Bhatia said. 'Congress leader Pawan Khera tweets on this and then deletes. Rahul Gandhi's baseless allegations are also based on CSDS data,' he added. Deleting his post on Tuesday (August 19, 2025), Mr. Kumar wrote on X, 'I sincerely apologise for the tweets posted regarding Maharashtra elections. An error occurred while comparing the data of 2024 LS and 2024 AS. The data in the row was misread by our Data team.' The erroneous tweet has since been removed, he said, adding, 'I had no intention of dispersing any form of misinformation.'


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
NCERT releases two modules on Operation Sindoor for students from Classes 3 to 12
Over three months after the Pahalgam killings and subsequent military conflict between India and Pakistan, the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) has introduced two new modules on 'Operation Sindoor — A saga of valour' for Classes 3 to 8 and 'Operation Sindoor — A mission of honour and bravery,' for Classes 9 to 12. The modules state that 'Pakistan denied any involvement and didn't take any steps to stop the terrorists' and also states that the attack was 'directly ordered by Pakistan's political and military leadership.' The modules are meant as supplementary reading material for schoolchildren and are available online on NCERT website. Operation Sindoor has been described as 'a confluence of India's policy, intent and decisive capability,' and as 'our answer to protect peace of our country and stop these attacks (Pahalgam and so forth).' The module states that Operation Sindoor was named as such to honour the pain and strength of wives who had lost their soldier husbands to conflict. The module mentions the killing of 19 soldiers in Uri in 2016 and 40 CRPF jawans in Pulwama in 2019. It also mentions that 'the situation (in Jammu and Kashmir) changed over the years with abrogation of Article 370.' It further mentions that 'India's intelligence agencies found that Pakistan-based groups were planning terror attacks from across the border.' Additionally, it says, 'Operation Sindoor was India's way of stopping terrorism, led by Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Hizbul Mujahideen (HuM) and Pakistan's spy agency, ISI.' The module for Classes 9 to 12 states that 'Since independence, Pakistan has often tried to disturb peace in India — sometimes through war, and at other times, through terrorism.' It further states that abrogation of Article 370 paved way for development of Jammu and Kashmir, but 'Pakistan was not ready to accept this progress.' Candlelight marches The module also states that there were candlelight marches by civilians and how communities across India stood up to protest against the attack. It further states, 'Muslim communities in Hyderabad, Lucknow and Bhopal wore black armbands and openly denounced the attack. In Kashmir, shopkeepers closed their shops in protest. Villages near the border demanded strong action and supported the Armed Forces,' the module states. 'The local population stood up and spoke against terrorists. Their response breaks stereotypes and shows the real voice of peace-loving people,' it added. The module also mentions, 'Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, strategic guidance was very clear and empowering.' The module also states that 'On May 8, Pakistan escalated the conflict by attacking our airbases, logistic nodes, forward posts, all along the LoC and Army formation HQs — some using Unmanned Aerial Systems.' It goes on to say, 'Our (India's) integrated air defence grid and Counter-UAS grid were already in place. These systems — like the S-400, MRSAM, AKASH and traditional air defence guns — proved highly effective.' The module states that Pakistan intensified attacks on May 9 and targeted schools, religious places and civilian infrastructure. Indian Army neutralised 35-40 Pakistani Army personnel, as per intelligence inputs, the module states. 'The response (India's) shook Pakistani establishment as our airstrike breached their air defence, creating visible gaps that the world saw,' the module says. The NCERT has prepared special modules as supplementary reading material for students, focusing on key national themes. So far, 16 such modules have been released, including those on Partition Horrors and Chandrayaan Utsav among others. They are designed in a classroom format as a dialogue between a teacher and students intermingled with Q&A format activities.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Govindan issues legal notice to biz man over allegations of letter leak
1 2 3 T'puram: CPM state secretary M V Govindan has sent a legal notice to Muhammed Sharshad, a Chennai-based Keralite businessman, who accused his son Syamjith of leaking a letter Sharshad had written to the party's politburo against another businessman. The legal notice stated that Sharshad's wanton allegations were intended to damage Govindan's prestige. It said Govindan was deeply concerned, aggrieved and prejudiced by Sharshad's false and baseless statements, wherein he recklessly imputed corrupt practices and alleged misuse of political status, credibility and responsibility against Govindan. It mentioned that the letter, which Sharshad claimed to have been leaked using Govindan's influence, was circulating on social media and was released by Sharshad himself. The notice also reminded him of a letter he wrote to the CPM on May 17, 2024, in which Sharshad sought an apology for his allegations against Govindan. The notice demanded that Sharshad withdraw the allegations against Govindan within three days of receiving the notice publicly. It required him to publish a statement withdrawing the allegations through the same forums, desist from repeating such allegations and remove his allegations from social media. If Sharshad fails to do so, Govindan would be forced to initiate legal actions, it warned. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.