logo
Petronas unit flouting Sarawak law, says state government as row deepens

Petronas unit flouting Sarawak law, says state government as row deepens

CNA02-05-2025
KUALA LUMPUR: The Sarawak state government has accused national oil corporation Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) of flouting its laws, deepening a worsening spat that has already triggered foreign investor disquiet in a sector key to the Malaysian economy.
Sarawak's Utilities and Telecommunications Ministry issued a letter on Wednesday (Apr 30) to Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Malaysian oil giant, stating that it was operating the coastal Miri Crude Oil Terminal (MCOT) facility in the state without a licence, as required under Section 7(e) of its Distribution of Gas Ordinance.
According to the unsigned letter addressed to Petronas Carigali's Senior General Manager that was seen by CNA, Petronas Carigali has been given 21 days to obtain a licence or risk being slapped with an undisclosed financial penalty by the Sarawak state government.
The letter also referred to three earlier correspondences - first in December 2023, then in February and August last year - suggesting that the licensing issue at the terminal has been brewing for some time.
Section 7(e) of the Distribution Gas Ordinance stipulates that any 'operator of a building, managing or maintaining gas pipeline or other apparatus or equipment or mechanism for the distribution of gas' must be licensed.
Petronas has yet to respond to CNA's request for comment.
Sarawak's move was first reported on Friday by Malay language daily Utusan Malaysia.
Senior industry executives with close ties with the oil giant noted that the latest Sarawak directive was tantamount to an open challenge by the state to the decades-old monopoly Petronas has held since it was incorporated under a parliamentary statute in 1974 known as the Petroleum Development Act or PDA.
The PDA, among other things, decrees that the national oil corporation is the sole guardian of the nation's hydrocarbon reserves.
Sarawak, with probable and proven reserves of petroleum representing 60.87 per cent of Malaysia total reserves and accounting for 90 per cent Malaysia's liquified natural gas (LNG) exports, is insisting that PDA does not apply to the state.
It also wants greater control over its resources through wholly owned subsidiary Petroleum Sarawak, or Petros.
TIT FOR TAT
Industry executives are puzzled why Sarawak has trained its guns on MCOT, a facility that the Malaysian state-oil corporation has been operating since 1988, in its increasingly protracted dispute with Petronas.
MCOT is located along the Miri coast in Sarawak. The facility acts as a hub for receiving and storing crude oil and natural gas from offshore Sarawak fields before they are transported for refining and other purposes.
Several have suggested that this was a tit for tat move following allegations that Petros may have engaged in corporate espionage to secure some form of leverage in its face-off with Petronas.
Former Petronas manager Khairul Akmal Jasni pleaded not guilty in a Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur on Apr 18 to charges that he had attempted to leak highly confidential information in June last year on the national oil corporation's inner workings to Petros.
Cases of corporate spying are extremely rare in Malaysia and the allegations that Khairul had sought to share a document titled 'Q1 2024 Upstream Business Performance, Operational & Financial' has put Petros and the state government headed by Premier Abang Johari Openg in an awkward situation.
Abang Johari's state government is a crucial ally in Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's coalition government and the rising tensions with Petronas have strained federal-state ties, analysts have noted.
As recently reported by CNA, the confrontation over the control of hydrocarbon resources in the state has also stirred foreign investor unease in the oil and gas sector.
In a little-publicised surprise move last month, US oil giant ConocoPhillips decided to withdraw from operating the Salam-Patawali deepwater oil and gas field that the company discovered in 2018 with Petronas in a 50-50 joint-venture that was expected to cost RM13.7 billion (US$3.13 billion).
Industry executives noted that the decision was party driven by the increasingly unstable regulatory environment facing contractors operating in Sarawak.
Sarawak is disputing the overarching powers Petronas wields under the PDA and wants all the hydrocarbon reserves in the state to be regulated under a colonial-era Oil Mining Ordinance 1958 that stipulates that oil and gas resources found within 200 nautical miles of its waters belong to the state.
Both parties have tried to reach a compromise in talks that began sometime in April last year, but talks have broken down twice, with Petronas suspending all negotiations in December, according to executives from the national oil corporation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stocks to watch: CapitaLand Investment, CapitaLand Ascendas Reit, iFast, Lum Chang Creations
Stocks to watch: CapitaLand Investment, CapitaLand Ascendas Reit, iFast, Lum Chang Creations

Business Times

time12 hours ago

  • Business Times

Stocks to watch: CapitaLand Investment, CapitaLand Ascendas Reit, iFast, Lum Chang Creations

[SINGAPORE] The following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Wednesday (Aug 20): CapitaLand Investment (CLI) : The global real asset manager said on Tuesday that it will provide retail advisory services to Malaysian property developer Astaka for a new mixed-use project in Johor worth RM1.2 billion (S$364.5 million) in gross development value. Astaka chief executive Allen Khong said the project comprising a new lifestyle mall and a five-star hotel will be a key beneficiary of cross-border travel and retail activity thanks to the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone. The counter closed 1.1 per cent or S$0.03 up at S$2.70 on Tuesday. CapitaLand Ascendas Reit : The real estate investment trust on Wednesday announced the completion of the acquisition of two plots of freehold land in the UK, as previously planned . The plots are in Manton Wood and Towcester sites in the East Midlands, on which four new logistics properties are planned to be developed. The counter closed 0.8 per cent or S$0.02 up at S$2.70 on Tuesday. iFast : Shares of iFast on Tuesday had their biggest drop since April after Temasek-linked CP Invest offloaded about 14.4 million shares at a 6.7 per cent discount to the previous day's closing price. CGS International analyst Tay Wee Kuang said investors are likely taking this as a sign that iFast is 'fairly valued' at S$9.77. The counter closed 8.5 per cent or S$0.83 down at S$8.94 on Tuesday. Lum Chang Creations (LCC) : It is expected to report a 'significant improvement' in its profit before tax for its full year ended Jun 30, 2025, according to its profit guidance released on Tuesday. This is due to higher revenue from the improved progress of ongoing projects and the start of new projects undertaken in financial year 2025, compared with FY2024. LCC is expected to report its earnings on or before Aug 29. The counter closed on Tuesday S$0.03 or 7.2 per cent higher at S$0.445.

High-speed rail link proposal gets yet another airing
High-speed rail link proposal gets yet another airing

Business Times

time13 hours ago

  • Business Times

High-speed rail link proposal gets yet another airing

THE proposal for a high-speed rail (HSR) link between Singapore and Kuala Lumpur seems to be one of those ideas that refuse to die, despite all that has happened over the years. To go back a bit, a KL-Singapore HSR link was first mooted in the 1990s, with an estimated cost of about RM5 billion (S$1.5 billion today). It took more than 20 years for the project to be seriously considered, and by 2013 the estimated cost had ballooned to RM30 billion. The 350 km-long rail line, with purported train speeds of up to 350 kmh, finally led to a binding agreement with Singapore in December 2016. The aim was to have the line operational by 2026. The outbreak of Covid-19 and the election of a different coalition led to multiple postponements at Malaysia's request. Eventually, the agreement was abrogated in December 2020. Malaysia paid about S$102 million in compensation to Singapore for breaking the deal. Nevertheless, some important Malaysians want to revive the project and recent news reports say that three companies – YTL Corp, Berjaya Rail and China Railway Construction Corporation – have submitted detailed plans. Malaysia's Transport Minister Anthony Loke has ruled out any chance of government finance several times in the past. Even so, he said last month that the Anwar Ibrahim administration would make a final decision on the submissions by the end of this year. The timing of that decision seems elastic. Previously, it was reported that the deadline was the end of 2024. It is easy to understand the hesitation. Every HSR project in the world has been done with government financial backing. More importantly, few are operationally profitable, never mind the initial capital outlay. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up There is considerable Malaysian opposition to the prospect of a HSR for this very reason. Current estimates put the final figure of such an undertaking well north of RM80 billion. One Malaysian political wit sardonically suggested that it would be cheaper to give away free tickets for flights between the two cities than to borrow for the project. Democratic Action Party member Tony Pua based his calculations on information released by aviation data company OAG, which found that flights from Kuala Lumpur International Airport to Changi Airport were the busiest international route for 2023, at 4.9 million seats. Assuming each seat costs RM400, Pua said, it would add up to RM2 billion per year. At an interest rate of 5 per cent for an RM80 billion loan, the HSR project would cost the government RM4 billion in interest payments alone every year. 'So, the simple conclusion is, at RM4 billion interest cost for (the) HSR, the government might as well just pay for all flights between KL and Singapore and still save RM2 billion,' Pua said. Another critic argued that it would take 70 years for the proposed HSR to become financially viable, and pointed to European Union studies that had found financial justifications for such projects to be consistently overrated. Even in China, with its 48,000 km HSR network, only a handful of routes show operating profits. The rest run at a loss. It has also been argued that taxpayers from every other state in the Malaysian federation would have to foot the bill, while gains would be limited to those in the south of the peninsula. The Anwar government has good reason to fear being left holding the financial bag, if things go wrong. Clearly, then, it may serve its political interests to keep the idea of an HSR alive, but don't expect anything more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store