John Aylward's Sona Adds Senior Managers From BofA, Barclays
They Built a Secret Apartment in a Mall. Now the Mall Is Dying.
Why Did the Government Declare War on My Adorable Tiny Truck?
Trump Slashed International Aid. Geneva Is Feeling the Impact.
Chicago Transit Faces 'Doomsday Scenario,' Regional Agency Says
How SUVs Are Making Traffic Worse
Craig Nicol will join as a managing director and head of credit strategy in London and Oleg Melentyev will be director of US credit strategy in the firm's New York office, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential information.
Nicol previously worked at Barclays Plc as a high-yield strategist and Melentyev was head of high-yield credit strategy at Bank of America Corp starting in 2017.
Constantine Knox also joined the London office as general counsel from RBC BlueBay Asset Management, the person said. Knox was previously associate general counsel, head of corporate legal at the Royal Bank of Canada unit.
All three will join Sona in the second quarter, the person said.
The firm has made several hires from investment banks in recent years, including the appointment of leveraged-loan veteran Chris Herzog to its capital-markets team, which is led by Stephen Smith, former co-head of global leveraged finance syndicate at Barclays.
Aylward, a former Deutsche Bank AG trader, started Sona in 2016 with about $300 million and has grown assets under management to $11.3 billion. It has also expanded its teams across credit and private dealmaking to more than 100 globally, up from 29 in 2021. Sona manages strategies across its flagship, capital solutions and CLOs funds.
Earlier this year, Bloomberg reported that Karim Kassam will join Sona from Centerbridge Partners to work on its capital solutions business, which provides bespoke loans to businesses that often struggle to access cash. The firm launched its second fund for the strategy last year with $800 million.
(Updates with timing on new hire's previous job in third paragraph, description of capital markets in penultimate paragraph.)
Business Schools Are Back
Google Is Searching for an Answer to ChatGPT
The Richest Americans Kept the Economy Booming. What Happens When They Stop Spending?
A New 'China Shock' Is Destroying Jobs Around the World
How TD Became America's Most Convenient Bank for Money Launderers
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel's $24 Billion Rally Sends Valuation to Dot-Com Levels
(Bloomberg) -- After months of turbulence, Intel Corp. bulls are finally being rewarded for their patience. But the stock's sudden rebound comes with a worrying side effect: a valuation so high its most recent precedent is from the dot-com era more than two decades ago. Shares of the struggling chipmaker have rallied 28% this month, adding about $24 billion in market value, on reports that the US government is in talks for a potential equity stake, as well as plans for a $2 billion investment from Japan's SoftBank Group Corp. The jump has Intel trading at 53 times profits projected over the next 12 months, the highest since early 2002, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome 'The stock looks incredibly expensive here,' said Wayne Kaufman, chief market analyst at Phoenix Financial Services. 'That kind of multiple is a bet that the government will push Intel so hard on customers that it becomes a winner.' The surge in Intel this month followed a slump in the wake of a disappointing earnings report on July 24 and criticism of Tan earlier by President Donald Trump, who called for the CEO to step down, citing conflicts of interest. After meeting with Tan on Aug. 11, Trump changed his tune, saying Tan's 'success and rise is an amazing story.' Since then, reports have circulated that the Trump administration is in discussions to take a stake of about 10% in the company. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday that the talks are aimed at converting US grants already made to Intel under the Chips and Science Act into non-voting equity. Intel shares slid 1.4% in premarket trading Wednesday. Of course, the US's plans regarding Intel haven't been finalized and could still change. Intel declined to comment on Lutnick's remarks. For Paul Nolte, market strategist and senior wealth manager at Murphy & Sylvest Wealth Management, the potential government involvement could benefit Intel in the short-term but may pose a risk in the long term. 'This strikes me as an easy road to get onto, but a hard one to get out of,' Nolte said. 'At the end of the day, this raises so many more questions than it answers.' Meanwhile, Intel's premium valuation is largely a reflection of just how much its profitability has collapsed in recent years. Intel is projected to generate more than $1 billion in adjusted profit over the next four quarters, after losing about $1.3 billion in the previous four, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. From 2018 to 2021 the company generated more than $20 billion in annual profits on average. 'We have no idea what Intel can deliver in earnings growth since it is so behind on tech and because you can't cost-cut your way to growth,' said Nancy Tengler, chief executive officer of Laffer Tengler Investments. 'It's hard to have confidence in the estimates, which makes it difficult to assess the valuation. I think it's overvalued, but I also think the picture is so uncertain that it wouldn't be attractive at any price.' Wall Street largely echoes her caution. Fewer than 8% of the analysts tracked by Bloomberg recommend buying the stock, while nearly 80% have the equivalent of a neutral rating. In addition, at its Tuesday close of $25.31, Intel trades notably above the average price target of about $22, representing the weakest return potential among components of the Nasdaq 100 Index. Still, there is optimism that Chief Executive Officer Lip-Bu Tan will be able to turn things around. Much of his focus has been on cost cutting, which has improved Intel's outlook to return to profitability but raised concerns the chipmaker may be bowing out of the race for technological leadership. Part of his effort has also been centered on a costly build out of its foundry operations undertaken by his predecessor, Pat Gelsinger. 'Clearly it's going to take a number of years for it to really start operating on a smooth basis,' said Gerrit Smit, lead portfolio manager of the Stonehage Fleming Global Best Ideas Equity fund. 'We've got trust in him, but we think he's got a long slog ahead.' --With assistance from Subrat Patnaik and Dina Bass. (Updates with premarker share move in the fifth paragraph. An earlier version of the story corrected the figure in the headline.) Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Switzerland moves to strengthen its competitiveness after US tariffs
ZURICH (Reuters) -Switzerland is intensifying efforts to strengthen its attractiveness as a business location, its government said on Wednesday, after being hit with some of the highest U.S. tariffs worldwide. Efforts will focus on regulatory relief for Swiss companies, and new rules incurring high costs for businesses could be pushed back, the government said in a statement. U.S. President Donald Trump this month imposed U.S. import tariffs of 39% on Swiss goods, though pharmaceuticals and some other sectors have so far been spared the duties. "(The government) wants to decisively press ahead with its economic policy agenda and is focusing on reducing the regulatory burden on companies," the government said. Geographical diversification and Swiss companies' access to alternative international markets should also be strengthened, the statement said. The new U.S. levies currently affect around 10% of Swiss goods exports, and could have potentially severe consequences for some companies, the government said. Switzerland does not anticipate a recession akin to the global financial crisis or the pandemic, it added. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Companies have invested billions into AI, 95 percent getting zero return
Although there has been between $30 and $40 billion in enterprise investment into generative AI, a recent MIT report shows that 95 percent of organizations are seeing zero return. Just 5 percent of integrated artificial intelligence pilots 'are extracting millions in value,' while the majority contribute no measurable impact to profits, the report found. Many companies are implementing tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, with over 80 percent having explored or piloted these technologies, and nearly 40 percent reporting their deployment. However, these tools primarily function to enhance individual productivity rather than contribute to overall company earnings. Most times, AI integration fails to contribute to profits 'due to brittle workflows, lack of contextual learning, and misalignment with day-to-day operations,' the MIT report reads. The AI systems are unable to learn and think in ways humans can, as 'most GenAI systems do not retain feedback, adapt to context, or improve over time,' it continued. The research also suggests that generative AI implementation is unlikely to result in widespread job loss, at least for the next few years. 'Until AI systems achieve contextual adaptation and autonomous operation, organizational impact will manifest through external cost optimization rather than internal restructuring,' the report concluded.
