logo
A $1.1b cut to the government's new spending comes after Trump's trade trafiffs

A $1.1b cut to the government's new spending comes after Trump's trade trafiffs

RNZ News29-04-2025
Finance Minister Nicola Willis made a pre-budget speech to the Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce on Tuesday.
Photo:
RNZ / Sam Rillstone
Finance Minister Nicola Willis says her axing of a billion dollars from the government's operating allowance is a response to "the times we are living in" and pointed to
US President Donald Trumps trade tariff's
which she called a "seismic global economic event".
Willis also said the cut was about reducing New Zealand's interest debt burden.
The Greens are accusing Willis of "slash and burn" economics while Labour leader Chris Hipkins said it would drive New Zealanders overseas.
But Willis told media at a pre-Budget announcement on Tuesday she'd worked hard to avoid the mistakes of austerity budgets of the past, balancing growth with investment.
She was confident about getting back to surplus by 2029, saying New Zealand must curb its borrowing, and new spending would be slashed from $2.4b to $1.3b.
The minister told
Checkpoint
the government would continue to spend more each year after this year.
"What this is about is a responsible budget management because right now every week we're going out to the world and borrowing around $500 million.
"We have debt at levels not seen since the mid-1990s. We're running one of the biggest deficits in the world.
"That's the difference between what we're earning and what we're spending. That can't go on forever."
She said as a country, New Zealand couldn't keep wracking up unsustainable debt.
But she said there would still be more money in the May Budget for priority areas such as health, police and defence.
"The alternative approach is frankly irresponsible. To not adjust our spending to the times we find ourselves in. That way lies high inflation, high interest-rates and the economic ruin that comes with it."
Willis said a careful budget process, which was done by the entire Cabinet, had enabled the government to stop borrowing and start investing in critical areas.
"Let's not just forget that a few weeks ago there was a seismic global economic event that has affected global trade, that will affect New Zealand's growth trajectory...
"The introduction of tariffs, counter tariffs, tariff pauses, all of that by international consensus has lessened the forecast for global growth."
Asked if the public service should be prepared for more job cuts, Willis said it could not expect "more money to do the same things".
"This is not a time in which we can afford extravagant wage claims. I think the senior doctors coming out at 12 percent was pretty extravagant. I don't think there are many New Zealanders right now who have successfully got a 12 percent pay rise."
Senior doctors were planning strike action
for 24 hours on Thursday.
Willis said business growth was on the radar in the upcoming Budget, as was investment in social initiatives, and the government was committed to meeting the bill for superannuation which was in the billions.
She was concerned with debt levels at 42 percent of Gross Domestic Product, when it typically hovered at 25 percent.
"My worry is that if we were to have significant event, an earthquake, another pandemic God forbid, a biosecurity incursion, that we would properly at that point have to borrow more and then we're getting to the point where the interest on our debt would become almost very difficult to manage."
That debt was now more than $9b, she said.
"That's more than all the money that goes into the police, Corrections, Justice and Defence combined.
"We can't really afford to have that interest bill spiralling out of control."
Meanwhile, Infometric's chief forecaster Gareth Kiernan earlier told
Checkpoint
the minister's announcement came as a surprise.
"It's out of the blue given that she's been pretty committed to that $2.4b operating allowance previously and in the knowledge that even Treasury had said previously that wouldn't be enough to necessarily keep the lights on, given costs increases and demand pressures associated with population growth."
However, Kiernan said the key was looking at the other side of the equation with Willis given assurances there was still enough money for critical investment.
"It's not about slashing and burning everything," Kiernan told Lisa Owen.
"Gosh, we could be under a much more austere approach if we wanted to really get back to surplus a lot quicker but that is not going to be helpful to the economy if we go down that path."
Economist Gareth Kiernan says the government's announcement it will slash $1.1b from new spending in next month's Budget is a surprise.
Photo:
RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King
He predicted the savings the government had identified would be more targeted and nuanced than last year's "blunt instrument" of finding a six to seven percent savings across the board.
Asked by Owen if that was the slashing of public servants, Kiernan said it was the culling of programmes that hadn't progressed and job vacancies that hadn't been filled.
This time around he said deeper and more "sensible" questions had been asked by the government to achieve the savings.
Asked if Trump's trade tariffs had forced the government's hand, Kiernan said that was the message that "seems to have been put out there".
"That over the last couple of months the economic environment internationally has deteriorated.
"I mean, we've revised down our own forecast of GDP growth through 2026 by close to 1 1/2 percentage points, given the risks there are around that international trade situation."
He said that was not just a direct result of the tariffs but how it flowed through to New Zealand's other trade partners such as China.
"If the New Zealand economy grows more slowly going forward than we have been expecting, that means the government will have less tax revenue coming in and so that means they have less room to spend on the other side as well."
Kiernan said it looked as if there'd be a significant slow down in export growth and that recovery, as well as businesses and households being more cautious.
That could look like the labour market not picking up as quickly later this year, with businesses holding off hiring staff meaning job and income security might not be as strong going forward, he said.
Kiernan expected, however, to see more capital spending from the government and investment in infrastructure.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ban on protesting outside homes rebalances freedom of expression and privacy rights
Ban on protesting outside homes rebalances freedom of expression and privacy rights

RNZ News

time28 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

Ban on protesting outside homes rebalances freedom of expression and privacy rights

Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has announced protesting outside someone's home will become an offence. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The government's ban on protesting outside someone's home will rebalance the right to freedom of expression and the right to privacy, a law professor says. But another academic has questioned whether a new law is necessary, and says police may struggle to enforce it. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced on Friday protesting outside someone's home would become an offence, punishable with a fine or jail time. While it would apply to all residences, Goldsmith said there had been increased reports of demonstrations targeting the homes of public figures like MPs, judges and other officials. Otago University law professor Andrew Geddis said current laws around protests only related to public settings. "Protests that take place outside someone's home really do intrude into a sort of domestic sphere where people usually feel they should be able to exist unperturbed and unthreatened," he said. "So this particular change in the law will help to restrike that balance." Otago University law professor Andrew Geddis. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Geddis said the change would plug a legal gap highlighted by a Supreme Court ruling nearly two decades ago. The 2007 case, Brooker v Police, involved a man who was convicted of disorderly behaviour for standing outside a police officer's house playing the guitar and singing protest songs against her, he said. But the Supreme Court found his behaviour was not disorderly. "The Supreme Court said that disorderly behaviour only applies to the public consequences of your behaviour, how that affects the public place. "And just because it's intruding into someone's private home, that's not a consideration as to whether the protest is covered by disorderly behaviour," he said. It meant the balance between people's rights within their home and people's rights to protest in public was "out of whack", Geddis said. One of the judges noted the court's finding could lead to more protests outside people's homes, and Parliament would need to consider that at some point, he said. "It turns out he was right." Victoria University law professor Steven Price said police may find it hard to enforce the new law. Goldsmith said it would be tightly targeted and prohibit "unreasonable disruptions", but Price said the independent police watchdog's review of policing protests found officers struggled to make a call on that. "What the IPCA had to say about that ... is that police have trouble on the ground having to make fine distinctions about what's an unreasonable disruption and what's not, and that seems a fair point to make," he said. "But on the face of [Goldsmith's] press release, it doesn't really solve the problem." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Amend away, amend away
Amend away, amend away

Otago Daily Times

time2 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Amend away, amend away

Dunedin Labour MP Rachel Brooking has run a few marathons in her time, and she put in another long-distance effort in the House this week. She wasn't keeping count, but by my tally she delivered 31 speeches this week — and it would have been 32 but for her having to leave for the airport on Thursday afternoon to catch the last convenient flight home. As would be expected, it was the Resource Management Act which dominated Brooking's week, although she also found the time to delve into the inner workings of the Local Government (Water Services) Bill, and the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill as well. It was the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill which kept Brooking going for most of the week though. The relevant minister, Chris Bishop, has been labouring with a heavy cold all week and his heart must have sunk as Brooking — armed with pens, post-it notes and slabs of drafts and amendment papers — rose to her feet on Tuesday afternoon. Parliament is blessed with many MPs who can pick the minutest bone with any word or sentence — the Greens' Lawrence Xu-Nan and Bishop himself when in Opposition spring to mind — but few are as forensic and diligent as Brooking when it comes to working through clauses and sub-clauses. And she had plenty of material, the minister having just that morning tabled a substantial amendment paper. So substantial, in fact, that what Brooking suspected had happened was that the version of the Bill reported back from select committee — and not as yet agreed to by Parliament — had been used as the template for the soon to be amended again Bill. "This is a terrible way to make laws," Brooking lamented. "It's very frustrating, when you have been through a select committee process and have asked about the wording of different phrases and made amendments in the select committee process, to see that all upended on the day of the committee stage of the Bill." Bishop, to his credit, was somewhat repentant about that: "In mitigation, most of the changes in the Amendment Paper have been publicly announced, in some cases, a couple of months, if not earlier, than today. So members have had a good opportunity to kick those issues around." As it turned out, they were about to do a lot more kicking ... and not without good reason, as the Bill — now an Act — attempted to achieve a heck of a lot within its many pages. The much-criticised RMA is due to be axed next year: in the meantime the Amendment Act makes a many short-term changes to time frames for consent processing in areas such as infrastructure, renewable energy, farming and consenting after natural disaster. It is very broad in some places and narrowly specific in others — such as allowing the demolition of Wellington's Gordon Wilson flats and allowing Auckland to develop land around its railway stations. A lot of this is reasonable, Brooking agreed, in her third reading speech. "Labour was supporting this Bill when it was introduced and even at the second reading, despite having concerns about some of the changes that were made at select committee," she said. "But something happened on Tuesday morning. That was that a very large Amendment Paper was dropped and it made significant changes to the Bill. Changes that we were not even able to debate in this House because government members chose to stand up and close the debate on these very important aspects." Brooking then proceeded to give the government a stern and emotional telling off for its terrible law making ... none of which was enough to stop it being passed by lunchtime Thursday. Best supporting actor Taieri Green list MP Scott Willis also deserves an honorable mention in despatches for his efforts this week. Not only did he put his shoulder to the wheel with a succession of interventions on the aforementioned RMA Bill, he also had a crack at Science minister Shane Reti during Question Time on Thursday concerning job losses in the sector. Answering Willis' question about how many jobs had been lost in the sector since the formation of the government, Reti conceded that 134 jobs were to go with the disestablishment of Callaghan Innovation — the point that Willis was trying to make — but Reti also highlighted a Stats NZ survey which suggested a recent increase of people working in the sector. Which is not the same as jobs being lost, a point Willis soon made ... as well as pointedly asking if those laid-off scientists would be heading to the airport departure lounge post-haste. "I think that scientists who have been disestablished through part of the reforms will have a skill set that will be able to be applied in other parts of the science sector," Reti replied — which is true, but which also side-stepped the question of in which country's science sector that might be.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store