
The WhatsApp messages that could get you sacked
It's late evening, and your phone vibrates with some banter from colleagues. You join the conversation and go to bed feeling part of the work community. You then wake up and have a feeling of apprehension as to how the messages will be perceived.
WhatsApp might have started as a casual messaging app for friends, but it has now firmly become embedded in workplace communication – and increasingly in workplace conflicts, too.
WhatsApp chats have also been used to corroborate or refute claims in employment tribunals. An employee might claim they were promised a pay rise or flexible hours via WhatsApp, for example. But on the other hand, employers have also used WhatsApp logs to prove misconduct. This evidence has included sharing confidential information.
In the workplace, WhatsApp chats have replaced many casual real-life conversations. Colleagues create groups to coordinate work, message each other after hours and vent their frustrations in private messages. Although this feels informal, it can leave employees vulnerable.
But when disputes escalate to legal action, these messages can help judges understand what really happened. Tribunals treat WhatsApp messages like any other document.
We examined more than 2,000 cases brought to UK employment tribunals since 2019 that involved WhatsApp. The findings reveal a surprising range of ways in which these casual chats became evidence.
WhatsApp conversations have increasingly played a crucial role in misconduct and discrimination disputes, being used as evidence of harassment or inappropriate behaviour. The messages are also cited in unfair dismissal and contract claims, especially where informal work communications and digital records were seen as central to the case.
In 2018, 48 cases brought to employment tribunals involved WhatsApp messages. By 2024, that had climbed to 562. The cases span a wide range of jurisdictions, but unfair dismissal, contract breaches, harassment and discrimination were dominant. From the cases we examined, several themes were clear.
1. Removal or exclusion from a WhatsApp group
In the case of Ms B Djagbo v Women's Health Dulwich Ltd, the claimant successfully brought a claim for unfavourable treatment due to pregnancy and maternity. This followed a series of incidents that took place after she informed her employer of her pregnancy.
Several actions made her feel as though her employment was being prematurely ended, including being removed from the workplace WhatsApp group chat. The tribunal awarded her almost £20,000.
2. Discriminatory messages or harassment via WhatsApp
In the Mr D Robson v NGP Utilities Ltd case, the claimant is a gay man and brought a complaint of harassment. This included a series of inappropriate and offensive incidents at work, notably, a WhatsApp group message from a colleague.
The message was part of a wider pattern of jokes targeting gay colleagues. The employment tribunal awarded him more than £36,000.
3. Termination of employment via WhatsApp
The case of Miss J Hodkinson v B&R Care Ltd highlights a pregnant care worker who was awarded more than £40,000 in compensation after being unfairly dismissed via WhatsApp. The fact that the dismissal was carried out informally and insensitively supported the tribunal's findings of 'procedural and substantive unfairness'.
4. WhatsApp communications submitted as evidence
The Mr M D Black v Alain Charles Publishing Ltd tribunal noted that the claimant's evidence was consistent with WhatsApp message screenshots included in the evidence bundle. As a result, compensation of almost £100,000 was awarded.
WhatsApp groups can also offer a window into workplace culture. Tribunals have seen examples of co-workers using WhatsApp to share sexist and racist jokes or to gossip about colleagues.
With remote and flexible working, these chats illustrate a growing tension between constant connectivity and work burnout.
The tribunal cases show just how deeply WhatsApp has become part of working life, blurring the line between personal and professional. Colleagues chat the way friends do.
But when working relationships sour or rules are broken, each of these informal chats carries legal weight. What someone thought was a single throwaway remark in a private conversation can later be dissected as part of a wider body of evidence.
There have been cases where an employer was ordered to hand over work-related WhatsApp exchanges, and others where an employee's own messages were used against them.
It's a clear lesson. Privacy in digital communication is never guaranteed. Even encrypted messages can become public in a courtroom.
WhatsApp dos and don'ts
The volume of references to WhatsApp in tribunal cases frames some key lessons for both employees and employers. In a nutshell, if you wouldn't write it in a company email or say it in a meeting, don't put it into WhatsApp.
Jokes can be misinterpreted, and offensive remarks don't just go away. Many have learned this the hard way.
Using WhatsApp to share instructions and decisions might seem convenient, but it shouldn't replace a formal process.
And for employers, it's time to update communication policies, including guidelines on after-hours messaging, the use of group chats and respecting expectations of inclusivity.
Banning WhatsApp might not be practical, but setting out expectations is important. Even a policy stating that any work-related communication on personal messaging apps should adhere to the company's expected code of conduct is a start.
Many people are unaware that a private chat can reappear as evidence. Knowing that a tasteless joke on WhatsApp could support a harassment claim potentially costing an unlimited fine, or that ignoring a late-night work message might be used as evidence of poor performance, will harden most people to conduct more mindful communication.
Jonathan Lord is a Lecturer in Human Resource Management and Employment Law at the University of Salford. Gordon Fletcher is an Associate Dean, Research and Innovation at the University of Salford. Saad Baset is an Associate Lecturer & Researcher, Salford Business School at the University of Salford.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Three union leaders included in King's Birthday Honours
Three trade union leaders have been included in the King's Birthday Honours for services to areas including education and green jobs. Dave Ward, long-serving general secretary of the Communication Workers Union (CWU) is made a CBE for services to trade unions, and Dr Patrick Roach, who recently retired as general secretary of the NASUWT teachers' union is made a CBE for services to education. Sue Ferns, deputy general secretary of the civil service union Prospect, is made an OBE for services to green jobs and workplace transition. Mr Ward has been general secretary of the CWU for a decade, leading the union through the privatisation of Royal Mail and recent sale of the postal giant to Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky. He started work as a messenger boy at Tooting delivery office in south London before becoming a union rep, holding several positions before succeeding Billy Hayes as general secretary in 2015. He is married with four children, supports Chelsea and is a keen blues guitarist. He told the PA news agency: 'The New Deal for Workers campaign was founded and led by the CWU. 'At a time when society has never been more unequal the trade union movement pushing Labour to turn this campaign into a new Employment Rights Bill could not have been more important. 'This honour is recognition of our union's work in this area and for the way we stand up for postal, telecom, financial services and tech workers across the UK. 'I joined the GPO as a telegram boy in 1976 and it is a privilege to now be the general secretary of a union that campaigns for our members in and out of the workplace. 'We now need employers and the Government to go even further in rebalancing workplaces and society. We will continue to lead this.' Dr Roach stepped down as NASUWT general secretary in April after five years. The son of Jamaican immigrant parents, he grew up in Walsall, West Midlands, in the 1970s, and has described how he faced racism at school on a daily basis. He is married with two children. He was a teacher of politics and sociology in further education and was a researcher and lecturer in education, social policy and equalities in higher education. He later joined NASUWT and headed the union's education and equalities work before becoming assistant general secretary and then deputy general secretary. He has served in a number of voluntary roles as a school governor and in supporting the provision of supplementary education for African Caribbean children. Dr Roach became head of the union in 2020 at the start of the first national lockdown, leading union members in uncharted territory as schools and colleges, teachers and headteachers adapted to one of the most challenging post-war periods in education. As head of the TUC's anti-racism taskforce, Dr Roach was instrumental in leading Britain's trade union movement in challenging racism and injustice at work. He told the PA news agency: 'I am humbled and incredibly proud to be granted this honour. 'It has been my privilege to have been afforded the opportunity to devote my career to education and in the service of NASUWT members, teachers and headteachers, whose commitment, work and dedication every day continues to inspire, shape lives and make a world of difference.' Sue Ferns, who has also been a member of the TUC General Council since 2005, grew up in Sheffield, South Yorkshire, and was the first member of her family to go to university, studying industrial relations at Salford University. After graduating in 1982, she started working for the TUC's economics department. She joined Prospect in 1993, becoming head of research in 2002, director of communications and research in 2013, and senior deputy general secretary in 2018. She has campaigned on issues including the gender pensions gap, workers' rights in the science, engineering and energy sectors, and clean energy. She has taken part in several government taskforces and working groups, particularly on clean energy jobs and workforce skills. She told the PA news agency: 'I am privileged to have spent my career in the trade union movement, determined to make a positive difference to the lives of working people. 'I'd like to thank the countless colleagues, trade union representatives and members within our movement, whose commitment to improving the lives of others has been an inspiration throughout my career.'


The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reality TV star Georgia Harrison ‘blown away' at MBE for campaigning efforts
Reality TV star Georgia Harrison has said she is 'completely blown away' at being made a Member of the Order of the British Empire (MBE) for services to tackling online privacy and cyber crime awareness. Over the past couple of years the 30-year-old, who has starred in reality TV shows including The Only Way Is Essex and Love Island, has turned her hand to campaigning on violence against women and girls after becoming a victim of revenge porn. She told the PA news agency: 'Honestly, I'm completely blown away to be receiving an MBE – it's one of my proudest achievements and something I didn't expect to be coming through the letter box this summer. 'It means the world to have this kind of recognition, not just for me, but for all the survivors who've been through what I have. 'Speaking out after what happened wasn't easy, but I knew it was important. 'I didn't want anyone else to feel as alone or powerless as I did. I've tried to turn something painful into something positive, and this honour is a reminder that we can make change when we use our voices. 'Thank you to everyone who's supported me along the way, to all of the MPs that invited me in to speak with open arms and to all the charities that supported me and my fellow survivors. 'I'll never stop fighting for what's right and I'll always step up when and where I think I can make a positive difference for others.' In 2021, the TV star waived her right to anonymity amid a trial that saw her ex-partner, Stephen Bear, accused of sharing a secretly recorded sex tape of her to adult content website OnlyFans. Bear, also a reality TV star, served 10 and a half months of a 21-month sentence after being found guilty of voyeurism and of two counts of disclosing private sexual photographs and films with intent to cause distress. In April 2023, the month after he was sentenced, Harrison attended a demonstration, held outside Parliament by domestic violence charity Refuge, calling for specific protections for women and girls to be included in the Online Safety Bill. She also called for social media platforms to be 'held accountable' for online harassment and abuse, and criticised the justice system for failing to 'keep up'. Later that year, she discussed the Bill in a Downing Street meeting with former technology secretary Michelle Donelan as it returned to the Commons for its final stages. In recognition of her work advocating for online safety and the prevention of violence against women and girls she won the activist gong at the Glamour Women of the Year Awards 2023. Reflecting on her campaigning, she told The Sun in October 2023 that she had had 'serious conversations with a couple of Labour MPs' about a bid to represent an Essex constituency. In 2024, she helped Thames Valley Police launch a campaign about sexual consent titled Consent Conservations. Harrison explored the prevalence of deepfakes and image-based sexual abuse in an ITV documentary titled Georgia Harrison: Porn, Power, Profit, which was released earlier in the year. As well as Love Island, she has taken part in reality TV shows including Celebrity Ex On The Beach and Channel 4 reality show Celebrity SAS: Who Dares Wins, which she won with boxer Lani Daniels. In April, she announced she was expecting her first child with her partner Jack Stacey.


The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Harry Dunn mother speaks of ‘undeserved' MBE for being ‘mum who was just broken'
The mother of a teenage motorcyclist, killed by a US citizen who was able to leave the UK under diplomatic immunity laws, has said she feels 'undeserving' of her MBE because she was 'a mum who was just totally broken'. Charlotte Charles, the mother of 19-year-old Harry Dunn, said her work on road safety following the crash that resulted in her son's death in 2019 was an 'avenue to direct my grief down'. Harry was killed when a Volvo driven by then-US state department employee Anne Sacoolas hit him while on the wrong side of the road outside RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire. Sacoolas had diplomatic immunity asserted on her behalf following the crash and she was able to leave the country 19 days later. Mrs Charles, alongside Harry's father Tim Dunn, campaigned for justice for three years – which included a meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House. Speaking about her reaction to when she received the letter telling her she had been made an MBE, Mrs Charles, 50, told the PA news agency: 'One of a bit of bewilderment, I guess. 'I couldn't be happier on behalf of Harry, if I'm honest. 'I just always wanted to make sure his death led to change, and if it means that a few more lives are saved, and victims of a serious crime are treated a little bit better, and that the roads in and around our bases in the UK are safer, then I'm thrilled to accept the award on behalf of him. 'But I don't think it's sunk in yet.' She continued: 'I think when I received the letter I just felt almost a little bit undeserving – because you don't forget all of the achievements that you've worked so, so very hard to secure. But at the end of the day I just view myself as a mum who was just totally broken. 'I didn't know any other way of coping apart from focusing on as many positive things as I possibly could. 'It was an avenue to direct my grief down – so for me, the last five-and-a-half years… campaigning for one more string to the bow of Harry's legacy was a real focus. 'So for it to be honoured and recognised feels a little bit surreal because I was just doing what I desperately needed to do at the time – which was to try and secure safety and a better understanding of everything that we had been going through. 'So it just feels quite surreal.' Questioned on whether she felt her work on road safety and changing the laws regarding diplomatic immunity would be recognised in such a way, she said: 'No, not at all – it's the furthest thing from your mind. 'All you're thinking about at the time is to just try to make sure that what happened to us just never happened to anybody else. 'When Anne Sacoolas left the country and jumped through what we discovered was a loophole – that was one of the main things on my radar, to get that loophole closed. 'Then you start looking more widely.' She added: 'You work on these things and you do your absolute best at the time for what you have in your head and what changes you want to make for the sake of healing your heart a little bit more. 'But you never ever think that a recognition like this is going to come along – it's just not in your realms of thinking at all.' Mrs Charles, and the rest of the Dunn family, are expecting a parliamentary inquiry to be announced soon before the sixth anniversary of Harry's death in August. She told PA: 'I would say that we have been more at peace since justice was done. 'In our eyes, we did achieve what we set out to achieve. 'We were able to show that those who think they are above the law aren't – certainly not in our country. 'We can't control other countries' laws and regulations but we had a lot of faith and hope in our justice system. 'So to be able to achieve that was incredible, and I think the overall feeling is one of peace. 'I carried out that promise to Harry – and the public and the media, and eventually our own Government, helped us to achieve that. 'Life is still really hard – if I'm honest we're still trying to work out what our life is without Harry. 'You constantly live with that pain and that sense of sheer loss – but certainly I can say on behalf of myself and the family that we do have a better sense of peace in our broken hearts now.' Asked if her MBE was on behalf of her son, she said: 'Absolutely it's on behalf of Harry. 'My love for him has got me through all of the fights that we've had to have to get to where I am today. 'So the award is absolutely on behalf of Harry, yes.'