
‘My farm makes me just £50 a week - Labour's scrapping of £1bn subsidy scheme will be devastating'
As a proud dairy farmer, the 47-year-old father-of-two wanted to focus 'every square inch' of his 1,400 acres on food and milk production, and once believed post-Brexit environmental subsidies threatened to turn many farners into 'subsidy junkies'.
But a significant squeeze on margins and the wish to bring in cash for a robotic milking system led to a redress of the situation - and on Wednesday, he met with a farming expert to discuss an application for the government's sustainable farming incentive (SFI).
Providing winter bird feed and creating of grass margins along watercourses could warrant £10,000 a year, Mr Goady estimated, and give access to capital funding for the wanted farming equipment.
But last week, Labour announced that SFI, which was launched in 2022, was now fully suscribed and closed to new applications with immediate effect. Under £1bn worth of deals already agreed, farmers are paid for managing land to protect soil, restore hedgerows and boost nature recovery.
'I was gobsmacked,' said Mr Goadby, who said he now makes just £50 a week from his farming business already 'propped up' by the conversion of industrial units. He said he now lives off his wife's primary school teacher salary.
'I will impact us hugely, you take away the SFI, you take away another income while we try desperately to survive. You don't make a penny from farming anymore, it's unsustainable and so we now need the support. This is devastating.'
Mr Goadby, who has around 700 cows and also grows wheat, barley and oats, said the government decision to scap SFI was another 'attack' on the farming sector, months after chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a change to inheritance tax for farmers.
'With my father aged 81, we're lookng at a succession plan, but we fear inheritance tax will destroy us,' Mr Goadby said. 'How are we going to raise £800k, and pay it over 20 years - we're going to have sell up land to survive which will make us less viable.'
In his community, Mr Goadby said two farmers had killed themselves over the past two years. 'There will be more from this [scrapping of SFI],' he added.
Food security minister Daniel Zeichner told the Commons last week that the government planned to 'redesign' the SFI programme. The scheme was the largest part of new environmental land management (Elms) project which replaced EU-era farming subsidies.
Also impacted is Northamptonshire farmer Ben Aveling, who had already seeded 20 acres of 'low input' grassland for yet-to-be submitted application for cash under the SFI programme. The land, Mr Aveling said, could have been used for growing wheat, raising £16,000.
The 39-year-old father-of-three has already heavily diversified his 250-acre farm. Three years ago he set up clamping and has created an online farm shop.
He said: 'Farming has become less profitable, and so we have focused on other ways to make money such as through environment schemes - but to now hear it has been closed off despite our work is bitterly disappointing.
'It feels like an absolute onslaught on farming with another thing taken away from us as we struggle to survive. Labour is putting food security at risk, and that places at risk our job to feed the nation.'
Last week, farmers gathered by the Houses of Parliament to protest over the scrapping of the scheme, as well as the changes to inheritance tax.
The rise in anger in the farming community has also put many newly-elected rural Labour MPs in a difficult position. Around 40 have reportedly joined a 'rural growth group', sending a letter to Ms Reeves on their concerns over the inheritance levy.
In November, Labour peer Baroness Ann Mallalieu warned the party faced a wipeout of rural MPs at the next election.
On Tuesday, farmers met Mr Zeichner to discuss their concerns over the scrapping of SFI in a meeting organised by the National Farmers' Union (NFU). President Tom Bradshaw said: 'We made it clear to the minister that this decision not only threatens the livelihoods of numerous farmers, especially upland farmers, commoners and tenants, but also undermines the ability of farm businesses to deliver environmental work.'
Sarah Lee, director of policy at the Countryside Alliance, told The Independent: 'Farmers are being asked to navigate an increasingly unerctain landscape, from concerns about the farm tax to broader economic pressures, while continuing to produce high-quality food and tackling biodiversity decline and climate change.
'This decision comes at a time when confidence in the farming sector is already fragile. Closing to applications without immediate clarity on what comes next risks exacerbating uncertainty.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Aid groups say Israel's new registration rules are ‘weaponising aid'
More than 100 aid organisations working in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank have accused Israel of dangerously 'weaponising aid' in its application of new rules for registering groups involved in delivering humanitarian assistance. The letter represents the latest broadside from the international aid community against Israel after the EU, Britain and Japan on Tuesday called for urgent action to stop 'famine' spreading in the Gaza Strip. The letter was published as Gaza's health authority reported continuing deaths from malnutrition in the besieged Palestinian territory, and amid threats by Israel to take full military control of the coastal strip with reports in Hebrew media suggesting the country may be planning to mobilise up to 100,000 reservists for the new offensive. The letter, signed by organisations including Oxfam, Médecins Sans Frontières and Care, was written in response to registration rules announced by Israel in March that require organisations to hand over lists of their donors and Palestinian staff for vetting. The groups contend that doing so could endanger their staff and give Israel broad grounds to block aid if groups are deemed to be 'delegitimising' the country or supporting boycotts or divestment. The registration measures were 'designed to control independent organisations, silence advocacy and censor humanitarian reporting', they said. The letter added: 'This obstruction has left millions of dollars' worth of food, medicine, water and shelter items stranded in warehouses across Jordan and Egypt.' On Tuesday, Israel's ministry for diaspora and combating antisemitism said it had revoked the work permits of 10 NGOs that had applied for authorisations. Under the new rules, which are vague and broad-reaching, a team led by the diaspora ministry can refuse registration to aid groups if they or their members published calls to boycott Israel in the past seven years; if there is 'reasonable basis to assume' that they oppose Israel's existence as a Jewish and democratic state; or if they 'actively advance delegitimisation activities against the state of Israel'. The aid groups' letter said the rules violated European data privacy regulations, noting that in some cases aid groups had been given only seven days to comply. 'Instead of clearing the growing backlog of goods, Israeli authorities have rejected requests from dozens of NGOs to bring in lifesaving goods, citing that these organisations are 'not authorised to deliver aid',' the letter added, saying that 60 requests from 29 organisations were denied in July citing this justification. Cogat, the Israeli military body in charge of humanitarian aid to Gaza, denied the letter's claims, adding without evidence that aid groups were being used as cover by Hamas to 'exploit the aid to strengthen its military capabilities and consolidate its control', despite the fact that Israel already claims to control 75% of Gaza. The aid groups stressed on Thursday that most of them had not been able to deliver 'a single truck' of life-saving assistance since Israel implemented a blockade in March. The vast majority of aid is not reaching civilians in Gaza, where tens of thousands of people have been killed, most of the population has been displaced and famine is taking hold. UN agencies and a small number of aid groups have resumed delivering assistance, but say the number of trucks allowed in remains far from sufficient. The letter was published as Israel's far-right finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, backed plans for a major settlement development outside Jerusalem, which he said would represent the 'final nail in the coffin' of Palestinian ambitions for their own state. The E1 settlement plan for more than 3,000 housing units – which critics, including much of the international community, say would split the West Bank from occupied East Jerusalem – is highly likely to be approved by a planning body next week. But it still remains uncertain whether the plan, which has been frozen for more than five years, will advance, given the likely international fallout. While his support for the plan was announced by Smotrich at a press conference on Thursday, it remains uncertain how much backing it has from the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, as does the attitude of Donald Trump's White House. Smotrich's comments come after many countries said they would recognise a Palestinian state in September. 'This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognise and no one to recognise,' said Smotrich, whose extremist party has experienced a collapse in support.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Nearly half of voters fear the Government will not be able to 'smash the gangs' after migrant count hits 50,000
Nearly half of voters think the Government can't control migrants arriving on small boats. While the poll applies to British governments in general, it indicates a lack of faith in Sir Keir Starmer 's 'smash the gangs' policy to control the boats. The survey came as the number of illegal migrants who have crossed the Channel since Labour was elected just over a year ago reached 50,000 – a figure reached more quickly under Sir Keir than previous prime ministers. His first act upon winning the election was to scrap the Rwanda deterrent scheme that the Tories had banked on to get the boat crossings down. The Government's 'returns deal' with France appears to have done little to deter those determined to get to Britain, with more than 2,000 arrivals in the seven days since the 'one in, one out' scheme launched. The YouGov poll, which sampled 8,731 adults, revealed that 48 per cent thought British governments did not have the ability to control the number of arrivals. Just 44 per cent had faith that ministers would be able to restrict the number of small boats, while eight per cent didn't know. Respondents were asked: 'Thinking about the powers and abilities of British governments in general, rather than specific governments, how much do you think a British government has the ability to control the number of migrants coming to the UK on small boats?' Of the five responses – ranging from 'a great deal' to 'none at all' – the most cited category was 'not very much' when it came to controlling numbers. Ministers attempted to dodge the blame after figures confirmed the number of small-boat arrivals had passed 50,000 under Labour even though the milestone – equivalent to one migrant arriving every 11 minutes – was passed seven months earlier than under Sir Keir's Conservative predecessor, Rishi Sunak. Hundreds more arrived at Dover on Sunday with official figures released on Monday Former Labour home secretary Jacqui Smith blamed the Tories, saying: 'What is happening is the result of the last Government.' She told BBC Breakfast: 'It is an unacceptable number of people. It demonstrates the way over the last six or seven years that the criminal gangs have got an absolute foothold in the tragic trafficking of people across the Channel.' But Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp dismissed Baroness Smith's claims, saying Labour had 'surrendered our borders'. Small-boat numbers are soaring, with 27,029 arrivals this year, up by 47 per cent on the same point last year and 67 per cent on 2023. Since the start of the crisis in 2018, 178,167 migrants have reached Britain, with only about four per cent of them removed. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch this week vowed to stop all small-boat migrants. Asked if the Conservatives could reduce the number of crossings from five figures to zero, Mrs Badenoch replied: 'I think that we can.'


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Green Party leadership hopefuls' bold plan to secure votes from Labour
Green leadership hopefuls have vowed to take their party into a fight against Labour, as the two camps enter the final fortnight of their campaigns. The party's incumbent co-leader Adrian Ramsay, who is running jointly with North Herefordshire MP Ellie Chowns, called for a 'bold and practical' strategy which puts the Greens ' 'wilderness years' behind them. Challenging them, Mr Ramsay's current deputy Zack Polanski claimed 'bold messaging at the national level' had been 'missing' from his party's high offices. Green Party members began voting on August 1 and are halfway through the process, with polls closing on August 30. ' One of our top priorities, absolutely, is winning over support from people who are utterly disillusioned with Labour,' Mr Ramsay told the PA news agency. 'But there will also be people from other parts of the political spectrum who are also feeling politically homeless, deeply care about the environment, want to see our services restored. 'And in the era of politics that we're now in, there are so many people who don't think about politics in old left-right terms, and we need to be the ones that are showing what Greens stand for – for social justice and for a liveable future for people and planet.' Mr Ramsay, the Waveney Valley MP, said the Greens under his leadership would move to tackle 'inequality and poverty, the decline of our public services, the degradation of our natural environment and the threat of climate breakdown'. Mr Polanski said his party was 'here ultimately to replace the Labour government'. The London City Hall member said: 'In the same way that Reform have really made the Tories collapse, I think there's a huge space for the Green left in this country to galvanise and to take votes away, and to say that we don't have to take second-best and actually you can have a party that's unapologetic about its values – that will stand up for migration, that will stand up for the poorest communities, and will take the fight to wealth and power.' He added: 'Alongside the Labour government, of course, Reform are a huge issue for the entire country. 'But I think the problem is a Labour Party pretending to be that antidote to Reform whereas they're just mimicking them. 'And if people want Reform-lite policies, then they'll just vote Reform.' Under Mr Ramsay's co-leadership with Carla Denyer, with Mr Polanski as their deputy, the party gained 241 council seats in 2023, and picked up a further 74 last year. The Green Party also secured four seats at the general election. Mr Polanski pledged to 'continue' with existing efforts but added: 'What has been missing, though, is the bold messaging at the national level, and we need to make sure that before we've even knocked on a door or someone's picked up a leaflet, they already know that the Green Party stand for so much more than the environment. 'Now, the environment is really important to us, it will remain really important to us, but this is about lowering bills, rent controls, making sure that we're funding our public services and taxing the super-wealthy, all measures that are increasingly popular.' Mr Ramsay warned that Mr Polanski's language was aimed at 'the 'progressive activist' section of the public', who were already convinced by the party's messaging. He added: 'Having that credibility alongside the distinctive Green policies that we're putting forward is so crucial and it's what's taken us out of the wilderness years that the Green Party was in in my early time in the party. 'I've been in the party 27 years. People used to say, 'Well, I like what you stand for but can you really win? Can you really take on these positions and make a real impact? 'We've demonstrated that now and we've got to continue that route of continuing to build our impact and continuing to build on a record-breaking success and a record-breaking strategy.' Mr Ramsay said he was 'concerned about the Green Party going down a populist route, given that populism relies on polarising and divisiveness'. Mr Polanski said: 'The idea that eco-populism is divisive is a fundamental misunderstanding of what it is I'm talking about, which is the 99% versus the 1%. 'Now that 1% are corporations who are destroying our environment, destroying our democracy and destroying our communities, so if it's divisive, it's where the division already is, which is between the super-rich and then everyone else who is working hard with their hands and their brain.' Ms Denyer, the Bristol Central MP, is not standing for a leadership role.