Tesla's European sales rout continues but new Model Y boosts Norway deliveries
LONDON (Reuters) -Tesla's car sales fell sharply in several European markets including Sweden and Portugal in May, a fifth consecutive monthly decline that has been blamed on CEO Elon Musk's political activities and an outdated model lineup.
However, Norway, where Tesla has started delivering revamped versions of its midsize SUV Model Y, provided a lone bright spot for the company as it prepares to roll out the refreshed vehicle in more European markets from this month.
The company's U.S.-listed shares were 2.2% lower in pre-market trading.
Tesla has not launched a new mainstream model since 2020, while traditional automakers are rushing to produce more affordable electric cars and Chinese rivals like BYD enter the European marketplace.
In Sweden, Tesla's new car sales plunged 53.7% in May from a year earlier, while in Portugal they were down 68%. Overall electric vehicle sales in both markets rose by almost a quarter in May.
Tesla's sales were also down 30.5% in Denmark, 36% in the Netherlands and 19% in Spain, while data from PFA in France released on Sunday showed a 67% fall.
In Norway, sales jumped 213% in May, data from the Norwegian Road Federation (OFV) showed, with purchases of Model Ys - both the new and old versions - rising to 2,346 from 690.
"Tesla's strong performance in Norway points to the way forward for the company: innovate," said Ben Nelmes, founder of EV data analysis firm New AutoMotive. "No car company can rest on its laurels and be guaranteed success."
Buyers can already order a new Model Y across much of Europe, but Tesla's websites in Germany, Britain, France and Italy say estimated deliveries of the lowest-cost version - its biggest seller historically - will only start this month, so have yet to show up in sales data.
Tesla has also been offering financial incentives for purchases in Sweden, Germany, Britain and France in a bid to drum up demand. In Norway, it is offering interest-free loans for the new Model Y.
Quentin Wilson, founder of EV lobby group FairCharge said Tesla's price cuts were stimulating sales, but with only the Model Y and Model 3 selling in large volumes, "things aren't looking great for the future of the brand".
Musk's close alliance with U.S. President Donald Trump and his embrace of far-right politics in Europe have led to protests against the billionaire CEO and his company, as well as vandalism at its showrooms and charging stations across the United States and Europe.
Musk left the Trump administration last week, saying he will devote more of his time to running the automaker.
The Model Y was Europe's best-selling car in 2023 but Tesla now faces more intense competition in a number of markets.
In Sweden, for example, sales of Volkswagen's electric ID.7 were almost twice those of the Model Y. Tesla's mass-market Model 3 was also outsold in Sweden by electric models including Porsche's Macan, BYD's Seal and the G6 from Chinese EV maker Xpeng.
(Reporting By Nick Carey; Editing by Kirsten Donovan)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US examines equity stake in chip makers for CHIPS Act cash grants, sources say
By Andrea Shalal, David Shepardson, Nandita Bose and Max A. Cherney WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the government taking equity stakes in Intel and other chipmakers in exchange for grants under the CHIPS Act, which aims to spur factory-building in the U.S., two sources said. As part of a plan to revive U.S. manufacturing - a key Trump agenda - Lutnick said earlier on Tuesday the U.S. government wants an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants approved by the administration of former President Joe Biden. Now Lutnick wants to expand that plan to other companies, according to a White House official and a person familiar with the situation. The Trump administration has recently made unusual deals with U.S. companies, including allowing AI chip giant Nvidia to sell its H20 chips to China in exchange for the U.S. government receiving 15% of those sales. The Pentagon is slated to become the largest shareholder in a small mining company to boost output of rare earth magnets. The government's intervention in corporate matters has worried critics who say President Donald Trump's actions create new categories of corporate risk and that a bad bet could mean a hit to taxpayer funds. Much of the funding under the CHIPS Act has not yet been dispersed for companies such as Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, Samsung and Intel. TSMC and Intel declined to comment. Micron, Samsung and the White House did not respond to requests for comment on whether Lutnick is considering more stakes. The two sources told Reuters on Tuesday that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in the CHIPS Act discussions, but that Lutnick is driving the process. The Commerce Department oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act money. Lutnick has been pushing the equity idea, the sources said, adding that Trump likes the idea. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed earlier that Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel to take a 10% government stake. "The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before," she told reporters. Speaking on CNBC, Lutnick said the U.S. wants a return on its "investment". "We'll get equity in return for that ... instead of just giving grants away," he said. Trump has previously said he wanted to kill the CHIPS Act program. Lutnick's comments suggested any stake would be non-voting, meaning it would not enable the U.S. government to tell the company how to run its business. His comments came a day after SoftBank Group agreed to invest $2 billion in Intel, which has struggled to compete after years of management blunders. "The Biden administration literally was giving Intel money for free and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving the money for free, and Donald Trump turned it into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action for the American taxpayer'," Lutnick said. South Korean presidential advisor Kim Yong-beom said neither the government nor the potentially affected companies have heard about such a plan. He added that foreign companies like Samsung needed "predictability" for their U.S. investments. A Korean chip industry official, meanwhile, said it would be hard for chipmakers to accept U.S. government equity stakes, and some may either decide not to invest or delay investments unless Washington provides incentives like increasing funding. Taking lawmaker questions in Taipei on Wednesday and asked whether the U.S. government could take a stake in TSMC, Taiwan Economy Minister Kuo Jyh-huei said his ministry would consult with the company, which he pointed out was private and not a state-owned enterprise. "We will also discuss with the National Development Council, as it is a shareholder of TSMC. We will thoroughly understand the underlying meaning of the U.S. Commerce Secretary's remarks, but this will require some time for discussion and assessment," Kuo said.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla shareholder group urges probe, ‘appropriate remedial action' from Nasdaq over Elon Musk's $29 billion pay package
In the latest twist in a long-running battle over Elon Musk's compensation at Tesla, the SOC Investment Group has requested that Nasdaq formally investigate 'and take appropriate remedial action' against Tesla for its recent $29 billion equity grant to the CEO. In a letter to Nasdaq, the group raised concerns about compliance with executive compensation rules and shareholder transparency. The SOC Group, formerly known as the CtW Investment Group, works with pension funds sponsored by a coalition of unions representing over 2 million members; many of those funds are Tesla investors. In a letter dated Aug. 19, 2025, addressed to Erik Wittman, deputy general counsel and head of enforcement at Nasdaq, SOC expressed 'serious concerns' about Musk's new compensation package. Specifically, SOC said it was concerned that Tesla's board circumvented Nasdaq listing rules when awarding Musk a '2025 CEO Interim Award,' disclosed earlier this month. The group claims this equity award should have required a shareholder vote, as stipulated under Nasdaq's rules, given that it materially amended compensation plans. Tesla's board approved Musk's new equity package under the company's 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, largely as compensation for his previously awarded—and overturned—$56 billion options package from 2018, known as the '2018 CEO Performance Award.' That older award was (twice) overturned by the Delaware Chancery Court owing to questions regarding board independence—a decision currently being appealed at the Delaware Supreme Court. Fortune's Shawn Tully reported that the new package will only apply if Musk and Tesla lose on appeal in Delaware. He also noted that unlike with the $56 billion award, the newer $29 billion award includes restrictions that protect shareholders: The shares vest on the second anniversary of the grant, or early August 2027, only if Musk serves for the entire period as CEO or chief of product development or operations. Musk can't sell any of those vested shares until five years later, or on Aug. 3, 2030. Fortune's Amanda Gerut reported that, such restrictions notwithstanding, the package lacks hard performance targets for Musk. Brian Dunn, director of the Institute for Compensation Studies at Cornell University, told Fortune that experts sometimes refer to these as 'fog-the-mirror grants.' In other words: 'If you're around and have enough breath left in you to fog the mirror, you get them.' The objections lobbied by SOC Investment Group in its letter have nothing to do with either feature of the grants. The group argues that the Tesla board dodged shareholder approval for the package, in contravention of Nasdaq listing policy. Tejal Patel, executive director of the SOC Investment Group, told Fortune in an interview that the 'real issue is the fact that the original plan … was pretty clear in the disclosures that the company did not intend to include Elon Musk in that plan.' Acknowledging that such issues are usually raised with the Securities and Exchange Commission, she added: 'Admittedly, this is the first time I've flagged something like this to Nasdaq, [and that's] because it was a very specific listing standard.' Her understanding of the Nasdaq standard is that 'this is exactly what it was designed to avoid.' Shareholders likely 'did not believe' they were voting to approve a new Musk package The SOC Investment Group emphasizes that when Tesla shareholders approved the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, company disclosures explicitly excluded Musk from eligibility, stating that his compensation would be exclusively tied to the extraordinary 2018 award. 'When shareholders voted on the 2019 Plan it is likely that, based on the available disclosures and research, they did not believe they were voting on an equity plan that would cover compensation to Mr. Musk,' the SOC letter notes, 'precisely because of the 'truly extraordinary' nature of the 2018 CEO Performance Award.' The SOC letter also notes that Tesla's 2019 proxy statement repeated multiple times that the 2019 plan was not intended to cover awards to Musk. Furthermore, the letter mentions that major proxy advisory firms indicated that the 2018 CEO Performance Award was 'intended to be the sole means of compensation for Mr. Musk, relying on the Company's disclosures.' Therefore, SOC writes, the 2025 CEO Interim Award 'appears to expand the class of participants under the 2019 Plan in manner that would be sufficiently material to require a separate shareholder vote.' The letter also warns that Tesla's board has indicated further interim awards could follow, potentially bypassing shareholder votes while the Delaware case, the so-called Tornetta litigation, is pending. The SOC letter urges Nasdaq to act to 'restore 'the rightful balance between shareholder and management's interests,'' prevent dilution, and ensure executive compensation transparency. SOC has 'real concerns over director independence,' Patel told Fortune. 'This is sort of the outcome of having a board that is not independent.' She said her group is concerned with issues over a lack of director independence and the juggling of responsibilities by Elon Musk, and matters have 'come to a head in the last several months.' This timeline overlaps with Musk's brief engagement as a special advisor to the White House, including extensive involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The new compensation plan, if anything, 'was an opportunity for the board to get Musk to focus on Tesla, and instead' they've arrived at this package, she said. She also noted that the conditions under which Musk would receive the same pay, even if he was a chief of product development or operations, is 'pretty unheard-of.' A vocal, active shareholder SOC Investment Group has a long and active history of engagement with Tesla, focusing on issues such as executive compensation, governance, board independence, and labor rights. The group has repeatedly opposed large pay packages for Musk—including leading campaigns to encourage shareholders to vote against Musk's $56 billion option award and calling for votes against related awards, especially when it believed proper shareholder approval procedures were circumvented or governance standards were not met. The group has also urged Tesla shareholders to vote against the reelection of certain directors, such as Kimbal Musk and James Murdoch, citing concerns about lack of board independence from Elon Musk and alignment with shareholders' interests. Similar to its current letter to Nasdaq, it has requested investigations by regulators into Tesla's governance practices, arguing that the company's board favors Musk's interests over those of public shareholders. For example, the group asked the SEC to probe Tesla's plan to shrink its board in 2022. The group has also joined with other investors in co-filing shareholder resolutions calling for Tesla to adopt comprehensive labor rights policies, including noninterference with worker organizing and compliance with global labor standards. SOC has been involved in webinars and resolutions highlighting risks related to Tesla's approach to unions and labor issues across several countries. Tesla has not publicly responded to the letter and did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Oil prices gain as US inventory withdrawals point to strong demand
By Katya Golubkova TOKYO (Reuters) -Oil prices gained slightly on Thursday as larger-than-expected declines crude oil and fuel inventories in the U.S., the world's biggest oil user, supported expectations for steady demand. Brent crude futures were up 13 cents, or 0.19%, to $66.97 a barrel at 0055 GMT, after gaining 1.6% in the previous session. U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures rose 15 cents, or 0.24%, to $62.86, after climbing 1.4% on Wednesday. U.S. crude inventories fell by 6 million barrels last week to 420.7 million barrels, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday, versus analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll for a 1.8 million-barrel draw. Gasoline stocks dropped by 2.7 million barrels, versus expectations for a 915,000-barrel draw, the EIA said, indicating steady driving demand during the summer travel season. That was also seen in a jump in the four-week average for jet fuel consumption to its highest since 2019. "Crude oil prices rebounded as signs of strong demand in the U.S. boosted sentiment," Daniel Hynes, senior commodity strategist at ANZ, said in a note on Thursday. Still, Hynes cautioned that some "bearish sentiment remains evident as traders continue to monitor negotiations to end Russia's war against Ukraine." Russia said on Wednesday attempts to resolve security issues relating to Ukraine without Moscow's participation were a "road to nowhere," as U.S. and European military planners have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine. The drawn-out efforts to secure peace in Ukraine mean that Western sanctions on Russian oil supply continue to remain in place. The possibility of further U.S. sanctions and tariffs on Russian oil buyers also hang over the market. Russia, however, remains adamant it will keep providing crude to willing buyers, with Russian diplomats in India saying on Wednesday the country expects to continue supplying oil to India despite warnings from the U.S. U.S. President Donald Trump has announced an additional tariff of 25% on Indian goods from August 27 because of their Russian crude purchases. The European Union has also sanctioned Indian private refiner Nayara Energy, which is backed by Russian oil company Rosneft. Indian refiners initially backed off their Russian buying but company officials at state-run Indian Oil and Bharat Petroleum have bought Russian oil for September and October delivery, resuming purchases after discounts widened. Sign in to access your portfolio
