Insolvency law cannot override PMLA, says NCLAT; upholds asset attachment by ED
PMLA
), said appellate tribunal
NCLAT
, adding assets of an debt-ridden firm once attached by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) and confirmed by competent authority cannot be released for its resolution.
Under section 14 of IBC, a moratorium is applied on those assets for the purpose of resolution. However, if the property is alleged to be "proceeds of crime" and is already under adjudication by competent authority under a penal statute, such property cannot be deemed to be part of the freely available resolution estate, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) said.
The appellate tribunal held that if there is any attachment by ED under the PMLA, which is "validly made and confirmed, it cannot be undone under IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code).
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Farmer Finds Diamond Ring. When He Shows It To His Wife, She Says, 'I Want A Divorce'.
Plays Star
Undo
Citing section 238 of IBC, which has an overriding effect over other laws, a three-member NCLAT bench said it "cannot override the PMLA in respect of proceedings involving proceeds of crime."
PMLA and IBC operate in distinct spheres and there is no "irreconcilable inconsistency" exists between the two, said NCLAT adding ED does not act as a creditor, but as a public enforcement agency.
Live Events
"The attached assets are not to satisfy creditors, but to uphold penal objectives and international obligations under FATF and UN Conventions," said the appellate tribunal, while upholding an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
NCLAT also cited a directive issued by the Supreme Court in the Embassy Property matter, saying it "lacks jurisdiction to interfere with the PAO, which has been subsequently confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA".
The appellate tribunal's 36-page-order came over a plea filed by the resolution professional of
Dunar Foods
, challenging an NCLT ruling, which had refused to direct the ED to release provisionally attached assets of the debt-ridden company.
On December 22, 2027, the Mumbai bench of NCLT had ordered insolvency proceedings against Dunar Foods, which was engaged in processing and exporting basmati rice. The insolvency petition was filed by a consortium of banks led by public sector lender
SBI
for a loan repayment default of Rs 758.73 crore.
Accordingly, CIRP (
corporate insolvency resolution process
) was initiated against Dunar Foods with the appointment of a resolution professional.
Meanwhile, the ED initiated an investigation under PMLA against PD Agroprocessors, an associate company of Dunar Foods.
It traced the flow of alleged tainted funds to Dunar Foods based on scheduled offences under the Indian Penal Code and Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), alleging that large export advances received by Dunar Foods from PD Agroprocessors were proceeds of crime.
ED then attached Dunar Foods' several immovable and movable assets worth Rs 177.33 crore, prompting the resolution professional (RP) of the firm to move NCLT seeking immediate de-attachment of the provisionally attached properties.
However, the NCLT on May 21, 2018 dismissed the RP's application and held that the provisional attachment order issued by the ED under PMLA did not fall within the scope of the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC.
NCLT had said that PMLA is a special penal statute and has a 'distinct adjudicatory mechanism', hence unless and until the attachment was set aside by the PMLA adjudicating authority, the NCLT has no jurisdiction to direct its release.
Aggrieved by this decision, Dunar Foods' RP then approached appellate tribunal NCLAT.
Meanwhile, the lenders of Dunar Foods approved the resolution plan submitted by Amit Gupta in November 2019 during the pendency of the appeal in NCLAT.
The appellate tribunal said though Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) was issued by ED after the commencement of CIRP, ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report) investigation commenced as far back as 2013.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Laundering case against IPS officer's wife in Maharashtra: ED records statement of complainant
Mumbai: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Monday recorded the statement of a complainant, a Sion-based businessman, in a fresh money laundering case registered against Purushottam Chavan, the husband of an IPS officer. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Chavan is currently in jail, and the ED is likely to seek his custody in this case. The money laundering case stems from a police FIR alleging that Chavan defrauded multiple individuals by promising them posh flats at low rates under the govt quota. The complainant's advocate, Mohan Tekavde, stated, "Proceeds of the crime were converted into untainted property by committing forgery and cheating." The complainant said that Chavan called him and his wife to sign property-related documents at a residence above the Colaba police station (official residence of Chavan's wife). Chavan also allegedly called the complainant to the Thane registration office, where all registration formalities were completed. Believing the transaction to be genuine as it was carried out in a govt office, the complainant later discovered it was a well-planned trap executed by Chavan with the assistance of an unidentified govt official. Chavan promised a flat worth about Rs 7 crore at half the rate. Earlier, the ED investigated Chavan in another case in which he collected funds from a money laundering accused by promising relief through his influence. During that investigation, the ED searched Chavan's place, where he lived with his wife at her official residence above the Colaba police station. The ED said it found several documents indicating Chavan's involvement in other frauds unrelated to their case, leading them to share the information with other relevant agencies. Subsequently, the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of Mumbai Police registered an offence against Chavan for defrauding people by promising flats under the govt quota.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
National Herald: IT dept said 90 cr loan sham transaction, how's ED filing case? asks Young Indian
Young Indian on Monday argued that the income tax department had called the purported Rs 90 crore loan to Associated Journals Limited (AJL), publisher of the National Herald newspaper, a sham transaction saying "monies never flew", but it became the basis of the ED's case. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has accused Sonia and Rahul Gandhi , late Congress leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, and a private company, Young Indian, of conspiracy and money laundering over the fraudulent takeover of properties valued at over Rs 2,000 crore belonging to AJL, which published the National Herald newspaper. ED alleges Gandhis held the majority 76 per cent shares in Young Indian, which fraudulently usurped assets of AJL, in exchange for a Rs 90 crore loan. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Referring to the income tax department's purported statement, Young Indian's counsel on Monday asked, "If two arms of the government are taking a different stance, how is the offence possible?" He argued that the complaint "was covered with absurdities" and had "inherently improbable allegations". Live Events "The ED was statutorily required to test the veracity of the allegations. Not even a superficial probe was conducted. The complaint is not by a public servant but by a private citizen. How does Swamy come to the figure of Rs 2,000 crore?" the counsel further asked. The lawyer pointed out that according to the income tax department Rs 90 crore loan was a sham transaction and monies never flew. Senior advocate Pramod Kumar Dubey, appearing for another accused Dotex Merchandise Pvt Ltd, said the ED "wrongly proceeded" to file the ECIR (equivalent to an FIR) in the absence of a registered copy of the complaint by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy . He argued certain documents in the case, including those regarding repayment of loan, interest charged on it, and others, were suppressed by the agency. "ED had proceeded wrongly in this case, as they had proceeded without obtaining certified copy of the complaint (by Subramanian Swamy) in the predicate offence, while registering the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) on June 30, 2021," Dubey argued. He continued, "One could be the best chef in the country but one could not possibly make biryani without rice. The approach of the ED was to miss the trees for the woods." Dubey said the agency took different stands while defining proceeds of crime, at different stages. Counsel for Dotex, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda and Young Indian on Monday refuted ED's arguments on the point of cognisance of the chargesheet against them. Gandhis too have previously contested the ED's claims. Pitroda's counsel said his client, now based in Chicago, hadn't been ascribed a specific role for the alleged offence and he did "everything within the ambit of the law". "It is alleged that I indirectly tried to gain properties of AJL. This is not tenable because shareholding does not confer right to property. My credentials and conditions should be considered. There was a scheme to revive the properties of AJL; to keep the publication alive. Vicarious liability cannot be fastened on me alleged offence," the counsel argued. Suman Dubey's counsel, on the other hand, argued the complaint did not disclose generation of proceeds of crime. "It is alleged that the letter by which the loan was sought was signed by Suman Dubey. I do not know the genesis of Dotex Merchandise. At the time when the laon was taken, it was a Non Banking Finance Company (NBFC), permitted by the RBI," he argued. Calling it a "fallacious case", the counsel said, "Everything that AJL and Young Indian did were within their sovereign functions. There is no corporate veil to be pierced. Every aspect of the transaction; the conduct of AJL and Young India; is in public domain." The arguments on behalf of Dotex would continue on July 8. The ED chargesheeted Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi , Rahul Gandhi and others under Sections 3 (money laundering) and 4 (punishment for money laundering) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
ED attaches ₹14-crore assets of former principal secy to ex-Haryana CM Hooda
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has provisionally attached assets in the form of nine immovable properties and about ₹14.06 crore deposited in bank accounts belonging to former Haryana IAS officer, ML Tayal and his family under the Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), Act. The ED had initiated money laundering investigations on the basis of a first information report (FIR) registered by the CBI, Chandigarh. (HT File) As per a July 7 ED statement, the provisional attachment of assets and bank accounts was done on June 30. The former IAS officer was booked by the CBI in a disproportionate assets case in 2017. A charge sheet was filed by the CBI in a court in 2024. The ED in a statement said that provisionally attached property including two houses and seven apartments located in Chandigarh, New Delhi and Gurgaon. The ED had initiated money laundering investigations on the basis of a first information report (FIR) registered by the CBI, Chandigarh. The FIR alleged that Tayal who served as principal secretary to the then Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda (from March 6, 2005 to October 31, 2009) and later as member in the Competition Commission of India (from November 30, 2009 to December 31, 2014) and his family members had amassed assets disproportionate to their known sources of income. The check period was from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2014. Subsequently, the ED initiated investigation into the financial affairs, income tax records and stock market dealings of the former IAS officer, his wife, Savita Tayal, and son Kartik Tayal. The ED investigation, as per a statement by the financial investigation agency, revealed that during the check period from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2014 the accused had acquired disproportionate assets worth about ₹14.06 crore using proceeds of crime generated through illegal gratification, the ED said in a statement.
