
Insolvency law cannot override PMLA, says NCLAT; upholds asset attachment by ED
PMLA
), said appellate tribunal
NCLAT
, adding assets of an debt-ridden firm once attached by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) and confirmed by competent authority cannot be released for its resolution.
Under section 14 of IBC, a moratorium is applied on those assets for the purpose of resolution. However, if the property is alleged to be "proceeds of crime" and is already under adjudication by competent authority under a penal statute, such property cannot be deemed to be part of the freely available resolution estate, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) said.
The appellate tribunal held that if there is any attachment by ED under the PMLA, which is "validly made and confirmed, it cannot be undone under IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code).
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Farmer Finds Diamond Ring. When He Shows It To His Wife, She Says, 'I Want A Divorce'.
Plays Star
Undo
Citing section 238 of IBC, which has an overriding effect over other laws, a three-member NCLAT bench said it "cannot override the PMLA in respect of proceedings involving proceeds of crime."
PMLA and IBC operate in distinct spheres and there is no "irreconcilable inconsistency" exists between the two, said NCLAT adding ED does not act as a creditor, but as a public enforcement agency.
Live Events
"The attached assets are not to satisfy creditors, but to uphold penal objectives and international obligations under FATF and UN Conventions," said the appellate tribunal, while upholding an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
NCLAT also cited a directive issued by the Supreme Court in the Embassy Property matter, saying it "lacks jurisdiction to interfere with the PAO, which has been subsequently confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority under the PMLA".
The appellate tribunal's 36-page-order came over a plea filed by the resolution professional of
Dunar Foods
, challenging an NCLT ruling, which had refused to direct the ED to release provisionally attached assets of the debt-ridden company.
On December 22, 2027, the Mumbai bench of NCLT had ordered insolvency proceedings against Dunar Foods, which was engaged in processing and exporting basmati rice. The insolvency petition was filed by a consortium of banks led by public sector lender
SBI
for a loan repayment default of Rs 758.73 crore.
Accordingly, CIRP (
corporate insolvency resolution process
) was initiated against Dunar Foods with the appointment of a resolution professional.
Meanwhile, the ED initiated an investigation under PMLA against PD Agroprocessors, an associate company of Dunar Foods.
It traced the flow of alleged tainted funds to Dunar Foods based on scheduled offences under the Indian Penal Code and Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), alleging that large export advances received by Dunar Foods from PD Agroprocessors were proceeds of crime.
ED then attached Dunar Foods' several immovable and movable assets worth Rs 177.33 crore, prompting the resolution professional (RP) of the firm to move NCLT seeking immediate de-attachment of the provisionally attached properties.
However, the NCLT on May 21, 2018 dismissed the RP's application and held that the provisional attachment order issued by the ED under PMLA did not fall within the scope of the moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC.
NCLT had said that PMLA is a special penal statute and has a 'distinct adjudicatory mechanism', hence unless and until the attachment was set aside by the PMLA adjudicating authority, the NCLT has no jurisdiction to direct its release.
Aggrieved by this decision, Dunar Foods' RP then approached appellate tribunal NCLAT.
Meanwhile, the lenders of Dunar Foods approved the resolution plan submitted by Amit Gupta in November 2019 during the pendency of the appeal in NCLAT.
The appellate tribunal said though Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) was issued by ED after the commencement of CIRP, ECIR (Enforcement Case Information Report) investigation commenced as far back as 2013.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Bail rule, jail exception' principle forgotten in recent past, says CJI Gavai
CJI Gavai NEW DELHI: Chief Justice of India B R Gavai lamented that in the recent past, the principle of "bail is the rule, and jail is the exception" has been forgotten. Though judicial pronouncements over the decades have integrated this norm, it has not been implemented in true spirit in recent years, he said. Delivering the Justice V R Krishna Iyer Memorial Law Lecture in Kochi on Sunday, the CJI said he tried to reestablish the principle while granting bail in various cases, paving the way for high courts and lower courts to follow suit. "I am happy to state that I had the opportunity in the last year, 2024, to reiterate this legal principle in the cases of Prabir Purkayastha, Manish Sisodia, and Kavita vs ED," Justice Gavai said. Justice Iyer's contribution was immense in protecting the rights of marginalised communities, he said. The SC in recent years passed a series of orders to protect the rights of undertrial prisoners and held that delay in trial and long incarceration were grounds to grant bail even in serious offences under the PMLA and the UAPA, A, despite stringent bail conditions under the special laws. It opened the gate for bail to accused in money launder- ing and unlawful activities cases. The CJI also recalled Justice Iyer's strong opposition to undertrials being kept in jail for long periods without trial. In an important ruling in Aug last year, SC had held that the conventional idea of 'bail is the rule, jail is an exception' should be applicable not only to IPC offences but also to other offences for which special statutes have been enacted, such as UAPA, if the conditions prescribed under that law are fulfilled. SC in its various orders had appealed to HCs and lower courts to be liberal in granting bail and asked them not to hesitate in granting the relief in serious offences also if a case is made out for bail.


India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
ED carries out search operations against 3 suspected shell companies in UP
New Delhi [India], July 7 (ANI): Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Chandigarh Zonal Office has carried out search operations at the premises of three suspected shell companies located in Uttar Pradesh's Noida and Lucknow, the central agency said on Monday. ED stated that raids were carried out under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. 'Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Chandigarh Zonal Office has carried out search operations on 04.07.2025 at the premises of three suspected shell companies - Kindent Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Rainet Technology Pvt. Ltd. and Mool Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. located in Noida and Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The companies were being operated by dummy Directors and were posing as IT firms offering wallet-based APIs, domestic money transfers (DMT), Aadhaar-enabled payment systems (AEPS) and bill payment solutions,' ED said in a press release. ED further stated that the management of these companies could not substantiate that the activities carried out by them are within the framework regulated by the RBI. 'It was then found that these companies were actually fronts for laundering Proceeds of Crime (POC) generated through the multi-crore QFX/YFX online forex and MLM (Multi Level Marketing) scam, which duped thousands of investors across India,' the agency added. ED stated that based on the evidence recovered, the agency has frozen 116 accounts in several banks associated with these entities, and as per confirmation received so far from 16 bank accounts, more than Rs 103 Crore of POC has been frozen. 'Numerous digital devices, financial documents and electronic records were also seized from the premises and are currently under forensic examination to establish the complete trail of POC and persons involved in the scam. ED also conducted searches in February 2025 and had frozen several bank accounts associated with QFX, YorkerFX and botbro etc. securing 187 Crore of POC. The main masterminds Navab alias Luvish Chaudhary, Rajender Sood, Vineet Kumar and Santosh Kumar absconded to Dubai after defrauding thousands of innocent investors,' the ED said. The agency further said that the ongoing investigation is likely to expose more such shell companies, benami assets and complex layering networks used to disguise the origin of funds defrauded from innocent investors. It is also likely to uncover additional individuals, masterminds, operators, beneficiaries and front-end facilitators involved in orchestrating and facilitating the laundering of POC from the QFX scam, the release said. (ANI)


India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
ED seizes luxury cars, Rs 78 lakh in Debock Industries scam raids
New Delhi [India], July 7(ANI): The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Jaipur Zonal Office, conducted search operations on Friday at several locations in Jaipur and Kota districts of Rajasthan under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, in the case of the Debock Industries Ltd (DIL) Scam, said the release. The searches have been conducted at the residence and office of the Chairman, i.e. Mukesh Mahavar alias Mukesh Manveer Singh of Debock Industries Limited (a NSE-listed company), and his associates. ED initiated an investigation based on an FIR registered by the Rajasthan Police against Abhishek Khandelwal, Najiya Bano and others, and a Prosecution Complaint filed by the SEBI against Debock Industries Limited, Mukesh Manveer Singh, Sunil Kalot and Priyanka Sharma. The company undertook a rights issue of shares in June 2023 and collected a sum of Rs 49.09 Crore. As per the release, during the PMLA investigation, it was discovered that these individuals had inflated share prices and cheated gullible investors for their personal gain. DIL manipulated its financial statements, submitted false bank accounts, reported fake sales and purchases, did round-tripping of funds and migrated to the main board of the National Stock Exchange for the issuance of rights shares. Further, the entire proceeds collected from the issue of rights that should have been used for legitimate business purposes have been siphoned off by the promoters and their associates. During the search operations, it was discovered that the suspects had appointed their low-level employees as Directors to mislead the stock exchanges. Furthermore, prima facie, it is found that the Directors had siphoned off monies to overseas entities, diverted this money, and invested in real estate. Furthermore, the ED has seized Rs. 78 lakh in unaccounted cash, along with four high-end luxury cars, including a Rolls-Royce Phantom, a Bentley Mulsanne, a Mercedes-Benz G-Wagon (Brabus), and a Toyota Land Cruiser. During the search, various incriminating documents related to investments in properties, banking records, and digital devices have been seized. Further investigation is under progress. (ANI)