logo
Queensland plan to increase lethal shark control measures goes against advice of government-commissioned report

Queensland plan to increase lethal shark control measures goes against advice of government-commissioned report

Queensland's shark control program (SCP) has been killing an increasing number of non-target species and is failing to meet its ecological goals and community expectations, according to a report commissioned by the state government.
The KPMG Shark Control Program Evaluation Report stressed that while 'traditional measures' are still required, the program needed to transition away from 'environmentally harmful practices' such as drumlines and mesh nets, and suggested a trial removing nets during whale migration season.
Yet the Queensland Government has announced the 2025-2029 SCP would include the expanded use of lethal-control measures and has ruled out removing nets during winter to 'support Queensland's beach culture'.
The decision has angered many within the scientific community, which has long questioned the evidence underpinning the use of lethal measures.
But the Queensland Government said the evidence was clear the SCP was working, and human safety came before all else.
Mesh nets and drumlines are the main measures used to control sharks in Queensland
There are 27 nets used in the state, most of which are near popular beaches on the Gold Coast, Sunshine Coast and Rainbow Bay.
The nets are up to 186 metres long and six metres deep, anchored to the sea floor.
The criticism of nets is that they catch indiscriminately, and can ensnare endangered animals, including turtles, dugongs and whales.
The KPMG report noted that nets caught 843 animals between 2021-2024. Some 695 of which were not one of the seven species of shark targeted by the SCP, meaning that 82 per cent of what is caught is considered 'bycatch'.
Of those seven such 'target species', the White, Tiger and Bull shark are considered most dangerous.
There are 383 drumlines placed parallel to popular beaches in Queensland, which are large, baited hooks attached to buoys and also anchored to the ocean floor.
The drumlines are better at targeting sharks, given other species are either too small to grab the hook, or aren't attracted by the chunks of mullet or shark used as bait.
These hooks snared 2,753 animals between 2021-2024, 1,223 of which was bycatch.
Most of what is hooked on drumlines dies, either while snared on the hook, or by contractors paid to euthanise target sharks.
The average annual bycatch killed by Queensland's SCP has increased in recent years, from 305 animals per year between 2001-2021 to 363 per year between 2021-2024, according to KMPG.
The report's author acknowledges this level of mortality is no longer acceptable to many Queenslanders, and 'there is a need to reduce the impact on ecosystems … to respond to community expectations'.
However, the Queensland Government has made it clear that reducing shark bites is what matters.
'While the program will seek to minimise negative impacts on marine ecosystems, this is not a purpose of the program,' its 2025-2029 SCP reads.
The evidence for lethal control measures in the report noted that before 1962 — when shark control in the state began — there was an average of three bites and one death per year in Queensland.
Between 1962 and 2024, there was an average of 2.3 shark 'incidents' and 0.35 deaths per year, despite a significant increase in human population.
The KPMG report said this was due to the removal of sharks which had the potential to attack swimmers.
Between 2001 and 2021, nearly 7,000 target sharks were caught in Queensland, which is an average of 350 per year.
Between 2021 and 2024, 1,678 target sharks were caught at an average of 438 per year.
At the same time, shark incidents per year have gone from 3.35 between 2001-2021 to 1.04 between 2021-2024, according to KPMG.
While the report noted this was correlative evidence and did not necessarily prove lethal measures have caused a reduction in attacks, the Queensland Government has used it to justify the expansion of the use of nets and drumlines at seven new locations on the Gold Coast, Sunshine Coast and in the Wide Bay region.
It will also introduce daily servicing of drum lines to ensure they are baited and 'operating effectively'.
'It is anticipated that the increase in servicing will correspond to an increase in shark catch,' the 2025-2029 SCP stated.
Australian Marine Conservation Society shark scientist, Dr Leonardo Guida, said there was a genuine need for protective measures on Queensland beaches, in part because of climate change.
'You're getting these subtropical species like tiger sharks and bull sharks progressively moving further and further south,' he said.
'As they identify certain habitats that they feel comfortable in, they may in fact overlap with beaches that are popular with people.'
But he said lethal shark control lacked scientific evidence and was ethically outdated.
'It's utterly baffling. It's 2025, not 1925.'
He pointed to a 2019 decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal which found Queensland's lethal shark program in the Great Barrier Reef Marine National Park was 'out of step with national and international developments' and did not reduce the risk of unprovoked attacks.
'They interviewed scientists from across the country, reviewed the literature and their conclusion was that with respect to the lethal component of the shark control program … the evidence to support the case that it doesn't improve people's safety was overwhelming,' he said.
'Not only does it not improve public safety, but it comes at a real, significant and disproportionate risk to critically endangered animals like grey nurse sharks, turtles, dolphins and dugongs.'
As a result, the state government is required to release sharks caught on drumlines within the federally administered marine national park.
The government's new SCP includes the use of new, non-lethal measures which have the support of people like Dr Guida.
A SharkSmart drone program will be established at 20 beaches following a successful trial of the technology, which allows surf lifesavers to identify potentially dangerous sharks from the air.
It will also invest in shark population assessments and trial whale deterrents to prevent them becoming entangled in nets.
The Queensland Government has said it would only use catch-alert drumlines — which send out a ping when something is snared so it can be released quickly — as well as tag and track sharks in the Great Barrier Reef National Park, where it is legally required to do so.
This is because the KPMG report questioned the effectiveness of catch-alert drumlines. This is due to the fact they are placed out every morning and taken in at night, thereby catching fewer sharks and not offering round-the-clock protection.
'It's as though the Queensland Government has literally put a stop sign up and said we are not progressing further with evidence-based measures,' Dr Guida said.
'We'll keep what's currently available and we'll expand culling instead.'
Dr Guida said political realities got in the way of meaningful change.
'I think there is this deep-seated fear that if they were to change something and something untoward were to happen... another politician is going to use that against them to bring down their career,' he said.
Dr Daryl McPhee from Bond University has been studying the 40-year trend of increasing shark bites globally.
'That's unsurprising because we have more people in the water in more places doing a great diversity of things,' he said.
'We also expect to see more bull sharks around river mouths after prolonged rain and flooding rains, which we've seen a lot over the last couple of years.'
He said healthier whale populations might also be responsible for attracting sharks to the east coast.
Dr McPhee said a reduction in fishing has likely helped some smaller shark species recover in recent decades. But it was difficult to say whether anecdotal reports of a greater abundance of white, tiger and bull sharks were correct.
'They're highly mobile and rare animals, so that makes stock assessment quite difficult,' he said.
Like others, Dr McPhee said he was 'extremely surprised' the Queensland government was expanding lethal shark control measures.
To mitigate the 'very low' risk posed by sharks, Dr McPhee said all governments would be better off spending tens of millions on researching shark movements and educating humans.
'A very significant component in the government's new plan does have rejigged and re-emphasised education as a part of it, which is a good thing,' he said.
'Individuals need to take some personal responsibility as well.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Murray-Darling Basin Authority class action hears of alleged water mismanagement
Murray-Darling Basin Authority class action hears of alleged water mismanagement

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Murray-Darling Basin Authority class action hears of alleged water mismanagement

A class action launched by irrigators against the Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA) has laid out allegations that the authority mismanaged the water resource and did not follow its own guidelines. An eight-week hearing in the New South Wales Supreme Court began today and will examine the claim that the MDBA breached a duty of care to irrigators, reducing the water available for agriculture. The action has been brought on behalf of 28,000 irrigators from the central Murray region of southern NSW and the Goulburn Murray region of northern Victoria. The case centres around "overbank" flooding at the Barmah Choke, a narrow section of the Murray River between Tocumwal and Deniliquin, during the 2017/18 and 2018/19 water years. The plaintiffs allege the MDBA decided to transfer river flows exceeding the choke's capacity by opening regulators to flood the Barmah Millewa redgum forest, with the water eventually flowing back into the river downstream. In his opening statement, counsel for the plaintiffs Tony Bannon SC told the court that transferring water this way was a "blunt and inefficient instrument". He said the MDBA failed to follow its own procedures. "It was not reasonable, not reasonably required and contrary to their own operating parameters, guidelines and assessment at the time," he told the court. The plaintiffs argue it caused lower water allocations for irrigators, resulting in a significant loss of profits, higher temporary water prices and meant that some farmers could not meet supply contracts. Counsel for the MDBA is yet to present its opening arguments, but the authority has denied the allegations in court documents. About a dozen irrigators travelled to Sydney to be in court. Southern Riverina Irrigators chief executive Sophie Baldwin said it was good to see the matter come before the court, after it was first lodged in 2019. "I hope that it gives the people around us, the irrigators at home both in northern Victoria and New South Wales, the hope that there can be some resolution and we can stop this waste of water in the future," she said. "It's not about money, it's about managing our water resources better and protecting the staple food production for our country." Moulamein farmer Darcy Hare said he hoped the case would shine a light on water management to ensure that every megalitre of water was used efficiently. NSW Murray MP Helen Dalton said the case could have wide implications for water management in the future. "The government needs to listen to farmers and rural communities when they are making some of the rules around water management," she said. "The MDBA have been absolutely unaccountable and lack transparency, and someone needs to hold them to account, and if the federal government won't do it, then the courts will now."

From Sulawesi to Arnhem Land: The Story of Relationship of Sea Cucumber Traders and First Nations Peoples
From Sulawesi to Arnhem Land: The Story of Relationship of Sea Cucumber Traders and First Nations Peoples

SBS Australia

time6 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

From Sulawesi to Arnhem Land: The Story of Relationship of Sea Cucumber Traders and First Nations Peoples

LISTEN TO SBS Indonesian 17:06 Indonesian The relationship between cucumber traders and Indigenous peoples in Australia involved long-standing historical exchanges, beginning with Makassar fishermen trading sea cucumbers for goods, which had a major impact on the local culture and language. In this interview, Daeng Abdi Karya, an artist from Makassar, recounts a humanitarian initiative that successfully reunited families separated for more than a hundred years. The initiative focuses on tracing the footsteps of a Makassar sailor named Husaing Daeng Rangka (also known as Yuching by the Yolngu community) who had two wives in Makassar and two in the Yolngu community, Australia. After new immigration laws were enacted in 1906, Husaing was unable to return to Australia, so he was separated from his family there. The tracing process is underpinned by Australian government archival records and, more importantly, by the 'songlines' or traditional chants of the Yolngu tribe that hold the stories and memories of Makassar sailors. Yolngu man, Arian Pearson (standing, L) performs an Indigenous dance depicting colours brought over by Macassan people. Credit: KJRI Sydney Although on the Makassar side there are no similar records, the stories from the descendants of the sailors who were passed down orally became key. A team of artists and academics managed to identify a fifth descendant of Husaing Daeng Rangka, from both the Makassar and Yolngu sides. The meeting was organized on the banks of the Jeneberang River in Makassar, a very historic location as it was the center of civilization of the Kingdom of Gowa. This gathering was not only a family reunion, but also a sacred ritual attended by Husaing descendants from Makassar, descendants from the Yolngu tribe, and some Aboriginal elders from South Australia. The ceremony was accompanied by classical music and dance of Makassar, as well as traditional Yolngu chants that reaffirmed the collective memory of both sides. This reunion shows that the history of both countries exists not only in the formal record, but also lives on in folklore and oral traditions. This story affirms the importance of recognizing and documenting Indigenous narratives that are often overlooked in the national education curriculum. Daeng Abdi Karya hopes that stories like these will continue to be unearthed and immortalized through art, making them accessible to a wide audience and strengthening the connection between Indonesia and Australia. Listen to SBS Indonesian every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Sunday at 3pm. Follow us on Facebook and Instagram , and don't miss our podcasts .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store