Amadeus and Google Join Forces — Again — To Bolster Flights Business
Amadeus' partnership with Google Flights and Google Cloud will enhance the user experience and strengthen the global presence of its airline IT business, CEO Luis Maroto said Thursday.
The collaboration — announced in May — integrates Google's QPX flight offer management system and Google Flights with Amadeus' airline platform, Nevio. Speaking during the company's second quarter earnings call, Maroto said the partnership is designed to help Amadeus attract more airline customers.
'For airlines, this means greater control over their commercial strategy,'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DSV AS (DSDVF) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Navigating Market Challenges with Strategic ...
Gross Profit (GP): Increased despite market challenges; Schenko contributed 925 million for two months. Synergies: Expected to deliver 500 million this year from Schenko integration. Transaction Costs: Estimated at 2 to 2.5 billion for the year. Net Interest Cost: Increased due to Schenko acquisition. Cash Flow: Nearly 4 billion in the quarter; 76 billion paid for Schenko business. Net Working Capital: Reduced to 2.4% of revenue. Debt Ratio: Gear ratio around 3, ahead of expectations. EBIT Guidance: Reiterated full-year guidance between 9.5 and 21.5 billion. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 11 Warning Signs with FRA:E0E. Release Date: July 31, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points DSV AS (DSDVF) reported solid financial performance despite challenging market conditions, with growth in gross profit (GP) driven by the integration of Schenker. The company maintained its full-year outlook, indicating confidence in its strategic direction and operational resilience. DSV AS (DSDVF) successfully negotiated a constructive agreement with the German Works Council, paving the way for smoother integration of Schenker employees. The integration of Schenker is on track, with expected synergies of 500 million this year, contributing to long-term growth. DSV AS (DSDVF) has a strong cash flow position, with nearly 4 billion generated in the quarter, supporting its financial stability and strategic initiatives. Negative Points DSV AS (DSDVF) missed its guidance slightly due to foreign exchange fluctuations, impacting financial results. The road and contract logistics segments underperformed, with significant losses in Schenker's US operations and challenges in the German, UK, and Norwegian markets. The company faces higher transaction and integration costs, with expectations to spend over 2 billion this year. There is uncertainty regarding the full realization of synergies, with only 75% expected by the end of 2027, indicating potential delays. DSV AS (DSDVF) anticipates a higher tax rate during the integration period, affecting net earnings. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you provide an update on customer attrition and the impact of FX on your financials? A: Michael Ebbe, CFO: We have a hedging policy in place for up to 6 months, which helps mitigate FX impacts. We don't foresee an acceleration in FX losses. Jens Lund, CEO: We've intensified our dialogue with customers, which has been positively received. We are focused on maintaining GP rather than just volume, and we are confident in achieving a solid outcome. Q: Could you share details on the agreement with the German Works Council and why synergies are expected to take until 2027? A: Jens Lund, CEO: The agreement involves compensation factors for employees, and we are currently working on optimizing operations in Germany. The timeline for synergies is due to the complexity of infrastructure consolidation, but we are working to accelerate this process. Q: What scenarios could lead to a year-over-year decline in EBIT in the second half? A: Jens Lund, CEO: The guidance reflects current uncertainties, including geopolitical factors and integration challenges. While volumes have shown some improvement, the European economy remains a concern. We will reassess the guidance in the next quarter. Q: Can you explain the differences in yield between Schenker and legacy DSV, and the impact of US contract logistics headwinds? A: Jens Lund, CEO: Schenker's yields are lower due to different operational focuses, such as less emphasis on own box volumes. We are aligning operations to improve yields. In the US, a significant site loss has been addressed, reducing deficits from $8 million to $1-2 million for the rest of the year. Q: What are your plans for IT systems post-acquisition, and could share buybacks occur earlier than expected? A: Michael Ebbe, CFO: We are on track with synergies and hope to accelerate share buybacks. Jens Lund, CEO: For IT, we are evaluating Schenker's platform, which is more modern and cost-effective. We aim to integrate systems efficiently to control costs and improve operations. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta to share AI infrastructure costs via $2 billion asset sale
By Echo Wang (Reuters) -Meta Platforms is pressing ahead with efforts to bring in outside partners to help fund the massive infrastructure needed to power artificial intelligence, disclosing plans in a filing on Thursday to offload $2 billion in data center assets as part of that strategy. The strategy reflects a broader shift among tech giants — long known for self-funding growth — as they grapple with the soaring cost of building and powering data centers to support generative AI. The social media giant said earlier this week that it was exploring ways to work with financial partners to co-develop data centers to help finance its massive capital outlay for next year. 'We're exploring ways to work with financial partners to co-develop data centers,' Meta Chief Finance Officer Susan Li said on a post-earnings conference call on Wednesday. While the company still expects to fund much of its capital spending internally, some projects could attract 'significant external financing' and offer more flexibility if infrastructure needs shift over time, Li said. The company did not have any finalized transactions to announce, she said. The disclosure in Meta's quarterly filing, however, signals that plans are firming up. In its quarterly filing on Thursday, Meta said it had approved a plan in June to dispose of certain data center assets and reclassified $2.04 billion worth of land and construction-in-progress as "held-for-sale". These assets were expected to be contributed to a third party within the next twelve months for co-developing data centers. Meta did not record a loss on the reclassification, which values the assets at the lower of their carrying amounts or fair value less costs to sell. As of June 30, total held-for-sale assets stood at $3.26 billion, according to the filing. Meta declined to comment for this story. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has laid out plans to invest hundreds of billions of dollars into constructing AI data center 'superclusters' for superintelligence. 'Just one of these covers a significant part of the footprint of Manhattan,' he said. The Instagram and WhatsApp owner on Wednesday raised the bottom end of its annual capital expenditures forecast by $2 billion, to $66 billion to $72 billion. It reported stronger-than-expected ad sales, boosted by AI-driven improvements to targeting and content delivery. Executives said those gains were helping offset rising infrastructure costs tied to its long-term AI push. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump's tariffs are as unpopular as ever, but the GOP's tolerance is growing
Donald Trump TariffsFacebookTweetLink Follow There has been something of a shift in the conventional wisdom about President Donald Trump's tariffs of late. On the one hand, economists and political analysts have warmed to the idea that Trump is more or less getting what he bargained for out of his threats of a global trade war. This has come as a number of foreign nations come to the table and, in a few cases, cut apparent deals. On the other, that's different from saying Trump's tactics will ultimately work. And the picture there certainly got more complicated this week, including with yet more judges suggesting they could rein in Trump's tariff authorities and the increasingly troubling economic numbers highlighted by another bad jobs report Friday. Many have been wondering when (and if) the economic pain many economists predicted would actually arrive, and signs are increasing that it might be upon us. In other words, we seem to be at an inflection point, particularly with Trump signaling Thursday that he'll finally press forward with global tariffs (probably!) next week. But how is all of this playing? Are people reevaluating their previous positions? It's too soon to gauge public opinion on Trump's latest moves this week. But the short answer is that we haven't seen many shifts of late in the already pretty dismal views of Trump's trade war at the macro level; if anything, views appear to have gotten slightly worse. But there have been some key shifts that suggest his base is more on-board than it used to be, which could allow Trump to press forward. Overall, foreign trade and tariffs remain some of the president's worst issues, and it continues to look like the policy that very few people (besides Trump) are asking for right now. Gallup polling shows Trump's approval on 'foreign trade' dropping from 42% in February to 36% in mid-July. Fox News polling around the same time showed Americans disapproved of Trump on tariffs by a 26-point margin, virtually the same as in April (25 points). And CBS News-YouGov polling shows people increasingly dislike that this is a priority for Trump. Its most recent data, from mid-July, show 61% say Trump is too focused on tariffs, similar to April but up from March. It also showed a new high in the percentage of people who say Trump isn't focused enough on lowering prices (70%). (This also ties into the tariffs, because tariffs are often inflationary.) The CBS data also show a slight drop in the percentage of Americans who think Trump's policies are making them better off financially (23% in March versus 18% today), and an increase in perceptions that his policies are making food prices increase (52% in March versus 62% today). Overall, Americans went from opposing the tariffs by 12 points in March to opposing them by 20 points today. So if there is a vibe shift on Trump's tariffs, it hasn't really shown up in the polls – at least yet. But as with most things Trump, overall views probably don't matter as much as how his base feels. The president has proven over and over again that he's happy to plow ahead as long as his supporters are on board. And those supporters might be growing in their tolerance for this gambit. The percentage of Republicans who say Trump is focused too much on tariffs in the CBS poll actually fell from 34% in April to 28% today. And polling from Quinnipiac University suggests Republicans are also less pessimistic about economic pain from the tariffs. Republicans were already much more patient with Trump's gambit. More than 8 in 10 said in that polling in both April and today that the tariffs were likely to help the economy over the long term. That's been consistent. But there has been a shift in Trump's favor in views of their short-term impact. While Republicans back in April were about evenly split on whether the tariffs would help or hurt in the short term, they now say by about a 2-to-1 margin that they'll help over the short term. While Republicans in April said 46-44% that the tariffs would help in the short term, they now say that 62-30%. Republicans also overwhelmingly express confidence in Trump's strategy on tariffs, saying it's working, 84-9%, in Quinnipiac's July polling. All of which suggests Trump's leash on this has lengthened with his base, which matters a great deal. It means GOP lawmakers who might feel compelled to try and check Trump on this gambit will probably be less likely to do so. But all of this is subject to change, particularly if the economic numbers look suspect like many economists predicted they will. How Republicans respond to that is when the rubber will really meet the road and the White House could face some really hard choices.
