
Pro-government newspaper in Japan shocks with ‘radical' support for female emperor
TOKYO (The Straits Times/ANN): The two main conservative media outlets in Japan are waging a battle for public opinion, after the Yomiuri newspaper broached an idea long held to be taboo and one that breaks from right-wing values.
'We should not rule out the possibility of a female emperor, or an emperor through a female line,' the Yomiuri declared in its page one story on May 15, as it unveiled policy proposals on the question of imperial succession.
'If we continue to insist on male descendants in the male line, the survival of the symbolic emperor system will be in jeopardy.'
That the influential Yomiuri Shimbun – Japan's largest broadsheet with a daily circulation of 6.2 million copies – was giving policy recommendations is not surprising. Since 1994, it has leveraged its position as the nation's most-read newspaper to drive policy agenda through its proposals.
However, what has rippled through Japan's political hallways was how the Yomiuri, often considered to be pro-government for its alignment with the conservative Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), has embraced a stance that is more in line with the political left.
The hawkish Sankei newspaper, with a circulation of under one million, launched a broadside, enlisting commentators who accused the Yomiuri of 'misleading the public' with 'sloppy content'.
Its chief editorial writer Satoshi Sakakibara said the Yomiuri was bordering on blasphemy and would lead to 'Japan ceasing to be Japanese'.
A Sankei editorial noted that legacy newspapers should not jump on the popular bandwagon and engage in 'knee-jerk politics, by rushing to conclusions based on superficial information without considering the weight of history or responsibility to the future'.
The culture war comes as the future of Japan's monarchy – the world's oldest hereditary royal lineage dating to 660BC – is now a hot-button issue in Japan's Parliament, due to the dwindling number of political heirs.
Public opinion, however, is firmly in support of a female monarch or an emperor of matrilineal descent. This clashes with conservative hardliners within the LDP, who want to preserve the Chrysanthemum Throne exclusively for male descendants of the male line.
This is nothing to do with a gender divide: Among the staunchest flag-bearers for hardline policy is former economic security minister Sanae Takaichi, a prime ministerial hopeful who has of late sharpened her criticism of incumbent leader Shigeru Ishiba.
Kiyotaka Akasaka, president of the non-profit Nippon Communications Foundation, told The Straits Times that the Yomiuri's proposals are 'radical' given the newspaper's usual position, and come as a 'bombshell to the political right'.
The policy ideas might not have been possible if veteran journalist Tsuneo Watanabe, who was Yomiuri's managing editor from 1985 until his death at 98 in 2024, was still alive, Mr Akasaka said.
The clash in views, he added, stems from the hardliners' unwavering commitment to traditional values regardless of circumstance and despite the alarming decline of imperial family members.
However, he noted: 'It is very difficult to foresee how greatly these proposals will impact the current policy considerations, but they have very much encouraged the political opposition.'
There are just three heirs to the Chrysanthemum Throne: Crown Prince Akishino, 59, the Emperor's younger brother; Prince Hisahito, the 18-year-old son of the Crown Prince; and finally, Prince Hitachi, 89, the siblings' uncle.
This is the stark reality: If Prince Hisahito chooses not to get married, or does not produce a male child, there would be nobody to succeed the throne.
Already, there has been pushback.
In contrast to his grandfather, the late wartime emperor Hirohito, who was revered as a deity until Japan lost the war, Crown Prince Akishino said at a news conference in 2024 that politicians should not lose sight of how the royals who are affected by policy are 'real live human beings'.
There are now five unmarried women in the 16-member imperial household, including Princess Aiko, who is 23 years old and the only child of Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako.
While commoner women marry into the imperial family, like Empress Masako, princesses who are born in the family lose their royal identity and become commoners themselves when they wed commoners.
The latest to leave the family is Crown Prince Akishino's daughter Mako, 33, who married her college sweetheart in 2021. The couple promptly relocated to the United States and have not returned to Japan since.
On May 30, the Imperial Household Agency said the couple had given birth to their first child, without revealing the gender.
As a solution to the dwindling numbers, the Yomiuri Shimbun suggests allowing princesses to keep their royal status after marriage, with their husbands and children entering the imperial household.
Traditionalists agree that princesses should remain as royals and continue official duties after marriage. But they draw the line at admitting their spouses and children into the family, arguing that this could result in a matrilineal emperor and taint the royal bloodline.
They note that while there have been eight female emperors, they were all unmarried and patrilineal heirs. There has never been a matrilineal emperor.
The Yomiuri, however, believes that the idea of 'one family, two statuses' is unrealistic. As commoners, the spouses and children would be free to express their opinions that could impugn the imperial family's 'political neutrality and dignity'.
It further points to how the unbroken bloodline, across millennia, had been sustained by concubines, with 55 illegitimate children having become emperors.
Meanwhile, traditionalists also favour bringing back members of 11 former branches of the imperial family that were disbanded after World War II, through 'adoption'. It is said that there are at least 10 unmarried male descendants in their 20s or younger among these branches.
But the idea has very little traction among the public. Eighty years have passed since the war, and members of these branch families would have grown accustomed to life as commoners, outside the public eye and rigid rules of the imperial household.
Kanda University of International Studies lecturer Jeffrey Hall told ST that this plan would 'raise questions about the human rights of the individuals involved', noting that the Yomiuri sees this as 'a more unreliable and unpredictable solution that could dilute public support for the monarchy'.
Dr Hall noted that the monarchy is not a major issue for moderate or centre-right voters, although there is a 'very vocal minority' of extreme conservatives who prefer the Sankei to the Yomiuri for 'more consistently taking their side on culture war issues'.
While they are not the majority of LDP voters, the party would have difficulty winning elections without their support, he said.
'To many Japanese, the insistence on male-only succession seems to clash with the concepts of gender equality and women's rights,' Dr Hall said. 'But die-hard conservatives will do almost anything to protect what they see as one of their nation's most sacred traditions.' - The Straits Times/ANN

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Japan PM Ishiba mulls Trump trade meeting before G7, says Yomiuri newspaper
TOKYO: Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is considering visiting Washington to meet President Donald Trump before a mid-month summit of the Group of Seven nations as he seeks a trade deal, the Yomiuri newspaper reported on Sunday. Japanese officials see signs of progress on easing Trump's tariffs after repeated visits by top tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, and say the U.S. side has shown strong interest in Japan's proposals, the Yomiuri said, citing Japanese government officials it did not name. Economy Minister Akazawa will return to Washington for more talks late this week, after which a decision will be made on a U.S. trip by Ishiba, the newspaper said. The White House and the Japanese Prime Minister's Office did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Japan, a major U.S. ally, faces a 24% tariff from next month unless it can negotiate a bilateral deal. It is also scrambling to find ways to get Washington to exempt its automakers from 25% tariffs on automobiles, Japan's biggest industry. Some Japanese government officials hope an agreement can be announced in time for President Trump's birthday on June 14, the Yomiuri said. Akazawa, after meeting Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, said on Friday the two sides had 'agreed to accelerate the talks and hold another round ahead of the G7 summit,' to be held from June 15 to 17 in Canada. But he said there would be no deal without U.S. concessions on tariffs, including on autos. Ishiba has said bilateral negotiations were progressing on trade expansion, non-tariff measures and economic security, while Tokyo has mentioned possible increases in its purchases of U.S. military equipment and energy, as well as cooperation on shipbuilding and repairing U.S. warships in Japan.


The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Japan PM Ishiba mulls Trump trade meeting before G7
TOKYO: Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is considering visiting Washington to meet President Donald Trump before a mid-month summit of the Group of Seven nations as he seeks a trade deal, the Yomiuri newspaper reported on Sunday. Japanese officials see signs of progress on easing Trump's tariffs after repeated visits by top tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, and say the U.S. side has shown strong interest in Japan's proposals, the Yomiuri said, citing Japanese government officials it did not name. Economy Minister Akazawa will return to Washington for more talks late this week, after which a decision will be made on a U.S. trip by Ishiba, the newspaper said. The White House and the Japanese Prime Minister's Office did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Japan, a major U.S. ally, faces a 24% tariff from next month unless it can negotiate a bilateral deal. It is also scrambling to find ways to get Washington to exempt its automakers from 25% tariffs on automobiles, Japan's biggest industry. Some Japanese government officials hope an agreement can be announced in time for President Trump's birthday on June 14, the Yomiuri said. Akazawa, after meeting Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, said on Friday the two sides had 'agreed to accelerate the talks and hold another round ahead of the G7 summit,' to be held from June 15 to 17 in Canada. But he said there would be no deal without U.S. concessions on tariffs, including on autos. Ishiba has said bilateral negotiations were progressing on trade expansion, non-tariff measures and economic security, while Tokyo has mentioned possible increases in its purchases of U.S. military equipment and energy, as well as cooperation on shipbuilding and repairing U.S. warships in Japan.


The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Europe's top diplomat rejects Pentagon chief's call that it limits role in Asia
SINGAPORE: Europe's top diplomat Kaja Kallas (pic) has rejected calls from the United States that the continent should limit its role in Asia, saying that the security theatres of the Indo-Pacific and Europe are intimately connected. US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth had suggested at the Shangri-La Dialogue that allies in Europe focus on security in Europe, so that Washington could focus on Asia. In response to a question at the security forum organised by the International Institute for Strategic Studies on what role Europe's militaries should play in Asia, Hegseth said initially that it could be 'useful' that China takes into account the presence of other countries in the region. But, he added, the US 'would much prefer that the overwhelming balance of European investment be on that continent'. This, he said, will allow the superpower to use its 'comparative advantage as an Indo-Pacific nation to support our partners here'. Speaking to The Straits Times on May 31 hours after the Pentagon chief's speech, Kallas pushes back against this notion. 'It's an illusion that these security theatres of Indo-Pacific and Europe are not interlinked,' the vice-president of the European Commission says, citing North Korea's involvement in Russia's invasion of Ukraine through its soldiers and weaponry, and China's 'enabling' of the Russian war effort through the provision of critical dual-use goods – something that the Asian power denies. 'Great powers maybe think that they don't need anybody; everybody needs them instead. 'But I think in these times, everybody needs everyone. We need to work together – the big powers too,' she adds, saying that she had made her views known to Hegseth after his speech. It is six months to the day that Kallas became Europe's top diplomat. And in that half-year, she has had to steer the 27-country bloc through Ukraine's war with Russia – now into its fourth year; fending charges of sitting on its hands over the deepening horrors in Gaza; and perhaps most traumatic of all for the Europeans, an unprecedented rupture in the transatlantic alliance after Donald Trump occupied the White House. Current American leaders – from President Trump to his key lieutenants – have handled Europe with barely concealed antipathy and distaste at times, making clear that the relationship which has been undergirded by links in almost every way conceivable since the end of World War II is up for review. Asked about the toughest thing she's had to navigate since she became the European Union's No. 2 – and thus its high representative for foreign affairs and security policy – on Dec 1, 2024, and Kallas says without hesitation: 'To be very frank with you, the biggest challenge has been that the strong alliance that we have had with the Americans is somewhat changing.' Kallas, who turns 48 in June, was Estonia's first female prime minister – a role she held from 2021 to 2024 – before she resigned to assume her current position, taking over from Spain's Josep Borrell. Being prime minister was 'a walk in the park' compared with what she does now, having to corral the EU's 27 countries from Germany to Hungary – all of which have their own views on foreign matters. Getting a majority is hard. Unanimity is near impossible. One of the most important issues confronting the bloc today is its China policy. Reeling from the shock of long-time ally the US ripping up the trade playbook – Europe was hit by a 20 per cent 'reciprocal tariff' before Trump called for a pause, and 25 per cent tariffs on auto, steel and aluminium imports – some European leaders want a pivot towards China, and to find common cause in open global trade. Leaders from countries such as Spain and France have made recent trips to Beijing, as has Kallas' boss, European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen. But Kallas flags 'two big worries with China' – its role in Russia's war in Ukraine, and what she calls 'coercive economic practices' – the dumping of cheap Chinese goods in Europe. She runs through other concerns: Chinese-flagged ships that damage subsea cables in the Baltic Sea and cyber attacks that she says were conducted by Chinese companies on the Czech Republic. 'So these are not good signs. China is saying that they want good, strong relations with us Europeans. And then we say, if we are your friends, why are you doing these things to friends, or why are you helping those who are not our friends, like Russia? 'But there are, of course, different views as well on how to proceed with China,' she adds. 'We have very divergent views. As long as we have divergent views, then we are weaker. 'So this needs some contemplation on our side, how we see our relationship developing.' She refuses to be drawn into whether the bloc has developed a more pro-China tilt in the last six months. Later in June, she and the EU's 27 foreign ministers are meeting to see how they can work on a common position on China. The last such meeting was in June 2023. 'I think a lot has changed in the meantime,' she says wryly. One big change has been how the US has positioned itself in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Trump has appeared to side with Moscow against Europe's strategic interests, inducing fears that Washington may throw Ukraine – and Europe – under the bus in a bid to end the war. But on May 29, Trump signalled that he would set a two-week deadline for Russian President Vladimir Putin to demonstrate his seriousness about ending the war. Asked whether he believed Putin intended to do so, a frustrated-sounding Trump told reporters: 'I'll let you know in about two weeks. We're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along or not. And if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently.' But the mercurial Trump has had a track record of walking back on what he's said, and when asked if she thinks he is serious this time, Kallas gives little away but for a tiny grimace. She says simply: 'It has been now over two months since Ukraine agreed to an unconditional ceasefire. If you want the killing to stop, then you should put the pressure on the one who's doing the killing.' For its part, Europe is putting together its 18th package of sanctions, which Kallas says will focus on banking and energy fuelling Russia's war chest. These steps could include lowering the price cap for Russian oil and disconnecting more Russian banks from the Swift international payment system. It was also in recent weeks that Europe, along with the UK, has taken the lead to ratchet up pressure on Israel over the war in Gaza, with Kallas announcing on May 20 that the bloc will be reviewing preferential trade arrangements with Tel Aviv, under the EU-Israel Association Agreement. Observers say that this could finally be an inflection point in the response of the EU – Israel's biggest trading partner – to the nearly 20-month war. The EU-Israel association pact includes a human rights clause, Article 2, that is now being reviewed. It states that human rights and respect for international law are legally 'essential elements' of the agreement. What has been the turning point for Europe, Kallas says, was the blockade of humanitarian aid, mostly European-funded. 'The loss of life is untenable, and we have been conveying these messages to our Israeli counterparts as well. So we are working on that review, and also proposing next steps, and at the same time talking to Israelis all the time to really stop this, also putting pressure on Hamas to have the ceasefire.' A suspension of the preferential trade benefits requires a qualified majority – 15 of 27 EU states voting in favour; while harsher steps – such as sanctions on Israel – require unanimity. On how much time the EU will give the Israelis, before taking action, she demurs: 'You know, we have also 27 countries with very different views. 'But that we actually agreed on the review of Article 2 – that means that Israel is losing friends.' - The Straits Times/ANN