‘We knew these girls had something special' – Teenage robotics team from Co Offaly make history with their robot Agatha
The 'Steminists' – Jasmine Matsushita (13), Emily Thunder (13), Olivia Hoey (14), Rachel Ebenezer (13) and Alice Duffy (12) – have become robotics champions in less than a year with their powerhouse robot, Agatha Trunchbull.
Their robot, who was named after the formidable principal from Matilda, was the result of seven months of relentless work by the team.
"We knew these girls had something special,' said their teacher Aisling Bourke, who supported the team throughout the year alongside her colleague Sindy Meleady.
Agatha is programmed to compete in challenges and matches against other robots, with the team earning the opportunity to head to Texas this week.
"They're the highest achieving Irish team, to bring home the judges award – and it's the first all-girls team to go. We're very excited for them, they were brilliant,' said Ms Bourke.
She said the girls were the 'driving force' behind the work, bringing Agatha home with them after school some evenings to work on the design or the composition of the robot.
"Emily, who was in charge of the coding, used to only be able to run the code at nighttime when her younger brother and sisters were in bed,' said Ms Bourke.
"They used to carry the robot from the school to their house – they've convinced me now that we need a trolley.'
The girls would also work during weekends and midterms to get their robot to the highest standard they could.
ADVERTISEMENT
Jasmine was the team's lead builder, who worked on making sure the robot was solid and competition ready, while Emily, the team's programmer was responsible for writing and refining the robot's code.
Olivia led on the design of the robot, with Rachel playing a key role in the research and strategising and Alice supporting the engineering process as a builder while also focusing on game analysis.
Speaking on their way home from Dublin Airport, the girls said they feel 'amazing' in the aftermath of their achievement.
"They cannot wait to get back to Tullamore,' added Ms Bourke.
President Michael D Higgins said the team's accomplishment in reaching the world championships serves 'as a powerful reminder of the immense potential that lies in the minds and hands of our young people, particularly young girls, when given the opportunity to engage with science, technology, engineering and mathematics'.
The team will be honoured with a special homecoming event with family and friends in Tullamore today, before their school welcomes them back with an official homecoming event on Monday.
Ms Bourke said the school recognised the importance of helping students to 'open up doors to opportunities that they wouldn't get in the classroom through the curriculum'.
"They thought this was very important. We're just facilitating that which is great, to come home with such a prestigious award like we are absolutely over the moon.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Post
10 hours ago
- Business Post
Apple lobbied Irish government on landmark EU regulation weeks before €500m fine
• What Apple said to Irish ministers ahead of its €500m Digital Markets Act fine — and how they responded • Details of Apple's private warnings over EU regulation and US tariffs
RTÉ News
10 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Academic row over 'temperature neutrality' vs 'climate neutrality'
Ireland's national climate objective is set out in the 2015 Climate Act. It is to "pursue and achieve" and make the transition to "a climate resilient, biodiversity rich, environmentally sustainable and climate neutral economy" by the year 2050. There are massive commitments packed into that single sentence, yet it is not really clear what precisely it means. Ireland's climate scientists are now fighting over that issue. The first bit is OK - climate resilience. We are going to have intense rain, more frequent and violent storms, bigger droughts and greater heat stress. Resilience means preparing to live with that. The biodiversity bit is OK too. Protecting nature is not hard to understand and most people would sign up for that. The third term – "environmentally sustainable". Some people think "sustainability" on its own is a bit of a wishy-washy term. But environmental sustainability is now commonly understood. Committees have been set up to focus on it in workplaces and communities all over the country. But that last phrase in the national climate objective, the commitment to a "climate neutral economy". That is a different ball game altogether. There is no agreement about what this entails, and a big academic row has now broken out among climate scientists about it. They are at loggerheads over what exactly climate neutrality is and how it should be measured. On one side is the Climate Change Advisory Council. This is the independent statutory body of climate experts that advises the Government about climate matters. It is their job to set Ireland's so-called "carbon budgets". This involves calculating how much cumulative greenhouse gas emissions need to be restricted to, every five years, if the country is to stay within its legally binding climate commitments. A huge amount of data and information, and some very important judgement calls, are needed for their calculations. The data and information parts are complicated but straightforward enough. Judgement calls however, are never straight forward and can be very controversial, as they are in this case. This week, a group of climate scientists took a major swipe at a most important judgement call recently made by the Climate Change Advisory Council when setting Ireland's carbon budget for the years 2031 to 2035. They accused the council of choosing to define climate neutrality in a way that confers a competitive advantage on Irish agriculture. Their complaint, which is a serious one, is that the Government's key climate advisers are choosing now, for the first time, to substitute "temperature neutrality" for "climate neutrality" when calculating Ireland's carbon budget. It means the Climate Change Advisory Council has told the Government it is OK to only ensure that by 2050 Ireland causes no additional warming to the earth's atmosphere. This is not the same as delivering "net zero" emissions from Ireland by 2050 which is much harder to achieve. The "net zero" approach puts the key emphasis on the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions. It requires, among other things, enormous changes in farming practices, forestry and land use to ensure that absolutely all greenhouse gases still coming out of Ireland by 2050 are re-absorb by natural processes here. Of course, the alternative "temperature neutrality" approach, now favoured by the Climate Change Advisory Council, aims to do everything possible to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But the difference with this approach is that the ultimate emphasis is to ensure the contribution Ireland is making to rising global temperatures is zero by 2050. The council explained that it considered multiple definitions of what climate neutrality means before deciding that, for Ireland in particular, it had to mean ensuring temperature neutrality. It also explained that in making this judgement call, it reflected on the national climate objective and was guided by the objectives of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. It said the Paris Agreement's long-term temperature goal - which is to limit global warming to well below 2C and pursue efforts to limit warming to 1.5˚C - was also key in its deliberations. Ireland produces nine times more beef and dairy output than it consumes. Because of this it has an unusual greenhouse gas emissions profile, with a far higher share of methane emissions than most other countries. New Zealand is similar. But there are not many other places in the developed world where agriculture is so dominant. Methane from agriculture is an enormously potent greenhouse gas. It is capable of trapping about 85 times more heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide over a short time frame. After about 10 years however, methane dissipates. It breaks down and disappears from the atmosphere. So, its impact on global temperature ceases in a few short years while the warming effect of carbon dioxide carries on for several hundred years. All this means that a country with a huge agriculture sector can have an outsized impact in terms of limiting global warming by doing a relatively small amount of methane reduction. It gives it more wriggle room if the main aim is to eliminate a nation's contribution to rising global temperature. In some circumstances it could even enable a country to ease up on carbon emission efforts in sectors outside of agriculture and still ensure a lower contribution to the global warming potential of its national greenhouse gas mix. It turns out that this is precisely the impact the Climate Change Advisory Council's adaptation of the temperature neutrality target has for Ireland. The council itself has gone to some length to explain and document this impact. It calculated that aiming for temperature neutrality instead of net zero emissions will enable Ireland to emit an additional nine million tonnes of greenhouse gases during the first five years of the next decade. It also said it is entirely up to the Government to decide which sectors of the economy can share in that additional climate mitigation wriggle room, and by how much. Its carbon budget proposal document says all this will be fine "provided the rest of the world follows an emissions pathway that can be considered compliant with the Paris Agreement long term temperature goals". In essence what they are saying is that since most countries in the world do not have as large an agriculture sector as Ireland, or New Zealand, they are unlikely to choose the same temperature neutrality approach. That is because there is no advantage for them in doing so. And if that remains the case then all will be well. It is an approach that has startled the critics who have specifically highlighted the polar opposite argument – that it would be a disaster if every country followed Ireland and adopted temperature neutrality as their climate target. The dissenters insist it would seriously jeopardise the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5˚C. These criticisms are outlined in a paper published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, by Dr Colm Duffy and David Styles of University of Galway, Dr Róisín Moriarty and Professor Hannah Daly of University College Cork, and Carl Doedens and Malte Meinshausen of the University of Melbourne. They claim that Ireland's approach rewards modest cuts in methane emissions and serves to protect what they describe as "methane emissions privileges" at the expense of poorer nations. In doing so, they say it locks in current inequalities in the global food system. Their paper highlights that, by enabling Ireland to maintain a high share of global agriculture emissions, adopting the temperature neutrality target undermines the global transition to a sustainable and equitable food system. They note too that it dramatically reduces the level of ambition needed for overall greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Many might argue that the additional wriggle room it provides of nine million tonnes of emissions for Ireland spread out over a nine-year period does not sound particularly dramatic. However, if lots of countries were to benefit from the same approach the impact could become dramatic very quickly.
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Irish start-up secures funding for groundbreaking concussion tech
The Irish start-up says it has developed a compact, behind-the-ear sports wearable that detects head impacts instantly, and that will enhance player safety and performance by eliminating undetected concussions. The €650,000 funding includes private investors and has the support of Enterprise Ireland's high-potential start-up unit. The funding will be used by Sports Impact Technologies to accelerate the roll-out of the company's test product. The company says the sensor will sit comfortably and discreetly behind the ear and monitor head impacts during a game by recording sharp and sudden head movements. Data and alerts will be sent in real time through an app to coaches, medical staff, or safety officials who will receive information on a player's current condition after an impact. This will enable them to make an informed decision about whether to take a player off the pitch to be assessed for concussion, which should reduce the risk of further injury and enhance player safety on the field. Sports Impact Technologies was founded in 2022 by Eóin Tuohy, with their headquarters based at NovaUCD in Dublin. Mr Tuohy said: 'Using our smart sensor technology to monitor head impacts in real time, our goal is to make unrecognised concussions a thing of the past – protecting athletes, optimising their performance, and enabling participation. 'We're thrilled to have closed this funding round with the backing of both private investors and Enterprise Ireland. The investment will support the final stages of product development and help us bring our beta wearable to market.' Sports Impact Technologies previously completed the Enterprise Ireland funded New Frontiers programme at TU Dublin, a finance scheme to help start-ups, and secured €100,000 in Enterprise Ireland Pre-Seed Fund Start (PSSF) funding. Keith Brock, a senior client advisor of Enterprise Ireland, said: 'Enterprise Ireland is proud to support Sports Impact Technologies through our high-potential start-up funding. 'This investment reflects our commitment to backing innovative Irish companies that are solving real-world challenges with global relevance. The team's wearable sensor technology is a game-changer for athlete safety, and we're excited to support their journey as they bring this product to market.' Sports Impact Technologies, which is part of a network in Europe that supports entrepreneurs in developing businesses called the ESA BIC, was named the winner of the 'Best New Start' Award in the Connacht and Leinster regional final of the 2024 InterTradeIreland Seedcorn Investor Readiness Competition.
