Solo or together? The big question for Maharashtra alliances this BMC poll season
Senior Congress leader Balasaheb Thorat was cautious. He told the media on Monday that MVA will decide together how to proceed. 'Parties with similar ideologies should stay together and for the upcoming polls, as MVA, our leaders will sit and discuss how to take it forward.'
MVA leaders—some on record, some off record—say they will assess each other's strengths and then decide. But the sense ThePrint got after speaking to leaders across the alliance was that in high profile seats like Mumbai, Pune, Nagpur and Thane, each party could go alone.
Mumbai: The Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) may spring a surprise in the BMC polls scheduled later this year—all three allies, the Congress, the Shiv Sena UBT and the NCP (SP), might go solo. But so far, no one is making it official.
However, other Congress leaders in Mumbai told ThePrint, they might leave the final decision to local leaders and karyakartas. Congress spokesperson Atul Londhe said, 'Our line is very clear. We have left it to our local level leaders. Wherever they decide to go solo, we will go solo. It depends on local level leadership.'
Another Congress leader said, 'We will contest alone where we are strong, like Mumbai, Nagpur, etc. And wherever we feel we need to combine our efforts like Kolhapur, Sangli, Pune, we will do that. So MVA is intact. However each corporation, zilla parishad, nagar panchayat will be assessed individually.'
This comes in at a time when the Congress's alliance partner Shiv Sena UBT is sending feelers to Raj Thackeray and his MNS, 'in the larger interest of Maharashtra'.
Shiv Sena UBT leaders have also said they may go solo in the BMC polls. Former Mumbai mayor Kishori Pednekar told ThePrint they have left the decision to party chief Uddhav Thackerary. 'Whether to go as Aghadi or with Raj Thackeray or solo, he will take that ultimate call. As karyakartas we are preparing our ground. We are angry over what has been happening, and now it is high time elections are held. We are ready for anything.'
Political analyst Hemant Desai said it seems likely the MVA will fight separately, especially in big seats. 'At the moment, it doesn't look that MVA is preparing to fight together. Their strengths are different in different pockets. Especially in Mumbai, Sena UBT is able to get Muslim votes as previously seen in assembly and Lok Sabha. So they don't need Congress as such. And in Vidarbha, Congress is stronger. So it doesn't make sense for them to fight it together. Besides, issues will crop up in seat sharing especially between Congress and Sena UBT.'
Uddhav-Raj, Sharad-Ajit?
There could also be alliances outside the MVA. On the one hand, Sena UBT and MNS might decide to go together citing the Marathi manoos plank, on the other hand, the frequent meetings of Sharad Pawar-Ajit Pawar—the latest on 1 June 1 at Vasantdada Sugar Institute—are leading to speculation of a possible patch-up.
'These elections will be fought on local issues and that is why the equations are totally different. Besides, if we talk about Mumbai, Sena is stronger. Previously, we did not have a great experience with seat sharing with them. So, that could still be an issue,' warned one Congress leader. 'In my opinion, if we go with Shiv Sena UBT, it might hurt both of us if the votes don't get transferred. Besides, in the BMC elections, our poll issues are also different. A post-poll alliance of MVA is also possible,' he added.
There are rumblings within the Mahayuti too with BJP preparing to go solo in local body polls. But Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis himself has said the alliance will be together in most places; while on some seats, there could be friendly fights.
Terms of all 29 municipal corporations ended in February and elections to corporations and multiple nagar panchayats and zilla parishads are expected to be held later this year.
The Maharashtra State Election Commission has already begun the process of ward formation in an exercise that is expected to be a mini assembly election.
(Edited by Viny Mishra)
Also Read: As Ajit Pawar's NCP cements dominance, what lies ahead for Sharad Pawar & his party
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Congress leader Rajesh Soni arrested for Facebook posts on Operation Sindoor, booked under new BNS law
What the police say sparked the arrest Live Events What the charges actually mean (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Rajesh Soni, a senior Congress leader in Gujarat, was arrested early Friday by the state's Cyber Crime Cell over a pair of Facebook posts that police allege endangered national morale and spread misinformation about a major military posts were related to Operation Sindoor, an ongoing mission by the Indian armed forces targeting terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK). Soni now faces charges under two sections of the recently enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)—sections 152 and 353(1)(a).The FIR, filed by the CID Cyber Crime team on Thursday, cited two Facebook posts made by of them depicted Prime Minister Narendra Modi wearing a fighter pilot uniform in a poster-like image. In another, Soni allegedly claimed that 'the Indian government surrendered during the operation,' an accusation the police say could undermine both the mission and the morale of troops deployed on the of Police (CID-Cyber Crime), Bharatsinh Tank, said, 'Soni was accused of breaking defence personnel's morale and putting India's sovereignty in danger through misleading posts on Facebook.'Tank went on to say, 'We arrested Soni for his posts which could break the armed forces' morale and send a wrong message to soldiers that their contribution and sacrifice on the battlefield will go in vain.'Soni has been charged under Section 152 of the BNS, which deals with acts that endanger the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India. This section carries serious consequences, including up to life imprisonment or a minimum of seven years' jail, plus a second charge—Section 353(1)(a)—relates to statements that could incite public mischief. This legal provision, too, has teeth and signals the government's intent to regulate what it views as provocative or destabilising online behaviour, especially during military arrest did not go unnoticed by Soni's party after news broke, several Congress leaders gathered at the CID's office in Gandhinagar in protest. Leading the charge was Gujarat Congress president Shaktisinh Gohil, who described the police action as disproportionate and politically said, 'He only tried to highlight that soldiers need to get their due credit instead of the govt spending taxpayers' money on publicity.'He also accused the authorities of cracking down on free expression at a time when the nation should be focusing on supporting its armed forces, not silencing Sindoor has become a national talking point in recent weeks. The Indian military launched the mission with the stated goal of eliminating terror infrastructure in Pakistani territory and PoK. It has been projected by the government as a demonstration of India's zero-tolerance policy towards cross-border the operation has also sparked debates over public narrative management. As the conflict plays out on the ground, its portrayal in digital spaces has become sensitive—especially with a politically charged environment and general elections in government's actions suggest it sees misinformation as a direct threat to the morale of soldiers and the success of such operations. At the same time, critics argue that there is a thin line between national interest and political convenience when it comes to controlling arrest under the new BNS framework could mark a pivotal moment in how India enforces online accountability. It raises difficult questions: Where does one draw the line between political critique and disinformation? Who decides whether a post is morale-breaking or simply provocative?For now, Rajesh Soni remains in custody, his party defiant, and the legal system gearing up for what may become a high-profile case on digital speech and national security.(With inputs from TOI)
News18
28 minutes ago
- News18
You Did Well, Jaishankar Tells Multi-Party Teams On Return To India As Leaders Share Feedback
Last Updated: Sources said the delegations told Jaishankar that they were received well and the countries were willing to listen to India's side of the story On Friday, External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar met two delegations that have returned from the multi-country visits—one led by NCP (SP) MP Supriya Sule and the other by NDA alliance partner Shiv Sena's parliamentary party leader Shrikant Shinde—the youngest amongst all the delegate leaders. The Sule-led delegation visited countries like South Africa, Ethiopia, and Egypt, while those on Shinde's list were UAE, followed by countries like Republic of Congo, Sierra Leone and Liberia. Sources said Jaishankar was told that many countries that they went to want India to sit across the table and have a dialogue with Pakistan. Some countries have even asked why India did not take a stand on the escalation between several other countries. It is learnt that the members explained to these countries that it was not possible to speak to Pakistan because it cannot be trusted due to its policy to support terror. The delegations expressed how they were made to feel welcome, and people in these countries were willing to listen to India's side of the story. It is also learnt that the delegation told the minister that there is more need for better communication with these countries so that India can present its view. It would not be fair to judge them assuming that they would be supporting Pakistan by virtue of being a Muslim nation. Through these visits, the countries also said India should seek deeper engagement with them, not just in trade and commerce, but on other softer issues like culture, tourism etc. The delegation also gave feedback to the government that it was important to have better dialogue and engage with Western media to be able to explain India's narrative better. The Shinde team, on the other hand, had a much better engagement. A moment of silence in the memory of those who lost their lives in the Pahalgam attack was observed in Sierra Leone and Liberia. In fact, in Liberia, it was done in Parliament and Shinde was asked to speak at the podium. Jaishankar expressed satisfaction with the interaction of the teams to these countries, which have often been dismissed as insignificant, but will have a role to play in the future. 'These countries are not very prominent for many looking at it from a world view, but the kind of narrative that you have been able to bring back home. It is a great service to the country," the minister is said to have told the delegation. The delegation led by Shinde also expressed sentiments of the people of these countries who wanted better trade relations with India. The potential for investment and better trade could certainly be explored with deeper engagement, they said. Jaishankar was also told that Liberia, for example, has been looking out for a space to have its consulate in India. India is a great importer of rubber and rubber-related goods for which markets in these African countries can also be explored. These African countries can also be a great investment sector for mining, the delegation expressed. The delegation also added that there was a huge appreciation for India's role in UN peacekeeping and the kind of support India gave to these countries during Covid-19 by providing vaccines and other essential medicines, which is deeply appreciated. So far, five delegation members out of seven have met Jaishankar and shared the detailed feedback that they have been able to gather in their multi-party visits across many countries. The remaining two delegations from Ravi Shankar Prasad's team and Shashi Tharoor's team are likely to meet the minister some time next week. Some members have also submitted a detailed written report and note for the government of India to consider. A total of seven delegations, comprising 55 members—including MPs, former diplomats, and former Union ministers—were dispatched to 38 countries to explain India's stand on terrorism. These delegations were led by prominent leaders such as Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, NCP(SP)'s Supriya Sule, BJP's Ravi Shankar Prasad and Baijayant Panda, Shiv Sena's Srikant Shinde, DMK's Kanimozhi, and JD(U) MP Sanjay Jha.
Hans India
38 minutes ago
- Hans India
Harish Rao gives presentation on Kaleshwaram, details about the project
Former minister and BRS leader Harish Rao has issued a robust defence of the Kaleshwaram project following criticisms. Presenting a detailed PowerPoint at Telangana Bhavan, Rao highlighted that the project has successfully supplied water to a total of 2.033 million acres. Rao noted that discussions regarding the project proceeded without any objections from Maharashtra, stating that he engaged with Maharashtra representatives to address concerns within 45 days of the government's formation. He said that the Kaleshwaram project encompasses three barrages, fifteen reservoirs, nineteen substations, twenty-one pump houses, 203 kilometres of tunnels, 1,531 kilometres of gravity canals, 98 kilometres of pressure mains, and a storage capacity of 141 TMC, with water lifts reaching heights of 530 metres. "Initially designed to source water from Tammidihati to Yellampalli, the project was relocated to Medigadda due to reduced water availability at Tammidihati. The Medigadda barrage was constructed in seven blocks and supported by 85 piers," Rao said Rao responded to Congress claims that farming had succeeded without Kaleshwaram, asserting that it is this very project that facilitated crop production in the Yasangi season. He emphasised that water availability via the project is sourced from three different locations, capable of filling thousands of tanks. "Everything built from Medigadda to Mallanna Sagar is operational," he added. The canal associated with the Kaleshwaram project alone is projected to provide water for 90,000 acres of land.
