Starlink Got Faster In the Past Two Years. It's Still Not Regularly Meeting Broadband Speeds
Median download speeds from the satellite internet provider have steadily ticked up over the past few years, going from 53.95 megabits per second in 2022 to 104.71Mbps today. That's an impressive feat considering Starlink added about 5 million customers over the same period and recently passed the 6 million mark globally. However, according to Ookla's data, only 17.4% of Starlink customers are getting internet speeds that meet the FCC's definition of minimum broadband speeds: 100Mbps download and 20Mbps upload.
Ookla
"The fact that Starlink's median download speeds nearly doubled from Q3 2022 until Q1 2025 is definitely a notable and impressive development," Sue Marek, editorial director at Ookla, told CNET. "It indicates that their ongoing efforts to expand their satellite constellation's capacity is making a difference."
Starlink accomplished that by drastically increasing its capacity. At the beginning of 2022, the company had about 1,761 satellites in orbit; today, that number stands at 7,607, according to Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer who maintains a catalog of space objects. SpaceX, the company that owns Starlink, has said it eventually hopes to have as many as 42,000 satellites in space.
It's going to need them. Recent changes to the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment Program could funnel as much as $20 billion in government subsidies to Starlink for providing internet in rural areas. But many industry experts are skeptical that Starlink can add millions of new customers without sacrificing speed.
Locating local internet providers
That's a reasonable concern. While most subscribers are meeting the 100Mbps download speed threshold, Starlink's median upload speeds are just 14.84Mbps, falling short of the FCC's broadband definition, which ISPs must meet to receive BEAD money.
Latency, or the time it takes data to get from your computer to where it's going, is also on the high side -- 45 milliseconds (ms) compared to 12ms for the country as a whole; CNET recommends around 50ms or lower for activities like online gaming.
In October 2024, Maine began offering free Starlink dishes to residents in its 'hardest-to-reach locations.' I asked Brian Allenby, the senior director with the Maine Connectivity Authority, if he was concerned about Starlink hitting that 100/20Mbps benchmark in a previous interview.
"We have a very granular level of reporting through the Starlink portal, and it has all been compliant," Allenby said. "So we don't have immediate concerns about that."
A representative for Starlink didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
States that qualify for a free Starlink dish had higher speeds
The Starlink experience can vary dramatically depending on where you live. Last week, the company instituted a "demand fee" of $500 in the Pacific Northwest to combat congestion in high-use areas. In other states with more capacity available, it's giving customers the $349 satellite dish for free.
Ookla took a look at the areas where Starlink is offering free equipment and found that all of them, except West Texas and Alaska, had median download speeds over 100Mbps. South Dakota, Rhode Island and Wyoming had the highest percentage of customers meeting the 100/20Mbps benchmark, while Alaska, Mississippi and Louisiana had the lowest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
3 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
That Strange NFL-Disney Deal
This week's deal giving the NFL part-ownership of Disney's ESPN reflects the NFL's importance as a prop under the otherwise rapidly sinking traditional television business. But honorable mention should also go to the car-insurance advertisers, Geico and Progressive, which have done more than their bit to keep linear, ad-littered television not only financial ambulatory but entertaining. Geico with its gecko and cavemen, and Progressive with its long-running ensemble featuring Flo and her aproned insurance mavens, are among the best things on television. They also inject much of the cash that keeps the old machine ticking over.
CNN
3 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump is planning a massive IPO of the government's mortgage companies
President Donald Trump and his economic advisers are planning a historic sale of stock in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-owned mortgage giants that help provide stability and affordability to America's home loan market. The plans, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, have not yet been finalized, and Trump continues to weigh various options, according to a senior administration official. But the White House believes an initial public offering of up to 15% of the two companies' shares could raise $30 billion, which could make it the largest IPO in history. The president has been weighing an IPO for years. Trump's first administration tried — and failed — to privatize Fannie and Freddie from the government conservatorship. But Trump has renewed his effort in his second term. In May, he posted on Truth Social that he was 'giving very serious consideration to bringing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac public.' He said would consult with cabinet members and make a decision 'in the near future.' Trump has met with various Wall Street bank CEOs in recent weeks, including JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon, Goldman Sachs' David Solomon and, this week, Bank of America's Brian Moynihan, with whom Trump discussed a potential Fannie and Freddie IPO, according to a source familiar with their discussions. Many of Trump's allies in the Republican Party have long advocated for ending the government conservatorship that Fannie and Freddie were placed under during 2008 global financial crisis. The conservatorship ensured their survival during the housing crisis that precipitated the Great Recession, but government control of the two entities was intended to be temporary. Proponents say the companies are viable on their own, and returning Fannie and Freddie to the public could help raise money for a government that is flooded with debt. But some economists have warned that attempts to privatize Fannie and Freddie could upset the balance in the mortgage market, making it even more expensive for Americans to borrow money to purchase a home. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, estimated in 2024 that privatization could cost the typical American taking out a new mortgage between $1,800 and $2,800 per year. Critics have also noted that Fannie and Freddie have enormous backing from hedge fund investors, so much of the proceeds of an IPO would go to wealthy financial backers, not taxpayers. The companies guarantee 70% of America's mortgages. Although they don't issue mortgages to borrowers, Fannie and Freddie help ensure America's housing market functions properly: They buy mortgages from lenders and repackage them for investors, helping money flow in and out of the housing market. Fannie and Freddie are both instrumental in making 30-year mortgages possible – and relatively affordable (although rates have surged in recent years for a variety of reasons). An IPO would return Fannie and Freddie to their pre-2008 state, when they were publicly traded companies backed by the US Treasury. They were placed under government control on September 7, 2008, after facing massive losses amid crashing home values. A week later, Lehman Brothers collapsed, sparking a global financial crisis.
Forbes
3 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Are Millions Of Managers Becoming Obsolete? Here Are 21 Reasons
In response to several articles here and here suggesting that millions of managers are becoming obsolete, I have been asked to clarify. What is the evidence? These managers are mostly highly educated, successful for many years, very well-paid, and often held in high esteem by their respective businesses. So what exactly is the problem? A Problem Within A Bigger Problem That question in fact is a key to understanding the issue: the obsolescence of managers has less to do with the personal characteristics of individuals acting as managers and more to do with the obsolete state of the organizations they work for. One useful insight in dealing with complex multi-dimensional problems is to take note of the insight--sometimes wrongly attributed to Albert Einstein--is to rethink fundamentals. 'If you have an hour to solve a problem, spend the first 55 minutes defining the problem and the last five minutes solving it." The Interconnections Of The Issues Dealing with any one aspect of the obsolescence of managers is likely to obscure the scale and interconnections with many other issues. All of the issues by themselves are well-known and have been discussed one-by-one many times in articles and journals. What is less common, indeed almost unprecedented, is to review all the many ways in which businesses and their managers are becoming obsolete. When we review the whole array of issues together, we can a better sense of the multi-dimensional nature of the problem. In this way, we can better understand why any individual issue is so hard to resolve. The Interconnected Causes Of Managerial Obsolescence To summarize, the principal interconnected reasons why firms and their managers are becoming obsolete are: Good News: Many Firms Have Now Evolved While resolving all these issues amounts to a new kind of organization and vast societal change, the good news is that we now have many examples of change actually having happened As shown below, many public firms are well along the way, although they are still only ~20% of all public firms. (None of the firms is perfect: all exhibit some aspects of traditional management.) Value-creating enterprises emerged from the combination of two elements: first, entrepreneurs began using digital technology and AI to deliver exponentially more value than traditionally-managed firms; and second, digital technology gave customers the power to demand more value from businesses. The killer insight: value-creating enterprises not only satisfy customers: they make much more money than firms focused on making money. Workplaces devoted to creating value for customers are also likely to be more congenial as workplaces than those focused on extracting value from customers and boosting executive bonuses. And read also: Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete—By Solving The Wrong Problem Why Millions Of Managers Are Becoming Obsolete—It's Not Rocket Science—Or AI
