Sheku Bayoh inquiry chairman will not recuse himself
After considering the matter, Lord Bracadale has refused the application for his recusal.
Read More:
In a decision published on Wednesday, he said: 'Having reviewed the facts, the fair-minded and informed observer would conclude that there was no real possibility that I was biased.'
He said such an observer would note that 'although the meetings with the families of Sheku Bayoh were private, they were not kept secret'.
The application for recusal of the chairman and assessors was lodged on behalf of the Scottish Police Federation, Pc Craig Walker and Nicole Short.
A spokeswoman for the inquiry said: 'The inquiry held a procedure and conduct hearing on June 12.
'After careful consideration of written and oral submissions from core participants, Lord Bracadale has decided not to recuse himself or terminate the appointments of the assessors.
'Having regard to the relevant legal test, he has determined there is no apparent bias.
'Taking into account various considerations in respect of the handling of the inquiry, he has determined having meetings with the families was not unfair.
'There is much important work for the inquiry still to do, not least proceeding with closing submissions and moving towards the writing of the final report. The team is working at pace and will announce next steps in due course.'
The inquiry has been examining the circumstances of Mr Bayoh's death, and whether race was a factor.
In a statement issued on behalf of the Bayoh family, lawyer Aamer Anwar said: 'Lord Bracadale, following an application by the Scottish Police Federation, PCs Craig Walker and Nicole Short to recuse himself and to terminate the appointments of the assessors Raju Bhatt and Michael Fuller, has refused to do so – he has delivered a humiliating and devastating indictment not just on the Federation but also the Solicitor General and Police Scotland.
'Despite their desperate claims, the chair Lord Bracadale has done nothing wrong, he is a judge with over 50 years' legal experience, respected for his impartiality and integrity.
'It comes as no surprise that both the Police Federation and Solicitor General failed to grasp that this inquiry's duty under the Human Rights Act is to conduct a thorough investigation into the death of Sheku Bayoh, having at the inquiry's heart the Bayoh family.
'There is nothing wrong with the chair treating a bereaved family with compassion and respect.'
Scotland's Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'I note the detailed and extensive consideration that has informed Lord Bracadale's decision and hope all parties involved can progress the important work of the inquiry as soon as possible.
'The Scottish Government remains committed to establishing the facts surrounding the circumstances leading to Mr Bayoh's death.
'However, as it is vital all public inquiries operate independently of government, it would be inappropriate of me to comment any further.'
A spokesperson for the Scottish Police Federation said: 'Any fair-minded observer would be concerned when it is revealed that there have been five meetings with a core participant family, without the knowledge of the other core participants.
'The inquiry's legal team asserted that no evidence was discussed at these meetings, it subsequently transpired that was not the case.
'Lord Bracadale has never asked for a meeting with former Pc Nicole Short, who was assaulted in May 2015 in the line of duty and who has been unable to return to work as a result of her injuries.
'Police officers will continue to call for a fair and transparent hearing, based on the evidence alone.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
Highland community councillors are angry, united and very vocal
There was some uncomfortable shifting in seats from a few, and some got short shrift as they blamed everything but themselves and failed to take accountability or read the room. The reaction from the audience was angry, united and very vocal. READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Highlanders have the right to be angry over explosion of wind farms Most of the blame lies with Holyrood. The climate is changing, but using a woolly connection to net zero (whatever that means for us) is no reason for further energy exploitation. Communities were there to call for a halt to the rubber-stamping of the industrialisation of the Highlands by multinationals for energy export. They were there because they are being sidelined, landscapes commodified, and voices drowned out by corporate ambition dressed up as green progress. They are being steamrollered by rampant speculative development, and silenced by political complicity in corporate colonisation. The environment, wildlife, our wellbeing and health are being sacrificed for a green agenda that has no overarching plan and no independent cost/benefit analysis. Our health is being scoped out of planning applications, with Scottish Government and local authority approval, and the cost to all – environmentally, economically and emotionally – is immeasurable. Our tourism industry is under threat: visitors come for the views, not the volts. READ MORE: MPs and MSPs commit to debates on Highland energy projects pause The community so-called benefit that a few politicians thought should be wrung out of the developers won't touch what has been lost and destroyed, and was forcefully rejected. As for community ownership, it should have been a number one priority more than a decade ago. Do communities want yet more energy developments? Ask them. Ballot them. Do not presume to speak on their behalf based on cherry-picked national polling that fails to reflect their reality. Attempting to silence people, mentally and financially burdening them and allowing huge swathes of their natural environment to be plundered by wealthy multinationals is not democracy – especially when the enabling ministers don't even bother showing up to face the music but happily, and regularly, meet the very multinationals responsible for so much misery. What is happening in our glens and villages smacks of dictatorship. READ MORE: Scottish spot named one of Europe's best for stargazing The scale of the Big Energy construction that we are witnessing today was in no manifesto I read. We have been deliberately kept in the dark as to the true intentions of what was in store for us. That is not just or fair. It is certainly not honest, and we doubt it is even legal. For some it's a life sentence for a crime they didn't commit. We demand a halt. A moratorium against further Big Energy development just like the Scottish Government has in place for nuclear and fracking. They do have the powers. We need an independent cost/benefit analysis. We need a sensible plan – not reckless over-production of energy without guaranteed customers that will increase constraint payments and raise bills. What a ludicrous business model that has turned out to be for the Scottish people. And we need a national inquiry. We need all of that and we need it now before there is nothing left to save. This is not obstruction – this is survival. Lyndsey Ward, Beauly Communities B4 Power Companies EXCELLENT article from Lesley Riddoch (Highlander revolt is not a case of climate change denying and Nimbyism – it's anger, Aug 14). It is appalling that Highland communities are being left – each one on its own – to raise awareness, organise, and fight the destruction of their local environment. If the Scottish Government wants that, it is inexplicable and shameful. If it doesn't, but can't do anything, it should say so, fight back, and give the electorate another good reason to vote for independence. John Galloway via AN excellent letter from Ron Lumiere (Aug 14), which should be compulsory reading for politicians of all parties and those making public statements promoting either side of a 'complex policy question' as a 'binary contest', especially in matters related to 'culture wars'. Life presents few simple choices and the polarising doctrine of the far-right is more likely to spread misunderstandings, diminish mutual respect and 'fuel conflict' than bring enlightened harmony. Politicians in particular should be wary of arrogantly adopting entrenched positions, no matter the heights of their self-perceived personal intellects or otherwise. Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian
The Herald Scotland
10 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
EIS says 'time running out' to avert school strikes
A survey by the union found that 44% of teachers work an additional seven unpaid hours in a typical week, while more than 10% do an extra 15 hours or more. In its 2021 manifesto the SNP pledged to reduce workload by 1.5 hours per week. Read More: A ballot for industrial action, up to and including strikes, closes on August 28 and the union is urging members to vote yes. EIS General Secretary Andrea Bradley said: 'With the new term having started in most schools across Scotland, we are now in the fifth school year since the promise was made to address severe teacher workload by reducing teachers' class contact time. "Since the pledge was made, the progress towards delivery of this commitment by the Scottish Government and COSLA has been slower than glacial. "Whilst the Scottish Government has made funds available to local authorities on the joint agreement that there would be collaboration towards implementing the 21 hours commitment, no progress been made on delivery. Eight months since that agreement, we are still awaiting proposals to be put on the table as to precisely how and when this promise to teachers, pupils and the Scottish electorate will be kept. "Our current consultative ballot for industrial action is a direct result of the inaction of the Scottish Government and COSLA on this vital issue. As the years have passed since the pledge was made, workload levels in our schools have continued to soar, and the frustration felt by teachers has continued to escalate. "The latest research carried out by the EIS confirmed that Scotland's teachers are working, on average, an extra 11 hours per week, over and above their contractual commitments, in order to attempt to keep on top of workload demands. "This simply isn't sustainable, and is having a severe and detrimental impact on teachers' physical and mental wellbeing, with potentially long-term consequences for their health. 'The Scottish Government and COSLA have run out of time, after years of stalling and obfuscation. They must now produce their plan for delivery of this commitment, then they must move at a rapid pace to actually deliver it. In the meantime, I would urge every EIS member who is eligible to use their vote in our Workload ballot before it closes later this month. A very strong and very clear result in this consultative ballot will send a message that the Scottish Government and COSLA cannot ignore.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government will continue to work with unions and COSLA to agree our approach to delivering a reduction in class contact time, which ultimately requires agreement from the whole Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers. 'This is also why we are providing local authorities with an additional £186.5 million to restore teacher numbers, alongside an additional £29 million to support the recruitment and retention of the ASN workforce. 'This funding has been provided on the clear agreement that meaningful progress is made on reducing teacher class contact time.' A COSLA spokesperson said: 'We are aware of the increased pressures across the whole local government workforce and the teaching profession is rightly greatly valued. As we continue to engage with teaching unions on the issue of workload, we have committed, along with Scottish Government, to exploring ways of reducing class contact time. 'The provision of high-quality learning experiences for children and young people depends on the education workforce being adequately supported, resourced, skilled and confident to respond to the learners in front of them. COSLA works closely with trade unions, Scottish Government, and partners, to enable the delivery of this. 'Reducing teachers' class contact time by 1.5 hours a week – equal to almost two weeks per year – will require additional resource, significant advance planning and actions to tackle existing problems such as recruitment and retention in rural areas and shortages of teachers of certain subject areas. "There has to be a recognition that achieving the reduction in class contact time by maintaining teacher numbers as pupil numbers gradually decline is a challenge and will take time. 'In addition, councils will have to consider how to maintain other statutory services as the proportion of the salary bill required for teachers increases.'
The National
11 hours ago
- The National
English students could face automatic annual hike to tuition fees
According to the i Paper, ministers are looking at the move amid fears institutions may start to go bankrupt unless extra funding is injected into the higher education sector. If fees were tied to inflation south of the Border, they could rise by more than £250 next year to nearly £9800, and it could pave the way for them to hit or exceed £10,000 a year in 2027. Last November, UK Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson made the call to increase tuition fees in England for the first time since 2017, hiking them from £9250 to £9535 for students starting courses this autumn. The SNP Scottish Government has had a long-standing policy of not making Scottish-domiciled students pay for tuition in Scotland. READ MORE: Scottish Government hits back at Tory MSP over Nicola Sturgeon memoir claims Under the reported new system in England, fees would rise at the start of each academic year in line with the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) inflation forecast (Retail Price Index excluding mortgage interest, or RPIX). Based on the OBR's current forecast, this would result in fees rising by 2.7% next year, from £9535 to £9792. Currently, ministers need to get both Houses of Parliament to approve secondary legislation to raise fees. Making the uplift automatic would provide universities with greater certainty about their long-term funding but it would require the Government to pass legislation which could expose ministers to yet another threat of rebellion. Asked directly about the subject on the BBC's Today programme on Thursday, Philipson did not say whether she would allow inflation-linked fees. She said: 'We did give universities an increase through the tuition fee increase that we delivered last year, but we'll be looking at all of these areas around the long-term financial sustainability of universities as part of that post-16 white paper that we'll set out later on this year.' It has also been reported the tuition fee increase could be accompanied by enhanced maintenance support to put more money in poorer students' pockets. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon defends Kate Forbes over Fringe venue ban Vivienne Stern, the chief executive of Universities UK, said: 'Tuition fees are now worth only two-thirds of what they were in 2012 because for years universities weren't allowed to increase them to keep pace with inflation. 'Universities are tackling this challenge head-on, finding back-office savings and increasingly working together to become more efficient. However, the country needs universities firing on all cylinders if it is to get the economic growth everybody wants. That means they need to be funded sustainably with tuition fees linked to inflation year-on-year and their ground-breaking research properly funded.' Nick Hillman, the director of the Higher Education Policy Institute think-tank, said that permanent indexation of fees was 'increasingly the assumption that university planners are operating under'.
