logo
Trump revokes security clearance of 37 former and current officials

Trump revokes security clearance of 37 former and current officials

Straits Times19 hours ago
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Among those whose security clearance has been stripped is a senior Central Intelligence Agency analyst currently serving undercover.
WASHINGTON – American President Donald Trump revoked the security clearance of 37 current and former national security officials, many of whom worked on Russia analysis or foreign threats to US elections, according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
Mr Trump has stripped security clearances throughout his administration, including from his best-known rivals like former president Joe Biden. But the actions announced on Aug 19 were a deeper cut, pushing far into the national security establishment.
At least three current senior officials at various intelligence agencies, all with reputations for non-partisan work, are among those who lost their clearance and their jobs.
They included Ms Shelby Pierson, a senior intelligence official who warned Congress about Russian meddling in the 2020 election; a senior Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) analyst currently serving undercover; and Mr Vinh X. Nguyen, a senior National Security Agency (NSA) data scientist.
Rescinding security clearance appears to be part of a campaign by Ms Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, to reveal what she sees as flaws in intelligence assessments about Russian malign influence operations during the 2016 election.
Ms Gabbard's attention to that issue has won praise from Mr Trump, who has long claimed without evidence that the Obama administration tried to undermine him in that vote.
Critics also say that Mr Trump has turned the focus onto the 2016 election to distract from questions about disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.
'Gabbard's move to yank clearances from a seemingly random list of national security officials is a reckless abuse of the security clearance process and nothing more than another sad attempt to distract from the administration's failure to release the Epstein files,' said Democratic Senator Mark Warner, who is vice-chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Mr Warner said he had introduced legislation to create standards for security clearances and prevent political abuse of the system.
Current and former officials said they were particularly distraught by the removal of Mr Nguyen, a gifted mathematician, from the NSA.
Mr Nguyen was mentioned in an article in Real Clear Investigations that noted his work for the director of national intelligence at the time of the 2016 election assessments. The article was highlighted on social media by Mr Sebastian Gorka, a Trump administration national security official.
Mr Nguyen is an expert on quantum computing, data science and cyber issues. He has been working on artificial intelligence projects for the agency. Former officials said the loss of his expertise could set back the US government's development of key technologies.
Ms Gabbard is not the only administration official releasing documents or investigating the 2016 intelligence assessments.
After she released a report and accused the Obama administration of a 'treasonous conspiracy', Attorney-General Pam Bondi announced a task force to look into potential wrongdoing. Mr John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, declassified a tradecraft review related to the 2016 inquiries and made a referral to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) seeking an investigation of Mr John Brennan, the former CIA head.
On Aug 19 , Ms Gabbard released a memo on social media about her actions, which she said were taken at the direction of Mr Trump.
'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right,' Ms Gabbard wrote. 'Those in the intelligence community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold.'
Ms Gabbard's office claimed that the people who would lose their security clearances were involved in the 'politicisation or weaponisation of intelligence' to advance partisan agendas, or had failed to adhere to tradecraft practices or to safeguard classified information.
The memo provided no evidence that the individuals had mishandled material or used it for partisan purposes.
While stripping the security clearances of current officials effectively removes them from their jobs, it is not clear how many of the 37 individuals were currently employed by intelligence agencies or held government contracts. It is also not clear how many of the former officials maintained a current clearance.
Most former officials who are not working for government contractors do not need clearances, though some do informal or formal consulting for intelligence officials. Holding a clearance makes such advising easier.
Many of the officials have only tangential ties or no ties to the original analysis of Russian malign influence operations. Some have been mentioned in reporting about the 2016 election assessments or have commented on the intelligence work publicly.
Mr Edward Gistaro and Ms Beth Sanner, both of whom briefed Mr Trump during his first term, were also on the list. Both were mentioned in a recent book on the CIA written by Mr Tim Weiner.
Many of the individuals have commented publicly on national security matters. Some, though not all, had been critical of the Trump administration.
After serving as an election threat official, Ms Pierson returned to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency to take a senior position. She has been leading the agency's analysis team, according to former officials.
During the first Trump administration, Mr Richard Grenell, who was the acting director of national intelligence agency, opted to keep Ms Pierson in her post.
Members of the Biden administration's national security staff will also lose their clearance, including Mr Maher Bitar, who was a senior director for intelligence, and Ms Emily Horne, a former spokesperson.
The order stripping Mr Bitar of his clearance presents a potential separation-of-powers issue. He is now a senior national security aide to Democratic Senator Adam Schiff.
Mr Mark Zaid, a lawyer who frequently represents intelligence officials and whose own security clearance was stripped by the Trump administration, said that stripping security clearances in the name of ending politicisation was hypocritical.
'These are unlawful and unconstitutional decisions that deviate from well-settled, decades-old laws and policies that sought to protect against just this type of action,' Mr Zaid said.
Referring to the intelligence community, he continued: 'It has become clear that the current IC leadership itself constitutes a grave danger to national security.'
Ms Gabbard has been removing security clearances of former officials in keeping with an executive order from Mr Trump and as part of her efforts to counter the 'politicisation or weaponisation of intelligence'.
CIA and NSA officials declined to comment, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency did not return a request for comment. NYTIMES
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jeffrey Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, judge rules
Jeffrey Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, judge rules

Straits Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Jeffrey Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, judge rules

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: Judge Richard Berman is seen in this file photo, during a hearing, in a courtroom sketch at Federal Court in New York, U.S., August 27, 2019. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg/File Photo NEW YORK - A U.S. judge denied on Wednesday the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein on sex trafficking charges, saying the material paled in comparison to the trove of records the government has about the case but is not releasing. Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Richard Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump has sought to quell discontent from his conservative base of supporters over his administration's decision not to release files of the case. The judge wrote that it would be more logical for the government to directly release the vast amount of information it has collected from its investigation into Epstein than to petition the court to release the more limited grand jury materials, whose secrecy is protected by law. "The Government's 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials," Berman wrote. "The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct." The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump, a Republican, had campaigned for a second term in 2024 with promises to make public Epstein-related files, and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 18 persons nabbed and 82 vapes seized in HSA ops in Raffles Place and Haji Lane Singapore 3 Sengkang Green Primary pupils suspended for bullying classmate, with 1 of them caned: MOE Singapore Woman trapped between train doors: Judge rules SBS Transit '100% responsible' Singapore Religion growing in importance for Singaporeans: IPS study Life Record number of arts patrons in 2024, but overall donation dips to $45.74m Life 'Loss that's irreplaceable': Local film-makers mourn closure of Singapore indie cinema The Projector Singapore Nearly 2 years' jail, caning for man caught with at least 100 sexually explicit videos of children Singapore Grab users in Singapore shocked by fares of over $1,000 due to display glitch In July, Trump instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Justice Department said in a court filing in July. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. The New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging. On Aug. 11, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied a similar request by the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein to abuse. Engelmayer wrote that the public would not learn anything new from the release of materials from Maxwell's grand jury because much of the evidence was made public at her monthlong trial four years ago. The grand jury testimony contained no evidence of others besides Epstein and Maxwell who had sexual contact with minors, Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review her case. In July, a Florida judge rejected the administration's request to unseal grand jury records from federal investigations there into Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Epstein served a 13-month sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a state-level prostitution charge as part of a deal now widely regarded as too lenient. REUTERS

Brazil judge targeted by US sanctions confident of Trump reversal
Brazil judge targeted by US sanctions confident of Trump reversal

Straits Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Brazil judge targeted by US sanctions confident of Trump reversal

BRASILIA - The judge at the center of escalating tensions between Brazil and the United States told Reuters he is counting on a change of heart from President Donald Trump to unwind sanctions against him, which he said lack consensus within the U.S. government. Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has ratcheted up restraining orders against former President Jair Bolsonaro during his trial for an alleged 2022 coup plot. Trump demanded an end to the case that he calls a "witch hunt" as he slapped a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods and hit Moraes with financial sanctions that are putting Brazil's banks on edge. Despite fears of a spiraling crisis for bilateral relations, the judge expressed confidence in a late Tuesday interview at his Brasilia office that sanctions would be unwound against him via diplomatic channels or an eventual challenge in U.S. courts. "A judicial challenge is possible and I have not yet found a U.S. or Brazilian lawyer or scholar who doubts the courts would overturn. But at this moment, I've chosen to wait. That's my choice. It's a diplomatic matter for the country," said Moraes. The standoff with Trump is the highest-profile test yet for the 56-year-old jurist, whose bald visage and muscular frame have come to define the Brazilian high court he joined eight years ago. He has taken the lead on many of the court's most prominent cases, cowing Elon Musk in a showdown over his social media platform, sending hundreds of right-wing rioters in the capital to prison and barring Bolsonaro from running for office. Navigating the U.S. crackdown on his personal finances and bilateral trade with Brazil has done little to change his routine, he said, which includes boxing, martial arts and a new favorite book: Henry Kissinger's "Leadership," the late U.S. diplomat's final volume on 20th century statecraft. Moraes said he trusts diplomacy will restore his standing in Washington. He said prosecutors blamed the current fallout on a campaign by allies of Bolsonaro, including the former president's lawmaker son Eduardo, who is in the U.S. and under investigation in Brazil for courting Trump's intervention in his father's case. "Once the correct information has been passed along, as is being done now, and the documented information reaches the U.S. authorities, I believe it won't even require any legal action to reverse (the sanctions). I believe that the U.S. executive branch itself, the president, will reverse them," Moraes said. Pressed on the reason for that confidence, Moraes said he was aware of internal divisions in the U.S. government that had slowed the sanctions and could still undermine them. "There was reluctance in the State Department and great reluctance in the Treasury Department," he said, without elaborating or explaining how he received that information. A State Department official with knowledge of the matter told Reuters separately that the sanctions against Moraes had faced substantial pushback from career officials. The actions against Moraes were "completely, legally inappropriate," said the source on condition of anonymity, adding that officials from the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control had initially said no but were overruled. A Treasury spokesperson said: "The Treasury Department and Office of Foreign Assets Control, along with the entire Trump administration, is in lockstep that Alexandre de Moraes has engaged in serious human rights abuse. Rather than concocting a fantasy fiction, de Moraes should stop carrying out arbitrary detentions and politicized prosecutions." The U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Brazilian courts could punish Brazilian financial institutions for seizing or blocking domestic assets in response to U.S. orders, Moraes also said in the interview. REUTERS

India test-fires ballistic missile ahead of US tariff hike
India test-fires ballistic missile ahead of US tariff hike

Straits Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

India test-fires ballistic missile ahead of US tariff hike

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Images posted online that are said to show India's nuclear-capable Agni-5 missile being tested on Aug 20. NEW DELHI - India on Aug 20 test-fired an intermediate-range ballistic missile capable of carrying multiple nuclear warheads, a government statement said, in an apparent show of strength ahead of a threatened US tariff increase. The Agni-5 missile was successfully launched in India's eastern Odisha state, with authorities saying it 'validated all operational and technical parameters.' The test-fire came a week before US tariffs are set to double from 25 per cent to 50 per cent, unless India meets President Donald Trump's demand that it stop buying Russian oil. India last tested the Agni-5 missile in March 2024. Prime Minister Narendra Modi said this month that, in the face of US tariffs, India was seeking self-reliance with energy independence and the development of its own defence systems. New Delhi has deepened defence cooperation with Western countries in recent years, including in the Quad alliance with the United States, Japan and Australia as an apparent counter to rival China. But India's relations with China have warmed recently with several bilateral visits, and Mr Modi is scheduled to visit Tianjin later this month in his first visit to the country since 2018. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore 18 persons nabbed and 82 vapes seized in HSA ops in Raffles Place and Haji Lane Singapore 3 Sengkang Green Primary pupils suspended for bullying classmate, with 1 of them caned: MOE Singapore Woman trapped between train doors: Judge rules SBS Transit '100% responsible' Singapore Religion growing in importance for Singaporeans: IPS study Life Record number of arts patrons in 2024, but overall donation dips to $45.74m Life 'Loss that's irreplaceable': Local film-makers mourn closure of Singapore indie cinema The Projector Singapore Nearly 2 years' jail, caning for man caught with at least 100 sexually explicit videos of children Singapore Grab users in Singapore shocked by fares of over $1,000 due to display glitch Agni, meaning 'fire' in Sanskrit, is the name given to a series of rockets India developed as part of a guided missile development project launched in 1983. The Agni-5 employs technology that enables it to carry several nuclear warheads, so they can split up and hit different targets. AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store