
In India's TV War Rooms, the ‘Generals' Were Loud, Facts Optional, and the Enemy Always in Retreat
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
Media
In India's TV War Rooms, the 'Generals' Were Loud, Facts Optional, and the Enemy Always in Retreat
Sanjiv Krishan Sood
35 minutes ago
Now that a ceasefire has been announced, the curtain has come down. Sadly, this means the media may soon return to its usual programming: communal outrage, political vendettas, and panel discussions where decibel levels count more than insight.
Illustration: The Wire.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Donate now
When Operation Sindoor began, India's television newsrooms went into overdrive. The usual suspects – political party spokespersons and loudmouth analysts – quietly stepped aside, making space for a fresh crop of self-styled defence experts, security analysts, and retired military personnel, suddenly back in demand.
This new cast did little to elevate the discourse. If anything, they took the absurdity to greater heights. Many had emerged from the obscurity of long retirements (your humble narrator included), summoned into studio lights and seated before frothing anchors chasing ratings.
Out came the long-unused three-piece suits, and with them, a sober tone – quickly abandoned as panelists launched into theatrical calls to 'annihilate Pakistan' and 'take back PoK.' Some confidently claimed that enemy generals were shivering in bunkers, while others cited unnamed sources to report that Pakistani leaders had chartered planes to send their families to the West.
One retired Major distinguished himself with rapid-fire verbal salvos at his Pakistani counterpart – missiles of rhetoric that would put BrahMos to shame. A moustachioed General, not to be outdone, turned his ire inward, lambasting India's political leadership for agreeing to a ceasefire. With a full-throated roar, he demanded that Pakistan be wiped off 'the face of the Atlas' – a cartographic flourish that surely left Mercator himself spinning in his grave.
Awards may not be in the offing, but these two certainly earned the unofficial title of TRP Commanders-in-Chief.
Meanwhile, news channels diligently kept the public 'informed.' One ran a breaking update announcing that the Prime Minister had arrived at his office – perhaps under the impression that citizens needed to be reassured that he does, in fact, have one. Others breathlessly reported that the Chiefs of Defence Staff were seen in combat uniforms, their attire now imbued with geopolitical symbolism.
When I mildly suggested to an anchor that we might be over-reading sartorial choices, my microphone was promptly muted.
A Hindi channel took things up a notch. Its star anchor – who has made a career out of camouflage cosplay – set up a war game scenario live on air. In a curious imitation of exercises at military academies, newly anointed security experts jostled to make their strategic points, mimicking the enthusiasm of young Captains attending their first Junior Command Course. That modern warfare has evolved well beyond the Cold War-era doctrines they once practised did not seem to bother anyone. The aim wasn't analysis – it was performance.
Fortunately, I was spared from participating. Another channel summoned me at the same time, eager for my 'expertise.' The anchor-general later published an 'appreciation' of the conflict, carefully constructing each scenario to end in Indian victory. Ironically, none of them foresaw the kind of operation that India actually carried out on the night of May 6 and 7, striking militant camps across the border.
What was missing, across channels, was verification. Reports about decimated Pakistani battalions, captured cities, and destroyed ports all relied on 'unnamed sources.' One channel confidently declared Indian troops were deep inside Pakistani territory – but couldn't say where from.
'Secrecy' was preserved in unintentionally comic fashion. Reporters were asked to go live 'from the ground,' but instructed not to disclose their location. 'Nilesh,' an anchor would begin, 'who is reporting from somewhere near Barmer, please tell us what you're seeing – without revealing where you are.' The sound of air raid sirens – played every few minutes for dramatic effect – added to the chaos. Eventually, the government had to step in and ask them to stop.
Perhaps the only thing the media was truly fair about was panic. They spread it equally on both sides of the border. Pakistani viewers were informed of impending annihilation; Indian viewers were told that multiple cities had come under air attack, and that the Nagrota Army base had suffered a fidayeen strike.
The entertainment value was undeniable. After years of avoiding television, I found myself tuning in – not for information, but for a good laugh. The coverage of Operation Sindoor could well qualify as 2025's most successful comedy series.
Now that a ceasefire has been announced, the curtain has come down. Sadly, this means the media may soon return to its usual programming: communal outrage, political vendettas, and panel discussions where decibel levels count more than insight.
Until then, those of us who survived the TV war games will quietly fold away our suits and wait for the next invasion – on screen.
Sanjiv Krishan Sood was additional director general of the BSF.
This piece was first published on The India Cable – a premium newsletter from The Wire & Galileo Ideas – and has been updated and republished here. To subscribe to The India Cable, click here.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
Live: India, Pakistan Continuing Confidence-Building Measures to Reduce Level of Alertness
Petition Urging Indians, Pakistanis to Reject Division and Hate Gets Over 5,500 Signatures
Habits of Thought in the Time of Terrorism and War
J&K: For Residents Who Live Near the LoC, Life Is Now a Living Nightmare
The Path Forward For India and Pakistan Should Be Shaped By Peace, Not By Excitement Over War Games
The Wire Wrap | 'Mediator' Trump in India-Pakistan Ceasefire and More
High-Stakes Nuclear Poker: How Pakistan's Deterrent Still Checks India—Even After Operation Sindoor
BSF Jawan Who Was Captured by Pakistan in April Released, Handed Over to Indian Authorities
Army Commanders Have 'Full Authority' to Counter Future Ceasefire Violations: Military
View in Desktop Mode
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Will eventually come back to haunt you': Jaishankar gives blunt warning after Pahalgam attack; asks 'why Laden felt safe in Pakistan?'
External affairs minister S Jaishankar External affairs minister S Jaishankar , who is currently in Brussels to meet the European Union (EU) leaders, had pushed back against the international media's narrative that the India's action " Operation Sindoor " against Pakistan following the terror in Kashmir was a tit-for-tat between two nuclear-armed neighbours and questioned the presence of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. In an exclusive interview with European news website Euractiv, Jaishankar recalled the October 1947 incident when "Pakistan sent invaders" and claimed that the Western countries were very supportive of this. When asked about the international media's narrative over Operation Sindoor, Jaishankar said, "Let me remind you of something – there was a man named Osama bin Laden. Why did he, of all people, feel safe living for years in a Pakistani military town, right next to their equivalent of West Point?" "I want the world to understand – this isn't merely an India–Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism. And that very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you," he added. On Russia-Ukraine Jaishankar also addressed why India has not taken any side in Russia Ukraine war . He said India don't believe that differences can be resolved through war or from the battlefield. He further added that it's not for India to prescribe what that solution should be. When asked that India's being judgemental enough by refusing to take a side when Russia is clearly the aggressor, Jaishankar said, "We have a strong relationship with Ukraine as well – it's not only about Russia. But every country, naturally, considers its own experience, history and interests. India has the longest-standing grievance – our borders were violated just months after independence, when Pakistan sent in invaders to Kashmir. And the countries that were most supportive of that? Western countries." "If those same countries – who were evasive or reticent then – now say 'let's have a great conversation about international principles', I think I'm justified in asking them to reflect on their own past," he added. On new geopolitical order Jaishankar said that the multipolarity is already here. Europe now faces the need to make more decisions in its own interest – using its own capabilities, and based on the relationships it fosters globally. 'I hear terms like 'strategic autonomy' being used in Europe – these were once part of our vocabulary," Jaishankar said in an interview. On Trump and India ties Jaishakar said, "I take the world as I find it. Our aim is to advance every relationship that serves our interests – and the US relationship is of immense importance to us. It's not about personality X or president Y.' On India's relationship with China mJaishankar said that any companies are becoming increasingly careful about where they locate their data – they'd rather place it somewhere secure and trustworthy than simply go for efficiency.


Economic Times
24 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Pakistan eyeing German missile shield used in Ukraine after BrahMos proves too fast for Chinese systems: Report
Pakistan is considering acquiring the German IRIS-T SLM air defense system to counter supersonic cruise missiles like India's BrahMos, which have proven effective against its existing Chinese systems. Despite facing economic challenges and securing international loans, Pakistan has increased its defense budget, raising concerns from India about the allocation of funds. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads IRIS-T SLM shows effectiveness against supersonic cruise missiles Feature IRIS-T S-400 BrahMos Type Defensive Defensive Offensive Origin Germany Russia India- Russia Role Point area & Defence Long-range air defence High-speed precision strike Max. Range ~40 km ~400 km ~400 km (latest variants) Speed of Target Handling Supersonic missiles Hypersonic threats Supersonic (Mach 3) In service with Germany, Ukraine Russia, India, China India (Army, Navy, Air Force) Designed to defeat Cruise missiles, drones Missiles, aircraft Ground/naval targets Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Pakistan's defence upgrade comes amid financial troubles India objects to international loans given to Pakistan German defence ties span both sides of the subcontinent Reliance enters into a partnership with the German firm Pakistan is reportedly exploring the option of acquiring an advanced air defence system from a German company to counter supersonic cruise missiles , such as India's BrahMos , which have proven highly effective against Pakistan's existing Chinese-made HQ-16 and HQ-9 systems. According to media reports, the system has already been inducted into the Ukrainian armed forces. Last month, Ukraine claimed that the advanced air defence system successfully shot down over 60 targets since its initial deployment last IRIS-T SLM system, developed by Diehl Defence , has reportedly been very successful in Ukraine, particularly against Russian P-800 Oniks missiles that are similar in performance to the BrahMos. The system was originally meant for Egypt, which had signed a deal for ten batteries, but some of the units were redirected to Ukraine during the ongoing in 1990, the IRIS-T SLM has undergone multiple upgrades. It includes a radar, an operations centre, and multiple launchers—each mounted on a compact 20-foot frame. This modular design allows for easier deployment. The cost of one complete unit is estimated at around $200 interest in the system comes at a time when its existing air defence systems have failed to counter threats like the Indo-Russian BrahMos missile . The country is facing severe economic challenges and has repeatedly sought help from global financial institutions. In the last month alone, Pakistan secured an $800 million loan from the Asian Development Bank and a $1 billion loan from the International Monetary its fiscal crisis, the Pakistani government cancelled development projects worth 1,000 billion Pakistani rupees but raised the defence budget by 18%, according to a report by India has raised objections against Pakistan receiving billions in loans from multi-lateral agencies like ADB and IMF. It has claimed, 'the loan amount would be used for terror financing rather than their intended use for development.'While Pakistan is exploring a deal for IRIS-T SLM from Germany, Diehl Defence is also a partner of Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems that is working on an Indian defence project. The two companies are working together to supply an Interactive Defence and Attack System (IDAS) for six submarines being developed under India's Rs 70,000 crore Project 75I for the Indian Defence, subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure announced on Wednesday that the company has entered in a partnership which could generate around Rs. 10,000 crores in revenue. The deal is to manufacture Vulcano 155mm artillery shell that is used for long range precision strikes. It would help give the Indian Army a boost in the conducting precision strikes. The company will manufacture atleast 50% of the system in India.


Deccan Herald
26 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Who is Muhammad Shahzeb Khan? Pak man extradited to US from Canada for planning mass shooting of Jews on Oct 7
Major news… earlier this afternoon, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, a Pakistani citizen residing in Canada, was extradited to the United States on charges of attempting to provide material support to ISIS and attempting to commit acts of terrorism. In the fall of last year, Khan… — FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) June 10, 2025 Met members of the various delegations who represented India in different countries and elaborated on India's commitment to peace and the need to eradicate the menace of terrorism. We are all proud of the manner in which they put forward India's voice. — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) June 10, 2025