
Netflix's new Osama bin Laden series: Why the US didn't inform Pakistan govt about its mission in Abbottabad
A new Netflix documentary series titled American Manhunt: Osama bin Laden recalls how the US government captured the 'Most Wanted' terrorist in the world following the 9/11 attacks.
The three-part series covers the decade between the 2001 attacks and bin Laden's killing at the hands of US forces in Abbottabad, Pakistan, in 2011. It features CIA officials and key figures in the administrations of US Presidents George Bush and Barack Obama.
It also briefly touches upon why Obama decided against alerting the Pakistan government about his decision to raid what they suspected to be bin Laden's residence on the night of May 2, 2011.
What was the rationale for the US's decision? And what was Pakistan's level of awareness about bin Laden living less than 150km from the military headquarters in Rawalpindi? Here is what officials and reports have found over the years.
The United States began the mission to find Laden even before the September 11 attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon (headquarters of the US Department of Defence). Around 3,000 Americans died in what was the biggest terror attack on US soil.
Bin Laden, who hailed from Saudi Arabia, was known to US intelligence agencies because of his links to funding mujahideen. As far back as 1996, the CIA's Counter-Terrorist Centre (CTC) set up a special unit dedicated to analysing his actions in the Middle East and Africa.
In the late 1990s, he shifted base to Afghanistan and formed al-Qaeda, intending to wage global jihad. The US government had earlier supported mujahideens in the country to push back against Soviet presence (1979-89). However, bin Laden was of the view that the United States was the real enemy that needed to be targeted for its interference in the Middle East, and its supposed incompatibility with Islamic values.
The manhunt intensified right after 2001, with US officials believing that the Taliban government was sheltering al-Qaeda and bin Laden, and ultimately dislodging it from power. However, bin Laden remained at large. Finally, towards the end of the 2000s, his presence in Pakistan was zeroed in on through several clues, including tracking courier movements and satellite imagery.
This information led US intelligence officers to a three-story white mansion in Abbottabad, which had two families going in and out, but seemed to house a third set of inhabitants. It had high walls and a covered balcony, which stood out in a town known for its scenic views of mountains.
However, US agencies still lacked definitive proof. The decision for the US SEAL Team 6, a specialised force, to reach Abbottabad via Afghanistan and not inform the Pakistan government was thus further complicated.
The Obama war cabinet gave mixed opinions on going in without concrete evidence. Then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lent her support, while Vice President Joe Biden opposed it. Ultimately, Obama decided in favour of it.
John Brennan, who was the chief counterterrorism advisor to Obama at the time of the mission, said in the documentary, 'President Obama was clear that we're not going to inform the Pakistanis, because Pakistani intelligence has worked both sides of the fence for many years, and they had relationships with a lot of the militant and terrorist groups in the areas, including with al-Qaeda.'
In his book A Promised Land (2020), Obama detailed this view. Even during the 2008 presidential campaign, he said during a public debate, 'If I had Osama bin Laden in my sights within Pakistani territory, and the Pakistani government was unwilling or unable to capture or kill him, I would take the shot.'
He criticised the Bush administration for maintaining 'the dual fiction that Pakistan was a reliable partner in the war against terrorism and that we never encroached on Pakistani territory in the pursuit of terrorists.'
A report by Bruce Riedel, a former National Intelligence Officer, is also mentioned in the book. It said that 'Not only did the Pakistan military (and in particular its intelligence arm, ISI) tolerate the presence of Taliban headquarters and leadership in Quetta, near the Pakistani border, but it was also quietly assisting the Taliban as a means of keeping the Afghan government weak and hedging against Kabul's potential alignment with Pakistan's archrival, India.'
However, the US was still dependent on Pakistan for overland routes to supply their Afghanistan operations, and to 'tacitly facilitate our counterterrorism efforts against al-Qaeda camps within its territory.'
Still, Obama was clear that for the bin Laden mission, 'Whatever option we chose could not involve the Pakistanis. Although Pakistan's government cooperated with us on a host of counterterrorism operations… it was an open secret that certain elements inside the country's military, and especially its intelligence services, maintained links to the Taliban and perhaps even al-Qaeda.'
He added, 'The fact that the Abbottabad compound was just a few miles from the Pakistan military's equivalent of West Point (the Pakistan Military Academy) only heightened the possibility that anything we told the Pakistanis could end up tipping off our target. Whatever we chose to do in Abbottabad, then, would involve violating the territory of a putative ally in the most egregious way possible, short of war— raising both the diplomatic stakes and the operational complexities.'
In the immediate aftermath of the mission, the Pakistani government denied having any information about bin Laden's whereabouts. Husain Haqqani, Pakistan's Ambassador to the US in 2011, later claimed that Pakistan would have gained in terms of its credibility on terror-related issues by cooperating on bin Laden, and would have actually helped the US if it knew his location.
Several commentators have questioned the possibility of the Pakistan government being totally unaware. A report in The New York Times claimed in 2014 that over time, US officials would deny any culpability of the Pakistani government to journalists. 'It was as if a decision had been made to contain the damage to the relationship between the two governments,' it said.
One source also told The NYT that the ISI 'ran a special desk assigned to handle Bin Laden. It was operated independently, led by an officer who made his own decisions and did not report to a superior.'
Further, the files collected from bin Laden's house revealed regular correspondence between Bin Laden and leaders such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) founder Hafiz Saeed, whom the Pakistan government is known to have supported in the past.
On its part, Pakistan set up a commission of inquiry after the Abbottabad raid. Its contents were never made public, but Al Jazeera claimed to have unearthed it in 2014. It said, 'The Commission's 336-page report is scathing, holding both the government and the military responsible for 'gross incompetence' leading to 'collective failures' that allowed both Bin Laden to escape detection, and the United States to perpetrate 'an act of war'.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Kashmir Will Now Be...': Khawaja Asif's BIG Declaration On Simla Agreement Amid India-Pak Tensions
/ Jun 05, 2025, 10:08PM IST Pakistan's Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has declared the 1972 Simla Agreement 'a dead document,' stating that Pakistan has returned to the 1948 UN position, calling the LoC a ceasefire line. He claimed the bilateral framework with India has collapsed and hinted at a shift toward international mediation. Asif also questioned the status of the Indus Waters Treaty and issued a nuclear warning, saying Pakistan is on high alert. In an earlier TV interview, he had admitted Pakistan's past role in backing terror groups during the Cold War and post-9/11 era, calling it a mistake that damaged the country and its global reputation.#pakistandiplomacy #khawajaasif #simlaagreement #kashmirconflict #loc #unresolution #nuclearalert #pakistannuclear #terrorism #terrorconfession #yaldaakim #indiapakistan #geopolitics #foreignpolicy #southasia #internationalrelations #defencepolicy #bilateralism #multilateralism #pojk #pok #pakistan #india #indiapakistantensions #news #usa #viral #trending #toi #toibharat
&w=3840&q=100)

India.com
36 minutes ago
- India.com
Shashi Tharoor In US Gives Evidence Of Pakistans Involvement In Pahalgam Terror Attack
Congress MP and the lead of India's All-Party Delegation to the United States, Shashi Tharoor, on Thursday listed three evidence about Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam terror attack of April 22 in which 26 individuals were killed. As he addressed the media's queries in the US, he was questioned if any country had asked the delegation for evidence of Islamabad's involvement in the Pahalgam attack. "I'm very glad you raised this. I didn't plant it, I promise you. Very simply, no one had any doubt, and we were not asked for evidence. But the media have asked in two or three places. Let me say very clearly that India would not have done this without convincing evidence. But there were three particular reasons I want to draw your attention to all of you,' the Congress MP replied. He continued to list three pieces of evidence about Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam terrorist attack: 1- Over Three Decades Of Pattern The first point that Tharoor raised was that there has been a 37-year pattern of repeated terror attacks from Pakistan, accompanied by repeated denials. 'I mean, Americans haven't forgotten that Pakistan did not know, allegedly, where Osama bin Laden was until he was found in a Pakistani safe house right next to an army camp in a cantonment city. That's Pakistan. Mumbai attacks- they denied having anything to do with it… So we know what Pakistan's all about. They will dispatch terrorists, they will deny they did so until they're actually caught with red hands," he added. 2- TRF's Claim The next point the Congress leader highlighted was that The Resistance Front (TRF), a proxy front of the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) had claimed the responsibility for the Pahalgam terror attack and later withdrew it. 'Second point, the moment this happened, within 45 minutes or so of this happening, the terrorist attack, a group called The Resistance Front, claimed credit. Who is The Resistance Front? They're a well-known proxy front of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, a banned organization listed by the United Nations (UN) listed by the US State Department…' he elaborated. 'These people then claimed credit within a time span. There were no media present when these killings took place. Most of the world hadn't even learned about this when they claimed credit. So that was itself a smoking gun. They repeated that claim 24 hours later. And having repeated that claim 24 hours later, then their handlers must have woken up to the gravity of this and told them to take it off their site. So they did. But the fact is, the credit claim was on record, and the world has seen it,' he presented his second point. 3- Funerals After India's Strikes Tharoor presented the next point and said, 'Third, when the first strikes happened on the terrorist camps, funerals were conducted, including for members of some of the key organizations, the Jaish-e-Mohammed in particular, and the Lashkar-e-Taiba.' 'The funerals were conducted, and photographs have emerged on social media showing Pakistani generals and police officers in uniform attending these funerals being conducted by relatives of these terrorists,' he continued. #WATCH | Washington DC: On a question asked by his son about whether any country had asked the delegation for evidence of Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam attack and about Pakistan's repeated denials of any role in the attack, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "I'm very glad… — ANI (@ANI) June 5, 2025 Congress leader Tharoor is leading an All-Party delegation which includes Shambhavi Chaudhary (Lok Janshakti Party), Sarfaraz Ahmed (Jharkhand Mukti Morcha), G M Harish Balayogi (Telugu Desam Party), Shashank Mani Tripathi, Tejaswi Surya, and Bhubaneswar Kalita (all from the BJP), Mallikarjun Devda (Shiv Sena), former Indian Ambassador to the US Taranjit Singh Sandhu, and Shiv Sena MP Milind Deora. The Delegation met the US Vice President JD Vance on Thursday. The seven All-Party Delegations were entrusted to carry forth the strong message of zero tolerance against terrorism. After the terror attack Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Sindoor during the wee hours of May 7, hitting terrorist infrastructure sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK).


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India would not have conducted strikes without convincing evidence, Shashi Tharoor replies to question from his journalist son
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Congress MP Shashi Tharoor , leading a multi-party delegation to the US, was on Thursday asked a question by his journalist son regarding whether government interlocutors sought evidence of Pakistan's culpability in the Pahalgam attack to which he replied India would not have conducted Operation Sindoor without convincing evidence."That shouldn't be allowed. This is my son," Tharoor said laughing, during an interaction at the Council on Foreign Relations when his son Ishaan Tharoor, global affairs columnist with the Washington Post, stood up to ask him a question."Ishaan Tharoor, Washington Post. Definitely asking a question in a personal capacity. Mostly to say hi before you go off to your next engagement," Ishaan said."I'm curious though, on this tour you've been on various countries in the Western Hemisphere. Have any of your government interlocutors asked you to show evidence of Pakistan's culpability in the initial attack? And what do you say to the repeated Pakistani denials of having any hand in the initial attack?" Ishaan asked."I'm very glad you raised this, Ishaan. I didn't plant it. I promise you. This guy does this to his dad," Tharoor replied amid laughter from the audience."Very simply, no one had any doubt, and we were not asked for evidence, but media have asked, and so you are speaking for your tribe, and that in two or three places, media asked this question," the Congress leader said."Let me say very clearly that India would not have done this without convincing evidence," Tharoor said."I can assure you, India is not the kind of country that would undertake a military operation without a very solid basis for doing so. This was not some random terror attack. I must say, our government counts 24 terrorist attacks in the course of last year emanating from Pakistan, but none of them required this kind of response," he said."We dealt with them. We either got the terrorists or killed them, minimal damage, a very little loss of life. We dealt with it. This showed all the hallmarks of a sophisticated, planned, deliberate operation with reconnaissance, with intelligence work, with a modus operandi worked out this cynical exercise of asking people their religion, shooting them between the eyes," he said India has had a 37-year pattern of repeated terror attacks from Pakistan accompanied by repeated denials."Americans haven't forgotten that Pakistan allegedly didn't know where Osama bin Laden was until he was found in a Pakistani safe house right next to an army camp in a cantonment city," he the Mumbai attacks , Tharoor said they denied having anything to do with it, but one of the terrorists was caught alive; his name, his identity, his address in Pakistan, everything was revealed, and he disclosed where he was trained."The US intelligence, as well as ours, recorded the voice of a Pakistani handler giving minute-by-minute instructions to the killers in Mumbai... So, we know what Pakistan is all about," he added."They will dispatch terrorists. They will deny they did so until they're caught with red hands," he said that minutes after the Pahalgam attack happened, a group called the Resistance Front claimed credit. "Who are the Resistance Front? They're a well-known proxy front of the Lashkar-e-Taiba , a banned terrorist organization," he added.