Dems cross aisle
Senate Majority Leader John Thune can only lose one more vote with Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) already opposed. As Senate GOP leaders scramble to strike deals to keep the bill on track, House Republicans are drawing red lines, with fiscal hawks threatening to tank the bill over the Senate's budget framework and moderates balking at the provider-tax crackdown.
Here are the big fights we're watching when amendment votes kick off at 9 a.m., leading to a final vote on passage late Monday or early Tuesday:
Medicaid: GOP Sen. Rick Scott's proposal to curb a key Medicaid funding mechanism after 2030 has Thune's support as part of a deal struck to get the Florida senator and a handful of other holdouts to advance the megabill to debate.
If it fails, it could cost leadership some fiscal hawks, though Sens. Scott and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) refused to go there Sunday night. If it passes, it could alienate so-called Medicaid moderates. One of them, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, filed an amendment that would double the stabilization fund for rural hospitals to $50 billion, and pay for it by adding a 39.6-percent bracket on earners making over $25 million.
Medicaid moderates could also try to further water down the bill's cut to the provider tax. Keep an eye on Tillis, now unburdened by a reelection bid, who slammed the Medicaid cuts in a fiery floor speech Sunday and might jump in again. Another key player to watch is Sen. Lisa Murkowski and whether her support slips after the parliamentarian derailed Medicaid-payment provisions aimed at winning over the Alaskan. The parliamentarian also, as of early this morning, had yet to rule on food-aid waivers for Alaska that could affect Murkowski's vote.
Green credits: Moderates including Tillis and Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah) could offer amendments to soften the bill's deep cuts against wind and solar energy, including its crackdown on IRA credits and a new excise tax. That could provoke a fight with House conservatives and the White House, which have pushed for aggressive rollbacks.
AI: Commerce Chair Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) are pitching a plan to cut the megabill's 10-year moratorium on state enforcement of AI laws in half and make accommodations for internet protections.
The grand finale could be a manager's amendment that House GOP leaders are pushing for to further resolve differences between the chambers and speed the bill to Trump by Friday. The House is scheduled to vote as soon as Wednesday at 9 a.m.
What else we're watching:
— Farm bill fight: Dozens of agriculture groups are urging senators to oppose an amendment from Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) that would limit income thresholds of farmers who can receive federal aid. A host of farm-state GOP senators also oppose Grassley's push, according to three people granted anonymity. Some are concerned that liberal senators could join with conservative fiscal hawks to pass the amendment.
— Solar and wind tax backlash: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Solar Energy Industry Association are slamming a new addition to the megabill that would tax solar and wind projects that have components from foreign sources, including China. 'Taxing energy production is never good policy, whether oil & gas or, in this case, renewables,' Chamber executive vice president and chief policy officer Neil Bradley wrote on X.
— Campaign announcements: Rep. Don Bacon is expected to announce his retirement Monday, according to two people familiar with his plans. The centrist Republican's Nebraska seat is a prime pickup opportunity for Democrats; it's one of only three GOP-held districts Kamala Harris won in 2024. Meanwhile GOP Rep. Dusty Johnson is expected to announce a bid for South Dakota governor on Monday, according to two people familiar with his planning. He'll be the eighth House Republican to run for higher office in 2026.
Jordain Carney, Meredith Lee Hill, Mohar Chatterjee and Josh Siegel contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Calls Lara Trump His 'First Choice' for NC Senate Seat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump said his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, would be his "first choice" to replace North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis as U.S. Senator. Asked who he'd like to see replace Tillis, the president said in part, "Somebody that would really be great is Lara [Trump], she grew up there. But they live in Florida, and they have a very good life, and they're great people." He continued, "That would always be my first choice, but she doesn't live there now, but she's there all the time, and she really knows North Carolina well. And I won it three times." The wife of Eric Trump and host of Fox News' My View with Lara Trump, joined Fox Across America with guest host Emily Compagno on Monday and teased that she is "considering" a run for U.S. Senate. Trump on Tillis's replacement: "Somebody that would really be great is Lara. She grew up there. But they live in Florida. They have a very good life." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 1, 2025 This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Defeat of a 10-year ban on state AI laws is a blow to tech industry
'The Senate came together tonight to say that we can't just run over good state consumer protection laws,' Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., said in a statement. 'States can fight robocalls, deepfakes and provide safe autonomous vehicle laws.' Advertisement There are no federal laws regulating AI but states have enacted dozens of laws that strengthen consumer privacy, ban AI-generated child sexual abuse material and outlaw deepfake videos of political candidates. All but a handful of states have some laws regulating artificial intelligence in place. It is an area of deep interest: All 50 have introduced bills in the past year tied to the issue. The Senate's provision, introduced in the Senate by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, sparked intense criticism by state attorneys general, child safety groups and consumer advocates who warned the amendment would give AI companies a clear runway to develop unproven and potentially dangerous technologies. The proposed ban on state AI laws stemmed from a proposal championed by Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. On May 22, the House's approved version of the bill included the 'Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology Modernization Initiative,' a 10-year moratorium on state AI laws. Advertisement Silicon Valley venture capital powerhouse Andreessen Horowitz and AI startups OpenAI and Anduril, a defense tech company, lobbied fiercely in favor of the amendment. They said it was too difficult for startups to comply with dozens of different state AI laws. The Trump administration also threw its support behind the proposal. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick called the moratorium a critical policy to advance American leadership in AI. 'If we're serious about winning the AI race, we must prioritize investment and innovation,' Lutnick posted on social media Monday. On Sunday, it appeared more likely the AI amendment might go through after Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., reached a compromise with Cruz on a shorter moratorium of five years. But the compromise included language that many legal experts said could neuter existing state laws. Blackburn withdrew her amendment written with Cruz late Monday and introduced a motion to strike his original amendment. 'The Senate did the right thing today for kids, for families and for our future by voting to strip out the dangerous 10-year ban on state AI laws, which had no business being in a budget bill in the first place,' Jim Steyer, CEO of the child safety group, Common Sense Media, said in a statement. This article originally appeared in .
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Roughly 30 percent of 2024 voters used mail ballot: Research
Nearly a third of the ballots cast in the presidential election last fall were submitted by mail, despite long-standing efforts from President Trump and other Republicans to discourage the controversial voting method, new research found. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) released a report this week that found that, while mail-in ballots didn't hit the record levels seen during the height of the pandemic four years earlier (43 percent), the percentage of voters who cast ballots by mail last fall (30.3 percent) remained well above pre-pandemic levels. Most voters in the 2024 general election cast their ballots in person, with 37.4 percent on Election Day and 35.2 percent through in-person early voting opportunities, the report found. However, more than 48 million mail-in votes were cast and counted in the 2024 presidential election, in addition to ballots sent in by members of the military and other overseas voters. 'State policies on the availability of mail voting have evolved rapidly over the past few election cycles,' the EAC's analysts wrote of the findings. Eight states and Washington, D.C., have adopted 'all' or 'mostly' mail elections, where ballots are sent to registered voters and can be returned via secure drop boxes or the U.S. Postal Service, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Additional states allow mail-in elections in some jurisdictions. The growing popularity of voting by mail also comes as Trump has targeted the ballot-casting method as a potential avenue for voter fraud. The president signed an executive order in March that would require all states and territories to count mail-in ballots on or before Election Day, as part of a broader election system overhaul that Trump backed after years of making unfounded claims about widespread voter fraud. 'Free, fair, and honest elections unmarred by fraud, errors, or suspicion are fundamental to maintaining our constitutional Republic,' Trump wrote in the order, which a federal judge blocked last month. 'The right of American citizens to have their votes properly counted and tabulated, without illegal dilution, is vital to determining the rightful winner of an election.' Trump's executive order, rather than ending early voting, sought to rein in delays in finalizing vote tallies in some states, including California, which is the country's most populous state and has an all-mail voting system. California allows mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted up to seven days after polls close. Trump cited other countries that have more restrictions on when ballots can be counted, including those submitted by mail. 'While countries like Denmark and Sweden sensibly limit mail-in voting to those unable to vote in person and do not count late-arriving votes regardless of the date of postmark, many American elections now feature mass voting by mail, with many officials accepting ballots without postmarks or those received well after Election Day,' he wrote. The EAC findings are based on surveys of elections officials in all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.
