logo
CoreCivic inmate sues Trousdale Turner prison staff over alleged extortion

CoreCivic inmate sues Trousdale Turner prison staff over alleged extortion

Yahoo02-06-2025
An inmate at CoreCivic's Trousdale Turner prison in Tennessee is suing prison administrators for allowing gang members to assault him. (Photo: Kansas Reflector)
A Trousdale Turner Correction Center inmate serving time at a privately-run prison in Tennessee is suing the warden and staff for allowing gang members to assault him and extort money from his mother.
Filed in May in U.S. District Court in Nashville, the lawsuit claims gang members at the CoreCivic prison in Trousdale County threatened to assault inmate Charles Anderson if his mother and two family friends didn't send them money, then beat and sexually assaulted him anyway after he complained to prison staff.
Trousdale Turner already faces a federal civil rights investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice for gang violence and murders.
The lawsuit names prison warden Vince Vantell, assistant warden Keith Huggins, investigator Robert Fohrd and a sergeant at the facility, which is run by the Brentwood-based prison operator under contract with the state of Tennessee.
U.S. Department of Justice opens investigation into CoreCivic Trousdale County prison
The filing says almost as soon as Anderson was transferred to Trousdale Turner in October 2023, he became the repeated victim of violence, with gang members stealing his property and threatening and inflicting violence on him. Gang members ordered him to buy back the stolen items in a well-known prison extortion scheme, according to the filing.
Anderson then instructed his elderly mother to pay gang members' affiliates outside the prison through mobile methods or a 'green dot' card or else he would be severely harmed or killed.
Gang members armed with shanks forced him to call his mother and ordered him to tell her to make payments between $40 and $150.
'These calls were placed from (Trousdale Turner Correctional Center) lines and presumably monitored by staff at TTCC,' the filing says.
When the inmate's mother couldn't afford to make the payments, he asked two family friends for 'protection' payments to 'preserve his life.'
The family friends told Fohrd about the extortion and threats, yet the staff member did 'nothing' meaningful to intervene or put Anderson in protective custody, the filing says.
In May 2024, the family friend sent multiple emails to the warden's office about the 'incessant' extortion, and at one point a prison official told the friend they were 'committed' to placing him in protective custody.
Yet in June 2024, Anderson was assaulted again, and in October 2024, he was sexually assaulted by at least four gang members with a broom handle. They claimed he owed them $1,000 for 'debt.' No staff members intervened, the filing says.
The victim received treatment at Nashville General Hospital in October, but when he returned to the prison, gang members attacked him again and poured 'scalding hot water' on his face as he slept.
Despite receiving medical treatment, he wasn't placed in protective custody and was attacked again and threatened if he didn't perform sexual favors for the gang members, which he refused to do, according to the filing.
A corrections officer recommended he be put in protective custody, and staff reviewed the request. After repeated complaints and a request to file a Prison Rape Elimination Act complaint, Anderson met with prison officials when Vantell told him it was 'okay if he was gay.' Anderson replied that he wasn't.
'This interaction was an attempt to cover-up the rape as a consensual act and escape liability for the defendants' acts and omissions,' the filing says.
The defendants denied his requests for protective custody, alleging he 'was not honest about why he needed protective custody' and 'became argumentative with the board' of prison officials.
In December 2024, Fohrd spoke with the inmate's mother and told her to pay the gang members 'one more time' to buy back his property and he would be put into protective custody. The filing says the phone call was made in the presence of Anderson and gang members.
'Because the defendants failed to stop gang violence and extortion directed towards Mr. Anderson and his family, the violence and extortion continues, without reprieve, even to present,' the filing says.
Since last October, the victim has received multiple disciplinary write-ups for refusing his cell assignment, because he believes 'segregation' is the only way to be protected from 'constant gang violence,' according to the filing. Yet he remains in the general population.
Vantell resigned as warden in April after being placed on involuntary administrative leave amid the Department of Justice investigation into inmate physical and sexual violence, as well as understaffing at Trousdale Turner.
The plaintiffs are represented by Moseley & Moseley Attorneys in Murfreesboro and Leanne Thorne in Lexington, Tennessee.
A CoreCivic spokesman said the company doesn't comment on pending litigation but added that 'the safety and well-being of every person in our care is a top priority for our leadership and the staff at our Trousdale Turner Correctional Center.'
CoreCivic 5-22-25
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The US is exploring a stake in Intel. It wouldn't be used 'to drum up business,' Treasury Secretary says.
The US is exploring a stake in Intel. It wouldn't be used 'to drum up business,' Treasury Secretary says.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The US is exploring a stake in Intel. It wouldn't be used 'to drum up business,' Treasury Secretary says.

Top Trump officials confirmed reports that the White House is considering taking a stake in Intel. If it were to happen, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the US wouldn't pressure companies to buy Intel chips. A possible deal would be for the US to exchange $10.9 billion in grants for a stake. A US stake in Intel doesn't mean that President Donald Trump would put his finger on the scale for the beleaguered chipmaker. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Tuesday that while the White House wants to increase US-based production of semiconductors, it would not pressure companies to do business with Intel. "Yeah, the last thing we're going to do is put pressure, is to take a stake and then try to drum up business," Bessent said during an interview on CNBC. Bessent's comments come amid reports that the White House is discussing a deal that would give the US a 10% equity stake in Intel, potentially making US taxpayers Intel's largest shareholder. No announcement has been made, though Trump recently met at the White House with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. Separately on Monday, Intel announced that SoftBank would make a $2 billion investment. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is "ironing out the details," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday afternoon. "It is a creative idea that has never been done before to ensure we're both reshoring these critical supply chains while also gaining something for the American taxpayer," she said. Earlier Tuesday, Lutnick said if the US were to take a stake, it would not come with voting rights or anything akin to a so-called golden share. Instead, Trump wants to get something in return for the government grants Intel is set to receive. "America should get the benefit of the bargain," Lutnick said during a separate interview on CNBC. "I mean, that is exactly Donald Trump's perspective, which is, Why are we giving a company worth $100 billion this kind of money? What is in it for the American taxpayer?' And the answer Donald Trump has is we should get an equity stake for our money." Intel is set to receive roughly $10.9 billion in grants as part of the bipartisan Biden-era CHIPS Act. Trump and his team have been harshly critical of the law's design while supporting the broader idea of making more chips in the US. "I would say that the single point of failure for the global economy is that 99% of the advanced chips in the world are made in Taiwan," Bessent said. "And for national security, we have to stop that single point of failure." Asked about The Wall Street Journal editorial board calling the US government taking a stake in Intel "corporate statism," Lutnick said that the Trump White House simply wants something in return for the billions in grants. "We were giving away the money," Lutnick said. "Imagine this, look, the Biden administration was giving Intel money for free, and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving the money for free. And Donald Trump is saying, 'Hey, if we are going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action for the American taxpayers." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump administration seeks an equity stake in chipmaker Intel
Trump administration seeks an equity stake in chipmaker Intel

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Trump administration seeks an equity stake in chipmaker Intel

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (L) and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday confirmed the Trump administration wants an equity stake in Intel in exchange for CHIPs and Science Act funding. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo Aug. 19 (UPI) -- The Trump administration wants U.S. chipmaker Intel to give the federal government an equity stake to receive $8 billion via the CHIPS and Science Act. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday confirmed President Donald Trump wants Intel to give the federal government a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for money promised to it by the Biden administration upon passage of the CHIPS and Science Act. "We should get an equity stake for our money," Lutnick said when interviewed by CNBC on Tuesday. "We'll deliver the money, which was already committed under theBiden administration," Lutnick continued. "We'll get equity in return for it." Intel officials in the fall announced the tech company will receive an $8 billion grant via the CHIPS and Science Act. The president questions why the federal government is giving that much money to a tech firm that is worth $100 billion, Lutnick said. Commerce Secretary Scott Bessent also confirmed the Trump administration's demand for equity in Intel, saying it's needed to make the tech firm stable and capable of increasing domestic production of chips. Additionally, Taiwan produces most of the global supply of chips, and U.S. national security requires a domestic supply, Bessent told Bloomberg last week. The Trump administration's request for equity in Intel comes a day after Japan-based tech investor SoftBank on Monday announced it will invest $2 billion in Intel in exchange for Intel common stock. "Semiconductors are the foundation of every industry," said Masayoshi Son, SoftBank chairman and chief executive officer. "For more than 50 years, Intel has been a trusted leader in innovation." Son said SoftBank officials believe Intel will have a "critical role" in expanding the United States' semiconductor manufacturing and supply. SoftBank will pay $23 per share for Intel stock, which would amount to nearly 87 million common shares. The Trump administration, likewise, wants equity in Intel in exchange for CHIPs and Science Act funding, rather than giving away taxpayer funds. Intel had begun building U.S. manufacturing facilities near Columbus, Ohio, with an estimated completion date in 2030. Intel Chief Executive Officer Lip-Bu Tan last month said the company is slowing the pace of construction and will continue work based on market conditions, CNBC reported. President Joe Biden signed the CHIPS and Science Act into law on Aug. 9, 2022, which provides about $280 billion in funding for the U.S. semiconductor industry. Biden lauded the act as a success a year ago in August after tech companies pledged more than $395 billion in investments in electronics and semiconductors and created more than 115,000 jobs during the act's first two years. U.S. tech firms account for about 10% of the global supply of chips that power artificial intelligence and a variety of consumer goods, including appliances and computers. The United States was on pace to produce about 30% of the global computer chip supply by 2032, Biden announced.

Oklahoma ideology test for teachers from New York and California draws criticism
Oklahoma ideology test for teachers from New York and California draws criticism

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Oklahoma ideology test for teachers from New York and California draws criticism

Oklahoma will require applicants for teacher jobs coming from California and New York to pass an exam that the Republican-dominated state's top education official says is designed to safeguard against 'radical leftist ideology,' but which opponents decry as a 'MAGA loyalty test.' Ryan Walters, Oklahoma's public schools superintendent, said Monday that any teacher coming from the two blue states will be required to pass an assessment exam administered by PragerU, an Oklahoma-based conservative nonprofit, before getting a state certification. 'As long as I am superintendent, Oklahoma classrooms will be safeguarded from the radical leftist ideology fostered in places like California and New York,' Walters said in a statement. PragerU, short for Prager University, puts out short videos with a conservative perspective on politics and economics. It promotes itself as 'focused on changing minds through the creative use of digital media.' Quinton Hitchcock, a spokesperson for the state's education department, said the Prager test for teacher applicants has been finalized and will be rolling out 'very soon.' The state did not release the entire 50-question test to The Associated Press but did provide the first five questions, which include asking what the first three words of the U.S. Constitution are and why freedom of religion is 'important to America's identity.' Prager didn't immediately respond to a phone message or email seeking comment. But Marissa Streit, CEO of PragerU, told CNN that several questions on the assessment relate to 'undoing the damage of gender ideology.' Jonathan Zimmerman, who teaches history of education at the University of Pennsylvania, said Oklahoma's contract with PragerU to test out-of-state would-be teachers 'is a watershed moment.' 'Instead of Prager simply being a resource that you can draw in an optional way, Prager has become institutionalized as part of the state system,' he said. 'There's no other way to describe it.' Zimmerman said the American Historical Association did a survey last year of 7th- to 12th-grade teachers and found that only a minority were relying on textbooks for day-to-day instruction. He said the upside to that is that most history books are 'deadly boring.' But he said that means history teachers are relying on online resources, such as those from Prager. 'I think what we're now seeing in Oklahoma is something different, which is actually empowering Prager as a kind of gatekeeper for future teachers,' Zimmerman said. One of the nation's largest teachers unions, the American Federation of Teachers, has often been at odds with President Donald Trump 's administration and the crackdown on teacher autonomy in the classroom. 'This MAGA loyalty test will be yet another turnoff for teachers in a state already struggling with a huge shortage," said AFT President Randi Weingarten. She was critical of Walters, who pushed for the state's curriculum standards to be revised to include conspiracy theories about the 2020 presidential election. 'His priority should be educating students, but instead, it's getting Donald Trump and other MAGA politicians to notice him,' Weingarten said in a statement. Tina Ellsworth, president of the nonprofit National Council for the Social Studies, also raised concerns that the test would prevent teachers from applying for jobs. 'State boards of education should stay true to the values and principles of the U.S. Constitution,' Ellsworth said. 'Imposing an ideology test to become a teacher in our great democracy is antithetical to those principles.' State Rep. John Waldron, the Oklahoma Democratic Party chairman, decried the test as 'political posturing.' 'If you want to see a textbook definition of indoctrination, how about a loyalty test for teachers,' said Waldron. 'It's a sad echo of a more paranoid past.' Waldron, a New Jersey native, said he would have been in the target demographic for this kind of test when he moved from Washington, D.C., to Oklahoma to teach social studies in 1999. He said it would have struck him as an indication that the state 'wasn't serious about attracting quality teachers.' 'Teachers are not rushing here from other states to teach. We've got an enormous teacher shortage and it's not like we have a giant supply of teachers coming in from blue states anyway,' he said. ___ Hollingsworth reported from Mission, Kansas, and Stengle from Dallas. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store