Next-Generation Approaches to Hematologic Malignancies
Key Growth Drivers and Opportunities
Increasing the Prevalence of Global Cancer: The increasing global spread of cancer greatly enhances the growth of the market of hematologic malignancies, as blood -related cancer, such as leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, become a large part of cancer worldwide. As more individuals are affected by these conditions, there is an increasing demand for accurate diagnosis, advanced treatment options and long -term disease management solutions. In cases, this increase encourages drug companies and research institutes to invest in innovative remedies such as targeted treatment, immunotherapy and CAR-T cell therapy. Additionally, high cancer phenomena motivate governments and healthcare systems to increase screening programs and to reach oncology.
Challenges
Hematologic malignancies markets face several borders, including high cost of advanced treatments such as car-T cell treatment and targeted drugs, which can restrict access to patients in low- and moderate-income areas. Complex regulatory approval, long clinical testing procedures, and severe side effects or ability to resist also face significant challenges. Additionally, limited availability of specialized clinical equipment and lack of efficient health care professionals in some fields obstruct timely and accurate diagnosis, overall treatment affects results and slows down market development.
Innovation and Expansion
Kyowa Kirin and Kura Oncology Collaborate to Create Ziftomenib for Acute Leukemias
In November 2024, in order to develop and market ziftomenib, Kura's selective oral menin inhibitor, which is being researched for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other hematologic malignancies, Kura Oncology, Inc. and Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd. announced they have formed a global strategic partnership.
Kura will get USD 330 million up front as part of the deal, and it anticipates receiving up to USD 420 million in near-term milestone payments, including one when ziftomenib is introduced in the monotherapy relapsed/refractory (R/R) context.
Merck Launched Phase III Trials for Novel Treatments for Blood Disorders and Cancer
In January 2024, With the start of pivotal Phase III studies for four new candidates for solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, Merck's strong oncology and hematology portfolio is progressing. Essential thrombocythemia (ET), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), some patients with endometrial carcinoma who have already received treatment, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are among the conditions for which the company announced active enrollment for investigational medications.
The firm is committed to ongoing research to broaden our portfolio of oncology treatments in order to continue addressing unmet needs in cancer care. The company has a rich history of transforming groundbreaking science into medicines that save and enhance lives worldwide.
Inventive Sparks, Expanding Markets
The key players operating the hematologic malignancies market includes, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc., Pfizer Inc., Novartis AG, AbbVie Inc., GlaxoSmithKline PLC., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., Celgene Corporation, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited., and others.
About Author:
Prophecy is a specialized market research, analytics, marketing and business strategy, and solutions company that offer strategic and tactical support to clients for making well-informed business decisions and to identify and achieve high value opportunities in the target business area. Also, we help our client to address business challenges and provide best possible solutions to overcome them and transform their business.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Looking For Yields: Avista, Merck, And Skyworks Solutions Are Consistent Moneymakers
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Companies with a long history of paying dividends and consistently hiking them remain appealing to income-focused investors. Avista, Merck, and Skyworks Solutions have rewarded shareholders for years and recently announced dividend increases. These companies currently offer dividend yields of up to around 5%. Avista Avista Corp. (NYSE:AVA) is an electric and natural gas utility company in the U.S. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. Avista has increased its dividends every year for the last 22 years. In its most recent dividend hike announcement on Feb. 12, it raised the quarterly payout from $0.475 to $0.49 per share, equal to an annual figure of $1.96 per share. More recently, in its dividend announcement on May 1, the company maintained the payout at the same level. Currently, the dividend yield on the stock is 5.18%. The company's annual revenue as of June 30 stood at $1.96 billion. The company on Aug. 6 posted Q2 2025 revenues of $411 million and EPS of $0.17, both coming in below expectations. Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? Merck Merck & Co. (NYSE:MRK) is a global biopharmaceutical company that discovers, develops, manufactures, and markets a wide range of health solutions. Merck has raised its dividends consecutively for the last 14 years. In its most recent dividend hike announcement on Nov. 19, the board increased the quarterly payout from $0.77 to $0.81 per share, equaling an annual figure of $3.24 per share. More recently, in its dividend announcement on July 22, the company maintained the payout at the same level. The current dividend yield on the stock is 4.03%. Merck's annual revenue as of June 30 stood at $63.62 billion. The company on July 29 posted Q2 2025 revenues of $15.81 billion, below the consensus estimate of $15.94 billion, while EPS of $2.13 beat the consensus of $ Solutions Skyworks Solutions Inc. (NASDAQ:SWKS) designs, develops, manufactures, and markets proprietary semiconductor products in the U.S. and internationally. Skyworks Solutions has raised its dividends every year for the last 11 years. In its most recent dividend hike announcement on Aug. 5, the company raised the quarterly payout by 1% to $0.71 per share, equaling an annual figure of $2.84 per share. Currently, the dividend yield on the stock stands at 3.96%. The company's annual revenue as of June 30 stood at $4.01 billion. The company on Aug. 5 posted Q3 2025 revenues of $965 million and EPS of $1.33, both coming in above the consensus estimates. Check out this article by Benzinga for seven analysts' insights on Skyworks Solutions. Avista, Merck, and Skyworks Solutions are good choices for investors seeking reliable passive income. Their dividend yields of up to around 5% and long history of consistent hikes make them attractive to income-focused investors. Read Next: Bill Gates Warned About Water Scarcity. Image: Shutterstock This article Looking For Yields: Avista, Merck, And Skyworks Solutions Are Consistent Moneymakers originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Hypebeast
10 hours ago
- Hypebeast
The Slow Death of the Contemporary Art Gallery
The contemporary art gallery as we know it is dying. In cities like New York and Los Angeles, dedicated spaces that once buzzed with foot traffic and formal openings are now struggling with rising rents and changing expectations. The old model, where a gallery does everything for its artists, feels like it's falling apart. Big gallery chains, the ones built on endless art fairs, multiple cities and huge rosters of artists, are losing their grip. Last month, Tim Blum announced he would close his Blum & Poe galleries in L.A. and Tokyo and even stop plans for a new one in Tribeca. He was blunt about the reason: 'This is not about the market. This is about the system,'he told ARTnews, pointing out that collectors have more power than ever to negotiate. His decision echoes a wider feeling across the industry with many giving up on the idea of building giant gallery empires. You can see this shift happening at major events. The latestArt Baselconfirmed that galleries are showing more mid-priced work, not just the massive, ultra-expensive pieces they once counted on. A recentreport from Art Basel and UBSshowed that while the overall art market shrank last year, the number of actual sales went up. It's a clear signal that the business is no longer just about a small group of big spenders, it's now about reaching a wider audience at lower price points. 'The old model was built on scarcity and prestige. The new one runs on access and attention.' A significant force behind this change is the shifting demand for different types of art. The once-dominant 'blue-chip' artists, masters whose work commanded staggering prices, are no longer the only game in town. Collectors are increasingly turning their attention to 'red-chip' artists, a new class of talents whose value is built on viral hype and cultural relevance rather than institutional endorsement. These artists are attractive for two main reasons: their work is often more accessible and affordable, and it brings fresh, diverse cultural perspectives that feel relevant and exciting to a global audience. This hunger for new voices and unconventional methods is reshaping the market. A key example isOlaolu Slawn, a London-based artist who sold out his solo show,I present to you, Slawn, at the Saatchi Yates gallery in 2024 by creating and selling 1,000 individual, more accessible pieces, an approach that challenges the fine art world's focus on scarcity and prestige. A separate but related trend sees celebrities entering the art market with their own work, often commanding high prices based on their fame. Actor Adrien Brody is a notable example. His art, which he described is about celebrating the little nuances in life has sold for significant amounts, as per a convo withInterview Magazine. For instance, a painting he created of Marilyn Monroe was sold at a Cannes gala auction for $425,000 USD, illustrating how star power can directly translate into commercial value. However, his work has drawn sharp criticism from the industry, with critics often labeling it as kitschy and derivative. One critic writing forARTnewsdescribed his work as having a 'faux naïve aesthetic' and 'mediocre production value,' while others have accused him of cheaply appropriating the styles of Jean-Michel Basquiat and Andy Warhol. As the old guard shrinks, smaller galleries are finding new ways to thrive. In New York,Tiwa Galleryshows self-taught artists in a relaxed space, rejecting flashy Landddcombines Latin American crafts with immersive events. In L.A.,Marta galleryblends art and design right into everyday life. These new spaces care more about quiet, genuine connection than putting on a spectacle. Retail is also becoming a new kind of gallery. Stores like South Korea's Gentle Monster and London's Dover Street Market are blurring the lines between art and commerce, transforming shopping into an immersive cultural experience. Gentle Monster's stores are famous for their fantastical, ever-changing installations, from surreal kinetic sculptures to robotic figures that draw in visitors who are just as interested in the art as they are in the eyewear. Dover Street Market, founded by Comme des Garçons's Rei Kawakubo, is a 'beautiful chaos' where each brand and artist is given a dedicated space to create a unique installation, turning the store into a constantly evolving exhibition. By blending high-end retail with cutting-edge art and design these spaces offer a new kind of public access to creativity, making the gallery experience a part of a commercial transaction rather than a separate cultural outing. 'If your space is fueled by DJs and cocktails, maybe it isn't really a gallery anymore.' It's clear that going to a gallery is no longer the only way to see or buy art. Today, buyers can just scroll on their phones and purchase work directly from studios or social media. This instant access has replaced the slow dance of white-cube shows and champagne previews. Some galleries are trying to keep up, creating online art drops and hosting pop-ups in different retail spaces. But others are pushing back, as one veteran gallerist puts it: if your space is fueled by DJs and cocktails, maybe it isn't really a gallery anymore. Art isn't disappearing. It's just moving, becoming more accessible and less tied to one physical location. The old model was built on scarcity and prestige. The new one runs on access and attention. The question isn't whether galleries will survive, but which ones can change fast enough to matter.
Forbes
12 hours ago
- Forbes
As Scammers Up Their Fraud Game, Consumers, Banks, And Law Enforcement Must Respond
Technology may make fraud easier—thanks to social media—but it may also be the way to stop it. getty Fraud schemes and scammers are increasingly making headlines, with some scratching their heads to figure out why—and how to stop it. A recent study conducted by BioCatch, a global company focused on solving next-generation digital identity challenges through examining behavioral biometrics, might offer some clarity. The survey found that 81% of Americans cited artificial intelligence (AI) as contributing to more sophisticated financial crimes, with social media (75%) and the dark web (73%) playing key roles in the equation. That data was pulled from a BioCatch survey of 800 senior fraud, anti-money laundering (AML), and risk and compliance professionals across 17 countries on five continents. The survey was an attempt to better understand how financial institutions are fighting fraud and financial crime, the impact of emerging technologies on the dark economy, and the level of collaboration among competing institutions, law enforcement, and governments. The impact on consumer wallets is significant. Nasdaq's Global Financial Crime Report estimates that $3.1 trillion in illicit funds moved through the world's financial system in 2023. Scams and fraud added up to $485.6 billion in projected losses. Of those moves, U.S. victims have taken a beating: the U.S. ranks second globally for major fraud losses. That likely explains why, in the U.S., almost all of those surveyed agree that combating activities that encompass the dark economy is important. So what can be done to stop it? Many professionals aren't quite sure. Most of those surveyed (83%) believe that their financial institutions are winning the fight against fraudsters, while only 56% believe their individual efforts have an impact on combating financial crime. That may not tell the whole story. Matt O'Neill, a former Secret Service agent, says there's a real disconnect between losses and what banks are prioritizing. Fraud losses hit individuals in the pocketbook, not banks. The banks aren't materially affected, and there hasn't been a real push to pivot from the status quo. While U.S. banks may trust technology, they don't trust each other, O'Neill explains. That means there's no meaningful sharing of information. That's a break from behaviors other countries where statistics suggest that when other countries share at scale, their losses are decreasing. (Part of the reluctance to share information may come from consumers. While 32% of those surveyed in the U.S. consider data privacy regulation as one of the main inhibitors to sharing data with other banks, 30% worry about the potential for misuse. These numbers are higher than global averages.) Nearly all (93%) of those surveyed consider their organization to be effective in fighting financial crime, and four in five of those surveyed say their banks have incorporated behavioral analysis into their technology stack to detect financial crime. Those numbers may sound impressive, but O'Neill says that criminal networks are actually outpacing banks while banks are still playing catch-up. The Role Of Law Enforcement Despite an increase in reports of fraud, law enforcement agencies are reaching out to banks less often. That means there may not be a unified effort to stop scammers. And, tellingly, it makes a real difference where the fraud happens—even when banks do contact local law enforcement, not all law enforcement have the means, ability, and time to respond to sophisticated scams and attacks. The majority of Americans working in financial crime prevention believe that law enforcement should do more when a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) is filed. By law, national banks are required to report known or suspected criminal offenses, transactions over $5,000 suspected to involve money laundering or violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), and transactions of $25,000 or more involving a criminal violation, even if no suspect is identified. The level of follow-up from those SARs may be inconsistent across banks and across demographics. Banks also report that they don't receive regular contact from law enforcement about their investigations into criminal activity. When it does happen, the contact tends to be less frequent than on a monthly basis. Customer-Focused Communications On the consumer side, banks and other financial institutions have tried to boost awareness about the potential for fraud, often by creating awareness campaigns. But Seth Ruden, Senior Director of Global Advisory at BioCatch, notes that can only go so far. 'Social engineering is so compelling,' he says, and efforts to combat it are not as effective as the tactics exercised by bad actors. Social engineering is a form of manipulation which relies on human psychology to direct behaviors. In this context, scammers may spend significant resources to convince potential victims to take certain steps like revealing personally identifiable information or transferring assets to a third party. To combat that manipulation, institutions need new controls to fight scammers, including those to alert potential victims. Oftentimes, banks may notice the potential fraud before the victim does, or before third parties do. But it may be too difficult to break the spell. Creating some friction at the consumer level could delay funds from being released. That, combined with the sharing of information between financial institutions, could be a difference maker. When funds leave an account, there's a narrow window of time before they're captured at the receiver bank. 'What if,' Ruden asks, 'we could connect in real time?' That could present an opportunity to stop or mitigate the damage. O'Neill agrees, suggesting that while precision analytics can be a real game-changer for banks, additional resources—including a human touch—can also make a difference. For example, when a potential victim is determined to send funds to a new payee, like a new romantic interest, asking the right questions could result in a pause in activity. Asking a question as simple as, 'Why would send money to someone you have never met before?' could trigger a conversation that could result in enough information to reveal that the payment is very suspicious. The key, of course, is to create friction without making it a competitive disadvantage. That, says Ruden, requires resources. Those on the other side of the equation—the fraudsters—are sophisticated actors and are willing to dedicate time and money to see a scam through. Fighting will require the same dedication from financial institutions. But it may well be the case that those spends are welcome since nearly two-thirds of those surveyed say they'd like to increase their investment in technology (those in the U.S. said so at a much higher rate than the global average). What Can Consumers Do? So much of fighting fraud still rests with the consumer. So, what can consumers do to protect themselves? O'Neill is quick to offer his advice, emphasizing, 'Never ever send money to anyone that you've never seen or touched before.' If you make a mistake, 'The cavalry isn't coming,' he says, noting that the likelihood is slim to recover the funds. 'There isn't a magic button to recover those funds,' so it's important to think it through. 'If it's going to hurt you to lose it, don't send it,' he warns. Ruden says that it's going to take a technology revolution to protect consumers. He thinks such a move should be welcomed, noting that it's in the interest of financial institutions and fiduciaries to help protect their customers. Some do a better job than others—and those are the organizations that consumers should seek out. 'Look for a culture of protection,' he advises, saying that consumers should keep an eye out for institutions that place an emphasis on fraud-fighting. This can mean existing trained fraud prevention teams or otherwise demonstrating a commitment to protect consumers through their business practices. Tax Rules For Losses If you are a victim of a scam, while you may not be able to recover your losses, you may be entitled to tax relief. Earlier this year, the IRS Office of Chief Counsel released a memo providing clarification on the deductibility of theft losses for scam victims. The memo was welcome for taxpayers who were confused about limits resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) made another tweak. Under the TCJA, for the tax years 2018 to 2025, personal casualty and theft losses are deductible only to the extent that the losses are attributable to a federally declared disaster. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act made the limits to losses permanent, with one exception: it has been expanded to include state-declared disasters. That means the theft loss deduction is still available for businesses and individuals who incur losses in transactions entered into for profit. There is no statutory definition of "a transaction entered into for profit." However, courts have determined that to meet the criteria, a primary profit motive is required. Next Steps As scammers develop new schemes to steal money and information from consumers (you can read about a new one here), the commitment to fraud prevention must evolve even faster. Understanding what kinds of scams exist and how they operate, as well as the roles that consumers, law enforcement, and financial institutions can play in mitigation and prevention, are all key. That means that education will continue to be a big part in stopping scammers. You can read the Biocatch global survey here. Forbes FBI Warns Scam Victims To Be On The Lookout For Fake Law Firms Offering To Help Recover Losses By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes IRS Issues Warnings On Tax Scams Driven By Bad Advice Often Found On Social Media By Kelly Phillips Erb Forbes Some Scam Victims May Be Able To Deduct Related Losses On Their Tax Returns By Kelly Phillips Erb
